This study examined outcomes of patients who experienced clinical deterioration requiring an emergency response within 24 hours or after 24 hours of emergency admission to medical or surgical wards. The study found that 28.4% of patients experienced deterioration within 24 hours of admission, who had lower rates of recurrent emergency responses, ICU admissions, and shorter hospital lengths of stay, compared to those whose deterioration occurred after 24 hours. Over half of all emergency responses on medical and surgical units during the study period were for patients admitted through the emergency department. Further research is needed to understand factors contributing to early clinical deterioration in patients admitted via the emergency department.
Call Girl Number in Vashi Mumbai📲 9833363713 💞 Full Night Enjoy
ANZICS S&Q 2014 - Abstract Presentation: Considine on outcomes of RRT patients within and beyond 24 hours of admission
1. Outcomes of patients who require
emergency response for clinical
deterioration within and beyond 24
hours of emergency admission
Julie Considine,1,2,3 Judy Currey,1,2 David Charlesworth41
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
2 Centre for Quality & Patient Safety Research, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia
3 Eastern Health – Deakin University Nursing & Midwifery Research Centre, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
4 Intensive Care Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
2. Background
Access targets
• many countries, including Australia, have set ED LOS
targets as a quality indicator of healthcare
• Australia = NEAT in 2011
• National Emergency Access Target = 90% of patients have
ED LOS <4 hours
Concerns
• will shorter ED LOS result in
• increased numbers of physiologically unstable patients on
medical / surgical wards?
• increased incidence of clinical deterioration during the
early stages of hospital admission?
3. Aim
• to compare the characteristics & outcomes of
patients who required an emergency response for
clinical deterioration* < 24 hours and ≥ 24 hours of
emergency admission to medical and surgical units
* emergency response for clinical deterioration = cardiac arrest team or rapid
response system activation
4. Method
Design
• a retrospective medical record audit
Site
• Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health
• 365 bed urban district hospital in Melbourne, Australia
• 46,640 ED presentations (2011/12)
• 17,343 adult patients (≥ 18 years) requiring medical &
surgical admission via ED (2011/12)
• RRS = MET since early 2012
• 9 medical or surgical wards (~214 beds)
5. Method
Sample
• adult patients (≥ 18 years)
• admitted to a medical or surgical ward via the ED
• who required an emergency response for clinical
deterioration during 2012
• exclusions: patients in whom emergency response
was located
• birthing suite / maternity wards
• inpatient mental health
• critical care unit
6. Results
819 patients on medical / surgical wards = 1480 emergency responses
81.3% MET activations
(n=1203 responses)
18.7% cardiac arrest team activations
(n=277 responses)
71% of patients (n=587) admitted via ED = 819 emergency responses
91.0% MET activations
(n = 534 patients)
9.0% cardiac arrest team activations
(n = 53 patients)
28.4% of patients had emergency
response <24 hours after admission
(n = 167 patients)
71.6% of patients had emergency
response ≥24 hours after admission
(n = 416 patients)
* 4 patients lost to follow-up
7. Results
Patients admitted via ED
• 819 emergency responses in 587 patients admitted
via ED
• 55.3% of all emergency responses during 2012 were for
patients admitted via ED
• median time to 1st emergency response was 59
hours (IQR = 22 – 132.6)
10. Conclusions
• ½ of all emergency responses for deterioration on
medical / surgical units were for patients admitted via
ED
• emergency responses for deterioration with 24 hours
of emergency admission
• occurred in 1/
3 of patients
• were associated with
• less recurrent activations
• lower ICU admission rates
• shorter hospital LOS
• further research is needed to understand antecedents
to deterioration in patients admitted via ED
11. julie.considine@deakin.edu.au
Considine J, Charlesworth D, Currey J. (in press). Characteristics and outcomes
of patients requiring rapid response system activation within 24 hours of
emergency admission. Critical Care and Resuscitation. accepted 6/5/2014.
Editor's Notes
Thanks to the conference organisers for the invitation to speak today. The diverse and interesting conference program is a great credit to the organisers and will make for a very interesting week.
Comparison of patients requiring emergency response for clinical deterioration within and beyond 24 hours of emergency admission showed no significant differences in age, gender, waiting times, ED length of stay or in-hospital mortality rates.
Patients in whom first emergency response occurred <24 hours after emergency admission were:
4 ½ times more likely to be triaged to category 1 (5.4% vs 1.2%, p=0.005),
1 ½ times less likely to be admitted to ICU immediately following emergency response activation (7.6% vs 13.9%, p=0.039),
3 ½ times less likely to have recurrent emergency responses during their hospital stay (9.7% vs 34.0%, p<0.001)
There was no difference in ED LOS between the two groups but patients in whom first emergency response occurred <24 hours after emergency admission: had shorter median hospital length of stay (7 vs 11 days, p<0.001) by 4 days.
an emergency response for deterioration occurred <24 hours of emergency admission in 28.4% of patients
patients whose 1st emergency response was < 24 hours of emergency admission (compared with >24 hours) had
less recurrent activations
lower ICU admission rates
shorter hospital LOS
further research is needed to understand the antecedents to deterioration in patients requiring emergency admission