SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 56
Can We Spare ‘Em?
Exploring a Carbapenem-Sparing
Strategy in ESBL Bacteremia
Anna Sandler, PharmD Candidate, 2023
1
Learning Objectives
 Review the mechanism of beta lactamases and
common organisms that may harbor them.
 Describe the current treatment of extended-
spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) bacteremia
infections.
 Evaluate literature and apply findings to a patient
case.
2
Patient case: OK is not Okay
OK is an 88-year old female presenting from a nursing home with a
chief complaint of abdominal pain and altered mental status that
were first noticed a few days ago. In the emergency department (ED)
the patient is disoriented and tachycardic.
What are some things you
would like to know?
What labs do you want to
run?
08.30.2022 08.31.2022 Future?
Patient case: OK is not Okay
• GERD
PTA VS
PMH Labs
4
• HTN
• HLD
• Dementia
• Hypothyroidism
• Levothyroxine 88
mcg PO daily
• Donepezil 10 mg
PO QHS
• Lisinopril 20 mg
PO daily
• Metoprolol tartrate
12.5 mg PO BID
• Temp: 100.9°F
• HR: 127
• RR: 22
• BP: 93/62
• SpO₂ 98%
• Na: 136
• K: 3.9
• Glucose: 470
• SCr: 0.68
• CrCl= 45
• AST: 33
• ALT: 24
• WBC: 22.3
OK is an 88-year old female presenting from a nursing home with a
chief complaint of abdominal pain and altered mental status that
were first noticed a few days ago. In the emergency department the
patient is disoriented and tachycardic.
What is your
differential at
this point?
08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
Patient case: OK is not Okay
• GERD
ID history CTA
UA CXR
5
The ED physician orders urine and blood cultures. The patient
presents similarly to her previous bacteremia infection, so empiric
coverage with meropenem is started and ID is consulted.
What would you
like to know before
we start empiric
antibiotics?
08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
• Leukocytes (+)
• Leukocyte
esterase (trace)
• Nitrite (-)
• Bacteria (few)
• ESBL bacteremia
secondary to
pyelonephritis
(1/2022)
• Negative • Negative
Patient case: OK is not Okay
• GERD
ID hx 1/2022 course
UA 8/30/2022 cxs
6
The ID physician is working really hard to be a good steward and
reduce development of resistance to carbapenems. He is considering
switching the patient to piperacillin/tazobactam since it is active
against ESBLs, but consults you as the pharmacist just in case.
08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
• Leukocytes (+)
• Leukocyte
esterase (trace)
• Nitrite (-)
• Bacteria (few)
• ESBL
bacteremia
secondary to
pyelonephritis
(2/2021)
• Treated with
meropenem 500
mg Q8H X 10
days
• Blood: E. coli
• Urine: E. coli
• (+) ST131 and
CTX-M
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html,
accessed September 13, 2022
Clinical Question
7
Is piperacillin/tazobactam an
appropriate agent for OK?
08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
8
ESBL-producing organisms: a global
health concern
• Commonly produced by gram negative
rod bacteria: Enterobacterales family
(ESBL GNRs)
• ESBL GNRs spread rapidly, may
complicate infections, and even pass on
resistance
• 2017: > 197,000 hospitalized patients;
>9,000 deaths
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html,
accessed September 13, 2022
Yearly
total cases
Year
9
A Review of Beta Lactam Pharmacology
Tmedweb. https://tmedweb.tulane.edu/pharmwiki/doku.php/betalactam_pharm. Accessed September 13, 2022
Bind penicillin
binding proteins
(PBP)
Inactivate
transpeptidase
Inhibition of
cross-linking
Interruption of
cell wall
synthesis
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
10
Beta lactam resistance: Beta Lactamases
Bioscience Notes. https://www.biosciencenotes.com/extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases-esbls/.
Accessed September 13, 2022
Pngitem. https://www.pngitem.com/middle/immJhbR_two-teams-tug-of-war-hd-png-download/
Accessed September 13, 2022
• Beta lactamases hydrolyze the
beta lactam ring, a core
structural feature needed to bind
to PBPs
• Common enzyme: CTX-M-15
• Risk factors:
• Receipt of antibiotics within last 30-
days
• Residence in a nursing home
• Chronic renal failure
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
11
Mechanisms of Resistance
Penicillins BLBLIs Cephalosporins Carbapenems
Penicillinases and
beta lactamases
X
ESBLs X * X
Carbapenemase X * X X
Organism
ESBLs • Eschiera Coli
• Klebsiella spp.
• Serratia
• Proteus
• Citrobacter
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. UpToDate. Accessed
September 13, 2022
Tamma and Rodriguez-Bano (2017), Clin Infect Disease. 2017
Apr 1; 64 (7): 972-980. Accessed September 13, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
* Beta lactam/beta
lactamase inhibitors
(BLBLIs):
• Piperacillin/tazobactam
• Amoxicillin/clavulanate
• Ceftazidime/avibactam
Used in serine carbapenemase-
resistant organisms (CREs)
12
Pathogenesis of ESBL blood stream
infections
Entry
Failure of host
immune
response
Colonization,
Replication,
Spread
• Evasion
• Compromised
immune system
• Hospitals
• Catheters
• Post-op
• If not cleared
spontaneously from
the bloodstream
Smith DA and Nehring SM. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed September 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
•Respiratory
•Hepatic
•Cardiovascular
•CNS
•Renal
Sepsis and Organ dysfunction
•Hypotension and fever
Vitals
•Disorientation
•Signs and symptoms associated with underlying source
(e.g., flank pain in a UTI)
Other
13
UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gram-negative-bacillary-bacteremia-in adults
Accessed September 13, 2022
Diagnosis:
• Non-susceptibility to
ceftriaxone (MIC ≥2
mcg/mL) as a proxy
• Detection of genes
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
14
Initiate prompt
empiric antibiotics
Tailor definitive
therapy and de-
escalate when
appropriate
Treatment
Goals
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
15
Current Treatment of ESBL infections
ESBL infections
Cystitis
Complicated
Carbapenem
Fluoroquinolone
TMP/SMX
Uncomplicated
TMP/SMX
Nitrofurantoin
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
Other Carbapenem Oral step down therapy*
* Oral step down therapy with fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX may be reasonable if susceptibility is demonstrated, patient is
hemodynamically stable, and source control measures have occurred
Tamma PD et al. 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
16
Current Treatment of ESBL infections
ESBL infections
Cystitis
Complicated
Carbapenem
Fluoroquinolone
TMP/SMX
Uncomplicated
TMP/SMX
Nitrofurantoin
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
Other Carbapenem Oral step down therapy*
• Oral step down therapy with fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX may be reasonable if susceptibility is demonstrated, patient is
hemodynamically stable, and source control measures have occurred
Tamma PD et al. 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Class/MOA Infections
17
Piperacillin and tazobactam (Zosyn (®)
• Beta
lactam/Beta
lactamase
inhibitor
• Intra-abdominal
• Pneumonia
• Skin and soft
tissue
• Cystic fibrosis
• Sepsis
• Complicated UTIs
Spectrum of
Activity
• Gram positive
• Strep spp.
• MSSA
• Enterococci
• Gram negative
• GNRs
• ?ESBLs
• Anaerobes
Piperacillin and tazobactam: Drug Information. UpToDate. Accessed Sep 19, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
PK AEs, Monitoring
Dosing,
Administration
18
• Adult Vd: 0.243 L/kg
• Both components ~ one
third protein bound
• Adult t1/2
• Piperacillin: 0.7-1.2
hours
• Tazobactam: 0.7-0.9
hours
• Renally excreted
• C. diff. infection
• Nephrotoxicity
• Seizures
• Myelosuppression
• Leukopenia
• Thrombocytopenia
• 3.375 g or 4.5 g
Q8H administered
over 4 hours or…
• 3.375 g or 4.5 g
Q6H over 30 min
Piperacillin and tazobactam (Zosyn (®)
Piperacillin and tazobactam: Drug Information. UpToDate. Accessed Sep 19, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
• Carbapenem
• Binds PBPs to
inhibit cell wall
synthesis
Class/MOA Indications
• Intrabdominal
• Meningitis
• Skin
• Gram-negative
bacteremia
