Russian Call Girls South Delhi 9711199171 discount on your booking
ASandler Patient Case Presentation_OK_ESBL bacteremia.pptx
1. Can We Spare ‘Em?
Exploring a Carbapenem-Sparing
Strategy in ESBL Bacteremia
Anna Sandler, PharmD Candidate, 2023
1
2. Learning Objectives
Review the mechanism of beta lactamases and
common organisms that may harbor them.
Describe the current treatment of extended-
spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) bacteremia
infections.
Evaluate literature and apply findings to a patient
case.
2
3. Patient case: OK is not Okay
OK is an 88-year old female presenting from a nursing home with a
chief complaint of abdominal pain and altered mental status that
were first noticed a few days ago. In the emergency department (ED)
the patient is disoriented and tachycardic.
What are some things you
would like to know?
What labs do you want to
run?
08.30.2022 08.31.2022 Future?
4. Patient case: OK is not Okay
• GERD
PTA VS
PMH Labs
4
• HTN
• HLD
• Dementia
• Hypothyroidism
• Levothyroxine 88
mcg PO daily
• Donepezil 10 mg
PO QHS
• Lisinopril 20 mg
PO daily
• Metoprolol tartrate
12.5 mg PO BID
• Temp: 100.9°F
• HR: 127
• RR: 22
• BP: 93/62
• SpO₂ 98%
• Na: 136
• K: 3.9
• Glucose: 470
• SCr: 0.68
• CrCl= 45
• AST: 33
• ALT: 24
• WBC: 22.3
OK is an 88-year old female presenting from a nursing home with a
chief complaint of abdominal pain and altered mental status that
were first noticed a few days ago. In the emergency department the
patient is disoriented and tachycardic.
What is your
differential at
this point?
08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
5. Patient case: OK is not Okay
• GERD
ID history CTA
UA CXR
5
The ED physician orders urine and blood cultures. The patient
presents similarly to her previous bacteremia infection, so empiric
coverage with meropenem is started and ID is consulted.
What would you
like to know before
we start empiric
antibiotics?
08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
• Leukocytes (+)
• Leukocyte
esterase (trace)
• Nitrite (-)
• Bacteria (few)
• ESBL bacteremia
secondary to
pyelonephritis
(1/2022)
• Negative • Negative
6. Patient case: OK is not Okay
• GERD
ID hx 1/2022 course
UA 8/30/2022 cxs
6
The ID physician is working really hard to be a good steward and
reduce development of resistance to carbapenems. He is considering
switching the patient to piperacillin/tazobactam since it is active
against ESBLs, but consults you as the pharmacist just in case.
08.30.2022 09.02.2022 Future?
• Leukocytes (+)
• Leukocyte
esterase (trace)
• Nitrite (-)
• Bacteria (few)
• ESBL
bacteremia
secondary to
pyelonephritis
(2/2021)
• Treated with
meropenem 500
mg Q8H X 10
days
• Blood: E. coli
• Urine: E. coli
• (+) ST131 and
CTX-M
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html,
accessed September 13, 2022
8. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
8
ESBL-producing organisms: a global
health concern
• Commonly produced by gram negative
rod bacteria: Enterobacterales family
(ESBL GNRs)
• ESBL GNRs spread rapidly, may
complicate infections, and even pass on
resistance
• 2017: > 197,000 hospitalized patients;
>9,000 deaths
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html,
accessed September 13, 2022
Yearly
total cases
Year
9. 9
A Review of Beta Lactam Pharmacology
Tmedweb. https://tmedweb.tulane.edu/pharmwiki/doku.php/betalactam_pharm. Accessed September 13, 2022
Bind penicillin
binding proteins
(PBP)
Inactivate
transpeptidase
Inhibition of
cross-linking
Interruption of
cell wall
synthesis
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
10. 10
Beta lactam resistance: Beta Lactamases
Bioscience Notes. https://www.biosciencenotes.com/extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases-esbls/.
Accessed September 13, 2022
Pngitem. https://www.pngitem.com/middle/immJhbR_two-teams-tug-of-war-hd-png-download/
Accessed September 13, 2022
• Beta lactamases hydrolyze the
beta lactam ring, a core
structural feature needed to bind
to PBPs
• Common enzyme: CTX-M-15
• Risk factors:
• Receipt of antibiotics within last 30-
days
• Residence in a nursing home
• Chronic renal failure
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
11. 11
Mechanisms of Resistance
Penicillins BLBLIs Cephalosporins Carbapenems
Penicillinases and
beta lactamases
X
ESBLs X * X
Carbapenemase X * X X
Organism
ESBLs • Eschiera Coli
• Klebsiella spp.
