SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
United States V.
Nixon
SSCG16 The student will demonstrate
knowledge of the operation of the
federal judiciary.
By: Tyler Smith
Back Ground Info
• In the court Case United States vs. Nixon, President Nixon is
being accused of being apart of a break in at the Water Gate
building.
• once the burglars were arrested and the prosecutors found
out that President Nixon was involve they went after him.
• They soon found out that he had a tape recorder in his office.
So the prosecutors went after Nixon to turn over the tapes
and he would not.
• Nixon pleaded that there was national secrets on that tape
that could endanger the National Security, But the prosecutors
that the conversations between Nixon and his staff that
planned the heist were on the tape and that the president
should hand them over to the law.
Back Ground info
Extended
• President Nixon and his lawyers argued for that the tapes
that were used were apart of his executive privilege
where he had the authority to keep the tapes.
• However the prosecutors disagreed and argued that his
executive privilege does not stand when it deals with a
criminal case.
The Decision
• In the court case U.S. V. Nixon the Supreme Court ruled
in favor of the United States.
• So President Nixon was forced to hand over the tapes.
Significance of the Case
• In the Case of United States V. Nixon its significance is
that a U.S. President has never been tried of a crime and
taken to the supreme court before.

More Related Content

What's hot

Rights of the Accused: The 5th Amendment
Rights of the Accused: The 5th AmendmentRights of the Accused: The 5th Amendment
Rights of the Accused: The 5th Amendment
Lina Nandy
 
Watergate Scandal
Watergate ScandalWatergate Scandal
Watergate Scandal
eakteacher
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
mtaft
 
Supreme court nomination process
Supreme court nomination processSupreme court nomination process
Supreme court nomination process
shoetzlein
 
Trail of tears
Trail of tearsTrail of tears
Trail of tears
NSM98683
 
Texas v johnson power point
Texas v johnson power pointTexas v johnson power point
Texas v johnson power point
nagu64
 
Road to Civil War PowerPoint
Road to Civil War PowerPointRoad to Civil War PowerPoint
Road to Civil War PowerPoint
Kristin Prusinski
 
Chapter19powerpt postwar boom
Chapter19powerpt postwar boomChapter19powerpt postwar boom
Chapter19powerpt postwar boom
Sandra Waters
 
Watergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpointWatergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpoint
zaarinb
 
Unit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980's
Unit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980'sUnit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980's
Unit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980's
Crosswinds High School
 
BROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION
BROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATIONBROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION
BROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION
jigjohn
 

What's hot (20)

Miranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizonaMiranda v. arizona
Miranda v. arizona
 
Rights of the Accused: The 5th Amendment
Rights of the Accused: The 5th AmendmentRights of the Accused: The 5th Amendment
Rights of the Accused: The 5th Amendment
 
Miranda Vs. Arizona
Miranda Vs. ArizonaMiranda Vs. Arizona
Miranda Vs. Arizona
 
13, 14,_15,_amendments
 13, 14,_15,_amendments 13, 14,_15,_amendments
13, 14,_15,_amendments
 
Watergate Scandal
Watergate ScandalWatergate Scandal
Watergate Scandal
 
PRELUDE TO CIVIL WAR
PRELUDE TO CIVIL WARPRELUDE TO CIVIL WAR
PRELUDE TO CIVIL WAR
 
Fourth Amendment notes
Fourth Amendment notesFourth Amendment notes
Fourth Amendment notes
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
Perfectessay.net term paper sample #1 mla style
Perfectessay.net term paper sample #1 mla stylePerfectessay.net term paper sample #1 mla style
Perfectessay.net term paper sample #1 mla style
 
Supreme court nomination process
Supreme court nomination processSupreme court nomination process
Supreme court nomination process
 
Dred Scott
Dred ScottDred Scott
Dred Scott
 
Presentation on the Trail of Tears
Presentation on the Trail of TearsPresentation on the Trail of Tears
Presentation on the Trail of Tears
 
Trail of tears
Trail of tearsTrail of tears
Trail of tears
 
The age of jackson ssush7a
The age of jackson ssush7aThe age of jackson ssush7a
The age of jackson ssush7a
 
Texas v johnson power point
Texas v johnson power pointTexas v johnson power point
Texas v johnson power point
 
Road to Civil War PowerPoint
Road to Civil War PowerPointRoad to Civil War PowerPoint
Road to Civil War PowerPoint
 
Chapter19powerpt postwar boom
Chapter19powerpt postwar boomChapter19powerpt postwar boom
Chapter19powerpt postwar boom
 
Watergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpointWatergate powerpoint
Watergate powerpoint
 
Unit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980's
Unit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980'sUnit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980's
Unit 11 Powerpoint The 1970's and 1980's
 
BROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION
BROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATIONBROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION
BROWNS VS. BOARD OF EDUCATION
 

Viewers also liked (8)

Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Three landmark court cases answers
Three landmark court cases answersThree landmark court cases answers
Three landmark court cases answers
 
Chapter 7 Assignments
Chapter 7 AssignmentsChapter 7 Assignments
Chapter 7 Assignments
 
UNITED STATES V. NIXON
UNITED STATES V. NIXONUNITED STATES V. NIXON
UNITED STATES V. NIXON
 
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. ArizonaPresentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
Presentation on a Famous Legal Case: Miranda vs. Arizona
 
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
(13) crisis and resurgence (1969 2000)
 
