SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
ALIGNING ASSESSMENTS TO
BETTER MEASURE LEARNING



  Multiple Choice vs. Free Response
  Assessments in an Inquiry-Based
         Science Classroom

 A’Rynn Davis
   Fall 2012
Could this be our future?
Statement of the Problem
The purpose of this study is to address
the efficacy of standard-based
assessments in a science classroom
centered on inquiry-based instruction

To what extent does curriculum align
with standardized assessments?
Important Questions
Which type of assessment best measures
learning in an inquiry based science
classroom?
To what extent do commercial objective tests
measure student understanding and growth?
To what extent do subjective and objective
assessments accurately measure mastered
concepts in an inquiry based science
classroom?
Research Setting & Participants
Liberty Grove Elementary
40 Fifth grade student participants
Teacher acted as the researcher.
Important Literature
Assessments in an inquiry based classroom.
  – Experts collaborate to work towards ensuring that
    assessments, standards, and classroom teaching
    correlate together (“Connecting Science”, 2010).
     • For assessments and teaching to be effective, teachers
       must understand the standards and how to implement
       them in everyday learning.
     • Teachers should be included in the creating and scoring
       of standardized tests in order to improve professional
       development and student performance.
  – Standard-based instruction should be able to be
    used directly to direct instruction and student
    learning (Rothman, 2002).
Important Literature
Standardized testing
  No Child Left Behind (Fulmer, 2010).
   – concentrates on states being required to create
     rigorous standards for content and standardized testing
   – implies that student success relies on the degree to
     which the test measures learning and the method of
     instruction
   – measures student success and makes teachers more
     accountable
  Standardized tests have focused on standardizing
  the content rather than diverse assessment and
  instruction (Sywerson, 2008)
Research Design
Participants               Ethnicity
included                  White
                          African American
   -English as a Second   Hispanic
       Language
       Students (ESL)
   -Gifted and Talented    40%
   -Special Education                  42%
                            18%
Research Design
Students in the          Students in the test
control group            group
– Received a pretest     – Received a pretest
– Taught the same        – Taught the same
  content with the         content with the
  same instruction as      same instruction as
  the test group           the control group
– Received a post test   – Received a post test
  with multiple choice     with free response
  questions                questions
Results
Items number two and nine were most
missed in the multiple choice group.
– 50% of students missed number two
– 60% missed number nine.
Results
• Students in the free response group were more
  successful.




• Most students who missed this question in the
  control group chose C: “As the angle
  increases, the force applied to the skateboard
  decreases”.
  • This is incorrect, but sounds close to what the student
    may have thought before reading the choices.
Results
This shows that the student has an understanding of the content
and drew pictures to support.
Implication for Teaching
Students should be allowed the opportunity
to show what they do know and not just be
measured based on one right answer.
How much does a student know about a
process or idea can be measured when
they are able to communicate their
thoughts rather than attempt to match them
with multiple choice answers.
Implications for Teaching
Do teachers feel pressured to “teach to
the test” to help their students be
successful?
Could free response questions be
advantageous for students’ mastery of
content?
Implications for Teacing
Further measure           Students’ attitudes
which types of            towards tests that
students perform          resemble the STAAR
better on multiple        Test or other
choice tests compared     standardized tests.
to free response tests.   – question whether
                            students feel less
– compare students by       frustration or anxiety if
  ethnicity, age            the structure of the test
  groups, and by their      were changed
  interests
Limitations
  The results of this study were not significant
  – may have revealed better findings if the sample size was larger.