• Serratia
• Proteus
• Citrobacter
Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. UpToDate. Accessed
September 13, 2022
Tamma and Rodriguez-Bano (2017), Clin Infect Disease. 2017
Apr 1; 64 (7): 972-980. Accessed September 13, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
* Beta lactam/beta
lactamase inhibitors
(BLBLIs):
• Piperacillin/tazobactam
• Amoxicillin/clavulanate
• Ceftazidime/avibactam
Used in serine carbapenemase-
resistant organisms (CREs)
12. 12
Pathogenesis of ESBL blood stream
infections
Entry
Failure of host
immune
response
Colonization,
Replication,
Spread
• Evasion
• Compromised
immune system
• Hospitals
• Catheters
• Post-op
• If not cleared
spontaneously from
the bloodstream
Smith DA and Nehring SM. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed September 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
13. Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis
•Respiratory
•Hepatic
•Cardiovascular
•CNS
•Renal
Sepsis and Organ dysfunction
•Hypotension and fever
Vitals
•Disorientation
•Signs and symptoms associated with underlying source
(e.g., flank pain in a UTI)
Other
13
UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gram-negative-bacillary-bacteremia-in adults
Accessed September 13, 2022
Diagnosis:
• Non-susceptibility to
ceftriaxone (MIC ≥2
mcg/mL) as a proxy
• Detection of genes
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
15. 15
Current Treatment of ESBL infections
ESBL infections
Cystitis
Complicated
Carbapenem
Fluoroquinolone
TMP/SMX
Uncomplicated
TMP/SMX
Nitrofurantoin
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
Other Carbapenem Oral step down therapy*
* Oral step down therapy with fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX may be reasonable if susceptibility is demonstrated, patient is
hemodynamically stable, and source control measures have occurred
Tamma PD et al. 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
16. 16
Current Treatment of ESBL infections
ESBL infections
Cystitis
Complicated
Carbapenem
Fluoroquinolone
TMP/SMX
Uncomplicated
TMP/SMX
Nitrofurantoin
Amoxicillin/clavulanate
Other Carbapenem Oral step down therapy*
• Oral step down therapy with fluoroquinolones and TMP/SMX may be reasonable if susceptibility is demonstrated, patient is
hemodynamically stable, and source control measures have occurred
Tamma PD et al. 2021. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
20. PK ADRs
• Administered as an
IV infusion
• Most cases: 500 mg
Q6H over 30 min
• Critically ill: 1 gm
Q8H over 3 hours
• CNS or MIC > 2: 2
gm Q8H over 3
hours
Dosing, Administration
20
• Time to peak: ~1
hour (tissues); CSF:
2-3 hours
• Adult Vd: 15-20 L
• Protein binding:
~2%
• Adult t1/2: 1 hour
• Renally excreted
(70%)
• CNS toxicity:
seizures, delirium
• C. diff
• Hypersensitivity
reactions
Meropenem (Merrem (®)
Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing
Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019.
Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
21. 21
Antibiotic Therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae
Bacteremia: Implications of Production
of Extended-Spectrum b-Lactamases
David L. Paterson, Wen-Chien Ko, Anne Von Gottberg et al. 2004
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
22. 22
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
•> 6 years old
•Positive blood cultures for K. pneumonia
Inclusion Criteria
•Prospective, observational study performed in 12 hospitals
•South Africa, Taiwan, Australia, Argentina, USA,
Belgium, Turkey
•Univariate and Multivariate analyses
Design
• Carbapenem therapy versus other antibiotics and 14-day
mortality
Interventions and Outcome
23. Results-Baseline Characteristics
Characteristic
Carbapenem
(n=42)
Non-carbapenem (n=29) P
Male no. (%) 28 (66.7) 14 (48.3) 0.15
Pneumonia no. (%) 9 (21.4) 7 (24.1) 0.79
Intra-abdominal no. (%) 6 (14.3) 10 (34.5) 0.08
UTI no. (%) 8 (19.0) 2 (6.9) 0.18
ICU admission no. (%) 15 (35.7) 13 (44.8) 0.47
Any immunocompromise
no. (%)
24 (57.1) 7 (24.1) 0.006
Previous LOS (median
days)
11.5 15.0 0.16
25
• Total of 455 episodes of K. pneumonia bacteremia
• ESBL-bacteremia: 85 (18.7%)
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
24. Results-Antibiotic use and Outcomes
26
• A total of 20 out of the 85 ESBL cases died within 14 days
• Use of carbapenem therapy* (mainly imipenem) associated
with significantly lower 14 day mortality due to ESBL-
producing K. pneumoniae
Primary
outcome
Carbapenem
therapy
Non-Carbapenem
therapy
OR (95% CI)
14-day
mortality
2 (4.8%) 8 (27.6) 0.173 (0.039-
0.755); P= 0.012)
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
* Either monotherapy or
combination therapy in 5-day
period after first blood xz
25. Strengths and Weaknesses
28
• Observational trial
• Confounding variables
• Only evaluated K.
