SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 34
The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension Presenter: York Chi  Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Hsu Date: May 5, 2010
[object Object]
Contents Reflection Results & Conclusion  Methodology  Introduction
Introduction ,[object Object],[object Object]
Introduction ,[object Object],[object Object]
Introduction ,[object Object],[object Object]
Introduction ,[object Object]
Purpose of the study ,[object Object]
Research Questions  1 2 If so, which one is more effective? Are there any differences in terms of reading comprehension quality between EFL learners who are instructed according to the  CI  and those with whom the techniques  CL  are utilized?
Research Questions 3 Would the use of  STAD  or  GI  yield any differences in students’ gains in reading comprehension?
Conceptual Framework 1 2 3 4 STAD Listen to teacher’s explanation of material Work in mixed groups to complete activities or worksheets Take individual quizzes Recognize the team achievement (Ghaithe, 2004)
Conceptual Framework ,[object Object],[object Object]
Conceptual Framework  Students form small interest groups Plan and implement their investigation  Synthesize information to produce a final product  Participate in the class presentation  GI
Methodology Subjects Instruments Procedure
Participants Participants  90  female students chosen from  140 students in  Dehdasht Taken from General English course  Dehdasht South West of Iran College level students  Level: Pre-intermediate B E C D A
Instruments Nelson Battery-section 300A (r= .75) Standardized reading comprehension test ( r= .73) Teacher-made test 1  Teacher-made test 2
Procedure of the study Nelson English Language Proficiency Test STAD group ( 30 subjects) GI group ( 30 subjects)  CI group ( 30 subjects)
Procedure of the study  STAD   group   GI group  CI group ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Procedure of the study STAD group GI group  CI group Receive STAD instruction Receive GI instruction Teachers’ lecture Individual quizzes Individual practice Post-test Nelson English Language Proficiency Test Group presentation
Methodology One-way ANOVA to examine  the difference among the participants’ score on the Nelson English Language Proficiency Test to examine  whether or not the observed differences among the participants’  mean  on the  post-test  were statistically significant
Methodology Post hoc Scheffe test  to determine where precisely the significance lay
Results ,[object Object]
Results  ,[object Object]
Results  ,[object Object]
Results ,[object Object]
Results ,[object Object]
Results ,[object Object]
Conclusion  ,[object Object]
Conclusion ,[object Object]
Reflection The researcher provides  sample items about the teacher- made quizzes and worksheets.  The researcher  did not provide detail information about the reading materials.
Reflection The Nelson English Proficiency Test seems to be old  (Fowler and Coe, 1976) The researcher did not provide sample item about the Nelson English Proficiency Test.
Reflection The researcher only recruited 90 female students as participants in this study. Why?
Thank You !

More Related Content

What's hot

The Power Of Clarifying 03
The Power Of Clarifying 03The Power Of Clarifying 03
The Power Of Clarifying 03
guest19cc722
 
Technology differentiated instruction
Technology differentiated instructionTechnology differentiated instruction
Technology differentiated instruction
Christina Rapti
 
Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3
Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3
Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3
Reedheiress
 
Program 1 Student Choice
Program 1 Student ChoiceProgram 1 Student Choice
Program 1 Student Choice
Maris Ferreira
 
Assessment plan
Assessment planAssessment plan
Assessment plan
mskmoss
 
First oral Presentation
First oral  PresentationFirst oral  Presentation
First oral Presentation
lynn3940
 

What's hot (20)

The Power Of Clarifying 03
The Power Of Clarifying 03The Power Of Clarifying 03
The Power Of Clarifying 03
 
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
Research PresentatioThe Effects of Student Assessment Choices on 11th Grade E...
 
Jaime McQueen doctoral defence powerpoint 2_24_17
Jaime McQueen doctoral defence powerpoint 2_24_17Jaime McQueen doctoral defence powerpoint 2_24_17
Jaime McQueen doctoral defence powerpoint 2_24_17
 
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATION
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATIONScience competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATION
Science competency based nat intervention program: PAPER PRESENTATION
 
Technology differentiated instruction
Technology differentiated instructionTechnology differentiated instruction
Technology differentiated instruction
 
Ed project
Ed projectEd project
Ed project
 
IRA poster presentation
IRA poster presentationIRA poster presentation
IRA poster presentation
 
Assessment for learning
Assessment for learningAssessment for learning
Assessment for learning
 
Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3
Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3
Rti academic-intervention-pyramid-tier-1-2-3
 
Program 1 Student Choice
Program 1 Student ChoiceProgram 1 Student Choice
Program 1 Student Choice
 
Davis a’rynnpresentation
Davis a’rynnpresentationDavis a’rynnpresentation
Davis a’rynnpresentation
 
HPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
HPSN 2012: Large Class SimulationHPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
HPSN 2012: Large Class Simulation
 