• The post-test used at the conclusion of the
  content being taught included 10 questions while
  the pretest had many more questions.
     –    This may have caused discrepancies among the mean
         scores and how they are viewed.
     –   Student scores may have shown different results if they were
         given more opportunities.
Limitations

Who is going to grade
these free response
 questions if multiple
  choice tests were
    eliminated?
Fifth Grade Science and Math Teacher
Multiple Choice vs. Free Response
Assessments in an Inquiry-Based
        Science Classroom

More Related Content

What's hot

RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3
RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3
RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3Heidi Veal
 
Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...
Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...
Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...schoolpsychology
 
Web 2 assessment pres2
Web 2 assessment pres2Web 2 assessment pres2
Web 2 assessment pres2kimbar94
 
Oral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
Oral defense presentation_Ennis BrinsonOral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
Oral defense presentation_Ennis BrinsonEnnis Brinson
 
Using assessment to inform instructional decisions
Using assessment to inform instructional decisionsUsing assessment to inform instructional decisions
Using assessment to inform instructional decisionsCarlo Magno
 
Traditional assessment vs school based assessment
Traditional assessment vs school based assessmentTraditional assessment vs school based assessment
Traditional assessment vs school based assessmentTeacher Trainee Institute
 
Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)
Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)
Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)Steve Vitto
 
Proposal defense
Proposal defenseProposal defense
Proposal defensesmilelynn
 
Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education
Evaluating Teaching in Higher EducationEvaluating Teaching in Higher Education
Evaluating Teaching in Higher EducationEmma Kennedy
 
Response to Intervention: What is it?
Response to Intervention: What is it?Response to Intervention: What is it?
Response to Intervention: What is it?paulaulloa671
 
Assessment Etil
Assessment EtilAssessment Etil
Assessment Etilmillerjtx
 
A review of School-Based Assessment
A review of School-Based AssessmentA review of School-Based Assessment
A review of School-Based AssessmentGwendolyn Yong
 
Summative Assessment in English Teaching
Summative Assessment in English TeachingSummative Assessment in English Teaching
Summative Assessment in English TeachingIvan Aguilar
 
Stem in early ed 2014
Stem in early ed 2014Stem in early ed 2014
Stem in early ed 2014drtmeagher
 
Features of Classroom Formative Assessment
Features of Classroom Formative AssessmentFeatures of Classroom Formative Assessment
Features of Classroom Formative AssessmentCarlo Magno
 
2010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report20032010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report2003york1896
 
Assessment, feedback, evaluation, & grading
Assessment, feedback, evaluation, & gradingAssessment, feedback, evaluation, & grading
Assessment, feedback, evaluation, & gradingfusonline
 

What's hot (20)

RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3
RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3
RtI Best Practices for Henderson Elementary Scenario 3
 
Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...
Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...
Response to Intervention: A Component in a Novel Educational Service Delivery...
 
Web 2 assessment pres2
Web 2 assessment pres2Web 2 assessment pres2
Web 2 assessment pres2
 
Oral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
Oral defense presentation_Ennis BrinsonOral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
Oral defense presentation_Ennis Brinson
 
Using assessment to inform instructional decisions
Using assessment to inform instructional decisionsUsing assessment to inform instructional decisions
Using assessment to inform instructional decisions
 
Traditional assessment vs school based assessment
Traditional assessment vs school based assessmentTraditional assessment vs school based assessment
Traditional assessment vs school based assessment
 
Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)
Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)
Steve Vitto Response to Intervention (RTI)
 
IRA poster presentation
IRA poster presentationIRA poster presentation
IRA poster presentation
 
Proposal defense
Proposal defenseProposal defense
Proposal defense
 
Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education
Evaluating Teaching in Higher EducationEvaluating Teaching in Higher Education
Evaluating Teaching in Higher Education
 
Response to Intervention: What is it?
Response to Intervention: What is it?Response to Intervention: What is it?
Response to Intervention: What is it?
 
Assessment
AssessmentAssessment
Assessment
 
Assessment Etil
Assessment EtilAssessment Etil
Assessment Etil
 
A review of School-Based Assessment
A review of School-Based AssessmentA review of School-Based Assessment
A review of School-Based Assessment
 
Summative Assessment in English Teaching
Summative Assessment in English TeachingSummative Assessment in English Teaching
Summative Assessment in English Teaching
 
Stem in early ed 2014
Stem in early ed 2014Stem in early ed 2014
Stem in early ed 2014
 
Features of Classroom Formative Assessment
Features of Classroom Formative AssessmentFeatures of Classroom Formative Assessment
Features of Classroom Formative Assessment
 
2010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report20032010 teresa's report2003
2010 teresa's report2003
 