• Cystic fibrosis
• Diabetic foot
infection
19
Meropenem (Merrem (®)
Spectrum of
Activity
• Gram positive
• Strep spp.
• MSSA
• Enterococci
• Gram negative
• GNRs
• ESBLs
• Anaerobes
Meropenem: Drug information. UpToDate. Accessed Sep 19, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
PK ADRs
• Administered as an
IV infusion
• Most cases: 500 mg
Q6H over 30 min
• Critically ill: 1 gm
Q8H over 3 hours
• CNS or MIC > 2: 2
gm Q8H over 3
hours
Dosing, Administration
20
• Time to peak: ~1
hour (tissues); CSF:
2-3 hours
• Adult Vd: 15-20 L
• Protein binding:
~2%
• Adult t1/2: 1 hour
• Renally excreted
(70%)
• CNS toxicity:
seizures, delirium
• C. diff
• Hypersensitivity
reactions
Meropenem (Merrem (®)
Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing
Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019.
Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
21
Antibiotic Therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae
Bacteremia: Implications of Production
of Extended-Spectrum b-Lactamases
David L. Paterson, Wen-Chien Ko, Anne Von Gottberg et al. 2004
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
22
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
•> 6 years old
•Positive blood cultures for K. pneumonia
Inclusion Criteria
•Prospective, observational study performed in 12 hospitals
•South Africa, Taiwan, Australia, Argentina, USA,
Belgium, Turkey
•Univariate and Multivariate analyses
Design
• Carbapenem therapy versus other antibiotics and 14-day
mortality
Interventions and Outcome
Results-Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic
Carbapenem
(n=42)
Non-carbapenem (n=29) P
Male no. (%) 28 (66.7) 14 (48.3) 0.15
Pneumonia no. (%) 9 (21.4) 7 (24.1) 0.79
Intra-abdominal no. (%) 6 (14.3) 10 (34.5) 0.08
UTI no. (%) 8 (19.0) 2 (6.9) 0.18
ICU admission no. (%) 15 (35.7) 13 (44.8) 0.47
Any immunocompromise
no. (%)
24 (57.1) 7 (24.1) 0.006
Previous LOS (median
days)
11.5 15.0 0.16
25
• Total of 455 episodes of K. pneumonia bacteremia
• ESBL-bacteremia: 85 (18.7%)
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results-Antibiotic use and Outcomes
26
• A total of 20 out of the 85 ESBL cases died within 14 days
• Use of carbapenem therapy* (mainly imipenem) associated
with significantly lower 14 day mortality due to ESBL-
producing K. pneumoniae
Primary
outcome
Carbapenem
therapy
Non-Carbapenem
therapy
OR (95% CI)
14-day
mortality
2 (4.8%) 8 (27.6) 0.173 (0.039-
0.755); P= 0.012)
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
* Either monotherapy or
combination therapy in 5-day
period after first blood xz
Strengths and Weaknesses
28
• Observational trial
• Confounding variables
• Only evaluated K.
pneumoniae bacteremia
• Combination and
sequential carbapenem
therapies
• Multicenter and
international
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Conclusions
29
Outcomes
Prospective
Prior
case
reports
Carbapenems recommended
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
30
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Carbapenem Therapy Is Associated With Improved
Survival Compared With Piperacillin-Tazobactam for
Patients With Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase
Bacteremia
Pranita D. Tamma, Jennifer H. Han, Clare Rock et al. 2015
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
31
•Determine impact of empiric piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ)
treatment compared with empiric carbapenem treatment
before carbapenem definitive treatment on 14-day
mortality in patients with an ESBL bacteremia
Objective
•Single-center, retrospective trial
•John Hopkin’s Hospital 2007-2014
•Cox-Proportional Hazards Model
Design
• Empiric PTZ versus carbapenem prior to definitive
carbapenem
Intervention
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results-Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic
PTZ/Carbapenem (n=
103)
Carbapenem (n=
110)
P
Age, mean 48.2 48.0 0.89
UTI (%) 19.3 18.4 0.87
Intra-abdominal (%) 16.3 15.1 0.82
Pneumonia (%) 9.8 11.3 0.77
Catheter-related 46.3 44.1 0.77
Structural lung disease 7.7 7.0 0.86
Immunocompromised 54.6 57.9 0.92
33
• Adjusted Cohort of ESBL-bacteremia: N= 213
0.
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results
34
Characteristic Multivariable analysis
Adjusted HR 95% CI, P value
PTZ 1.92 1.07-3.45; P=
0.03
14-day mortality
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
• 17 deaths (17%) in PTZ group, 9
(8%) in the carbapenem group
PTZ
Carbapenem
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Strengths and Weaknesses
35
• Retrospective study
• Only looked at empiric
therapy
• Single-center
• Data from > 7 years
• Data from > 7 years
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Conclusions
36
PTZ inferior to
carbapenems
Outcomes
Prior
case
reports
Researchers
• Consider early carbapenem
therapy in patients at high
risk of invasive ESBL
infections
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs.
Meropenem on 30-day Mortality for
Patients with E. Coli or Klebsiella
pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and
Ceftriaxone Resistance
Patrick N.A. Harris; Paul A. Tambyah; David C. Lye et al.
2018
37
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
38
•Evaluate the effect of a carbapenem-sparing regimen for
bloodstream infections caused by ceftriaxone or cefotaxime-
non-susceptible E. coli or Klebsiella spp.
Objective
•International, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority
randomized controlled trial
Design
• Piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem
Intervention
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
•≥ 18 years old
•≥ One positive blood culture not susceptible to ceftriaxone
or cefotaxime but susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam
Inclusion Criteria
•Allergy to either antibiotic
•Expected survival ≤ 96 hours
Exclusion Criteria
39
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Randomization with stratification
40
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Randomization
E. coli
Pip/tazo
meropenem
Klebsiella spp.
Pip/tazo
meropenem
Strata:
• Infecting organism
• Source of infection (urine or other)
• Severity of disease
1:1
1:1
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
41
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Timeline
Follow 30 days after randomization
Treatment X 4-14 days, daily clinical monitoring
Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g IV
Q6H
Meropenem 1 g IV Q8H
Randomization
Everyone
Blood cxs: day 3 or if
febrile  day 5
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Outcome Description Statistical Test
Primary • All cause mortality at 30 days post
randomization
Secondary • Time to clinical and microbiologic
resolution
• Clinical and microbiologic success at
day 4
• Relapsed bloodstream infection
Outcomes-Efficacy
14%/10%
mortality in
control/study
Noninferiority
margin: 5%
454
patients 80% power
43
Harris et al.2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
• Population= per
protocol (≥ 1 dose)
• Tests: Proportion
analyses risk
difference + 1-sided
97.5% CI
Non-inferiority=
Upper bounds of
97.5% CI < 5%
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
44
Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB)
Enrollment
start
Interim
Analysis #1
Interim
Analysis #2
Interim
Analysis #3
Enrollment
start
Interim
Analysis #1
Interim
Analysis #2
Interim
Analysis #3
Planned
Reality
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
50 patients 150 patients 340 patients
STOP
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results-Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic Pip/tazo (n=188) Meropenem (n=191)
Median age (IQR) 70 (55-78) 69 (59-78)
E. Coli no. (%) 162 (86.2) 166 (86.9)
E. Coli –less severe no. (%) 159 (84.6) 162 (84.8)
K. pneumoniae no. (%) 26 (13.8) 25 (13.1)
K. pneumoniae-less severe no. (%) 23 (12.2) 25 (13.1)
Urinary source no. (%) 103 (54.8) 128 (67.0)
Intrabdominal source no. (%) 34 (18.1) 28 (14.7)
Mod-severe renal dysfunction no. 31 (16.5) 30 (15.7)
ICU admission no. (%) 13 (7.0) 14 (7.5)
