The Standards Dilemma - Digital Library Standards 2008

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    Favorites, Groups & Events

    The Standards Dilemma - Digital Library Standards 2008 - Presentation Transcript

    1. The Standards Dilemma Strategic Content Alliance – Home Forum Edinburgh, May 2008
      • Alastair Dunning
      • JISC Digitisation Programme Manager
      • [email_address]
      • 0203 006 6065
    2. Standards everywhere
      • Digital content (file formats, metadata) but also software languages, Internet protocols, operating systems
      • It used to be so simple … create images as Tiffs, text as XML, make sure databases are SQL compliant
      • It still is that simple - Open standards should be at the heart of policy
      • But it’s no longer feasible to dictate standards
    3. What have we learnt? (I)
      • Standards have a context and cannot solely be dictated from top down
        • Skills are required to implement and exploit them
          • 95% of acronyms are intimidating
          • Take time and money to learn standards and related tools
          • METS (Metadata Transmission and Encoding Scheme) may be great, but it takes time to learn its ins and outs
          • Even ‘basic’ standards can be exploited in novel ways - but sometimes they are too limiting
    4. What have we learnt? (II)
      • Standards have a context and cannot solely be dictated from top do wn
        • Different users require different standards
          • TEI (Text Encoding Initiative) is great for scholars … but for everyone else?
          • On the other hand, simple TXT files may lack precision
        • Cost of standards fluctuate wildly
          • MJPEG2000 creates huge file sizes for moving images
          • But other formats are poorer quality
        • Open standards not necessarily the most suitable
          • WAV, MP3 preferred to OGG by users for sound files
    5. What have we learnt? (III)
      • Metadata and the creation of digital silos
        • Different metadata standards; more importantly different interpretations of metadata
        • E.g. basic Dublin Core vs granular VRA4 (Visual Resources Association)
        • Crosswalks and translation services exist, but are we fighting a losing battle
        • Different thesauri within the same communities?
      • Developing communities of practice which allow for early agreement and negotiation
    6. What have we learnt? (IV)
      • Standards may be fixed; but they inhabit an organic environment
        • Any standards policy that is implemented interacts with other issues throughout an institution
        • E.g. Staff skills and training, costs, times, available software and tools, relationship to hardware and operating systems, required end uses.
    7. Standards must be agile
      • Not necessarily different external users; same users in slightly different ways
      • Media and syndication of content
      • Create once; re-use many times
      • Migration is not just about digital preservation;
      • XML to PDF, TXT, XLS, MDB, RSS, HTML
      • At least use tools which can get you to XML
      • Letting others use your data in unexpected ways - mash-ups, visualisation
    8. What is JISC doing?
      • Conversations with experts to provide guidance
      • UKOLN - wide-reaching concern for standards and metadata
        • http://www.ukoln.ac.uk
      • Netskills workshops
        • http://www.netskills.ac.uk /
      • Cetis - Standards for educational technologies
        • http://jisc.cetis.ac.uk/
      • TASI (Technical Advisory Service for Images)
        • Soon to expand remit for sound and moving images - http://www.tasi.ac.uk
    9. What is JISC doing?
      • JISC Standards Catalogue
        • http://standards.jisc.ac.uk /
        • Experts from JISC services (and beyond) provide information
        • New editions created over time
        • Provides entries on key standards, including risk assessment and take-up elsewhere, plus links to further documentation
    10. What is the SCA’s involvement?
      • Planning for next iteration of standards catalogue
        • A catalogue tailored for different audiences
        • Providing informed advice on cost, skills required and suitability for respective audiences
        • Advocacy campaign to promote use
        • Better understanding of audience requirements
        • Hence events like today’s

    Alastair DunningAlastair Dunning, 2 years ago

    custom

    1063 views, 0 favs, 2 embeds more stats

    Talk given in Edinburgh, May 2008

    More Info

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version
    • Total Views 1063
      • 1058 on SlideShare
      • 5 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 0
    • Downloads 19
    Most viewed embeds
    • 4 views on http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com
    • 1 views on http://www.netvibes.com

    more

    All embeds
    • 4 views on http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com
    • 1 views on http://www.netvibes.com

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as innappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel

    Categories