The Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) has been advised by the Office...
Critical Reflections on Religion and Child Sexual Exploitation
1. Critical Reflections on
Religion and Child Sexual
Exploitation
Dr Sukhwant Dhaliwal
Not to be reproduced without permission from the author
2. • Religious groups as part of community awareness raising.
• ‘Asian/Muslim’ perpetrators and ‘Asian/Muslim’ victims.
• Emergence of a range of ‘religious’ or ‘faith-based’ responses to CSE.
• The slide from Multiculturalism to Multifaithism – religion as the primary
signifier of difference.
• Transfer the learning - historical debates about religious leaders as
gatekeepers / the policing of sex and sexuality.
Background
3. • Two roundtable events - November 2014 / February 2015
• Same twenty participants at both sessions
• Participants – from the voluntary sector providing services
for children, young people and women
• A safe space to:
• Share experiences and thoughts re: possibilities or
limitations of engaging religious organisations
• Problem solve
• Develop framework for good practice
Aim and Method
4. • Extending social responsibility for tackling CSE
• They are part of the landscape of local areas
• They have authority?
• Access to potential perpetrators
• Challenge the abusive practices being sanctioned within those
communities
Why did they engage?
5. • Strong objection to the slide from multiculturalism to multifaithism
– to the privileging of religious identity and the strengthening of
religious leaders
• Religious leaders as power brokers – not passive, not
representative
• Religion does more harm than good – it’s simply not useful to
engage religion on issues to do with sex/sexuality
• ‘Triaging’ – what is the best way to utilise limited resources?
Why did they steer clear?
6. • Role of community and religious ‘leaders’ in tracing women
• Religious and cultural arguments used as justifications for
abuse
• Religious group responses as ‘tokenistic’
• Growth of academies, especially those of a religious ethos,
restrict or reduce spaces for preventative work
Alignment of concerns
7. • Religion or culture should not override children’s rights
• Children’s rights and human rights need to be at the forefront of
responses
• Women’s groups and children’s charities need to be at the
forefront of partnerships and responses
• Religious groups have diverse ‘interests’
• An ethical evaluation required that distinguishes between a
range of religious interventions
Looking Forward
8. Analysing the values base ?
Child centred
Victim centred
Pre-occupied with honour/shame of the ‘community’
or family
Empowering
Safeguarding
Focus on punitive actions
Accountability Impunity – excusing the behaviour of perpetrators
Participatory Being saved by guardians of the faith or community
Rights based frameworks:
Children have rights
Women have rights
Human rights framework
Every Child Matters framework
Traditional action – gains legitimacy from traditional
authority, reliant on the reproduction of memories,
tradition and ritual.
Framework of ‘displaced agency’
Egalitarian – based on principles of equality Discriminatory – in practice and/or ideological frame
that is premised on inequality
Authoritarian / absolutist worldview
Non-judgemental Moralistic / judgemental