SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 17
IEEE 1902.1
RUBEE

By:
P13co002
M.Tech 1st
Contents
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Introduction
Motivation
Physical layer
Power
Data protocol
Responder states
collision
Rubee tags
Advantage over RFID
conclusion
Reference
Introduction
• It’s a wireless data communication protocol based
on IEEE 1902.1.
• RuBee is proposed for high security applications
and use in harsh environment.
• It uses long wave magnetic signal to send and
receive short data packets .
• Similar to the IEEE 802 protocols .
• But uses low frequency carrier(<450 kHz).
• RuBee is networked by using on-demand, peer-topeer, active radiating transceivers.
MOTIVATION
Rubee Physical layer
• For modulation ASK and BPSK with phase
shifts of 0 degrees or 180 is used.
• The Controller must support both modulation
but the Responder may only support one.
• Bi-phase Mark Coding (BMC), Manchester
Encoding technique is used for encoding.
• It can operate at other frequencies (< 450 kHz)
but 131 kHz is optimal.
Power
• The IEEE 1902.1 recommends devices to have an
average power of less than 10 milli-Watts (mW).
• Magnetic signals drop off 1/R3 (R distance from
antenna) so will not travel nearly as far as the RF
signal.
• RuBee tags have very low power consumption.
• Operating over medium range (0.5 to 30 meters)
and at low data transfer speeds (300-9600 bits
per second).
Data protocol
• The communications between controller devices
and responder devices uses near field.
• Two kind of Protocol data unit (PDU): Request
PDU and Respond PDU .
• Controller send Request PDU ,its address and
command to responder.
• Responder process the command and send
response PDU to controller.
• Response PDUs are less than half the length of
the request PDU.
• This facilitates the use of physically smaller and
less expensive batteries in responder devices
Protocol data unit

Request PDU

Response PDU
Responder states

state transitions in responder

• The Controller is always
"Awake“ connected with a
permanent power supply
source.
• The Responder is used
battery and switching
between "Listening" and
"Sleeping" states.
• In the "Listen" state
responder tries to detect a
carrier and read the
command to process.
• Responder is always awake
If the controller uses oneto-one request PDU.
Collision
• BMC encoding on BPSK modulation allows
synchronizing the listening of the carrier on a
specific Responder or Controller signal.
• The listener device have two listening
channels with 90º phase difference .
• No anti-collision mechanism like CSMA/CA .
• So Controllers and Responders must be
synchronized.
Network and Application Layer
• Peer-to-Peer network topology is used .
• Network size is 8 (node).
• RuBee tag use an 8 nibble address (32 bit) like
ip address which define tag as a unique.
• AES is used for encryption.
• Frame checking sequence is done on
application layer due to system simplicity .
Advantage over RFID
Rubee

RFID

•

• RFID work in the VHF, UHF or SHF
bands with the electric field.

RuBee is 99.99% magnetic waves
so not effected by people or
animals, mud or water.
• Steel can enhance a magnetic
signal. Long Wavelength magnetic
transmissions (below 1 MHz) is
not blocked or reflected by steel
so nulls do not occur.
• Magnetic signals drop off 1/R3 (R
distance from antenna) so noise
is also falls off 1/R3.
• Due to short range its also safe in
security

• In harsh environment like steel
block the Radio waves and create
problems like RF nulls .
• Radio signals and RFID power
drops off 1/R in far field so noise
is also falls off 1/R.
Rubee tag Design
• A RuBee Tag has a 4 bit CPU
• It could optionally have
sensors ,displays and
buttons.
• RuBee is bidirectional, ondemand, and peer-to -peer.
• It can operate at other
frequencies but 131 kHz is
optimal.
• The RuBee protocol uses an
IP Address and unique MAC
to communication with
other tags and RuBee
routers.
Advantage
• Long battery life: The IEEE 1902.1 recommends devices
to have an average power of less than 10 milli-Watts
(mW) .
• Human Safety: A RuBee base station produces only
nano watts of radio energy.
• Cost effective : low frequency is used so less amount of
money required for deployment .
• Less noise : magnetic signal falls off 1/R3(R distance
from antena).
• Better transmission distance: RuBee antennas read all
tags in a specified volumetric area, regardless of which
way the tags are facing, or what is around the tag .
Disadvantage
• There is no data protection mechanism like
CRC etc.
• Data range (15 m) and data rate (9.6 kb/s) is
low.
• Access mode is not available like CSMA/CA.
Summary
• Rubee is used magnetic single so it can be
used in harsh environment .
• RuBee has a high degree of security
protection.
• Also the power consumption of RuBee is low
therefore it can be used for a long time.
Reference
• Design and Application of RuBee-based Telemedicine
Data Acquisition System by Xiaohua Yu*, Xiangling
Xia, Xuhui Chen* in 2011.
• A Comparative Study of Short Range Wireless Sensor
• Network on High Density Networks by Mahdi
Zareei1*, Azar Zarei2, Rahmat Budiarto3, Mohd. Adib
Omar4 in 2011.
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RuBee
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1902.1
• http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnum
ber=6086496
• http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?2436

More Related Content

What's hot

Intro Lora - Makers.ID Meetup
Intro Lora - Makers.ID MeetupIntro Lora - Makers.ID Meetup
Intro Lora - Makers.ID MeetupMif Masterz
 
