A
Presentation
on
Leader Participation model-Vroom & Yetton

Presented to:

Presented by :

Prof. Swati Shome

Krunal
Amit
Ronak

164
170
167
Content
 Introduction
 Decision

making Style
 Type of Leader Participation
 Style of Leadership Participation
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
v.

Autocratic I
Autocratic II
Consultative I
Consultative II
Group
Introduction
Victor Vroom and Phillip’s leader participation model relates leadership behavior
and participation in decision making. The Vroom-Yetton contingency model is a
participation leadership model of industrial and organizational psychology
developed by Victor Vroom, in collaboration with Phillip Yetton (1973).
Involvement in decision-making improves the understanding of the issues
involved by those who must carry out the decisions.
People are more committed to actions where they have involved in the relevant
decision-making.
People are less competitive and more collaborative when they are working on
joint goals.
When people make decision together, the social commitment to one another is
greater and thus increases their commitment to the decision.
Several people deciding together make better decision than one person alone.
Decide-Decision is made
Decide-Decision is made
alone and is announced or
alone and is announced or
“sold” to the group.
“sold” to the group.
Delegate- Group
Consult
Delegate- Group
Consult
Decisio
makes decision
Individuallymakes decision
Individuallywithin prescribed
Present problem to
n
within prescribed
Present problem to
limits. No direct
group
limits. No direct
group
Making
role, but provide
individually, get
role, but provide
individually, get their
Styles
needed resources &
their
needed resources &
suggestion, and
encouragement.
suggestion,
encouragement.
then make a and
then make
Facilitate- Present
decision. a
Consult Group-Present
decision.
problem to group in a
problem to group in a
meeting. Facilitate, but
meeting, get their suggestion
take care that your input is
and then make decision.
not given greater weight
over others because of
Types Of Leader Participation
1. Autocratic
2. Consultative

3. Group
Normative Decision theory: 5 Steps
1) Autocratic I(Decide)
Leader solves a problem using
information that is readily available.
2) Autocratic II
(consultant individual)
A leader obtains additional
information from subordinates and
then solves the problem.
3)Consultative I
(consultant group)
A leader shares the problem with
subordinates on individual basis and
obtain there ideas and suggestion.
Further the leader choses a solution to
the problem at hand in end.
4) Consultative II
(facilitate)
A leader shares the problem with
subordinates as a group. The final
decision may or may not reflect
subordinate inputs.
5) Group(delegate)
A leader meets with subordinates as a
group. However he/she acts as a
chairperson who focuses and directs
discussion ,but does impose his or her
will on the group. Subordinates
participation is sought.
THANK YOU
Ob
Ob
Ob
Ob
Ob
Ob

Ob

  • 1.
    A Presentation on Leader Participation model-Vroom& Yetton Presented to: Presented by : Prof. Swati Shome Krunal Amit Ronak 164 170 167
  • 2.
    Content  Introduction  Decision makingStyle  Type of Leader Participation  Style of Leadership Participation i. ii. iii. iv. v. Autocratic I Autocratic II Consultative I Consultative II Group
  • 3.
    Introduction Victor Vroom andPhillip’s leader participation model relates leadership behavior and participation in decision making. The Vroom-Yetton contingency model is a participation leadership model of industrial and organizational psychology developed by Victor Vroom, in collaboration with Phillip Yetton (1973). Involvement in decision-making improves the understanding of the issues involved by those who must carry out the decisions. People are more committed to actions where they have involved in the relevant decision-making. People are less competitive and more collaborative when they are working on joint goals. When people make decision together, the social commitment to one another is greater and thus increases their commitment to the decision. Several people deciding together make better decision than one person alone.
  • 4.
    Decide-Decision is made Decide-Decisionis made alone and is announced or alone and is announced or “sold” to the group. “sold” to the group. Delegate- Group Consult Delegate- Group Consult Decisio makes decision Individuallymakes decision Individuallywithin prescribed Present problem to n within prescribed Present problem to limits. No direct group limits. No direct group Making role, but provide individually, get role, but provide individually, get their Styles needed resources & their needed resources & suggestion, and encouragement. suggestion, encouragement. then make a and then make Facilitate- Present decision. a Consult Group-Present decision. problem to group in a problem to group in a meeting. Facilitate, but meeting, get their suggestion take care that your input is and then make decision. not given greater weight over others because of
  • 5.
    Types Of LeaderParticipation 1. Autocratic 2. Consultative 3. Group
  • 6.
  • 7.
    1) Autocratic I(Decide) Leadersolves a problem using information that is readily available.
  • 8.
    2) Autocratic II (consultantindividual) A leader obtains additional information from subordinates and then solves the problem.
  • 9.
    3)Consultative I (consultant group) Aleader shares the problem with subordinates on individual basis and obtain there ideas and suggestion. Further the leader choses a solution to the problem at hand in end.
  • 10.
    4) Consultative II (facilitate) Aleader shares the problem with subordinates as a group. The final decision may or may not reflect subordinate inputs.
  • 11.
    5) Group(delegate) A leadermeets with subordinates as a group. However he/she acts as a chairperson who focuses and directs discussion ,but does impose his or her will on the group. Subordinates participation is sought.
  • 12.