pneumoniae bacteremia
• Combination and
sequential carbapenem
therapies
• Multicenter and
international
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
27. 30
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Carbapenem Therapy Is Associated With Improved
Survival Compared With Piperacillin-Tazobactam for
Patients With Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase
Bacteremia
Pranita D. Tamma, Jennifer H. Han, Clare Rock et al. 2015
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
28. 31
•Determine impact of empiric piperacillin/tazobactam (PTZ)
treatment compared with empiric carbapenem treatment
before carbapenem definitive treatment on 14-day
mortality in patients with an ESBL bacteremia
Objective
•Single-center, retrospective trial
•John Hopkin’s Hospital 2007-2014
•Cox-Proportional Hazards Model
Design
• Empiric PTZ versus carbapenem prior to definitive
carbapenem
Intervention
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
30. Results
34
Characteristic Multivariable analysis
Adjusted HR 95% CI, P value
PTZ 1.92 1.07-3.45; P=
0.03
14-day mortality
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
• 17 deaths (17%) in PTZ group, 9
(8%) in the carbapenem group
PTZ
Carbapenem
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
31. Strengths and Weaknesses
35
• Retrospective study
• Only looked at empiric
therapy
• Single-center
• Data from > 7 years
• Data from > 7 years
Tamma PD, et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
33. Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs.
Meropenem on 30-day Mortality for
Patients with E. Coli or Klebsiella
pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and
Ceftriaxone Resistance
Patrick N.A. Harris; Paul A. Tambyah; David C. Lye et al.
2018
37
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
34. 38
•Evaluate the effect of a carbapenem-sparing regimen for
bloodstream infections caused by ceftriaxone or cefotaxime-
non-susceptible E. coli or Klebsiella spp.
Objective
•International, multicenter, open-label, non-inferiority
randomized controlled trial
Design
• Piperacillin/tazobactam versus meropenem
Intervention
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
35. •≥ 18 years old
•≥ One positive blood culture not susceptible to ceftriaxone
or cefotaxime but susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam
Inclusion Criteria
•Allergy to either antibiotic
•Expected survival ≤ 96 hours
Exclusion Criteria
39
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
36. Randomization with stratification
40
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Randomization
E. coli
Pip/tazo
meropenem
Klebsiella spp.
Pip/tazo
meropenem
Strata:
• Infecting organism
• Source of infection (urine or other)
• Severity of disease
1:1
1:1
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
37. 41
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Timeline
Follow 30 days after randomization
Treatment X 4-14 days, daily clinical monitoring
Piperacillin/tazobactam 4.5 g IV
Q6H
Meropenem 1 g IV Q8H
Randomization
Everyone
Blood cxs: day 3 or if
febrile day 5
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
38. Outcome Description Statistical Test
Primary • All cause mortality at 30 days post
randomization
Secondary • Time to clinical and microbiologic
resolution
• Clinical and microbiologic success at
day 4
• Relapsed bloodstream infection
Outcomes-Efficacy
14%/10%
mortality in
control/study
Noninferiority
margin: 5%
454
patients 80% power
43
Harris et al.2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
• Population= per
protocol (≥ 1 dose)
• Tests: Proportion
analyses risk
difference + 1-sided
97.5% CI
Non-inferiority=
Upper bounds of
97.5% CI < 5%
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
44. Results-Safety
49
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
• Meropenem: 3/191 (1.6%)
Serious Adverse Event Association to study drug? Treatment group
Rash requiring cessation of drug Yes Pip/tazo
Renal dysfunction requiring
cessation of drug
Yes Pip/tazo
Dyspnea, fever/chills/ malaise,
neg. cx
Possibly Pip/tazo
Upper limb venous thrombosis No Pip/tazo
Readmission with colitis Possibly Pip/tazo
Serious AEs
• Piperacillin/tazobactam: 5/188 (2.7%)
No fatal AEs
linked to either
study drug
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
45. Strengths and Weaknesses
50
• Multicenter
• Randomization with
stratification
• Similar infectious
source and organism
to patient OK
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
• Prior empiric treatment with
meropenem or pip/tazo
• Lower representation of older
individuals
• Few comorbidities represented
• Low high-risk disease
representation
• Unblinded
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
46. Conclusions
51
Pip/tazo not recommended
DSMB
Primary
+ per
protocol
X non-
inferior.
