Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights

Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights
2015
Animal rights
Introduction
In ancient years, philosophers had a lot to say about how humans treat animals. However, experts in social sciences have taken part in issues concerning
humans and other animals. Every year, thousands of animals are in a tormented, and then died during the animal experiments. Another fact is from
Vivisection Information Network, there is a rough estimate from the European Union that 10.5 million vertebrate animals were used in animal
experiments, which is 28,800 per day or one every three seconds. Around 18.5 million animals were used in the USA per year (Updated, 2013). And
also the evidence in the emerging field of Human–Animal study, (HAS), shows that animal protection is not taken seriously. A review of Marxist
realism, feminism, ecofeminism, social constructionist theorists and approaches that shows the human–animal study is highly concerned. Animal
protection movement involves animal welfare, animal liberation, and animal rights. Our focus on this argument will be on animal rights....show more
content...
This is incorrect because animals have feelings, and some have a measure of speech. In addition, some take care of their young ones and protect each
other. This proves that similar to humans animals also have feelings, desires and emotions, and, therefore, deserve to have rights. According to Rene
Descartes, every being that has a mind deserves to be treated fairly because it shows that the animal has the ability to think rationally. Charles Darwin,
who came up with the theory of existence through evolution, came up with a hypothesis that shows a correlation between humans and nonhuman
beings. In his hypothesis, he concluded that animals have emotions and feelings that have evolved the same way as humans' emotions (Francione &
Garner,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Persuasive Speech On Animal Rights
Do animals have the right to a certain quality of life? How would your views change if our cooks got treated the same way cattle and poultry do?
How would you feel about them being beaten and brought to their knees just to be detained to know how to cook todays specials? You might think
that the food industry has no issues and no faults behind their tasty food, but when you open up the meat curtain, there is a different kind of world out
there that is cruel and inhumane. In Robert Kenner's 2008 film, Food, Inc., He shows the conditions that cows, chickens, and pigs have to live in. The
dark and closeted homes in which the animals are closely compacted together and eating, sleeping, and walking in their own manure. As a person who
would consider themselves an animal rights activist, most people would agree that the food industry treats their animals like products instead of
living things. Let's take chicken farming as an example. Chickens are injected with growth hormones to make their breasts bigger for human
consumption. The film showed chickens that were abnormally large. These modified chickens can only walk a few steps before having to sit back
down because they can't carry their own weight for too long. Some farmers will recycle the dead carcasses of the animals into the feed for herbivores
on the farm. So plant eating animals will be eating the meat of a dead carcass. Animals could get sick or contract a disease from the dead animals.
This infection would soon get

Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing
Animal Testing
Animals all over the world are being mistreated and abused, what have we done to help them? Over many years animal testing has developed life
saving techniques. Though it has taken the lives of over 2.6 million animals lives just in the us alone. Animal testing is a growing issue throughout the
entire world, not only is it affecting the lives of the animals, but the people who use the products too. It may not physically be hurting them, but more
so emotionally. The moral issue is that no animal has a voice and we need to speak up for them.
Animals cannot speak up for their rights so the only way to stop the testing is for us humans too step up and carry their voice. The Humane Society has
already begun the descend into the...show more content...
Animals are a thing of the past to be tested on. New ground breaking programs have shown us that technology is an amazing creation that is allowing
us to grow human skin and conduct tests on it. This will also avow us to stop experimenting products on animals, conveying a more authentic
conclusion. Kara Rogers acknowledges the use of other variables of testing in her article, "Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: Progress Report"
that, "Artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert... More useful results than testing chemicals on
animal skin" (Rogers). Animals can not be replicated o test on to get accurate results. So this indicates the push for using something more similar to
human skin which can bring a better outcome to lab results. Animal testing is a growing issue throughout the entire world and the main issue is
animals do not have a voice to speak their rights. We currently do have the technology to test products on them without harming anyone or anything.
The Humane Society points out that animals are, " Force feeding, forced inhalation" they have their necks broken and more, the list is endless. Their
rights need to be protected and our voice is theirs. "only certain animals are protected by the AWA (Animal welfare Act)" meaning some animals lives
are