Action research
Action researchAction research
Action research
 
Using data to plan and teach
Using data to plan and teachUsing data to plan and teach
Using data to plan and teach
 
Assessment plan
Assessment planAssessment plan
Assessment plan
 
Planning for Assessment
Planning for AssessmentPlanning for Assessment
Planning for Assessment
 
First oral Presentation
First oral  PresentationFirst oral  Presentation
First oral Presentation
 
Self paced instruction and mathematics achievement
Self  paced instruction and mathematics achievementSelf  paced instruction and mathematics achievement
Self paced instruction and mathematics achievement
 
Javed Iqbal Thesis Defense Presentation
Javed Iqbal Thesis Defense PresentationJaved Iqbal Thesis Defense Presentation
Javed Iqbal Thesis Defense Presentation
 
Ash edu 645 week 6 final paper curriculum based summative assessment design (...
Ash edu 645 week 6 final paper curriculum based summative assessment design (...Ash edu 645 week 6 final paper curriculum based summative assessment design (...
Ash edu 645 week 6 final paper curriculum based summative assessment design (...
 

Viewers also liked

Resume Jurnal Tesol
Resume Jurnal TesolResume Jurnal Tesol
Resume Jurnal Tesol
Febri Shandy
 
Service to Persons with Limited English Proficiency
Service to Persons with Limited English ProficiencyService to Persons with Limited English Proficiency
Service to Persons with Limited English Proficiency
IowaLegalAid
 
Who Speaks English
Who Speaks English Who Speaks English
Who Speaks English
Aiden Yeh
 
English language proficiency 1
English language proficiency 1English language proficiency 1
English language proficiency 1
nadynadhira
 
Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)
Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)
Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)
Reymarie Oohlala
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Regions i,ii,iii and ncr
Regions i,ii,iii and ncrRegions i,ii,iii and ncr
Regions i,ii,iii and ncr
 
Lecture h&f(2006) intro_chap1
Lecture h&f(2006) intro_chap1Lecture h&f(2006) intro_chap1
Lecture h&f(2006) intro_chap1
 
2017 lec 1
2017 lec 12017 lec 1
2017 lec 1
 
Markets and Des
Markets and DesMarkets and Des
Markets and Des
 
English for Careers in ASEAN
English for Careers in ASEANEnglish for Careers in ASEAN
English for Careers in ASEAN
 
Waffle time
Waffle timeWaffle time
Waffle time
 
Teflin 2013
Teflin 2013Teflin 2013
Teflin 2013
 
English is my favorite subject!
English is my favorite subject!English is my favorite subject!
English is my favorite subject!
 
Communication skills for teachers of english
Communication skills for teachers of englishCommunication skills for teachers of english
Communication skills for teachers of english
 
Resume Jurnal Tesol
Resume Jurnal TesolResume Jurnal Tesol
Resume Jurnal Tesol
 
Service to Persons with Limited English Proficiency
Service to Persons with Limited English ProficiencyService to Persons with Limited English Proficiency
Service to Persons with Limited English Proficiency
 
Who Speaks English
Who Speaks English Who Speaks English
Who Speaks English
 
English Langage Development Levels of Proficiency
English Langage Development Levels of ProficiencyEnglish Langage Development Levels of Proficiency
English Langage Development Levels of Proficiency
 
Philippines tourism photos
Philippines tourism photosPhilippines tourism photos
Philippines tourism photos
 
Tense and deixis
Tense and deixisTense and deixis
Tense and deixis
 
Travel 10 1Philippine Tourism and Geography week 1
Travel 10 1Philippine Tourism and Geography week 1Travel 10 1Philippine Tourism and Geography week 1
Travel 10 1Philippine Tourism and Geography week 1
 
English language proficiency 1
English language proficiency 1English language proficiency 1
English language proficiency 1
 
BICS and CALP
BICS and CALPBICS and CALP
BICS and CALP
 
Franchising - The Future Of Business Expansion
Franchising - The Future Of Business ExpansionFranchising - The Future Of Business Expansion
Franchising - The Future Of Business Expansion
 
Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)
Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)
Chap6 (tourism act of 2009)
 

Similar to 2010 teresa's report2003

Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...
Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...
Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...
Spyridoula Laizinou
 
2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告
2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告
2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告
york1896
 
Proposal defense
Proposal defenseProposal defense
Proposal defense
smilelynn
 
Proposal 2009 6 1
Proposal 2009 6 1Proposal 2009 6 1
Proposal 2009 6 1
york1896
 
Ppt for final defense0524 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0524 teresa final versionPpt for final defense0524 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0524 teresa final version
lynn3940
 
Ppt for final defense0519 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0519 teresa final versionPpt for final defense0519 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0519 teresa final version
lynn3940
 
9722612戚禎祐 York
9722612戚禎祐 York9722612戚禎祐 York
9722612戚禎祐 York
kdlsldn
 
Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011
Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011
Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011
lesllalarry
 
Proposal rehearsal
Proposal rehearsalProposal rehearsal
Proposal rehearsal
jlps0601
 

Similar to 2010 teresa's report2003 (20)

Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.pptPeer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
 
Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...
Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...
Which method, isolated or integrated, of teaching vocabulary is more effectiv...
 