Empiric BL/BLI no. (%) 38 (20.2) 49 (25.7)
Empiric Carbapenem no. (%) 26 (13.8) 28 (14.7)
Other empiric therapy no. (%) 124 (66.0) 114 (59.7) 45
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results-Primary Outcome
Endpoint Pip/tazo (n=187) Meropenem
(n=191)
Risk Difference
(97.5% CI)
30-day all-cause
mortality no. (%)
23 (12.3) 7 (3.7) 8.6% (-∞ to 14.5%)
P = 0.90
46
Primary analysis
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results-Secondary Outcomes
47
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Endpoint Pip/Tazo (177) Meropenem (185)
Clinical +
microbiologic
success
121 (68.4) 138 (74.6)
Clinical+ Microbiologic success
• Not statistically significant
• Between-group difference:
-6.2 ; 95% CI (-15.5% to 3.1%)
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results-Secondary Outcomes
48
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Endpoint Pip/Tazo (187) Meropenem (191)
Microbiologic
relapse
9 (4.8) 4 (2.1)
Relapse
• Not statistically significant
• Between-group difference:
2.7 (-1.1 to 7.1)
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Results-Safety
49
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
• Meropenem: 3/191 (1.6%)
Serious Adverse Event Association to study drug? Treatment group
Rash requiring cessation of drug Yes Pip/tazo
Renal dysfunction requiring
cessation of drug
Yes Pip/tazo
Dyspnea, fever/chills/ malaise,
neg. cx
Possibly Pip/tazo
Upper limb venous thrombosis No Pip/tazo
Readmission with colitis Possibly Pip/tazo
Serious AEs
• Piperacillin/tazobactam: 5/188 (2.7%)
No fatal AEs
linked to either
study drug
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Strengths and Weaknesses
50
• Multicenter
• Randomization with
stratification
• Similar infectious
source and organism
to patient OK
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
• Prior empiric treatment with
meropenem or pip/tazo
• Lower representation of older
individuals
• Few comorbidities represented
• Low high-risk disease
representation
• Unblinded
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Conclusions
51
Pip/tazo not recommended
DSMB
Primary
+ per
protocol
X non-
inferior.
Researchers
• Definitive treatment with
piperacillin/tazobactam did not
result in noninferior 30-day
mortality
• Findings do not support use of
pip/tazo in ESBL bacteremia
Presenter
• Results of this trial are consistent
with prior observations and confirm
that carbapenems should currently
be the mainstay of gram-negative,
ESBL bacteremia infections.
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Here we go again: OK is not Okay
• GERD
ID hx 1/2022 course
UA 8/30/2022 cxs
52
The ID physician is working really hard to be a good steward and
reduce development of resistance to carbapenems. He is considering
switching the patient to piperacillin/tazobactam since it is active
against ESBLs, but consults you as the pharmacist just in case.
• Leukocytes (+)
• Leukocyte
esterase (trace)
• Nitrite (-)
• Bacteria (few)
• ESBL
bacteremia
secondary to
pyelonephritis
(2/2021)
• Treated with
meropenem 500
mg Q8H X 10
days
• Blood: E. coli
• Urine: E. coli
• (+) ST131 and
CTX-M
• MIC meropenem
< 2 mcg/mL
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html,
accessed September 13, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
ESBL
bacteremia
CrCl = 45
Not critically ill
MIC < 2
Recommend
Meropenem
53
Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019.
Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Approach to
treatment
54
Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019.
Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Yahav D et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(7). Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Meropenem 500 mg IV
Q8H infused over 30 min X
7-14 days
MIC < 2,
CrCl 45
Uncomplicated
Not
critically
ill
What will help us guide
duration?
When do we consider
increased dosing/extended
infusion?
What do we need to monitor
?
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Predicting the Future
Antibiotic(s) Trial Info
• Piperacillin/tazobactam
• Meropenem
PETERPEN trial: PipEracillin
Tazobactam Versus
mERoPENem for Treatment of
Bloodstream Infections Caused
by Cephalosporin-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae
• Recruiting, estimated
completion date: April 2024
• Randomized, controlled open-
label trial
• Non-inferiority study
Promising in-vitro /post-hoc
studies: Ceftazidime-avibactam
Ceftolozane-tazobactam
Eravacycline
Farrell DJ, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013
Dec;57(12):6305-10.
Levasseur P, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015
Apr;59(4):1931-4.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Thank you for your
time!
56
57
1. Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Sader HS, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa with various resistance patterns isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011-2012). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Dec;57(12):6305-10. doi:
10.1128/AAC.01802-13. Epub 2013 Oct 7. PMID: 24100499; PMCID: PMC3837887.
2. Bitterman R, Paul M, Leibovici L, Mussini C. PipEracillin Tazobactam Versus mERoPENem for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by
Cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (PETERPEN). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03671967
3. Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. Published online April 2019.
4. Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC, et al. Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella
pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;320(10):984-994. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12163
5. Levasseur P, Girard AM, Miossec C, Pace J, Coleman K. In vitro antibacterial activity of the ceftazidime-avibactam combination against
enterobacteriaceae, including strains with well-characterized β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):1931-4. doi:
10.1128/AAC.04218-14. Epub 2015 Jan 12. PMID: 25583732; PMCID: PMC4356809
6. Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Antibiotic therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: implications of production of extended-spectrum
beta-lactamases. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. doi:10.1086/420816
7. Smith DA, Nehring SM. Bacteremia. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed September 19, 2022.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441979/
8. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of
Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1478
9. Tamma PD, Han JH, Rock C, et al. Carbapenem Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival Compared With Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Patients
With Extended-Spectrum -Lactamase Bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015:civ003. doi:10.1093/cid/civ003
10. Tamma PD, Rodriguez-Bano J. The Use of Noncarbapenem β-Lactams for the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Infections. Clin Infect Dis.
2017;64(7):972-980. doi:10.1093/cid/cix034
11.Yahav D, Franceschini E, Koppel F, et al. Seven Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Gram-negative Bacteremia: A Noninferiority
Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(7):1091-1098. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy1054
12.Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
References
58
Links
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/piperacillin-and-tazobactam-drug-
information?source=auto_suggest&selectedTitle=1~2---1~2---
piperac&search=piperacillin%20tazobactam
https://www.uptodate.com/contents/meropenem-drug-
information?source=auto_suggest&selectedTitle=1~2---1~2---
mero&search=meropenem
59
Appendix
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Univariate analysis in
Paterson et al. 2004
60
Appendix
Harris et al.2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Stratification in
MERINO trial
Can We Spare ‘Em?
Exploring a Carbapenem-Sparing
Strategy in ESBL Bacteremia
Anna Sandler, PharmD Candidate, 2023
61

