Concert Review Rubric By the appropriate deadlines (see Course Syllabus) turn in Concert Reviews which will be graded using the following rubric. C ri te ri a Unacceptable 0 Points Needs Improvement 5 Acceptable 7 Points Good 9 Points Excellent 10 Points 1 P e rf o rm e rs Does not reference soloist or ensemble References both soloist, conductor and/or ensemble specifically but provides no name References both soloist, conductor and/or ensemble specifically but provides name of only one Includes name of soloist, conductor or ensemble but not both Includes names of all soloists, conductor(s) and ensembles 2 C o n te x t Provides no context for the performance Provides little context for the performance Provides some context for the performance Provides good context for the performance Provides clear context for the performance including time, place and reason for concert 3 M u si c D e sc ri p ti o n The text contains no musical description. The text contains limited facts and examples related to the topic. The text may fail to offer a conclusion. The text provides facts, definitions, details, quotations, and examples that attempt to develop and explain the topic. The conclusion merely restates the development. The text provides relevant facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, and examples that develop and explain the topic. The conclusion ties to and supports the information/explanation. The text provides significant facts, definitions, concrete details, and examples that fully develop and explain the topic. The conclusion provides insight to the implications, explains the significance of the topic, and projects to the future, etc. 4 W ri te r’ s O p in io n The text does not contain a writer's opinion. The text contains an unclear opinion that suggests a vague position. The text attempts a structure and organization to support the position. The text introduces a an opinion but may not be supported by evidence of descriptions. The text has a structure and organization that is aligned with the claim. The text introduces an opinion that is clearly arguable and takes an identifiable position on the performance. The text has an effective structure and organization that is aligned with the claim. The text introduces a compelling opinion that is clearly arguable and takes a purposeful position on the performance. The report has a structure and organization that is carefully crafted to support the opinion. 5 Le n g th The text is significantly less than 400 words. The text is significantly more than 600 words. The text is a little less than 400 words. The text is a little more than 600 words. The text is between 400 and 600 words in length. 6 S tr u ct u re The text has no identifiable structure. The text ha ...

1. Concert Review Rubric
By the appropriate deadlines (see Course Syllabus) turn in
Concert Reviews which will
be graded using the following rubric.
C
ri
te
ri
a
Unacceptable
0 Points
Needs Improvement
5
Acceptable
7 Points
Good
9 Points
Excellent

2. 10 Points
1
P
e
rf
o
rm
e
rs
Does not reference soloist
or ensemble
References both soloist,
conductor and/or
ensemble specifically but
provides no name
References both
soloist, conductor and/or
ensemble specifically but
provides name of only one

3. Includes name of soloist,
conductor or ensemble but
not both
Includes names of all
soloists, conductor(s)
and ensembles
2
C
o
n
te
x
t
Provides no context for the
performance
Provides little context for
the performance
Provides some context for
the performance
Provides good context for

4. the performance
Provides clear context
for the performance
including time, place
and reason for concert
3
M
u
si
c
D
e
sc
ri
p
ti
o
n
The text contains no
musical description.
The text contains limited

5. facts and examples related
to the topic. The text may
fail to offer a conclusion.
The text provides facts,
definitions, details,
quotations, and examples
that attempt to develop and
explain the topic. The
conclusion merely restates
the development.
The text provides
relevant facts,
definitions, concrete
details, quotations, and
examples that develop
and explain the topic.
The conclusion ties to
and supports the

6. information/explanation.
The text provides
significant facts,
definitions, concrete
details, and examples
that fully develop and
explain the topic. The
conclusion provides
insight to the
implications, explains
the significance of the
topic, and projects to the
future, etc.
4 W
ri
te
r’
s
O

7. p
in
io
n
The text does not contain a
writer's opinion.
The text contains an
unclear opinion that
suggests a vague position.
The text attempts a
structure
and organization to
support the position.
The text introduces a an
opinion but may not be
supported by evidence of
descriptions.
The text has a
structure and organization

8. that is aligned with the
claim.
The text introduces an
opinion that is clearly
arguable and takes an
identifiable position on the
performance. The text has
an effective structure and
organization that is aligned
with the claim.
The text introduces a
compelling opinion that
is clearly arguable and
takes a purposeful
position on the
performance. The report
has a structure and
organization that is

9. carefully crafted to
support the opinion.
5
Le
n
g
th
The text is
significantly less than
400 words.
The text is significantly more
than 600 words.
The text is a little
less than 400 words.
The text is a little more than
600 words.
The text is between
400 and 600 words in
length.

