Civil Society Engagement in ASEAN (Yuyun Wahyuningrum)
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×
 

Civil Society Engagement in ASEAN (Yuyun Wahyuningrum)

on

  • 557 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
557
Views on SlideShare
557
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
13
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

Civil Society Engagement in ASEAN (Yuyun Wahyuningrum) Civil Society Engagement in ASEAN (Yuyun Wahyuningrum) Presentation Transcript

  • ASEAN & CIVIL SOCIETY ADVOCACY Yuyun Wahyuningrum, Senior Advisor on ASEAN and Human Rights, HRWG – Indonesia, wahyuningrum@gmail.com 2013
  • ENGAGING ASEAN • Civil Society‟s history of nonengagement in first 30 years; mutual distrust between CS and ASEAN Individual/ Citizen Victims/Survivors Private sectors • Different perspectives on civil society • ASEAN Charter language on peoples‟ participation in ASEAN (Art 13) • Lack of mechanisms for CS participation in ASEAN ASEAN Governments Think Tank Civil Society Groups, Lawyers • current practice by the ASEAN, i.e. CSO accreditation process
  • Who and what is civil society? • “Civil society refers to the arena of uncoerced collective action around shared interests, purposes and values. In theory, its institutional forms are distinct from those of the state, family and market, though in practice, the boundaries between state, civil society, family and market are often complex, blurred and negotiated. London School of Economics Center for Civil Society www.ise.ac.uk • Civil society comprises the realm of organizations that lie between the family at one extreme and the state at the other (Hegel 1821) • Civil society is the sphere of institutions, organisations and individuals located between the family, the state and the marketin which people associate voluntarily to advance common interests (Anheirer 2004) • [Civil society as] an anti-hegemonic force in society, whose purpose is to aggregate the interests of power of the marginalised members of society (Habermas 1996) • “associations of citizens (outside their families, friends and businesses) entered into voluntarily to advance their interests, ideas and ideologies. The term does not include profit-making activity (the private sector) or governing (the public sector)” (Cardoso et al. (2004), We the peoples: civil society, the United Nations and global governance. Report of the Panel of Eminent Persons on United Nations-Civil Society Relations, UN document UN A/58/817, http://www.un.org/reform/a58_817_english.doc) • Civil society is bourgeois society that maintains the dominant economic
  • Purpose • advocate a collective good (Mueller 2004); typically „public interest groups‟ • prime characteristic and motivation is a “search for meaning” and the “application of principled beliefs” (Khagram et al. 2002), rather than the use of authority (state) or the drive for profit (business • Role in building social capital, provision of social justice. Is democracy more likely and of better quality where there is a strong CS?
  • Contemporary dimensions of civil society Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) therefore are a wide array of organisations: community groups, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), labour unions, indigenous groups, charitable organisations, faith-based organisations, professional associations, and foundations (World Bank 2006). Civil society embraces: Institutionalised groups: such as religious organisations, trades unions, business associations and co-operatives. Local organisations: such as community associations, farmers’ associations, local sports groups, non-governmental organisations and credit societies. Social movements and networks (DFID 2006).
  • Non-state actors • NON-STATE ACTORS: non governmental organisations, organisations representing indigenous peoples, organisations representing national and/or ethnic minorities, local traders' associations and citizens' groups, cooperatives, trade unions, organisations representing economic and social interests, organisations fighting corruption and fraud and promoting good governance, civil rights organisations and organisations combating discrimination, local organisations (including networks) involved in decentralised regional cooperation and integration, consumer organisations, women's and youth organisations, teaching, cultural, research and scientific organisations, universities, churches and religious associations and communities, the media and any non-governmental associations and independent foundations, including independent political foundations. • gather the main structures of organised society outside government and public administration; are independent of the state; are active in different fields;
  • NGOs NGOs Civil Society Organisations Non State Actors
  • CSO Platforms in engaging ASEAN Name frequent Engaging the body ACSC/APF annually ASEAN SUMMIT Head of States/Governments ASEAN Disability Forum (ADF) annually ASEAN Youth Forum annually ASEAN Grass-root People Assembly annually ASEAN Community Dialogue annually ASEAN Committee Permanent Representatives (CPR) CPR Civil Society Forum to AMM on human rights annually ASEAN Ministers Meeting (AMM) Foreign Ministers Informal Dialogue between CSO and ASG annually ASEAN Secretary General (ASG) Secretary General Jakarta Human Rights Dialogue in ASEAN annually ASEAN Human Rights Mechanisms AICHR, ACWC GO-NGO Forum on Social Welfare & Development annually ASEAN Senior Official Meeting on SWD SOM officials
  • ASEAN Community Dialogue, 2012
  • Informal Dialogue with ASEAN Secretary General, 2012
  • Meeting with Minister Foreign Affairs, 2012