More Related Content

Similar to ASandler Patient Case Presentation_OK_ESBL bacteremia.pptx

Intro to antibiotics part 2: Clinical Pearls 7.28.15
Intro to antibiotics part 2:  Clinical Pearls 7.28.15Intro to antibiotics part 2:  Clinical Pearls 7.28.15
Intro to antibiotics part 2: Clinical Pearls 7.28.15arielandysteve
 
mRCC presentation.pptx
mRCC presentation.pptxmRCC presentation.pptx
mRCC presentation.pptxFaraz Badar
 
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 SymposiumOverview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 SymposiumEastern Pennsylvania Branch ASM
 
clinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptx
clinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptxclinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptx
clinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptxPathKind Labs
 
Board review presentation
Board review presentationBoard review presentation
Board review presentationNAIF AL SAGLAN
 
PRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY
PRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPYPRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY
PRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPYBashir BnYunus
 
Salon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ing
Salon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ingSalon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ing
Salon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ingtyfngnc
 
Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)
Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)
Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)Dr.Akhilesh kunoor
 
A Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning Signs
A Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning SignsA Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning Signs
A Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning SignsDR. METI.BHARATH KUMAR
 
CME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptx
CME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptxCME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptx
CME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptxAbhijit Dey
 
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common Infections
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common InfectionsAntimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common Infections
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common InfectionsPASaskatchewan
 
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseasesHow to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseasesFaculty of Medicine
 
PBC Case Closed Slides.pdf
PBC Case Closed Slides.pdfPBC Case Closed Slides.pdf
PBC Case Closed Slides.pdfDevi Seal
 
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseasesHow to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseasesSampathJayaweeraJaya
 
Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)
Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)
Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)SoM
 

Similar to ASandler Patient Case Presentation_OK_ESBL bacteremia.pptx (20)

Intro to antibiotics part 2: Clinical Pearls 7.28.15
Intro to antibiotics part 2:  Clinical Pearls 7.28.15Intro to antibiotics part 2:  Clinical Pearls 7.28.15
Intro to antibiotics part 2: Clinical Pearls 7.28.15
 