Researchers
• Definitive treatment with
piperacillin/tazobactam did not
result in noninferior 30-day
mortality
• Findings do not support use of
pip/tazo in ESBL bacteremia
Presenter
• Results of this trial are consistent
with prior observations and confirm
that carbapenems should currently
be the mainstay of gram-negative,
ESBL bacteremia infections.
Harris et al. 2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
47. Here we go again: OK is not Okay
• GERD
ID hx 1/2022 course
UA 8/30/2022 cxs
52
The ID physician is working really hard to be a good steward and
reduce development of resistance to carbapenems. He is considering
switching the patient to piperacillin/tazobactam since it is active
against ESBLs, but consults you as the pharmacist just in case.
• Leukocytes (+)
• Leukocyte
esterase (trace)
• Nitrite (-)
• Bacteria (few)
• ESBL
bacteremia
secondary to
pyelonephritis
(2/2021)
• Treated with
meropenem 500
mg Q8H X 10
days
• Blood: E. coli
• Urine: E. coli
• (+) ST131 and
CTX-M
• MIC meropenem
< 2 mcg/mL
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL.html,
accessed September 13, 2022
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
49. 54
Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019.
Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Yahav D et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(7). Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Meropenem 500 mg IV
Q8H infused over 30 min X
7-14 days
MIC < 2,
CrCl 45
Uncomplicated
Not
critically
ill
What will help us guide
duration?
When do we consider
increased dosing/extended
infusion?
What do we need to monitor
?
Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
50. Background Previous trials MERINO Conclusions
Predicting the Future
Antibiotic(s) Trial Info
• Piperacillin/tazobactam
• Meropenem
PETERPEN trial: PipEracillin
Tazobactam Versus
mERoPENem for Treatment of
Bloodstream Infections Caused
by Cephalosporin-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae
• Recruiting, estimated
completion date: April 2024
• Randomized, controlled open-
label trial
• Non-inferiority study
Promising in-vitro /post-hoc
studies: Ceftazidime-avibactam
Ceftolozane-tazobactam
Eravacycline
Farrell DJ, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013
Dec;57(12):6305-10.
Levasseur P, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015
Apr;59(4):1931-4.
52. 57
1. Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Sader HS, Jones RN. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas
aeruginosa with various resistance patterns isolated in U.S. Hospitals (2011-2012). Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Dec;57(12):6305-10. doi:
10.1128/AAC.01802-13. Epub 2013 Oct 7. PMID: 24100499; PMCID: PMC3837887.
2. Bitterman R, Paul M, Leibovici L, Mussini C. PipEracillin Tazobactam Versus mERoPENem for Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by
Cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (PETERPEN). Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03671967
3. Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. Published online April 2019.
4. Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC, et al. Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella
pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;320(10):984-994. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.12163
5. Levasseur P, Girard AM, Miossec C, Pace J, Coleman K. In vitro antibacterial activity of the ceftazidime-avibactam combination against
enterobacteriaceae, including strains with well-characterized β-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Apr;59(4):1931-4. doi:
10.1128/AAC.04218-14. Epub 2015 Jan 12. PMID: 25583732; PMCID: PMC4356809
6. Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Antibiotic therapy for Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia: implications of production of extended-spectrum
beta-lactamases. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. doi:10.1086/420816
7. Smith DA, Nehring SM. Bacteremia. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Accessed September 19, 2022.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441979/
8. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of
Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa). Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):e169-e183. doi:10.1093/cid/ciaa1478
9. Tamma PD, Han JH, Rock C, et al. Carbapenem Therapy Is Associated With Improved Survival Compared With Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Patients
With Extended-Spectrum -Lactamase Bacteremia. Clinical Infectious Diseases. Published online January 13, 2015:civ003. doi:10.1093/cid/civ003
10. Tamma PD, Rodriguez-Bano J. The Use of Noncarbapenem β-Lactams for the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Infections. Clin Infect Dis.