One of the topics that are debated the world over every year is the politics of animal rights. While there are a lot of people who are passionate about
making a change and helping other people recognize the rights of animals, there are an equal number of people who abuse these rights for their own
selfish reasons.
Just like many other charitable organizations and movements, animal rights have turned into a political game of sorts. By making false promises to aid
and defend the rights of the animals, many animal rights activists turn it into a political game for personal gain while doing hardly anything to help them.
However, there are plenty of vigilant people who are ready to defend the rights of poor creatures. These are the people who

Animal welfare versus animal rights is very controversial, but yet interesting subject. There is a huge debate between Animal Rights activists and
Animal Welfare activists. Animal Welfare refers to the state of the animal; the treatment that an animal receives is covered by other terms such as
animal care,animal husbandry, and humane treatment. Animal Welfare activists believe that animals should be treated humanely and fairly, but do not
have the same rights as humans. Animal Rights is a belief that animals have the right to live free from use in medical research, hunting, and other
services to humans. Animal Rights activists do not distinguish between human and animals. They believe that there is no rational difference between
an animal's...show more content...
One of these practices Animal Rights activists advocate against is factory farming. Factory farming is a system of rearing livestock using intensive
methods, by which poultry, pigs, or cattle are confined indoors under strictly controlled conditions. Factory farming is necessary due to the high
demand to feed our growing population. Most of these factory farms have intensive operations. An intensive livestock operation refers to a farm or
farm operation engaged in raising, breeding, or feeding beef or dairy cattle, horses, swine, sheep, goats, poultry/fowl, turkeys/ducks, or other livestock
in concentrations of 300 or more animal units. Another practice used in factory farming is confinement systems. Confinement system is any system of
raising poultry or other livestock in which the animals are kept from contact with the ground primarily as a sanitary measure. Using this system helps
keep our food from being contaminated and making the general public sick. At these farms, livestock animals are confined into small pens with
hundreds of other animals. Confining these animals in such small space can lead to the spread of disease. To combat this spread, farmers put loads of
antibiotics in the animal's feed. Another problem with having such a large amount of animals confined into a singular space is fighting. When the
animals get into fights,

Argumentative Essay: Do We Need Animal Rights?
Animals have the physical need to receive love and attention. Human beings have the need to correct and overcorrect our actions, especially towards
animals. Humanity is defined by any act of kindness, pity, or compassion. As a group, humans believe in both the lesser treatment of animals, and the
idea that animals deserve rights. Since we are at the top of the food chain, and we have greater cognitive ability, human beings have the control.
Human morality and ethics aren't always black and white, there is a grey area. And the crossing into this area is why certain animal rights activists raise
questions. If we look into the Bible, it states "God blessed them and said to them, Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule
over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground." (Genesis I:28) This phrase states that human
beings rule over the animals and God put these creatures on the...show more content...
He says, "The fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us–to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or
exploited for sport or money. Once we accept this view of animals–as our resources–the rest is as predictable as it is regrettable."( Regan, Tom.
Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1986/87. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. 179–189. Print.) Regan is a strong believer in
giving animals the rights that they deserve. He tries to show the contradictory side to the bible. He asks in rhetoric, "Why worry about their loneliness,
their pain, their death? Since animals only exist for us, to benefit us in one way or another, what harms them really doesn't matter." He tries to state that
those who believe such things are inhumane. His tactics raise questions in the readers mind to make the reader think for himself, and have empathy
towards

Animal Experimentation Argumentative Essay
It is shocking that researchers still use helpless animals to test new drugs and products, despite the fact that new medical advances can replace the need
to do that. Defenseless animals are often taken away from their homes, and are often starved, shocked, or paralyzed with fear, just to test new products.
After all of that, there often isn't any medical benefits made to human society. Animal welfare acts were passed to limit what researchers can do to
animals, but these acts are often not followed. Animal experimentation clearly should be discontinued because it is unethical, and unnecessary.
Animals have emotions and feelings just as humans do, and researchers seem to forget this. In society people would be outraged to see a human