Enteric fever
Enteric feverEnteric fever
Enteric fever
 
mRCC presentation.pptx
mRCC presentation.pptxmRCC presentation.pptx
mRCC presentation.pptx
 
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 SymposiumOverview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
Overview of C difficile Infections - Dr Steve Brecher - November 2010 Symposium
 
clinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptx
clinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptxclinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptx
clinical standards for ds tb treatment 2022 (1).pptx
 
Board review presentation
Board review presentationBoard review presentation
Board review presentation
 
daptomycin.pdf
daptomycin.pdfdaptomycin.pdf
daptomycin.pdf
 
PRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY
PRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPYPRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY
PRINCIPLES OF CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY
 
Salon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ing
Salon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ingSalon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ing
Salon b 13 kasim 15.45 17.00 müge aydoğdu-ing
 
Hepatitis.pptx
Hepatitis.pptxHepatitis.pptx
Hepatitis.pptx
 
Cryptococcal meningitis
Cryptococcal meningitisCryptococcal meningitis
Cryptococcal meningitis
 
Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)
Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)
Puzzles practices and evidences in tb management (final)
 
A Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning Signs
A Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning SignsA Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning Signs
A Case Presentation on Dengue With Warning Signs
 
CME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptx
CME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptxCME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptx
CME RGKMCH 20-02-2023.pptx
 
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common Infections
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common InfectionsAntimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common Infections
Antimicrobial Stewardship and Applications to Common Infections
 
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseasesHow to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
 
PBC Case Closed Slides.pdf
PBC Case Closed Slides.pdfPBC Case Closed Slides.pdf
PBC Case Closed Slides.pdf
 
Meningitis ppt.pptx
Meningitis ppt.pptxMeningitis ppt.pptx
Meningitis ppt.pptx
 
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseasesHow to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
How to minimize therapeutic failure in infectious diseases
 
Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)
Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)
Room a b02. tulkens-pk-pd-update-antibiotics_(en)
 

More from AnnaSandler4

Seminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptx
Seminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptxSeminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptx
Seminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docxASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docxAnnaSandler4
 
JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.docJC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.docAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_HF topic discussion.docx
ASandler_HF topic discussion.docxASandler_HF topic discussion.docx
ASandler_HF topic discussion.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docx
ASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docxASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docx
ASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_UTI_TD.docx
ASandler_UTI_TD.docxASandler_UTI_TD.docx
ASandler_UTI_TD.docxAnnaSandler4
 
Final_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docx
Final_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docxFinal_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docx
Final_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docx
ASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docxASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docx
ASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docx
ASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docxASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docx
ASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docxAnnaSandler4
 
Final mab DI question presentation.docx
Final mab DI question presentation.docxFinal mab DI question presentation.docx
Final mab DI question presentation.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docx
ASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docxASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docx
ASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.doc
ASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.docASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.doc
ASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.docAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
ASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.docASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
ASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.docAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docx
ASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docxASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docx
ASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docxAnnaSandler4
 
Propranolol and Neuro storming.pptx
Propranolol and Neuro storming.pptxPropranolol and Neuro storming.pptx
Propranolol and Neuro storming.pptxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_DKA topic discussion.docx
ASandler_DKA topic discussion.docxASandler_DKA topic discussion.docx
ASandler_DKA topic discussion.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docxASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docxAnnaSandler4
 
ASandler_JC_Invictus.docx
ASandler_JC_Invictus.docxASandler_JC_Invictus.docx
ASandler_JC_Invictus.docxAnnaSandler4
 
Final_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptx
Final_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptxFinal_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptx
Final_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptxAnnaSandler4
 

More from AnnaSandler4 (19)

Seminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptx
Seminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptxSeminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptx
Seminar 2022 presentation final_ASANDLER.pptx
 
ASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docxASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ACS (inpatient)topic discussion.docx
 
JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.docJC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
 
ASandler_HF topic discussion.docx
ASandler_HF topic discussion.docxASandler_HF topic discussion.docx
ASandler_HF topic discussion.docx
 
ASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docx
ASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docxASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docx
ASandler_PD_Topic Discussion_8_30.docx
 
ASandler_UTI_TD.docx
ASandler_UTI_TD.docxASandler_UTI_TD.docx
ASandler_UTI_TD.docx
 
Final_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docx
Final_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docxFinal_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docx
Final_ASandler_Dapag_HFpEF_JC.docx
 
ASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docx
ASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docxASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docx
ASandler_CKD_MBD_TD.docx
 
ASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docx
ASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docxASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docx
ASandler_HF2022_IM_TD.docx
 
Final mab DI question presentation.docx
Final mab DI question presentation.docxFinal mab DI question presentation.docx
Final mab DI question presentation.docx
 
ASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docx
ASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docxASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docx
ASandlerCAP topic discussion Final.docx
 
ASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.doc
ASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.docASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.doc
ASandler_JC_07072022_Edoxaban_VKA_TAVR.doc
 
ASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
ASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.docASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
ASandler_JC_sedation_MV_sepsis.doc
 
ASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docx
ASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docxASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docx
ASandler_Sepsis topic discussion.docx
 
Propranolol and Neuro storming.pptx
Propranolol and Neuro storming.pptxPropranolol and Neuro storming.pptx
Propranolol and Neuro storming.pptx
 
ASandler_DKA topic discussion.docx
ASandler_DKA topic discussion.docxASandler_DKA topic discussion.docx
ASandler_DKA topic discussion.docx
 
ASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docxASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docx
ASandler_ARDS topic discussion.docx
 
ASandler_JC_Invictus.docx
ASandler_JC_Invictus.docxASandler_JC_Invictus.docx
ASandler_JC_Invictus.docx
 
Final_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptx
Final_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptxFinal_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptx
Final_ASandler_PVD_Anticoag patient case.pptx
 

Recently uploaded

Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...
Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...
Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...Russian Call Girls Amritsar
 
Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...delhimodelshub1
 
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Timedelhimodelshub1
 
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptxBasics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptxAyush Gupta
 
College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...delhimodelshub1
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhVip call girls In Chandigarh
 
Call Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadCall Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabaddelhimodelshub1
 
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...Call Girls Noida
 
Call Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadCall Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabaddelhimodelshub1
 
Dehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Dehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service DehradunDehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Dehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service DehradunNiamh verma
 
Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...
Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...
Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...soniya singh
 
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Timedelhimodelshub1
 
Call Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service GurgaonCall Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service GurgaonCall Girls Service Gurgaon
 
Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...
Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...
Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...High Profile Call Girls Chandigarh Aarushi
 
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...High Profile Call Girls Chandigarh Aarushi
 
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In LudhianaHot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In LudhianaRussian Call Girls in Ludhiana
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591adityaroy0215
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...
Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...
Local Housewife and effective ☎️ 8250192130 🍉🍓 Sexy Girls VIP Call Girls Chan...
 
Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
Russian Call Girls Hyderabad Saloni 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
 
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls Secunderabad 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
 
Call Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Call Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service DehradunCall Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Call Girl Dehradun Aashi 🔝 7001305949 🔝 💃 Independent Escort Service Dehradun
 
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptxBasics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
Basics of Anatomy- Language of Anatomy.pptx
 
College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
College Call Girls Hyderabad Sakshi 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyd...
 
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In ChandigarhHot  Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
Hot Call Girl In Chandigarh 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Chandigarh
 
Call Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadCall Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls in Hyderabad Lavanya 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
 
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
pOOJA sexy Call Girls In Sector 49,9999965857 Young Female Escorts Service In...
 
Call Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service HyderabadCall Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
Call Girls Hyderabad Krisha 9907093804 Independent Escort Service Hyderabad
 
Dehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Dehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service DehradunDehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Dehradun
Dehradun Call Girls Service ❤️🍑 9675010100 👄🫦Independent Escort Service Dehradun
 
Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...
Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...
Gurgaon iffco chowk 🔝 Call Girls Service 🔝 ( 8264348440 ) unlimited hard sex ...
 
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any TimeCall Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
Call Girls LB Nagar 7001305949 all area service COD available Any Time
 
Call Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service GurgaonCall Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
Call Girl Gurgaon Saloni 9711199012 Independent Escort Service Gurgaon
 
Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...
Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...
Russian Call Girls in Chandigarh Ojaswi ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort ...
 