2017;64(7):972-980. doi:10.1093/cid/cix034
11.Yahav D, Franceschini E, Koppel F, et al. Seven Versus 14 Days of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Gram-negative Bacteremia: A Noninferiority
Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69(7):1091-1098. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy1054
12.Fehrenbacher L, VLRavenna. AAH Adult Meropenem Dosing Strategy. AAH antimicrobial Stewardship Programs 2019. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
References
54. 59
Appendix
Paterson DL, Ko WC, Von Gottberg A, et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(1):31-37. Accessed Sep 19, 2022.
Univariate analysis in
Paterson et al. 2004
55. 60
Appendix
Harris et al.2018. JAMA. 2018 Sep;320(10):984-994. Accessed September 10, 2022
Stratification in
MERINO trial
56. Can We Spare ‘Em?
Exploring a Carbapenem-Sparing
Strategy in ESBL Bacteremia
Anna Sandler, PharmD Candidate, 2023
61
Editor's Notes
The incidence of ESBL-E identified in bacterial cultures in the United States increased by 53% from 2012 to 2017, in large part due to increased community-acquired infections [6]. ESBLs are enzymes that inactivate most penicillins, cephalosporins, and aztreonam. EBSL-E generally remain susceptible to carbapenems. ESBLs do not inactivate non-β-lactam agents (e.g., ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, gentamicin). However, organisms carrying ESBL genes often harbor additional genes or mutations in genes that mediate resistance to a broad range of antibiotics.
Rather, non-susceptibility to ceftriaxone (i.e., ceftriaxone minimum inhibitory concentrations [MICs] ≥2 mcg/mL), is often used as a proxy for ESBL production, although this threshold has limitations with specificity as organisms not susceptible to ceftriaxone for reasons other than ESBL production may be falsely presumed to be ESBL-producers [16, 17]. For this guidance document, ESBL-E will refer to presumed or confirmed ESBL-producing E. coli, K. pneumoniae, K. oxytoca, or P. mirabilis. Treatment recommendations for ESBL-E infections listed below assume that in vitro activity of preferred and alternative antibiotics has been demonstrated.
The role of oral step-down therapy for ESBL-E infections outside of the urinary tract has not been formally evaluated. However, oral step-down therapy has been shown to be a reasonable treatment consideration for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections, including those caused by antimicrobial-resistant isolates, after appropriate clinical milestones are achieved [46, 47]. Based on the known bioavailability and sustained serum concentrations of oral fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, these agents should be treatment considerations for patients with ESBL-E infections if (1) susceptibility to one of these agents is demonstrated, (2) the patient is hemodynamically stable, (3) reasonable source control measures have occurred, and (4) concerns about insufficient intestinal absorption are not present [5].
Clinicians should avoid oral step-down to nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, doxycycline, or omadacycline for ESBL-E bloodstream infections. Nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin achieve poor serum concentrations [40, 41]. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and doxycycline achieve unreliable serum concentrations [33, 48]. Omadacycline is a tetracycline derivative with an oral formulation that may exhibit activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates but has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile [49, 50]. Until more clinical data are available investigating omadacycline’s role for the treatment of ESBL-E infections, the panel recommends against its use for this indication.
The role of oral step-down therapy for ESBL-E infections outside of the urinary tract has not been formally evaluated. However, oral step-down therapy has been shown to be a reasonable treatment consideration for Enterobacterales bloodstream infections, including those caused by antimicrobial-resistant isolates, after appropriate clinical milestones are achieved [46, 47]. Based on the known bioavailability and sustained serum concentrations of oral fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, these agents should be treatment considerations for patients with ESBL-E infections if (1) susceptibility to one of these agents is demonstrated, (2) the patient is hemodynamically stable, (3) reasonable source control measures have occurred, and (4) concerns about insufficient intestinal absorption are not present [5].