Landmark Cases
Landmark CasesLandmark Cases
Landmark Cases
 
Miranda vs arizona presentation
Miranda vs arizona presentationMiranda vs arizona presentation
Miranda vs arizona presentation
 

Similar to United States v Nixon

Major Supreme Court Cases
Major Supreme Court CasesMajor Supreme Court Cases
Major Supreme Court Cases
dficker
 
Nixon and watergate
Nixon and watergateNixon and watergate
Nixon and watergate
ewaszolek
 
9694 thinking skills wikileaks
9694 thinking skills wikileaks9694 thinking skills wikileaks
9694 thinking skills wikileaks
mayorgam
 
Ch 21 Nixon
Ch 21 NixonCh 21 Nixon
Ch 21 Nixon
jbeneigh
 
Wikileaks qr
Wikileaks qrWikileaks qr
Wikileaks qr
mayorgam
 
Nixon, Ford & Carter
Nixon, Ford & CarterNixon, Ford & Carter
Nixon, Ford & Carter
kbeacom
 
Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)
Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)
Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)
kbeacom
 

Similar to United States v Nixon (20)

Watergate scandal
Watergate scandalWatergate scandal
Watergate scandal
 
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixonUs v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
Us v leon_us_v_richard_nixon
 
Major Supreme Court Cases
Major Supreme Court CasesMajor Supreme Court Cases
Major Supreme Court Cases
 
Nixon and watergate
Nixon and watergateNixon and watergate
Nixon and watergate
 
Nixon
NixonNixon
Nixon
 
Watergate
WatergateWatergate
Watergate
 
9694 thinking skills wikileaks
9694 thinking skills wikileaks9694 thinking skills wikileaks
9694 thinking skills wikileaks
 
Nixon's Presidency; Testing the Superpower
Nixon's Presidency; Testing the SuperpowerNixon's Presidency; Testing the Superpower
Nixon's Presidency; Testing the Superpower
 
Ch 21 Nixon
Ch 21 NixonCh 21 Nixon
Ch 21 Nixon
 
Wikileaks qr
Wikileaks qrWikileaks qr
Wikileaks qr
 
US CH 31 Nixon 2019
US CH 31 Nixon 2019US CH 31 Nixon 2019
US CH 31 Nixon 2019
 
Landmark Supreme Court Cases and how they affected American society.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases and how they affected American society.Landmark Supreme Court Cases and how they affected American society.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases and how they affected American society.
 
Freedom of Information
Freedom of InformationFreedom of Information
Freedom of Information
 
Freedom of Information Act
Freedom of Information ActFreedom of Information Act
Freedom of Information Act
 
Nixon, Ford & Carter
Nixon, Ford & CarterNixon, Ford & Carter
Nixon, Ford & Carter
 
Nixon, Ford, & Carter
Nixon, Ford, & CarterNixon, Ford, & Carter
Nixon, Ford, & Carter
 
Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)
Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)
Nixon, Ford, & Carter (1969-1981)
 
Watergate Scandal
Watergate ScandalWatergate Scandal
Watergate Scandal
 
This is a watergate powerpoint
This is a watergate powerpointThis is a watergate powerpoint
This is a watergate powerpoint
 
Watergate Powerpoint
Watergate PowerpointWatergate Powerpoint
Watergate Powerpoint
 

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptxTowards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
Towards a code of practice for AI in AT.pptx
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptxWellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
Wellbeing inclusion and digital dystopias.pptx
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
Sensory_Experience_and_Emotional_Resonance_in_Gabriel_Okaras_The_Piano_and_Th...
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptxREMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
REMIFENTANIL: An Ultra short acting opioid.pptx
 
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptxCOMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
COMMUNICATING NEGATIVE NEWS - APPROACHES .pptx
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
80 ĐỀ THI THỬ TUYỂN SINH TIẾNG ANH VÀO 10 SỞ GD – ĐT THÀNH PHỐ HỒ CHÍ MINH NĂ...
 
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
NO1 Top Black Magic Specialist In Lahore Black magic In Pakistan Kala Ilam Ex...
 
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptxHMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
HMCS Vancouver Pre-Deployment Brief - May 2024 (Web Version).pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptxOn_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
On_Translating_a_Tamil_Poem_by_A_K_Ramanujan.pptx
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docxPython Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
Python Notes for mca i year students osmania university.docx
 
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdfUGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
 

United States v Nixon

  • 1. United States V. Nixon SSCG16 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the operation of the federal judiciary. By: Tyler Smith
  • 2. Back Ground Info • In the court Case United States vs. Nixon, President Nixon is being accused of being apart of a break in at the Water Gate building. • once the burglars were arrested and the prosecutors found out that President Nixon was involve they went after him. • They soon found out that he had a tape recorder in his office. So the prosecutors went after Nixon to turn over the tapes and he would not. • Nixon pleaded that there was national secrets on that tape that could endanger the National Security, But the prosecutors that the conversations between Nixon and his staff that planned the heist were on the tape and that the president should hand them over to the law.
  • 3. Back Ground info Extended • President Nixon and his lawyers argued for that the tapes that were used were apart of his executive privilege where he had the authority to keep the tapes. • However the prosecutors disagreed and argued that his executive privilege does not stand when it deals with a criminal case.
  • 4. The Decision • In the court case U.S. V. Nixon the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the United States. • So President Nixon was forced to hand over the tapes.
  • 5. Significance of the Case • In the Case of United States V. Nixon its significance is that a U.S. President has never been tried of a crime and taken to the supreme court before.