Effectiveness of E-Learning for Business Students: A Study on Army Institute of Business Administration, Savar.

1. Learning experiences are like journeys. The
journey starts where the learning is now,
and ends when the learner is successful.
The end of the journey isn't knowing more,
it's doing more." —Julie Dirksen, Learning
Strategy and Design Consultant

3. Farah Amira Khan
ID:B3160B025
Tasmin Nahar Nishi
ID:B3160B004
Md.Tuhin parves
ID:B3160B005

4. Supervisor:
Mohammad Ali Rana
Lecturer
Army Institute of Business Administration,
Savar Cantonment

5. Contents
• Introduction
• Objectives of the study
• Organizational profile
• Review of literature
• Methodology
• Data analysis & major findings
• Recommendation & conclusion

7. OBJECTIVES
• Finding out the
knowledge of E-
Learning of the
business students of
Bangladesh.
• Finding out the
effectiveness of E-
Learning for the
university students of
Bangladesh
especially for the
business students.

8. Organizational Profile
• Army Institute of Business
Administration, Savar
• Motto: Knowledge is power
• Type: Autonomous
• Established: 2015
• Address: Savar Cantonment, Dhaka,
Bangladesh
• BBA current students: 161
• MBA current student: 117
• Director: Brig Gen A.K.M Shawkat
Hasan ,psc (retd)
• Phone: 967-3400
• Undergraduate tuition and
fees: 6,25,000.00 BDT

9. Director
Additional Director
Deputy Director
Associate professor
Assistant professor
Section Officer
Senior Officer
Office Assistant
MLSS

10. Review of literature
A wider discussion on the use of the term e-
learning can be found in Pollard and Hillage
(2001),
‘The delivery and administration of learning
opportunities and support via computer,
networked and web-based technology to help
individual performance and development.’
(Pollard and Hillage, 2001, 20)

11. Methodology
Population
• Army Institute of Business
Administration, Savar
Sample size
• 50 Students

12. Sources & Methods
-Primary
• Questionnaires
-Secondary
• websites, journals and other papers
Data Analyzing Tools and
Procedures
• Microsoft Excel Spreadsheet
• Graphs

13. Data Analysis & Major findings
Undergrad Students 19-22
11 39

14. For the survey we used some question to know the result
1.E-Learning tools
2.E-Learning Platform
3.E-Learning techniques
4.Content structure
5.Usability
6.Faster Technology
7.Quick responsiveness
8.Learning quality
9.Time & Cost friendly
Data Analysis & Major findings(contd)

15. Where?
What?
How/Which?
E-Learning tools
E-Learning Platform
E-Learning Techniques
Data Analysis & Major findings(contd)

16. Content Structure Usability Faster Technology
 Structured well
 Comprehensive
 Effective
?
 Interface attractive
 User-Friendly
?
 Faster
 Buffer
 Functions correctly
 Functions
Accurately
?
Data Analysis & Major findings(contd)

17. Quick responsive Learning Quality Time & Cost friendly
 Get feedback quickly
 Take feedback
seriously
 Implement changes
?
 Reliable
 Change frequently
?
 Effective to submit
work on time
 Effective to organize
work
 Time consuming
 Less costly
?
Data Analysis & Major findings(contd)

18. Graphical representation of the survey
0%
50%
100%
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
Question 1Question 2Question 3Question 4Question 5Question 6Question 7Question 8Question 9Question 10Question 11Question 12Question 13Question 14Question 15Question 16Question 17Question 18
Percentage
Percentage
Percentage Chart

19. 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
StronglyAgree
Disagree
Question 1Question 2Question 3Question 4Question 5Question 6Question 7Question 8Question 9Question 10Question 11Question 12Question 13Question 14Question 15Question 16Question 17Question 18
6
21
19
4
0
50
6
30
9
5
0
50
10
23
12
4
1
50
7
17
23
21
50
7
1918
5
1
50
8
16
14
7
5
50
9
20
14
34
50
5
17
9
18
1
50
4
1818
9
1
50
5
20
18
5
2
50
8
18
16
6
2
50
5
23
16
6
0
50
11
14
18
5
2
50
10
23
13
4
0
50
27
13
7
21
50
20
18
10
11
50
18
20
8
4
0
50
27
15
332
50
Frequency
Frequency Chart

20. Major findings

21. E-learning tools
laptop user 32 students
Mobile & PC user 9 students
notebook user 1 student.

22. E-learning Platform
36 of the students
prefer Google 6 students use FB and
youtube equally.
1 student use GS, Wikipedia

23. E-learning techniques
15 students use Slide study
techniques frequently.

24. • Usability: positive feedback
• Technology: positive and Negative feedback
• Responsiveness: 46% of the students are agreed to that.
• Learning Quality: positive feedback

25. Recommendation
• Increase the number of students
• Increase the number of universities
• Should give more time on research

26. Students now a days have become highly
dependent on the e-learning system for their
academic purposes. They are now spending
more time on internet and this habit can help to
improve E-Learning.
Conclusion