Clinicians should avoid oral step-down to nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, doxycycline, or omadacycline for ESBL-E bloodstream infections. Nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin achieve poor serum concentrations [40, 41]. Amoxicillin-clavulanate and doxycycline achieve unreliable serum concentrations [33, 48]. Omadacycline is a tetracycline derivative with an oral formulation that may exhibit activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales isolates but has an unfavorable pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile [49, 50]. Until more clinical data are available investigating omadacycline’s role for the treatment of ESBL-E infections, the panel recommends against its use for this indication.
Multivariate analysis was performed using variables (primarily
severity-of-illness markers) that were determined to be
associated with all-cause death at 14 days after the first positive
blood culture result by univariate analysis (table 2). In multivariate
analysis, we used the following variables: carbapenem
use during the 5-day period after the first blood culture positive
for K. pneumoniae, accommodation in an ICU at the time of
bacteremia, and severity of illness (as measured by the Pitt
bacteremia score). Carbapenem use was independently associated
with decreased mortality (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.65;
Pp.017) (table 3). Three additional multivariate analyses,
which used variables found on univariate analysis to be associated
with 28-day all-cause mortality and 14- and 28-day mortality
thought to be due to K. pneumoniae bacteremia, also
showed that carbapenem use was independently associated with
decreased mortality (table 3).
* 18-36 months after dx
Predictors of mortality associated with ESBL-producing
K. pneumoniae bacteremia. For patients who received an
antibiotic active in vitro against the ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae
strains, factors significantly associated with death due
to ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae bacteremia by univariate
analysis included accommodation in an ICU at the time of
bacteremia (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.4–26.8; Pp.0109) and increased
severity of illness, as determined by the Pitt bacteremia
score (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1–2.0; Pp.006
Multivariate analysis was performed using variables (primarily
severity-of-illness markers) that were determined to be
associated with all-cause death at 14 days after the first positive
blood culture result by univariate analysis (table 2). In multivariate
analysis, we used the following variables: carbapenem
use during the 5-day period after the first blood culture positive
for K. pneumoniae, accommodation in an ICU at the time of
bacteremia, and severity of illness (as measured by the Pitt
bacteremia score). Carbapenem use was independently associated
with decreased mortality (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01–0.65;
Pp.017) (table 3). Three additional multivariate analyses,
which used variables found on univariate analysis to be associated
with 28-day all-cause mortality and 14- and 28-day mortality
thought to be due to K. pneumoniae bacteremia, also
showed that carbapenem use was independently associated with
decreased mortality (table 3).
All fully reversible
We developed a multivariable logistic regression model to estimate a propensity score for each patient's likelihood of receiving empiric PTZ therapy. Covariates included to generate the propensity score included the following: age, Pitt bacteremia score, ICU level care, profound neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤100 µg/mL), source of infection, underlying medical conditions, and immunocompromised status. A patient who received PTZ empirically was weighted by the inverse of the probability that he or she would be treated with PTZ, and a patient who received a carbapenem empirically was weighted by the inverse of the probability that he or she would be treated with a carbapenem, equivalent to 1 minus his or her propensity score. An IPW model can be unduly influenced by extreme weights assigned to patients with a low probability of getting the prescribed treatment. Therefore, stabilized IPWs were created by multiplying the marginal probability of treatment assignment by the IPW. The performance of the propensity model was assessed by comparing baseline characteristics in the 2 treatment groups after applying the stabilized IPW. Baseline characteristics were summarized as percentages or means with standard deviations for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Comparisons between the treatment groups were made using the Student t test for continuous variables and the Pearson χ2 test for categorical variables.
There were 17 deaths (17%) in the PTZ group and 9 deaths (8%) in the carbapenem group within 14 days of the first positive blood culture. Covariates independently associated with a higher risk of death by day 14 included higher Pitt bacteremia scores and ICU-level care needed on day 1 of bacteremia. There was a 1.92 times increased risk of death by day 14 for patients receiving empiric PTZ compared with patients receiving empiric carbapenems, adjusting for age, Pitt bacteremia score, and ICU level of care (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07–3.45; Table 2). Figure 2 shows an IPW-adjusted Kaplan–Meier curve depicting vital status at 14 days for patients receiving empiric PTZ compared with empiric carbapenem therapy. The distribution of PTZ MICs were as follows: 2μg/ml (1%), 4μg/ml (39%), 8μg/ml (46%), and 16μg/ml (14%).