Animal rights has always been conversional subject, what rights do they have, what type of treatment they may endure, and what is wildlife versus
what are pets. Society as it a whole as always had used animals as form entertainment for example like zoos, circuses, aquariums, rodeos, animal fighting
and hunting. Though these types of entertainments project as innocent forms of fun for all ages when it's enslavement for the animals. These animals are
taken from their homes to be forced behind cages, glass and concert walls to perform for the paying customer. The animals see millions of human
faces pressed against these walls staring in hoping to see them do tricks or just move in general. These animals are also forced to perform and train
for hours on in just to be a meal ticket for the right buyer.
The advertisement above illustrates how animals are used like puppets for entertainment. When you think of puppets, you think of a puppet master
pulling the strings, to make the puppet dance, sing and entertain you. Now just picture a wild animal having invisible strings attached to them with a
puppet master giving orders. Instead of strings they use actual force and punishment to get what they want. While in the picture it states, "The show
must go on", when you hear this phrase you know meaning that regardless of what happens, whatever show has been planned still must be performed
for the paying guests, the same goes for animals too. Which suggest no matter how much force, pain

Essay : Animal Rights And Human Rights
Animals Rights
Humans have used animals like dogs, cats and horses as companions to help guide us and teach valuable lessons about love and friendship. However,
we have also used other animals as sources of food and nourishment when humans hunted and farmed. The way in which we treat animals is a big
factor in whether or not they, too, deserve the same rights to be treated as we do. The rights that they do deserve are to live their lives without going
through pain and to be able to live their lives without being subordinated to humans; free and without discrimination. Animals under human care can be
exploited to endure tasks that are inhumane and could be raised in an environment that is full of disease with lack of food and secure attachment
from a supportive figure. By living in areas like crowded cages or barns shows that humans have taken no initiative to provide safe and humane
facilities in which these animals are to be kept. If something like this is not acceptable to people of society as human beings, then it should not be
accepted by society with animals. Due to the fact that they have no way of speaking with humans about their own philosophy of life, this does not
mean that we are to disregard all forms of communication or "voice" that they can show from their actions. Time and time again, humans are brought
about to the public for mistreatment of animals and are then faced with abuse in court. Although, there still need to be better restrictions on what people

A Change Of Heart About Animals By Jeremy Rifkin
Animal rights activists are rallying and petitioning for an animal bill of rights because they are stating that animals are only being considered
"property" by law, being no different than a table and chair. The Animal Legal Defense Fund is really passionate about the document being published
even having specific rights for animals with numbering and strong evidence to back up each right and claim, leaving little detail out. Also, in the
article "A Change of Heart About Animals" written by Jeremy Rifkin states "What these researchers are finding is that many of our fellow creatures
are more like us than we had ever imagined" (Rikin 2). I agree with his statement, because animals and humans have many similarities pointed out by
many researchers over the many years we have existed on this planet. He provides specific evidence like Koko the gorilla, who passed an IQ test with
a score of 70–95 or around that range and basically I think it's pretty amazing, sad, and ironic that Koko is smarter than a majority than humans.
There was also a parrot named alex who could communicate with it's owner and tell her how many of each colored shape was on a plate which was
presented to him, and literally asked for a glass of water and I think that is honestly incredible.
But in my opinion personally, I think animal rights activists are going way too far trying to push for an animal bill of rights and trying to encourage
other people how to treat their pets with certain rules applied. In an articled called "Hooked" written by Victoria Braithwaite, she claims that fish
do in fact feel pain and ignoring the creatures suffering and treating them like inferior beings when we go fishing and get them hooked on our line.
I disagree with the point that Braithwaite is trying to make, but I mean I get where is she is coming from but I think I can speak for all people
when I'm saying that it is really hard to feel sympathy for just a fish because it's honestly not the end of the world. With how many fish in the world
and how fast they repopulate I don't think that fish should be our primary concern as of right now, because it's not the end of the world if we hook a
fish on our line it just means me and my family are having a fish feast

Argumentative Essay On Service Animals
Author Anthony Douglas Williams once said, "We have more to learn from animals than animals have to learn from us," (A–Z Quotes), but what most
people fail to assimilate is that animals have given humans erudition on many subjects. Throughout history, animals have helped with advancements in
science, contributing to new ideas to keep people safe and healthy. Moreover, they continue to help humankind every second of the day, and will
continue to do so as science and technology evolve.
A multitude of traits qualifies animals to work as service animals. The variety of types of service animals are Assistance Animals, Psychiatric Service
Dogs, Emotional Support Animals, and Therapy Animals (Amundson). They are sometimes labeled as assistance animals,...show more content...
Doctors treat millions of children with Ritalin, a drug that is mostly used to improve the ability to focus on tasks, but scientists have figured out that
the drug also directly enhances the speed of learning by studying rats. Researchers in Gothenburg, Sweden have performed successful tests on mice
with a new vaccine that fights against genital herpes. Horseshoe crab blood carries a clotting agent that can isolate bacterial toxins. The Federal Food
and Drug Administration requires that it be used to test all intravenous drugs and vaccines for safety. A drug called Exenatide is the synthesized form
of a substance in Gila monster saliva that has led to healthy glucose levels and progressive weight loss in people with type–two diabetes who took part
in a three–year study. Thanks to sheep, a surgical procedure was invented to repair severe bone injuries and defects more