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
Call Girls Service Chandigarh Grishma ❤️🍑 9907093804 👄🫦 Independent Escort Se...
 
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In LudhianaHot  Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
Hot Call Girl In Ludhiana 👅🥵 9053'900678 Call Girls Service In Ludhiana
 
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
VIP Call Girl Sector 25 Gurgaon Just Call Me 9899900591
 
#9711199012# African Student Escorts in Delhi 😘 Call Girls Delhi
#9711199012# African Student Escorts in Delhi 😘 Call Girls Delhi#9711199012# African Student Escorts in Delhi 😘 Call Girls Delhi
#9711199012# African Student Escorts in Delhi 😘 Call Girls Delhi
 
Russian Call Girls South Delhi 9711199171 discount on your booking
Russian Call Girls South Delhi 9711199171 discount on your bookingRussian Call Girls South Delhi 9711199171 discount on your booking
Russian Call Girls South Delhi 9711199171 discount on your booking
 

ASandler Patient Case Presentation_OK_ESBL bacteremia.pptx

  • 1. Can We Spare ‘Em? Exploring a Carbapenem-Sparing Strategy in ESBL Bacteremia Anna Sandler, PharmD Candidate, 2023 1
  • 2. Learning Objectives  Review the mechanism of beta lactamases and common organisms that may harbor them.  Describe the current treatment of extended- spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) bacteremia infections.  Evaluate literature and apply findings to a patient case. 2
  • 3. Patient case: OK is not Okay OK is an 88-year old female presenting from a nursing home with a chief complaint of abdominal pain and altered mental status that were first noticed a few days ago. In the emergency department (ED) the patient is disoriented and tachycardic. What are some things you would like to know? What labs do you want to run? 08.30.2022 08.31.2022 Future?
  • 4. Patient case: OK is not Okay • GERD PTA VS PMH Labs 4 • HTN • HLD • Dementia • Hypothyroidism • Levothyroxine 88 mcg PO daily • Donepezil 10 mg PO QHS • Lisinopril 20 mg PO daily • Metoprolol tartrate 12.5 mg PO BID • Temp: 100.9°F • HR: 127 • RR: 22 • BP: 93/62 • SpO₂ 98% • Na: 136 • K: 3.9 • Glucose: 470 • SCr: 0.68 • CrCl= 45 • AST: 33 • ALT: 24 • WBC: 22.3 OK is an 88-year old female presenting from a nursing home with a chief complaint of abdominal pain and altered mental status that were first noticed a few days ago. In the emergency department the patient is disoriented and tachycardic. What is your differential at this point? 08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
  • 5. Patient case: OK is not Okay • GERD ID history CTA UA CXR 5 The ED physician orders urine and blood cultures. The patient presents similarly to her previous bacteremia infection, so empiric coverage with meropenem is started and ID is consulted. What would you like to know before we start empiric antibiotics? 08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future? • Leukocytes (+) • Leukocyte esterase (trace) • Nitrite (-) • Bacteria (few) • ESBL bacteremia secondary to pyelonephritis (1/2022) • Negative • Negative
  • 6. Patient case: OK is not Okay • GERD ID hx 1/2022 course UA 8/30/2022 cxs 6 The ID physician is working really hard to be a good steward and reduce development of resistance to carbapenems. He is considering switching the patient to piperacillin/tazobactam since it is active against ESBLs, but consults you as the pharmacist just in case. 08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future? • Leukocytes (+) • Leukocyte esterase (trace) • Nitrite (-) • Bacteria (few) • ESBL bacteremia secondary to pyelonephritis (2/2021) • Treated with meropenem 500 mg Q8H X 10 days • Blood: E. coli • Urine: E. coli • (+) ST131 and CTX-M Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html, accessed September 13, 2022
  • 7. Clinical Question 7 Is piperacillin/tazobactam an appropriate agent for OK? 08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
  • 8. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions 8 ESBL-producing organisms: a global health concern • Commonly produced by gram negative rod bacteria: Enterobacterales family (ESBL GNRs) • ESBL GNRs spread rapidly, may complicate infections, and even pass on resistance • 2017: > 197,000 hospitalized patients; >9,000 deaths Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html, accessed September 13, 2022 Yearly total cases Year
  • 9. 9 A Review of Beta Lactam Pharmacology Tmedweb. https://tmedweb.tulane.edu/pharmwiki/doku.php/betalactam_pharm. Accessed September 13, 2022 Bind penicillin binding proteins (PBP) Inactivate transpeptidase Inhibition of cross-linking Interruption of cell wall synthesis Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 10. 10 Beta lactam resistance: Beta Lactamases Bioscience Notes. https://www.biosciencenotes.com/extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases-esbls/. Accessed September 13, 2022 Pngitem. https://www.pngitem.com/middle/immJhbR_two-teams-tug-of-war-hd-png-download/ Accessed September 13, 2022 • Beta lactamases hydrolyze the beta lactam ring, a core structural feature needed to bind to PBPs • Common enzyme: CTX-M-15 • Risk factors: • Receipt of antibiotics within last 30- days • Residence in a nursing home • Chronic renal failure Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 11. 11 Mechanisms of Resistance Penicillins BLBLIs Cephalosporins Carbapenems Penicillinases and beta lactamases X ESBLs X * X Carbapenemase X * X X Organism ESBLs • Eschiera Coli • Klebsiella spp. • Serratia • Proteus • Citrobacter Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. UpToDate. Accessed September 13, 2022 Tamma and Rodriguez-Bano (2017), Clin Infect Disease. 2017 Apr 1; 64 (7): 972-980. Accessed September 13, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions * Beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs): • Piperacillin/tazobactam • Amoxicillin/clavulanate • Ceftazidime/avibactam Used in serine carbapenemase- resistant organisms (CREs)
  • 12. 12 Pathogenesis of ESBL blood stream infections Entry Failure of host immune response Colonization, Replication, Spread • Evasion • Compromised immune system • Hospitals • Catheters • Post-op • If not cleared spontaneously from the bloodstream Smith DA and Nehring SM. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed September 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 13. Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis •Respiratory •Hepatic •Cardiovascular •CNS •Renal Sepsis and Organ dysfunction •Hypotension and fever Vitals •Disorientation •Signs and symptoms associated with underlying source (e.g., flank pain in a UTI) Other 13 UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gram-negative-bacillary-bacteremia-in adults Accessed September 13, 2022 Diagnosis: • Non-susceptibility to ceftriaxone (MIC ≥2 mcg/mL) as a proxy • Detection of genes Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 14. 14 Initiate prompt empiric antibiotics Tailor definitive therapy and de- escalate when appropriate Treatment Goals Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 15. 15 Current Treatment of ESBL infections ESBL infections Cystitis Complicated Carbapenem Fluoroquinolone TMP/SMX Uncomplicated TMP/SMX Nitrofurantoin Amoxicillin/clavulanate Other Carbapenem Oral step down therapy* * Oral step down therapy with fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX may be reasonable if susceptibility is demonstrated, patient is hemodynamically stable, and source control measures have occurred Tamma PD et al. 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 16. 16 Current Treatment of ESBL infections ESBL infections Cystitis Complicated Carbapenem Fluoroquinolone TMP/SMX Uncomplicated TMP/SMX Nitrofurantoin Amoxicillin/clavulanate Other Carbapenem Oral step down therapy* • Oral step down therapy with fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX may be reasonable if susceptibility is demonstrated, patient is hemodynamically stable, and source control measures have occurred Tamma PD et al. 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 17. Class/MOA Infections 17 Piperacillin and tazobactam (Zosyn (®) • Beta lactam/Beta lactamase inhibitor • Intra-abdominal • Pneumonia • Skin and soft tissue • Cystic fibrosis • Sepsis • Complicated UTIs Spectrum of Activity • Gram positive • Strep spp. • MSSA • Enterococci • Gram negative • GNRs • ?ESBLs • Anaerobes Piperacillin and tazobactam: Drug Information. UpToDate. Accessed Sep 19, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 18. PK AEs, Monitoring Dosing, Administration 18 • Adult Vd: 0.243 L/kg • Both components ~ one third protein bound • Adult t1/2 • Piperacillin: 0.7-1.2 hours • Tazobactam: 0.7-0.9 hours • Renally excreted • C. diff. infection • Nephrotoxicity • Seizures • Myelosuppression • Leukopenia • Thrombocytopenia • 3.375 g or 4.5 g Q8H administered over 4 hours or… • 3.375 g or 4.5 g Q6H over 30 min Piperacillin and tazobactam (Zosyn (®) Piperacillin and tazobactam: Drug Information. UpToDate. Accessed Sep 19, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 19. • Carbapenem • Binds PBPs to inhibit cell wall synthesis Class/MOA Indications • Intrabdominal • Meningitis • Skin • Gram-negative bacteremia • Cystic fibrosis • Diabetic foot infection 19 Meropenem (Merrem (®) Spectrum of Activity • Gram positive • Strep spp. • MSSA • Enterococci • Gram negative • GNRs • ESBLs • Anaerobes Meropenem: Drug information. UpToDate. Accessed Sep 19, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 20. PK ADRs • Administered as an IV infusion • Most cases: 500 mg Q6H over 30 min • Critically ill: 1 gm Q8H over 3 hours • CNS or MIC > 2: 2 gm Q8H over 3 hours Dosing, Administration 20 • Time to peak: ~1 hour (tissues); CSF: 2-3 hours • Adult Vd: 15-20 L • Protein binding: ~2% • Adult t1/2: 1 hour • Renally excreted (70%) • CNS toxicity: seizures, delirium • C. diff • Hypersensitivity reactions Meropenem (Merrem (®) Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 21. 21 Antibiotic Therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia: Implications of Production of Extended-Spectrum b-Lactamases David L. Paterson, Wen-Chien Ko, Anne Von Gottberg et al. 2004 Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 22. 22 Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions •> 6 years old •Positive blood cultures for K. pneumonia Inclusion Criteria •Prospective, observational study performed in 12 hospitals •South Africa, Taiwan, Australia, Argentina, USA, Belgium, Turkey •Univariate and Multivariate analyses Design • Carbapenem therapy versus other antibiotics and 14-day mortality Interventions and Outcome
  • 23. Results-Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Carbapenem (n=42) Non-carbapenem (n=29) P Male no. (%) 28 (66.7) 14 (48.3) 0.15 Pneumonia no. (%) 9 (21.4) 7 (24.1) 0.79 Intra-abdominal no. (%) 6 (14.3) 10 (34.5) 0.08 UTI no. (%) 8 (19.0) 2 (6.9) 0.18 ICU admission no. (%) 15 (35.7) 13 (44.8) 0.47 Any immunocompromise no. (%) 24 (57.1) 7 (24.1) 0.006 Previous LOS (median days) 11.5 15.0 0.16 25 • Total of 455 episodes of K. pneumonia bacteremia • ESBL-bacteremia: 85 (18.7%) Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 24. Results-Antibiotic use and Outcomes 26 • A total of 20 out of the 85 ESBL cases died within 14 days • Use of carbapenem therapy* (mainly imipenem) associated with significantly lower 14 day mortality due to ESBL- producing K. pneumoniae Primary outcome Carbapenem therapy Non-Carbapenem therapy OR (95% CI) 14-day mortality 2 (4.8%) 8 (27.6) 0.173 (0.039- 0.755); P= 0.012) Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions * Either monotherapy or combination therapy in 5-day period after first blood xz