10. 6
S
tr
u
ct
u
re
The text has no identifiable
structure.
The text has limited
structure which does not
facilitate communication
and comprehension.
The text has an emerging
formal structure which
attempts to facilitate
communication and
comprehension.
The text has a clear
structure which facilitates

11. communication and
comprehension.
The text has an excellent
formal structure which
facilitates
communication and
comprehension.
7
W
ri
ti
n
g
M
e
ch
a
n
ic
s
Text is unreadable due to

12. multiple inaccuracies in
Standard English
conventions of usage and
mechanics.
Text contains numerous
grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors. The
style of writing does not
facilitate effective
communication.
Text includes some
grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors that
distract the reader.
Text is largely free of
grammatical, spelling or
punctuation errors. The
style of writing

13. generally facilitates
communication.
Text is free of
grammatical, spelling
or punctuation errors.
The style of writing
facilitates
communication.
8
A
p
p
ro
p
ri
a
te
u
se
o
f

14. th
re
e
p
la
n
e
s
o
f
li
st
e
n
in
g
.
Does not utilize the three
planes of listening in the
review.
Text fails to demonstrates
a basic understanding of

15. the different planes of
listening. The review does
not contain elements from
all three planes of
listening.
Text demonstrates a basic
understanding of the
different planes of
listening. The review does
not contain elements from
all three planes of
listening.
Text demonstrates a clear
understanding of the
different planes of
listening. The review
contains elements from all
three planes, but particular

16. focus is not given to the
musical plane.
Text demonstrates a
clear understanding of
the different planes of
listening. The review
contains elements from
all three planes, but
particular focus is given
to the musical plane.
9
U
se
o
f
C
o
u
rs
e

17. T
e
rm
in
o
lo
g
y
a
n
d
A
p
p
ro
p
ri
a
te
W
ri
ti
n

18. g
S
ty
le
Text fails to use an
appropriate vocabulary
or tone.
The text illustrates a
limited or
inconsistent tone and
awareness of topic-
specific vocabulary.
The text illustrates an
emerging awareness of
formal tone and topic-
specific vocabulary.
The text presents a formal,
objective tone and uses

19. precise language and topic-
specific vocabulary to
manage the complexity of
the topic.
The text presents an
engaging, formal, and
objective tone and uses
sophisticated language
and topic- specific
vocabulary to manage
the complexity of the
topic.
10
S
e
lf
ie
a
n
d

20. /o
r
Selfie and scan of
program not included
Scan of selfie OR program
included but not both
Selfie and scan of
program included
MUSC 2101– Music Appreciation
Concert Reviews
lb.rep
by . .
Submission date: 02-Jul-2021 01:27PM (UTC-0400)
Submission ID: 1615010414
File name: Reducing_Medical_Errors,,,,,,,,,.............._1.docx
(33.07K)
Word count: 1735
Character count: 9878
1

21. 1
1
2
4
1
2
3
5
1
1
1
1
2
1
2

22. 2
1
1
1
1
33%
SIMILARITY INDEX
28%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
33%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 18%
2 12%
3 2%
4 1%
5 1%
Exclude quotes Off

23. Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches Off
lb.rep
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Adtalem Global Education
Student Paper
Submitted to Chamberlain College of Nursing
Student Paper
assignmentfreelancers.com
Internet Source
www.coursehero.com
Internet Source
Submitted to Sharda University
Student Paper
lb.rep
by . .
Submission date: 02-Jul-2021 01:27PM (UTC-0400)
Submission ID: 1615010414
File name: Reducing_Medical_Errors,,,,,,,,,.............._1.docx
(33.07K)
Word count: 1735