Essay on Zoos and Animal Rights
Among many other fun and exciting attraction to visit around our community, a visit to the zoo has always been a memorable experience. This cost
effective priceless lifetime experience is being undermined by a group of activists all around the country. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
(PETA), world largest animal rights organization, argue that zoos deprived animals from satisfying their most basic needs. They urge not to patronized
zoos and claims that the money spent on ticket purchases pays for animals to be imprisoned and traded, not rescued and rehabilitated. They go on
saying in summary that zoos strip animals from their rights. So this heated debate revolves around the animal rights and how the zoo industry inhibits it.
...show more content...
Fifty–four percent of the individuals surveyed offered comments about the elevated awareness of their role in conservation as a direct consequence of
their visit to the zoo. Furthermore, sixty one percent of visitors were able to talk about what they learned from their previous visit, and thirty five
percent reported that the visit reinforced their existing beliefs about conservation, stewardship and love of animals in different surveys. As news writer
Amy miller (2014) states zoos are working harder than ever to save endangered animals around the world. She explained that the Wildlife
Conservation Society (WCS), which is headquartered at the Bronx Zoo in New York City, is working with local officials in Malaysia to stop people
from hunting exotic birds to sell their feathers. Furthermore, The California zoo is famous for its work helping to save China's giant panda. Three panda
cubs have been born at the zoo already. The San Diego Zoo now has the largest population of giant pandas outside mainland China.
In addition to promoting conservation many modern zoo encourage research. Studies and research have to be done in order to contribute to the
preservation of endangered species. The San Diego zoo for instance just opened the Conservation and Research for Endangered Species Center. The $22
million center gives scientists cutting–edge instruments and plenty of room to do their work as mentioned by Amy (2014). Farmers in Africa think the
spotted cheetah is an

When it comes to the rights of animals it can be very controversial. On one hand people see animal rights as ridiculous and unnecessary. And on the
other there are many people that take animal rights extremely seriously and some even go as far as to think that they should have the same rights as
humans. While I can view this from both sides I stand somewhere in the middle, because I don't think animals should have the same right as humans,
but I do think that they should have some rights. While some people may think that animals should have full human rights because they have human
emotions. I believe that they shouldn't have full human rights but, they should have some rights. Despite the common belief that, "Other animals have
no sense of morality and are unable to comprehend the concept of their own death. (Rifkin 11)" I don't exactly agree with that statement. Because as
Rifkin later stated, "Animals, it appears, experience grief. Elephants will often stand next to their dead kin for days, occasionally touching their bodies
with their trunks. (Rifkin 11)" This fact contradicts the previous common assumption that animals have no sense of morality. This shows that animals
are in fact able to feel empathy and sadness for their loss. So it could be a justified assumption that animals could feel human emotions. Now that you
have some knowledge of the emotions and feelings of animals, you can start to form a base for your opinion. But to go any further you need to think

Stem cell meat is also opening doors for vegetarians and giving hope to animal right activists. Animal right activist group PETA started this scientific
wave of ideas of creating meat when in 2008, they announced a prize of US$1 million to anyone who could create a stem–cell version of chicken meat.
70 billion farm animals are only brought up to be slaughtered for our consumption each year, and they receive horrible treatment for their whole
lifetime, from infections, limbs being cut off while conious, being only feed hormones and antibiotics that prevent disease and maximise their growth
and food production. If stem cell meat gains popularity these factory farms will close down, and the animal right activists will have accomplished their