  • 25. Strengths and Weaknesses 28 • Observational trial • Confounding variables • Only evaluated K. pneumoniae bacteremia • Combination and sequential carbapenem therapies • Multicenter and international Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 26. Conclusions 29 Outcomes Prospective Prior case reports Carbapenems recommended Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 27. 30 Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Carbapenem Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival Compared With Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Patients With Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Bacteremia Pranita D. Tamma, Jennifer H. Han, Clare Rock et al. 2015 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 28. 31 •Determine impact of empiric piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ) treatment compared with empiric carbapenem treatment before carbapenem definitive treatment on 14-day mortality in patients with an ESBL bacteremia Objective •Single-center, retrospective trial •John Hopkin’s Hospital 2007-2014 •Cox-Proportional Hazards Model Design • Empiric PTZ versus carbapenem prior to definitive carbapenem Intervention Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 29. Results-Baseline Characteristics Characteristic PTZ/Carbapenem (n= 103) Carbapenem (n= 110) P Age, mean 48.2 48.0 0.89 UTI (%) 19.3 18.4 0.87 Intra-abdominal (%) 16.3 15.1 0.82 Pneumonia (%) 9.8 11.3 0.77 Catheter-related 46.3 44.1 0.77 Structural lung disease 7.7 7.0 0.86 Immunocompromised 54.6 57.9 0.92 33 • Adjusted Cohort of ESBL-bacteremia: N= 213 0. Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 30. Results 34 Characteristic Multivariable analysis Adjusted HR 95% CI, P value PTZ 1.92 1.07-3.45; P= 0.03 14-day mortality Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. • 17 deaths (17%) in PTZ group, 9 (8%) in the carbapenem group PTZ Carbapenem Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 31. Strengths and Weaknesses 35 • Retrospective study • Only looked at empiric therapy • Single-center • Data from > 7 years • Data from > 7 years Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 32. Conclusions 36 PTZ inferior to carbapenems Outcomes Prior case reports Researchers • Consider early carbapenem therapy in patients at high risk of invasive ESBL infections Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 33. Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs. Meropenem on 30-day Mortality for Patients with E. Coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance Patrick N.A. Harris; Paul A. Tambyah; David C. Lye et al. 2018 37 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 34. 38 •Evaluate the effect of a carbapenem-sparing regimen for bloodstream infections caused by ceftriaxone or cefotaxime- non-susceptible E. coli or Klebsiella spp. Objective •International, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial Design • Piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem Intervention Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 35. •≥ 18 years old •≥ One positive blood culture not susceptible to ceftriaxone or cefotaxime but susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam Inclusion Criteria •Allergy to either antibiotic •Expected survival ≤ 96 hours Exclusion Criteria 39 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 36. Randomization with stratification 40 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Randomization E. coli Pip/tazo meropenem Klebsiella spp. Pip/tazo meropenem Strata: • Infecting organism • Source of infection (urine or other) • Severity of disease 1:1 1:1 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 37. 41 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Timeline Follow 30 days after randomization Treatment X 4-14 days, daily clinical monitoring Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g IV Q6H Meropenem 1 g IV Q8H Randomization Everyone Blood cxs: day 3 or if febrile  day 5 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 38. Outcome Description Statistical Test Primary • All cause mortality at 30 days post randomization Secondary • Time to clinical and microbiologic resolution • Clinical and microbiologic success at day 4 • Relapsed bloodstream infection Outcomes-Efficacy 14%/10% mortality in control/study Noninferiority margin: 5% 454 patients 80% power 43 Harris et al.2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 • Population= per protocol (≥ 1 dose) • Tests: Proportion analyses risk difference + 1-sided 97.5% CI Non-inferiority= Upper bounds of 97.5% CI < 5% Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 39. 44 Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) Enrollment start Interim Analysis #1 Interim Analysis #2 Interim Analysis #3 Enrollment start Interim Analysis #1 Interim Analysis #2 Interim Analysis #3 Planned Reality Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 50 patients 150 patients 340 patients STOP Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 40. Results-Baseline Characteristics Characteristic Pip/tazo (n=188) Meropenem (n=191) Median age (IQR) 70 (55-78) 69 (59-78) E. Coli no. (%) 162 (86.2) 166 (86.9) E. Coli –less severe no. (%) 159 (84.6) 162 (84.8) K. pneumoniae no. (%) 26 (13.8) 25 (13.1) K. pneumoniae-less severe no. (%) 23 (12.2) 25 (13.1) Urinary source no. (%) 103 (54.8) 128 (67.0) Intrabdominal source no. (%) 34 (18.1) 28 (14.7) Mod-severe renal dysfunction no. 31 (16.5) 30 (15.7) ICU admission no. (%) 13 (7.0) 14 (7.5) Empiric BL/BLI no. (%) 38 (20.2) 49 (25.7) Empiric Carbapenem no. (%) 26 (13.8) 28 (14.7) Other empiric therapy no. (%) 124 (66.0) 114 (59.7) 45 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 41. Results-Primary Outcome Endpoint Pip/tazo (n=187) Meropenem (n=191) Risk Difference (97.5% CI) 30-day all-cause mortality no. (%) 23 (12.3) 7 (3.7) 8.6% (-∞ to 14.5%) P = 0.90 46 Primary analysis Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 42. Results-Secondary Outcomes 47 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Endpoint Pip/Tazo (177) Meropenem (185) Clinical + microbiologic success 121 (68.4) 138 (74.6) Clinical+ Microbiologic success • Not statistically significant • Between-group difference: -6.2 ; 95% CI (-15.5% to 3.1%) Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 43. Results-Secondary Outcomes 48 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Endpoint Pip/Tazo (187) Meropenem (191) Microbiologic relapse 9 (4.8) 4 (2.1) Relapse • Not statistically significant • Between-group difference: 2.7 (-1.1 to 7.1) Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 44. Results-Safety 49 Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 • Meropenem: 3/191 (1.6%) Serious Adverse Event Association to study drug? Treatment group Rash requiring cessation of drug Yes Pip/tazo Renal dysfunction requiring cessation of drug Yes Pip/tazo Dyspnea, fever/chills/ malaise, neg. cx Possibly Pip/tazo Upper limb venous thrombosis No Pip/tazo Readmission with colitis Possibly Pip/tazo Serious AEs • Piperacillin/tazobactam: 5/188 (2.7%) No fatal AEs linked to either study drug Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 45. Strengths and Weaknesses 50 • Multicenter • Randomization with stratification • Similar infectious source and organism to patient OK Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 • Prior empiric treatment with meropenem or pip/tazo • Lower representation of older individuals • Few comorbidities represented • Low high-risk disease representation • Unblinded Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 46. Conclusions 51 Pip/tazo not recommended DSMB Primary + per protocol X non- inferior. Researchers • Definitive treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam did not result in noninferior 30-day mortality • Findings do not support use of pip/tazo in ESBL bacteremia Presenter • Results of this trial are consistent with prior observations and confirm that carbapenems should currently be the mainstay of gram-negative, ESBL bacteremia infections. Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 47. Here we go again: OK is not Okay • GERD ID hx 1/2022 course UA 8/30/2022 cxs 52 The ID physician is working really hard to be a good steward and reduce development of resistance to carbapenems. He is considering switching the patient to piperacillin/tazobactam since it is active against ESBLs, but consults you as the pharmacist just in case. • Leukocytes (+) • Leukocyte esterase (trace) • Nitrite (-) • Bacteria (few) • ESBL bacteremia secondary to pyelonephritis (2/2021) • Treated with meropenem 500 mg Q8H X 10 days • Blood: E. coli • Urine: E. coli • (+) ST131 and CTX-M • MIC meropenem < 2 mcg/mL Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html, accessed September 13, 2022 Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 48. ESBL bacteremia CrCl = 45 Not critically ill MIC < 2 Recommend Meropenem 53 Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions Approach to treatment
  • 49. 54 Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Yahav D et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(7). Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Meropenem 500 mg IV Q8H infused over 30 min X 7-14 days MIC < 2, CrCl 45 Uncomplicated Not critically ill What will help us guide duration? When do we consider increased dosing/extended infusion? What do we need to monitor ? Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
  • 50. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions Predicting the Future Antibiotic(s) Trial Info • Piperacillin/tazobactam • Meropenem PETERPEN trial: PipEracillin Tazobactam Versus mERoPENem for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae • Recruiting, estimated completion date: April 2024 • Randomized, controlled open- label trial • Non-inferiority study Promising in-vitro /post-hoc studies: Ceftazidime-avibactam Ceftolozane-tazobactam Eravacycline Farrell DJ, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Dec;57(12):6305-10. Levasseur P, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):1931-4.
  • 51. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions Thank you for your time! 56
  • 52. 57 1. Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Sader HS, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with various resistance patterns isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011-2012). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Dec;57(12):6305-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01802-13. Epub 2013 Oct 7. PMID: 24100499; PMCID: PMC3837887. 2. Bitterman R, Paul M, Leibovici L, Mussini C. PipEracillin Tazobactam Versus mERoPENem for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by Cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (PETERPEN). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03671967 3. Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. Published online April 2019. 4. Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC, et al. Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;320(10):984-994. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12163 5. Levasseur P, Girard AM, Miossec C, Pace J, Coleman K. In vitro antibacterial activity of the ceftazidime-avibactam combination against enterobacteriaceae, including strains with well-characterized β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):1931-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04218-14. Epub 2015 Jan 12. PMID: 25583732; PMCID: PMC4356809 6. Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Antibiotic therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: implications of production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. doi:10.1086/420816 7. Smith DA, Nehring SM. Bacteremia. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed September 19, 2022. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441979/ 8. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1478 9. Tamma PD, Han JH, Rock C, et al. Carbapenem Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival Compared With Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Patients With Extended-Spectrum -Lactamase Bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015:civ003. doi:10.1093/cid/civ003 10. Tamma PD, Rodriguez-Bano J. The Use of Noncarbapenem β-Lactams for the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(7):972-980. doi:10.1093/cid/cix034 11.Yahav D, Franceschini E, Koppel F, et al. Seven Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Gram-negative Bacteremia: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(7):1091-1098. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy1054 12.Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. References
  • 54. 59 Appendix Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022. Univariate analysis in Paterson et al. 2004
  • 55. 60 Appendix Harris et al.2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022 Stratification in MERINO trial
  • 56. Can We Spare ‘Em? Exploring a Carbapenem-Sparing Strategy in ESBL Bacteremia Anna Sandler, PharmD Candidate, 2023 61