All fully reversible
Patients were screened for enrollment in 26 hospitals in 9 countries (Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Italy, Turkey, Lebanon, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and Canada) from February 2014 to July 2017
The Pitt bacteremia score (PBS) is widely used in infectious disease research as a severity of acute illness index. It ranges from 0 to 14 points, with a score ≥4 commonly used as an indicator of critical illness and increased risk of death [9].
Meropenem, 1 g, was administered every 8 hours intravenously. Piperacillin-tazobactam, 4.5 g, was administered every 6 hours intravenously. Each dose of study drug was infused over 30 minutes. Study drug was administered for a minimum of 4 calendar days after randomization and up to 14 days, with the total duration of therapy determined by the treating clinician. Dose adjustment for renal impairment was made according to criteria specified in the trial protocol. The treating clinicians and investigators were not blinded to the treatment allocation
All patients had a blood culture collected at day 3 after randomization or on any other day if febrile (temperature >38°C) up to day 5. Patients were followed up for 30 days after randomization, by telephone call if the patient was discharged from hospital. All patients had baseline clinical and demographic data recorded, as well as any antibiotics given up to 48 hours prior to initial positive blood culture and for 30 days after randomization. Clinical data were recorded daily from day of initial positive blood culture until day 5 after randomization (with day 1 being the day of randomization, which had to occur within 72 hours of initial blood culture collection) (eTable 1 in Supplement 2). On day 5, the primary treating team had the option to cease all antibiotics, continue the allocated agent or change to step-down therapy
A data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) was established, comprising 2 independent infectious disease physicians with support provided by an independent statistician. Interim analyses were performed after the first 50, 150, and 340 patients completed the 30-day follow-up period. The predefined stopping rule for superiority was a statistically significant difference (at a significance level of P < .001) in primary outcome
The primary efficacy outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included (1) time to clinical and microbiologic resolution of infection, defined as the number of days from randomization to resolution of fever (temperature >38.0°C) and leukocytosis (white blood cell count >12 000/μL; to convert to ×109 /L, multiply by 0.001) plus sterilization of blood cultures; (2) clinical and microbiologic success at day 4 after randomization, defined as survival plus resolution of fever and leukocytosis plus sterilization of blood cultures; (3) microbiologic resolution of infection, defined as sterility of blood cultures collected on or before day 4 after randomization; (4) relapsed bloodstream infection, defined as growth of the same organism as in the original blood culture after the end of the period of study drug administration but before day 30 after randomization; and (5) secondary infection with ameropenem- or piperacillintazobactam–resistant organism or Clostridium difficile infection, defined as growth of a meropenem- or piperacillintazobactam–resistant gram-negative organism from any clinical specimen collected from day 4 after randomization to day 30 or a positive C difficile stool test in the setting of diarrhea. Adverse events were documented for each study group. Other BSI events (caused by organisms other than E coli or Klebsiella spp) were also recorded up to 30 days. For anymissing repeated variable used to define clinical resolution (eg, daily white blood cell count), the last observation was carried forward until a new observation was recorded.
A 5%noninferioritymarginwas chosen as the maximal difference in mortality between treatments that would be clinically acceptable, by consultation with infectious disease, critical care, and clinical trial specialists of the Australasian Society for Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network involved in the protocol development
Following theDSMBreview at 340 patients enrolled, a difference
in the primary outcome was observed, at a significance
level approximating the prespecified stopping rule
(P = .004). As such, the DSMB recommended temporary suspension
of the study on July 8, 2017, pending analysis once all
391 randomizedpatientshadcompleted30-day follow-up. This
analysis showed that completing full enrollment was highly
unlikely to demonstrate noninferiority of piperacillintazobactam.
If the mortality rate observed in the piperacillintazobactam
group at the interim analysis were to remain
unchanged, it would have required a mortality rate greater
than 43% in the meropenem group to conclude noninferiority
at the 5%threshold
Even if mortality dropped to 6%in the
piperacillin-tazobactam group, mortality greater than 34%in
the meropenem group would be necessary. A decision to terminate
the study on the grounds ofharmand futility wasmade
by the study management team, after discussionwith site investigators,
onAugust 10, 2017. This decision was made independently
from the DSMB.