  • ASEAN Civil Society Conferences/ASEAN Peoples Forums 2005-2012 Year Place The Name of the Event 2005 Shah Alam, Malaysia 1st ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC) 2006 Cebu, the Philippines 2nd ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC) 2007 Singapore 3rd ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC) 2009 Bangkok, Thailand 4th ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC)/ 1st ASEAN Peoples‟ Forum (APF) 2009 Hua Hin, Thailand 5th ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC)/2nd ASEAN Peoples‟ Forum (APF) 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam 6th ASEAN Peoples‟ Forum (APF) 2011 Jakarta, Indonesia ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC)/ ASEAN Peoples‟ Forum (APF) 2011 2012 Phnom Penh, Cambodia ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC)/ ASEAN Peoples‟ Forum (APF) 2012 – March & November 2013 Brunei ASEAN Civil Society Conference (ACSC)/ ASEAN Peoples‟ Forum (APF) 2013 - April
  • CSO/NGO participation Malysia 2005 Cebu 2006 Singapore 2007 Bangkok 2009 Cha Am 2009 Hanoi 2010 Jakarata 2011 Phnom Penh 2012 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
  • Thematic Engagements with ASEAN • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Human Rights Labor and Migrants Agriculture and Trade Issues Food Sovereignty and Land-related issues Extractives Industries: mining, gas, oil Large scale development projects: dams Environment/ Climate Change/ Climate Justice Housing Rights Gender Child Rights Youth Participation Refugees / Stateless Peoples/ Internally Displaced Peoples Indigenous Peoples Communication Rights and Freedom of Information Burma Peace and Conflict Etc.
  • + Our collective knowledge we produced through 8 years‟ ACSC/APF? ASEAN‟s Alternative Regionalism (Source: HRWG Study, 2011) • Particularly: Women & Youth, Indigenous People / Ethnic Minority, and CSOs • • • • CSO Participation in Decision Making Process Adoption of Basic Universal Values (1,2,3,6,7) • Against unjust FTA, privatization, • Reject neoliberal economic policies Democracy Human Rights Transparency Accountability (3,4,5,6,7) Holistic rights-based approach on Developmen t (1,2,4,5,6,7) Adoption of UN Bodies‟ related Conventions (1,2,4,5,6,7) • Mainly: ILO, UNFCCC, CE DAW, UNCRC, UN DRIP, &MDGs
  • Perspectives and Learning on Engagement with ASEAN • Gaps in CS capacities (countries, regional viz. country) • Multiple capacities needed: articulating a peoples’ agenda; mounting regional and national campaigns; rooting regional campaigns on the national level; bringing different thematic constituencies behind regional campaigns; convincing the public; having champions in govt • CS dependence on grants and CS-donor relations • CS roles in governance evolving • CS not homogenous, diff views on engagement • Governments’ and GONGOs continuing distrust of CSOs
  • Changes brought about by CS engagement with ASEAN • policy changes: human rights and other rights • institutional mechanisms: AICHR, ACWC, discussions on mechanisms for CS participation • changes in attitudes, outlooks
  • Strategy: Simultaneous Approaches Regional Lobby, Net work & Advocacy ASEAN National Lobby, Net work, Advoc acy & Campaign  Top Down: Creation of demand in regional level through regional organizations.  ASEAN secretariat  ASEAN Representatives/Bodies  International Institutions  Bottom Up: Pushing for need of making ASEAN HR Mechanism through civil society advocacy.  Individual member countries  CSOs/NGOs (Nat & Regional)
  • INSIDERS VS Outsiders • PRESSURE FROM THE OUTSIDE through confrontational tactics: marching, attacking the „red zone‟, showing the weakness or the contradictions of „the system‟, raise public consciousness, „show the king is naked‟ • ENGANGEMENT with policy-makers trying to provoke change „from within‟ • Accept the rules of the game in order to gain access to policy arenas • „Insiders‟ use techniques like persuasion, lobbying, campaigning • Critiques: Who is representative of CS/global public good? Risk of „watering down‟ criticism in favor of
  • INSIDE Dimension of engagement INSIDE OUTSIDE OUTSIDE Repertories of action and strategies towards policy processes Cooperative attitude: active engagement in policy-making processes through lobbying, advocacy and participation in multistakeholder processes. Policy processes are seen as “potential gain”. Insiders are the least independent from the political process. Confrontational attitude: “engagement” through pressure from the outside (counter-summits, campaigns, norm change…) and disruptive direct actions. Policy processes are perceived as “threats”.
  • Indonesia‟s Experiences & Engaging ASEAN
  • Indonesia‟s Experience • Our process toward democracy has informed that the pressures for a change both came from inside and outside the country have proved to be effective and strategic. • Organized society and the participation of civil society are the key to our economic and political reform in Indonesia. • Apart of using international mechanism, we started to shape the opinion of diplomatic community • • • UN, EU on draft law on mass organization to get more supports to our position ASEAN, OIC on expanding civil society space in closed countries and at the institution Request further protection for activists/ human rights defenders • Now, we are not only working with foreign diplomats but also Indonesian diplomats • Government has regular briefing with Foreign Diplomats and bilateral talk • It is always effective to have e-list of diplomatic community for information distribution, i.e. ASEANcats@googlegroups.com • Lately, we have a successful campaign on freedom of religions and beliefs, LGBTIQ, ASEAN Human Rights Declaration
  • USING ASEAN • Popularizing the concept of Civil Society in ASEAN Member States • Civil Society Space: Expanding its space at national and regional level • ACSC/APF, ADF, AGPA • Country cases: Vietnam, Brunei, Burma • Institutionalizing democratic dialogue • • • • Informal Dialogue with ASG ASEAN Community Dialogue with CPR Jakarta Human Rights Dialogue Informal Meeting with Head of States • Setting norms and shaping practices in ASEAN and its member countries: Charter, TOR AICHR, AHRD