Cps For Rti
Cps For RtiCps For Rti
Cps For Rti
 
Assessment, feedback, evaluation, & grading
Assessment, feedback, evaluation, & gradingAssessment, feedback, evaluation, & grading
Assessment, feedback, evaluation, & grading
 

Similar to Davis a’rynnpresentation

Learning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptx
Learning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptxLearning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptx
Learning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptxnpfabara
 
Assessment Intro
Assessment IntroAssessment Intro
Assessment Introtsmyth2
 
Assessment intro 3 19 10 b
Assessment intro 3 19 10 bAssessment intro 3 19 10 b
Assessment intro 3 19 10 btsmyth2
 
Assessment Intro 3 19 10 B
Assessment Intro 3 19 10 BAssessment Intro 3 19 10 B
Assessment Intro 3 19 10 Bguest3289552d
 
Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...
Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...
Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...Sedigh (Sid) Mohammadi
 
Types of Tests.pptx
Types of Tests.pptxTypes of Tests.pptx
Types of Tests.pptxMZSAUA
 
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.pptPeer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.pptMuxITLinks
 
Keys to Effective Testing
Keys to Effective TestingKeys to Effective Testing
Keys to Effective TestingVanz Justine
 
Buckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 Assessment
Buckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 AssessmentBuckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 Assessment
Buckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 AssessmentSteve Smith
 
Standards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptx
Standards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptxStandards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptx
Standards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptxwinda kho
 
edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2
edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2
edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2Shirleen Schofield
 
Assessment: Grading & Student Evaluation
Assessment: Grading & Student EvaluationAssessment: Grading & Student Evaluation
Assessment: Grading & Student EvaluationEddy White, Ph.D.
 
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...William Kritsonis
 
Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...
Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...
Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...William Kritsonis
 
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...William Kritsonis
 
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptxدانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptxnafiseh3
 
TSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research Procedure
TSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research ProcedureTSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research Procedure
TSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research ProcedureYee Bee Choo
 
Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...
Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...
Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...AJSSMTJournal
 
Connecting evidence based instructional practices to rti
Connecting evidence based instructional practices to rtiConnecting evidence based instructional practices to rti
Connecting evidence based instructional practices to rtiEast Central ISD
 

Similar to Davis a’rynnpresentation (20)

Learning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptx
Learning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptxLearning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptx
Learning_activity1_Erazo_Estevez_Fabara_Factos_Farfán .pptx
 
Assessment Intro
Assessment IntroAssessment Intro
Assessment Intro
 
Assessment intro 3 19 10 b
Assessment intro 3 19 10 bAssessment intro 3 19 10 b
Assessment intro 3 19 10 b
 
Assessment Intro 3 19 10 B
Assessment Intro 3 19 10 BAssessment Intro 3 19 10 B
Assessment Intro 3 19 10 B
 
Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...
Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...
Summary of testing language skills from theory to practice part one (hossein ...
 
Types of Tests.pptx
Types of Tests.pptxTypes of Tests.pptx
Types of Tests.pptx
 
Evaluation
Evaluation  Evaluation
Evaluation
 
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.pptPeer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
Peer Teaching PPT 02-02-23.ppt
 
Keys to Effective Testing
Keys to Effective TestingKeys to Effective Testing
Keys to Effective Testing
 
Buckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 Assessment
Buckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 AssessmentBuckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 Assessment
Buckingham Uni PGCE Feb 2017 Assessment
 
Standards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptx
Standards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptxStandards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptx
Standards-based and Standardized Assessment.pptx
 
edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2
edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2
edd581_r2_actionresearchproposaltemplateshirleens%2B2
 
Assessment: Grading & Student Evaluation
Assessment: Grading & Student EvaluationAssessment: Grading & Student Evaluation
Assessment: Grading & Student Evaluation
 
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salins, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritso...
 
Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...
Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...
Roselia Salinas, Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Dissertat...
 
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...
Dr. Roselia Alaniz Salinas, PhD Dissertation Defense, Dr. William Allan Krits...
 
