Literature Evaluation Table  In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student's ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project. For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the "Literature Evaluation Table" resource to complete this assignment. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Attachments NRS-490-RS-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx RUBRIC Attempt Start Date: 16-Dec-2019 at 12:00:00 AM Due Date: 22-Dec-2019 at 11:59:59 PM Maximum Points: 75.0 Literature Evaluation Table - Rubric No of Criteria: 13 Achievement Levels: 5 CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory 0-71%0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%75.00 %Satisfactory 76-79%79.00 %Good 80-89%89.00 %Excellent 90-100%100.00 %Article Selection100.0     Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article5.0Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.Article Title and Year Published 5.0Article title and year published section is not included.Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks.

1. Literature Evaluation Table
In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of
research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being
able to articulate the information and successfully summarize
relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to
support the student's ability and confidence to further develop
and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that
constitute the components of the course change proposal
capstone project.
For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight
peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation
table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each
of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the
last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement
developed earlier in this course. The articles may include
quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies,
or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to
provide background information for the purpose or problem
identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the "Literature
Evaluation Table" resource to complete this assignment.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment,
solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and
references should be presented using APA documentation
guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located
in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to
beginning the assignment to become familiar with the
expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

2. Attachments
NRS-490-RS-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx
RUBRIC
Attempt Start Date:
16-Dec-2019 at 12:00:00 AM
Due Date:
22-Dec-2019 at 11:59:59 PM
Maximum Points:
75.0
Literature Evaluation Table - Rubric
No of Criteria: 13 Achievement Levels: 5
CriteriaAchievement
LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory 0-71%0.00 %Less
Than Satisfactory 72-75%75.00 %Satisfactory 76-79%79.00
%Good 80-89%89.00 %Excellent 90-100%100.00 %Article
Selection100.0
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working
Link to Access Article5.0Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and
permalink or working link to access article section is not
included.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or
working link to access article section is present, but it lacks
detail or is incomplete.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and
permalink or working link to access article section is
present.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or
working link to access article section is clearly provided and

3. well developed.Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink
or working link to access article section is comprehensive and
thoroughly developed with supporting details.Article Title and
Year Published 5.0Article title and year published section is not
included.Article title and year published section is present, but
it lacks detail or is incomplete.Article title and year published
section is present.Article title and year published section is
clearly provided and well developed.Article title and year
published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed
with supporting details.Research Questions (Qualitative) or
Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of
Study10.0Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis
(quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not
included.Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis
(quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present,
but it lacks detail or is incomplete.Research questions
(qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim
of study section is present.Research questions (qualitative) or
hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section
is clearly provided and well developed.Research questions
(qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim
of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed
with supporting details.Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type
of Qualitative)5.0Design (type of quantitative, or type of
qualitative) section is not included.Design (type of quantitative,
or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative)
section is present.Design (type of quantitative, or type of
qualitative) section is clearly provided and well
developed.Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative)
section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with
supporting details.Setting or Sample5.0Setting or sample
section is not included.Setting or sample section is present, but
it lacks detail or is incomplete.Setting or sample section is
present.Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well
developed.Setting or sample section is comprehensive and

4. thoroughly developed with supporting details.Methods:
Intervention or Instruments5.0Methods: Intervention or
instruments section is not included.Methods: Intervention or
instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.Methods: Intervention or instruments section is
present.Methods: Intervention or instruments section is clearly
provided and well developed.Methods: Intervention or
instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed
with supporting details.Analysis10.0Analysis section is not
included.Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.Analysis section is present.Analysis section is
clearly provided and well developed.Analysis section is
comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting
details.Key Findings10.0Key findings section is not
included.Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.Key findings section is present.Key findings section
is clearly provided and well developed.Key findings section is
comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting
details.Recommendations10.0Recommendations section is not
included.Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail
or is incomplete.Recommendations section is
present.Recommendations section is clearly provided and well
developed.Recommendations section is comprehensive and
thoroughly developed with supporting details.Explanation of
How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone10.0Explanation of
how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not
included.Explanation of how the article supports EBP or
capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is
incomplete.Explanation of how the article supports EBP or
capstone section is present.Explanation of how the article
supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well
developed.Explanation of how the article supports EBP or
capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed
with supporting details.Presentation10.0The piece is not neat or
organized, and it does not include all required elements.The
work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of

5. required elements.The overall appearance is general, and major
elements are missing.The overall appearance is generally neat,
with a few minor flaws or missing elements.The work is well
presented and includes all required elements. The overall
appearance is neat and professional.Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language
use)10.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is employed.Frequent and repetitive
mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence
structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or
typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-
appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer
uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of
speech.The writer is clearly in command of standard, written,
academic English.Documentation of Sources (citations,
footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)5.0Sources are not
documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or
incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be
present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment
and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely
and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is free of error.
Total Percentage 100