24. Character count: 9878
1
1
1
2
4
1
2
3
5
1
1
1
1
2

25. 1
2
2
1
1
1
1
33%
SIMILARITY INDEX
28%
INTERNET SOURCES
0%
PUBLICATIONS
33%
STUDENT PAPERS
1 18%
2 12%

26. 3 2%
4 1%
5 1%
Exclude quotes Off
Exclude bibliography On
Exclude matches Off
lb.rep
ORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to Adtalem Global Education
Student Paper
Submitted to Chamberlain College of Nursing
Student Paper
assignmentfreelancers.com
Internet Source
www.coursehero.com
Internet Source
Submitted to Sharda University
Student Paper
1
Week 6 Assignment: EBP Change Process form
ACE Star Model of Knowledge Transformation
Follow Nurse Daniel as your process mentor in the weekly

27. Illustration section of the lesson.Please do not use any of the
Nurse Daniel information for your own topic, nursing
intervention, or change project. Nurse Daniel serves as an
example only to illustrate the change process.
Name: _____________________
Star Point 1: Discovery (Identify topic and practice issue)
Identify the topic and the nursing practice issue related to this
topic. (This MUST involve a nursing practice issue.)
Briefly describe your rationale for your topic selection. Include
the scope of the issue/problem.
Star Point 2: Summary (Evidence to support need for a change)
Describe the practice problem in your own words and formulate
your PICOT question.
List the systematic review chosen from the CCN Library
databases. Type the complete APA reference for the systematic
review selected.

28. List and briefly describe other sources used for data and
information. List any other optional scholarly source used as a
supplement to the systematic review in APA format.
Briefly summarize the main findings (in your own words) from
the systematic review and the strength of the evidence.
Outline one or two evidence-based solutions you will consider
for the trial project.
Star Point 3: Translation (Action Plan)
Identify care standards, practice guidelines, or protocols that
may be in place to support your intervention planning (These
may come from your organization or from the other sources
listed in your Summary section in Star Point 2).
List your stakeholders (by title and not names; include yourself)
and describe their roles and responsibilities in the change
process (no more than 5).

29. What specifically is your nursing role in the change process?
Other nursing roles?
List your stakeholders by position titles (charge nurse,
pharmacist, etc.). Why are the members chosen (stakeholders)
important to your project?
What type of cost analysis will be needed prior to a trial? Who
needs to be involved with this?
Star Point 4: (Implementation)
Describe the process for gaining permission to plan and begin a
trial. Is there a specific group, committee, or nurse leader
involved?
Describe the plan for educating the staff about the change
process trial and how they will be impacted or asked to
participate.
Outline the implementation timeline for the change process

30. (start time/end time, what steps are to occur along the timeline).
List the measurable outcomesbased on the PICOT. How will
these be measured?
What forms, if any, might be used for recording purposes during
the pilot change process. Describe.
What resources are available to staff (include yourself) during
the change pilot?
Will there be meetings of certain stakeholders throughout the
trial? If so, who and when will they meet?
Star Point 5: (Evaluation)
How will you report the outcomes of the trial?
What would be the next steps for the use of the change process
information?
9.2019 Update. DLP
1

31. MUSC 2101 Concert Reviews
1. Overview
a. List all musicians who performed (if it is a group, you do not
have to list
individual musicians). Please remember to list all performers,
not just the
soloist(s)
b. Where did the concert take place?
c. When did the concert take place?
d. Why did this concert take place? Was it part of a tour? Was it
for educational
purposes? Was it a part of a larger concert season? etc…
2. Elements of Music
a. List any/all instruments being played during this concert
(including voice)
b. What type of music was being performed?
c. What kind of ensemble was on stage? Solo? Duet? Trio?
Quartet? Etc…
d. Describe the music being performed using terminology we
have discussed in

32. class.
3. Your opinion of the concert
a. What piece(s) did you like? Why?
b. What piece(s) did you not you like? Why?
c. Would you go again? Why/Why not?