2. My Understanding about QR
My Belief in QR
Characteristics of QR
My own thesis
3. It demands art of writing
It requires peaceful and concentration of mind
QR could be flexible in the sense of inquiry :
emergent inquiry, contemporary inquiry and
natural setting
QR could be mindfulness thinking
QR could be capacity for listening rather than
questioning.
Researcher relies on views of research participant
perspectives
4. Emphasis on subjective dimensions of human
experiences on the base of context
Regular journal writing or dairy writing
Mental image that someone knowing has been filtered
through their experiences = mental framework.
Opinions are foundation of qualitative research.
Likewise impression and perceptions.
Opinion with subjectivity.
.)
QR focuses on understanding what people’s beliefs are because this helps
us get how they perceive, what we are studying and where their opinion
may come from
5. Real world setting
Researcher Plays an important role
Understanding of different methods
Participants meanings
Flexible
Reflexivity
Data analysis and interpretation
6. Transcribe word by word
Consider non verbal expressions
Transcribing could be done by researcher
Patience and time consuming
11. Virtual reality could be described as an immersion
technology.
Learners could be presented with the virtual learning
environment and learning takes place without the
boundary wall.
Immersion which means that learners would not feel
isolated because of their frequent connection with the
tutor, admin, and peers via technology and simulated
with an artificial presence.
Radianti, Majchrzak, Fromm, and Wohlgenannt (2020)
12. Interaction is concerned with making connection with
tutors and the learners for their academic enhancement
with the virtual space.
Involvement: It talks about the presence of participant
in the virtual world
13. It is not an absolute thing I would find it out there.
As a researcher following the interpretive paradigm,
I believe in the knowledge and understanding
rooted in our everyday world.
peoples’ experiences while encountering
their everyday experiences with word
paving the path for the truth and understanding
of bond.
14. Epistemology: the premises of sources and possibilities
about the knowing of the knowledge
It explains the possibilities of building knowledge
through the research participants’ experiences and their
presentation of the narratives on the base of the
contextual environment.
I understand that reality and knowledge are interrelated
with each other and contribute to the development of
knowledge
(Vasilachis de Gialdino, 2011).
15. An individual's engagement, on the way to constructing
self-other meaning as a part of a particular social group,
Can be relational, representational, collaborative,
creative, and critical in nature.
Learners construct existing meaning of the phenomena
in the questions
Social engagement help them construct the
transformational meaning
(Rahaman 2014),
17. • Self engagement refers to learner
autonomy, like subject and instrument
• Social learning theory: To uncover the way
social setting and virtual pedagogy
=learners' autonomy
(Amineh & Asl, 2015)
• It is evident that access to ICT might have controlled the
learners limiting their autonomy on using them in their
context.
• Learners may have limited choice in constructing the mediated
instruction to manage in their own way to go further.
18. • Integration refers to the process of mixing,
intermingling, and incorporating ICTs terms of
dialogue for reaching a conclusion
(Vasudevaiah, 2016),
• Learning through a social lens helped me
develop a sense that learning is a form of
sharing.
• The shared knowledge through social
interaction (Hurst et al., 2013).
• Social presence would not appear if they were not the
presence of co-actors
• If there would be no active arguing and sharing using social
media like Viber or Skype; then there would not the social
presence. (Oh, Bailenson and Weilch 2018,).
19.
• Using ‘facilitation bridge’ for a strong connection
• Connecting tool as the ‘path’ which serves for required
learning materials and its pedagogy for the teachers and
the students
• Connection is more important to develop a meaningful
learning in the ODL mode of environment.
• It is true that ICT helps students and teachers as well as
managers to connect within themselves and with the world.
• There may be several problems faced by the students of the
developing world.
• The limited speed of the computers, problem of electricity, poor
working atmosphere, and low investment in ICT education may
hamper the connection through ICT
(Siddiquah, & Salim, 2017)
20. Critical Reflections
• Making linkage between the content and the
human content should drive in.
• Enrollment is about getting entry to the content
Leaning can be ubiquitous in the ODL mode
(Letseka and Pitsoe 2013)
• Integration of ICT has many advantages to support the
administration of ODL in higher education.
• However, there are certain constraints that may hinder the
facilitation from administration to the ODL students.
• The main concern is about the investment in ICT resources; in the
lack of such support the expected assistance from the
administration through ICT may not be possible.
• A well-established management information system requires
adequate resources to support the ODL; otherwise they will turn
again to the traditional manual system that is in practice in many
developing worlds (Qureshi, Zuhaib & Muhammad, 2016)
25. QR gives immense pleasure to me engaging in the
particular issue
QR requires to be able to interact with text rather than
number
QR always seeks to contextualize process
QR requires to come up with bird’s eye view
QR needs to establish oneself with Duck’s
concentration.
26. Being a facilitator of an ODL group,
Thought and perceptions are my drives.
Being a reflector in an ODL group,
Argue, debate, agree/ disagree are my perspectives.
Being an evaluator of the ODL group,
Observe, motivate and supports are my responsibilities.
Share, dear and near are components of my subjectivity.
Thus, ICT is a major facilitation bridge of interactivity.
27. Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social
Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9-16.
Hurst, B., Wallace, R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading
Horizons, 52(4), 375-398.
Oh, C. S., Bailenson, J. N., & Welch, G. F. (2018). A systematic review of social presence: Definition,
antecedents, and implications. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5(114), 1-35.
doi:10.3389/frobt.2018.00114
Qureshi, Z. H., & Qazi Abro, M. (2016). Efficient use of ICT in administration. International Journal of
Economics, Commerce and Management, 4(10), 540-550. Retrieved from http://ijecm.co.uk/
Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive
virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research
agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 1-29. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
Rahaman, H. (2014). The role of ICT in open and distance education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance
Education, 15(4), 162-169. doi:10.17718/tojde.47700
Siddiquah, A., & Salim, Z. (2017). The ICT facilities, skills, usage, and the problems faced by the students
of higher education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8),
4987-4994. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00977a
Vasilachis de Gialdino, I. (2011). Ontological and epistemological foundations of qualitative research.
Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(2). doi:10.17169/fqs-
10.2.1299
Vasudevaiah, G. (2016). Promoting usage of ICT in open and distance education programs. The I
nternational Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(3), 77-86.