Animal Rights Argumentative Analysis
What makes hunting and trapping for sport is that people that do hunt or trap are seeing these animals as renewable resources. They can reproduce
without the help of humans; however, that does not give humans the right to use them as a natural resource. It is a failure to not treat them with
respect. One of the main concerns for defending hunting is that it is not different than what wildlife does to each other. The rights view sees that
animals not moral agents, and have different morals than what humans have. Then only have to kill what they need to. The still cause harm, but do no
moral harm in the logic of the rights view.
Regan does take into account how humans treat endangered species. The rights view is not contrasting to the efforts...show more content...
Leaver culture considers nature in how it improves with the world around it. Ismael uses the story of Cain and Able to explain the difference. For
anyone that has grown up learning about Christian beliefs, the story of Cain and Able is taught as a way that if you go against God then you get
punished. The way Ishmael explains it, is more about a difference of cultures. Able represents the Leaver culture, while Cain is a part of the Taker
culture. If humans look at the story from the Taker perspective, they see how it is a perspective in the bible. The story makes more sense if it looked
from a Leavers perspective. However, Leaver culture is not fully gone; but Taker culture has taken a majority of control.
Regan main claim is that humans are no capably of fully knowing when the animals suffer, but that does not deny them the rights they need. Regan is
searching for the answer in how to communicate with animals. Ishmael knows that our lost connection with nature is due to human's own fault.
Humans separated ourselves so far that humans cannot reach that communication point with nature. However, if humans were to be like Leaver
culture, then humans would be able to work with nature. At that point humans could gain the communication back to

What Are The Arguments Against Animal Rights
Animals are held against their will and forced to work in inhumane areas. Animals have families to take care of just like humans do. Violations
towards animals have been happening and they end up extremely hurt or dead, in the end nothing happens to prevent more of this to happen again.
Workers for the labs do not care forthe animals and leave them in unstable places. Other animals such as monkeys are kept in small facilities that can
only fit a small amount. The University of Louisiana caused 3 monkeys to die when they were stuck in a chute.
The opposition believe that animals have rights in the same way that humans have rights. Since animals do not follow the law and have no way to
think and act. Opponents believe that human interest should

Animal Rights Argument Essay
Animal rights are a very controversial topic. Some support the industry and buy products with their fur or products that are tests on animals. While
others, are 100% against it and make sure the products they are buying are not tested on animals and if they are buying fur they double check to make
sure it is fo–fur. I simply think that everyone should have the decency to treat animals with kindness and respect, and not make them suffer in any
way. Animals deserve to be left alone and living in their natural state of life, without harm, abuse or exploitation. It has been shown that animals are
capable of feeling pain, hunger, thirst, loneliness, and kinship. Fur belongs to its original owner and I am not a fan of fo–fur I think it looks unnatural
...show more content...
They are put through strenuous activities and routines to be able to perform. If they are not doing as there are supposed to they are whipped, and
abused until they perform to a certain standard. They undergo an immense amount of stress being caged up all day. They endure even more stress
traveling from city to city in their cages. They were ripped from their homes or even born into the circus ring, and forced to perform and put on a
show for money and people's pleasure. This final line delivers the message of the advertisement: don't participate in events that promote the abuse of
animals for

Argumentative Essay On Companion Animals
Companion animals have not always been considered beneficial to the human existence. In pasted centuries companion animals were consider objects
with little value. For example, Martha C. Armstrong stated that, "pound dogs stood little chance of escaping their destiny: death by starvation, injury,
gassing, or drowning." This illustrated how animals that were captured did not have any rights and could be disposed of in any way. These animal
companions were considered replaceable unless they were used as livestock and only if they would create a source of income for the animal guardian.
The documentary illustrated how instead of euthanizing the animals the animal shelter began incorporating other means of helping the animal
companion become more adoptable. It illustrated how placing the...show more content...
In addition, being able to watch how a shy and non–cooperative animal can develop the capability to learn and follow complex directions in six weeks
demonstrated that with proper training any animal can become the perfect animal companion. Therefore, I believe that all the animals that are turned in
to the animal shelters are there because their guardian lack the resources or are unwilling to take the time to properly train them. As Rollin and Rollin
stated, "most pet owners know very little about their animals...people wishing to acquire an animal should at least be compelled to demonstrate that
they know what they are getting into" (508). I believe that everyone who adopts an animal companion should have some training regarding what the
companion animal requires. The training should consist of how to teach them basic manners such as not jumping on people or chewing on items.
Having this basic knowledge would help all those animals who are turned in because according to many of their guardians these animal companions are
to

Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Argumentative Essay On Animal Rights