Editor's Notes

  1. The incidence of ESBL-E identified in bacterial cultures in the United States increased by 53% from 2012 to 2017, in large part due to increased community-acquired infections [6]. ESBLs are enzymes that inactivate most penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam. EBSL-E generally remain susceptible to carbapenems. ESBLs do not inactivate non-β-lactam agents (e.g., ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin). However, organisms carrying ESBL genes often harbor additional genes or mutations in genes that mediate resistance to a broad range of antibiotics.
  2. Rather, non-susceptibility to ceftriaxone (i.e., ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs] ≥2 mcg/mL), is often used as a proxy for ESBL production, although this threshold has limitations with specificity as organisms not susceptible to ceftriaxone for reasons other than ESBL production may be falsely presumed to be ESBL-producers [16, 17]. For this guidance document, ESBL-E will refer to presumed or confirmed ESBL-producing E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, or P. mirabilis. Treatment recommendations for ESBL-E infections listed below assume that in vitro activity of preferred and alternative antibiotics has been demonstrated.
  3. The role of oral step-down therapy for ESBL-E infections outside of the urinary tract has not been formally evaluated. However, oral step-down therapy has been shown to be a reasonable treatment consideration for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections, including those caused by antimicrobial-resistant isolates, after appropriate clinical milestones are achieved [46, 47]. Based on the known bioavailability and sustained serum concentrations of oral fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, these agents should be treatment considerations for patients with ESBL-E infections if (1) susceptibility to one of these agents is demonstrated, (2) the patient is hemodynamically stable, (3) reasonable source control measures have occurred, and (4) concerns about insufficient intestinal absorption are not present [5]. Clinicians should avoid oral step-down to nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, doxycycline, or omadacycline for ESBL-E bloodstream infections. Nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin achieve poor serum concentrations [40, 41]. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and doxycycline achieve unreliable serum concentrations [33, 48]. Omadacycline is a tetracycline derivative with an oral formulation that may exhibit activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates but has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile [49, 50]. Until more clinical data are available investigating omadacycline’s role for the treatment of ESBL-E infections, the panel recommends against its use for this indication.
  4. The role of oral step-down therapy for ESBL-E infections outside of the urinary tract has not been formally evaluated. However, oral step-down therapy has been shown to be a reasonable treatment consideration for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections, including those caused by antimicrobial-resistant isolates, after appropriate clinical milestones are achieved [46, 47]. Based on the known bioavailability and sustained serum concentrations of oral fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, these agents should be treatment considerations for patients with ESBL-E infections if (1) susceptibility to one of these agents is demonstrated, (2) the patient is hemodynamically stable, (3) reasonable source control measures have occurred, and (4) concerns about insufficient intestinal absorption are not present [5]. Clinicians should avoid oral step-down to nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, doxycycline, or omadacycline for ESBL-E bloodstream infections. Nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin achieve poor serum concentrations [40, 41]. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and doxycycline achieve unreliable serum concentrations [33, 48]. Omadacycline is a tetracycline derivative with an oral formulation that may exhibit activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates but has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile [49, 50]. Until more clinical data are available investigating omadacycline’s role for the treatment of ESBL-E infections, the panel recommends against its use for this indication.
  5. Multivariate analysis was performed using variables (primarily severity-of-illness markers) that were determined to be associated with all-cause death at 14 days after the first positive blood culture result by univariate analysis (table 2). In multivariate analysis, we used the following variables: carbapenem use during the 5-day period after the first blood culture positive for K. pneumoniae, accommodation in an ICU at the time of bacteremia, and severity of illness (as measured by the Pitt bacteremia score). Carbapenem use was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.65; Pp.017) (table 3). Three additional multivariate analyses, which used variables found on univariate analysis to be associated with 28-day all-cause mortality and 14- and 28-day mortality thought to be due to K. pneumoniae bacteremia, also showed that carbapenem use was independently associated with decreased mortality (table 3).
  6. * 18-36 months after dx
  7. Predictors of mortality associated with ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae bacteremia. For patients who received an antibiotic active in vitro against the ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae strains, factors significantly associated with death due to ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae bacteremia by univariate analysis included accommodation in an ICU at the time of bacteremia (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.4–26.8; Pp.0109) and increased severity of illness, as determined by the Pitt bacteremia score (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; Pp.006
  8. Multivariate analysis was performed using variables (primarily severity-of-illness markers) that were determined to be associated with all-cause death at 14 days after the first positive blood culture result by univariate analysis (table 2). In multivariate analysis, we used the following variables: carbapenem use during the 5-day period after the first blood culture positive for K. pneumoniae, accommodation in an ICU at the time of bacteremia, and severity of illness (as measured by the Pitt bacteremia score). Carbapenem use was independently associated with decreased mortality (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.65; Pp.017) (table 3). Three additional multivariate analyses, which used variables found on univariate analysis to be associated with 28-day all-cause mortality and 14- and 28-day mortality thought to be due to K. pneumoniae bacteremia, also showed that carbapenem use was independently associated with decreased mortality (table 3).
  9. All fully reversible
  10. We developed a multivariable logistic regression model to estimate a propensity score for each patient's likelihood of receiving empiric PTZ therapy. Covariates included to generate the propensity score included the following: age, Pitt bacteremia score, ICU level care, profound neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤100 µg/mL), source of infection, underlying medical conditions, and immunocompromised status. A patient who received PTZ empirically was weighted by the inverse of the probability that he or she would be treated with PTZ, and a patient who received a carbapenem empirically was weighted by the inverse of the probability that he or she would be treated with a carbapenem, equivalent to 1 minus his or her propensity score. An IPW model can be unduly influenced by extreme weights assigned to patients with a low probability of getting the prescribed treatment. Therefore, stabilized IPWs were created by multiplying the marginal probability of treatment assignment by the IPW. The performance of the propensity model was assessed by comparing baseline characteristics in the 2 treatment groups after applying the stabilized IPW. Baseline characteristics were summarized as percentages or means with standard deviations for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Comparisons between the treatment groups were made using the Student t test for continuous variables and the Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables.
  11. There were 17 deaths (17%) in the PTZ group and 9 deaths (8%) in the carbapenem group within 14 days of the first positive blood culture. Covariates independently associated with a higher risk of death by day 14 included higher Pitt bacteremia scores and ICU-level care needed on day 1 of bacteremia. There was a 1.92 times increased risk of death by day 14 for patients receiving empiric PTZ compared with patients receiving empiric carbapenems, adjusting for age, Pitt bacteremia score, and ICU level of care (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–3.45; Table 2). Figure 2 shows an IPW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curve depicting vital status at 14 days for patients receiving empiric PTZ compared with empiric carbapenem therapy. The distribution of PTZ MICs were as follows: 2μg/ml (1%), 4μg/ml (39%), 8μg/ml (46%), and 16μg/ml (14%).
  12. All fully reversible
  13. Patients were screened for enrollment in 26 hospitals in 9 countries (Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Italy, Turkey, Lebanon, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and Canada) from February 2014 to July 2017
  14. The Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) is widely used in infectious disease research as a severity of acute illness index. It ranges from 0 to 14 points, with a score ≥4 commonly used as an indicator of critical illness and increased risk of death [9]. 
  15. Meropenem, 1 g, was administered every 8 hours intravenously. Piperacillin-tazobactam, 4.5 g, was administered every 6 hours intravenously. Each dose of study drug was infused over 30 minutes. Study drug was administered for a minimum of 4 calendar days after randomization and up to 14 days, with the total duration of therapy determined by the treating clinician. Dose adjustment for renal impairment was made according to criteria specified in the trial protocol. The treating clinicians and investigators were not blinded to the treatment allocation All patients had a blood culture collected at day 3 after randomization or on any other day if febrile (temperature >38°C) up to day 5. Patients were followed up for 30 days after randomization, by telephone call if the patient was discharged from hospital. All patients had baseline clinical and demographic data recorded, as well as any antibiotics given up to 48 hours prior to initial positive blood culture and for 30 days after randomization. Clinical data were recorded daily from day of initial positive blood culture until day 5 after randomization (with day 1 being the day of randomization, which had to occur within 72 hours of initial blood culture collection) (eTable 1 in Supplement 2). On day 5, the primary treating team had the option to cease all antibiotics, continue the allocated agent or change to step-down therapy
  16. A data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) was established, comprising 2 independent infectious disease physicians with support provided by an independent statistician. Interim analyses were performed after the first 50, 150, and 340 patients completed the 30-day follow-up period. The predefined stopping rule for superiority was a statistically significant difference (at a significance level of P < .001) in primary outcome
  17. The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included (1) time to clinical and microbiologic resolution of infection, defined as the number of days from randomization to resolution of fever (temperature >38.0°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >12 000/μL; to convert to ×109 /L, multiply by 0.001) plus sterilization of blood cultures; (2) clinical and microbiologic success at day 4 after randomization, defined as survival plus resolution of fever and leukocytosis plus sterilization of blood cultures; (3) microbiologic resolution of infection, defined as sterility of blood cultures collected on or before day 4 after randomization; (4) relapsed bloodstream infection, defined as growth of the same organism as in the original blood culture after the end of the period of study drug administration but before day 30 after randomization; and (5) secondary infection with ameropenem- or piperacillintazobactam–resistant organism or Clostridium difficile infection, defined as growth of a meropenem- or piperacillintazobactam–resistant gram-negative organism from any clinical specimen collected from day 4 after randomization to day 30 or a positive C difficile stool test in the setting of diarrhea. Adverse events were documented for each study group. Other BSI events (caused by organisms other than E coli or Klebsiella spp) were also recorded up to 30 days. For anymissing repeated variable used to define clinical resolution (eg, daily white blood cell count), the last observation was carried forward until a new observation was recorded. A 5%noninferioritymarginwas chosen as the maximal difference in mortality between treatments that would be clinically acceptable, by consultation with infectious disease, critical care, and clinical trial specialists of the Australasian Society for Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network involved in the protocol development
  18. Following theDSMBreview at 340 patients enrolled, a difference in the primary outcome was observed, at a significance level approximating the prespecified stopping rule (P = .004). As such, the DSMB recommended temporary suspension of the study on July 8, 2017, pending analysis once all 391 randomizedpatientshadcompleted30-day follow-up. This analysis showed that completing full enrollment was highly unlikely to demonstrate noninferiority of piperacillintazobactam. If the mortality rate observed in the piperacillintazobactam group at the interim analysis were to remain unchanged, it would have required a mortality rate greater than 43% in the meropenem group to conclude noninferiority at the 5%threshold Even if mortality dropped to 6%in the piperacillin-tazobactam group, mortality greater than 34%in the meropenem group would be necessary. A decision to terminate the study on the grounds ofharmand futility wasmade by the study management team, after discussionwith site investigators, onAugust 10, 2017. This decision was made independently from the DSMB.
  19. * 18-36 months after dx
  20. Also confirmed in the per protocol analysis
  21. * 18-36 months after dx
  22. * 18-36 months after dx
  23. All fully reversible