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptxدانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی تبریز.pptx
 
TSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research Procedure
TSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research ProcedureTSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research Procedure
TSL3133 Topic 4 Educational Research Procedure
 
Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...
Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...
Teaching with Frequent Tests and its Consequences on Students’ Performance in...
 
Connecting evidence based instructional practices to rti
Connecting evidence based instructional practices to rtiConnecting evidence based instructional practices to rti
Connecting evidence based instructional practices to rti
 

Davis a’rynnpresentation

  • 1. ALIGNING ASSESSMENTS TO BETTER MEASURE LEARNING Multiple Choice vs. Free Response Assessments in an Inquiry-Based Science Classroom A’Rynn Davis Fall 2012
  • 2. Could this be our future?
  • 3. Statement of the Problem The purpose of this study is to address the efficacy of standard-based assessments in a science classroom centered on inquiry-based instruction To what extent does curriculum align with standardized assessments?
  • 4. Important Questions Which type of assessment best measures learning in an inquiry based science classroom? To what extent do commercial objective tests measure student understanding and growth? To what extent do subjective and objective assessments accurately measure mastered concepts in an inquiry based science classroom?
  • 5. Research Setting & Participants Liberty Grove Elementary 40 Fifth grade student participants Teacher acted as the researcher.
  • 6. Important Literature Assessments in an inquiry based classroom. – Experts collaborate to work towards ensuring that assessments, standards, and classroom teaching correlate together (“Connecting Science”, 2010). • For assessments and teaching to be effective, teachers must understand the standards and how to implement them in everyday learning. • Teachers should be included in the creating and scoring of standardized tests in order to improve professional development and student performance. – Standard-based instruction should be able to be used directly to direct instruction and student learning (Rothman, 2002).
  • 7. Important Literature Standardized testing No Child Left Behind (Fulmer, 2010). – concentrates on states being required to create rigorous standards for content and standardized testing – implies that student success relies on the degree to which the test measures learning and the method of instruction – measures student success and makes teachers more accountable Standardized tests have focused on standardizing the content rather than diverse assessment and instruction (Sywerson, 2008)
  • 8. Research Design Participants Ethnicity included White African American -English as a Second Hispanic Language Students (ESL) -Gifted and Talented 40% -Special Education 42% 18%
  • 9. Research Design Students in the Students in the test control group group – Received a pretest – Received a pretest – Taught the same – Taught the same content with the content with the same instruction as same instruction as the test group the control group – Received a post test – Received a post test with multiple choice with free response questions questions
  • 10. Results Items number two and nine were most missed in the multiple choice group. – 50% of students missed number two – 60% missed number nine.
  • 11. Results • Students in the free response group were more successful. • Most students who missed this question in the control group chose C: “As the angle increases, the force applied to the skateboard decreases”. • This is incorrect, but sounds close to what the student may have thought before reading the choices.
  • 12. Results This shows that the student has an understanding of the content and drew pictures to support.
  • 13. Implication for Teaching Students should be allowed the opportunity to show what they do know and not just be measured based on one right answer. How much does a student know about a process or idea can be measured when they are able to communicate their thoughts rather than attempt to match them with multiple choice answers.
  • 14. Implications for Teaching Do teachers feel pressured to “teach to the test” to help their students be successful? Could free response questions be advantageous for students’ mastery of content?
  • 15. Implications for Teacing Further measure Students’ attitudes which types of towards tests that students perform resemble the STAAR better on multiple Test or other choice tests compared standardized tests. to free response tests. – question whether students feel less – compare students by frustration or anxiety if ethnicity, age the structure of the test groups, and by their were changed interests
  • 16. Limitations The results of this study were not significant – may have revealed better findings if the sample size was larger. • The post-test used at the conclusion of the content being taught included 10 questions while the pretest had many more questions. – This may have caused discrepancies among the mean scores and how they are viewed. – Student scores may have shown different results if they were given more opportunities.
  • 17. Limitations Who is going to grade these free response questions if multiple choice tests were eliminated?
  • 18. Fifth Grade Science and Math Teacher
  • 19. Multiple Choice vs. Free Response Assessments in an Inquiry-Based Science Classroom