Assessment
AssessmentAssessment
Assessment
 
2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告
2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告
2009 二上論文寫作期刊上台報告
 
Proposal defense
Proposal defenseProposal defense
Proposal defense
 
proposal
proposalproposal
proposal
 
Proposal 2009 6 1
Proposal 2009 6 1Proposal 2009 6 1
Proposal 2009 6 1
 
Ppt for final defense0524 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0524 teresa final versionPpt for final defense0524 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0524 teresa final version
 
Ppt for final defense0519 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0519 teresa final versionPpt for final defense0519 teresa final version
Ppt for final defense0519 teresa final version
 
The Use of Modified Jigsaw Strategy to Improve the Students' Reading Comprehe...
The Use of Modified Jigsaw Strategy to Improve the Students' Reading Comprehe...The Use of Modified Jigsaw Strategy to Improve the Students' Reading Comprehe...
The Use of Modified Jigsaw Strategy to Improve the Students' Reading Comprehe...
 
EdLing 209 ppt (Abstract Report).pptx
EdLing 209 ppt (Abstract Report).pptxEdLing 209 ppt (Abstract Report).pptx
EdLing 209 ppt (Abstract Report).pptx
 
Thesis.ballew
Thesis.ballewThesis.ballew
Thesis.ballew
 
9722612戚禎祐 York
9722612戚禎祐 York9722612戚禎祐 York
9722612戚禎祐 York
 
Vocabulary learning strategies by Wissam Ali Askar
Vocabulary learning strategies by Wissam Ali AskarVocabulary learning strategies by Wissam Ali Askar
Vocabulary learning strategies by Wissam Ali Askar
 
Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011
Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011
Condelli_attendance_Leslla 2011
 
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptxدانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
 
Ckass 2 determining a research question
Ckass 2   determining a research questionCkass 2   determining a research question
Ckass 2 determining a research question
 
Proposal rehearsal
Proposal rehearsalProposal rehearsal
Proposal rehearsal
 
1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx
1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx
1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx
 
1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx
1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx
1. Introduction to Language Testing.pptx
 

2010 teresa's report2003

  • 1. The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension Presenter: York Chi Instructor: Dr. Pi-Ying Hsu Date: May 5, 2010
  • 2.
  • 3. Contents Reflection Results & Conclusion Methodology Introduction
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9. Research Questions 1 2 If so, which one is more effective? Are there any differences in terms of reading comprehension quality between EFL learners who are instructed according to the CI and those with whom the techniques CL are utilized?
  • 10. Research Questions 3 Would the use of STAD or GI yield any differences in students’ gains in reading comprehension?
  • 11. Conceptual Framework 1 2 3 4 STAD Listen to teacher’s explanation of material Work in mixed groups to complete activities or worksheets Take individual quizzes Recognize the team achievement (Ghaithe, 2004)
  • 12.
  • 13. Conceptual Framework Students form small interest groups Plan and implement their investigation Synthesize information to produce a final product Participate in the class presentation GI
  • 15. Participants Participants 90 female students chosen from 140 students in Dehdasht Taken from General English course Dehdasht South West of Iran College level students Level: Pre-intermediate B E C D A
  • 16.
  • 17. Instruments Nelson Battery-section 300A (r= .75) Standardized reading comprehension test ( r= .73) Teacher-made test 1 Teacher-made test 2
  • 18. Procedure of the study Nelson English Language Proficiency Test STAD group ( 30 subjects) GI group ( 30 subjects) CI group ( 30 subjects)
  • 19.
  • 20. Procedure of the study STAD group GI group CI group Receive STAD instruction Receive GI instruction Teachers’ lecture Individual quizzes Individual practice Post-test Nelson English Language Proficiency Test Group presentation
  • 21. Methodology One-way ANOVA to examine the difference among the participants’ score on the Nelson English Language Proficiency Test to examine whether or not the observed differences among the participants’ mean on the post-test were statistically significant
  • 22. Methodology Post hoc Scheffe test to determine where precisely the significance lay
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31. Reflection The researcher provides sample items about the teacher- made quizzes and worksheets. The researcher did not provide detail information about the reading materials.
  • 32. Reflection The Nelson English Proficiency Test seems to be old (Fowler and Coe, 1976) The researcher did not provide sample item about the Nelson English Proficiency Test.
  • 33. Reflection The researcher only recruited 90 female students as participants in this study. Why?