Open bts guide_en_v0.1
Open bts guide_en_v0.1Open bts guide_en_v0.1
Open bts guide_en_v0.1Daud Suleiman
 
Hacking Wireless World, RFID hacking
Hacking Wireless World, RFID hackingHacking Wireless World, RFID hacking
Hacking Wireless World, RFID hackingE Hacking
 
Abhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined Radio
Abhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined RadioAbhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined Radio
Abhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined Radioguestad4734
 
Software Defined Radio Engineering course sampler
Software Defined Radio Engineering course samplerSoftware Defined Radio Engineering course sampler
Software Defined Radio Engineering course samplerJim Jenkins
 
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christophe
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christopheR&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christophe
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christopheReseauxetservicestpa
 
20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshop
20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshop20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshop
20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshopHu-Cheng Lee
 
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ah
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ahAn Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ah
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ahFaheem Zafari
 
29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotware
29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotware29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotware
29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotwareAlexander Chemeris
 
Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...
Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...
Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...Olimex Bulgaria
 
Software defined radio
Software defined radioSoftware defined radio
Software defined radioDevesh Samaiya
 
AntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRS
AntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRSAntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRS
AntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRSMark Roemers
 
Advanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit Jadav
Advanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit JadavAdvanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit Jadav
Advanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit JadavNSConclave
 

What's hot (20)

Intro Lora - Makers.ID Meetup
Intro Lora - Makers.ID MeetupIntro Lora - Makers.ID Meetup
Intro Lora - Makers.ID Meetup
 
Open bts guide_en_v0.1
Open bts guide_en_v0.1Open bts guide_en_v0.1
Open bts guide_en_v0.1
 
Software Defined Radio
Software Defined RadioSoftware Defined Radio
Software Defined Radio
 
Hacking Wireless World, RFID hacking
Hacking Wireless World, RFID hackingHacking Wireless World, RFID hacking
Hacking Wireless World, RFID hacking
 
Lora vs Zigbee
Lora vs ZigbeeLora vs Zigbee
Lora vs Zigbee
 
Abhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined Radio
Abhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined RadioAbhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined Radio
Abhinav End Sem Presentation Software Defined Radio
 
Software Defined Radio Engineering course sampler
Software Defined Radio Engineering course samplerSoftware Defined Radio Engineering course sampler
Software Defined Radio Engineering course sampler
 
All your wireless devices belongs to me
All your wireless devices belongs to meAll your wireless devices belongs to me
All your wireless devices belongs to me
 
loy
loyloy
loy
 
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christophe
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christopheR&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christophe
R&s 10 juin 2015 sigfox christophe
 
20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshop
20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshop20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshop
20161227 Taipei Smart IOT Innovation Lab workshop
 
NB-IoT vs Lora
NB-IoT vs LoraNB-IoT vs Lora
NB-IoT vs Lora
 
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ah
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ahAn Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ah
An Overview of LoRA, Sigfox, and IEEE 802.11ah
 
29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotware
29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotware29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotware
29c3 OpenBTS workshop - Hardware and sotware
 
Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...
Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...
Open fest2018 LoRa, LoRa WAN, The Thing Network - capabilities, myths, applic...
 
LPWAN for IoT
LPWAN for IoTLPWAN for IoT
LPWAN for IoT
 
Software defined radio
Software defined radioSoftware defined radio
Software defined radio
 
AntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRS
AntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRSAntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRS
AntTail white paper: Technology scan IoT Datacommunications: LoRa, NB-IoT, GPRS
 
Bluetooth Module
Bluetooth ModuleBluetooth Module
Bluetooth Module
 
Advanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit Jadav
Advanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit JadavAdvanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit Jadav
Advanced Wireless Reconnaissance And Testing - Rohit Jadav
 

Similar to Ieee 1902.1

LTE Training for Abuja Team
LTE Training for Abuja TeamLTE Training for Abuja Team
LTE Training for Abuja TeamOpeyemi Praise
 
WPAN According To ZIGBEE
WPAN According To ZIGBEEWPAN According To ZIGBEE
WPAN According To ZIGBEEAfaq Siddiqui
 
zigbee technology
zigbee technology zigbee technology
zigbee technology N.CH Karthik
 
POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS USING R...
POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS  USING R...POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS  USING R...
POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS USING R...Nishmi Suresh
 
Zigbee- The Future of Data Communications
Zigbee- The Future of Data CommunicationsZigbee- The Future of Data Communications
Zigbee- The Future of Data CommunicationsArkaprava Sadhu
 
Zigbee intro v5
Zigbee intro v5Zigbee intro v5
Zigbee intro v5rajrayala
 
Robulink AMI System Technology
Robulink AMI System TechnologyRobulink AMI System Technology
Robulink AMI System Technologyjessie968
 
AWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptx
AWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptxAWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptx
AWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptxshashijntuhceh
 
fundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IP
fundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IPfundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IP
fundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IPHusseinAwil
 
Wireless_Connectivity_BASIC_Linkedin
Wireless_Connectivity_BASIC_LinkedinWireless_Connectivity_BASIC_Linkedin
Wireless_Connectivity_BASIC_LinkedinRobert Russell
 
Visible light communication (vlc) systems
Visible light communication (vlc) systemsVisible light communication (vlc) systems
Visible light communication (vlc) systemsCKSunith1
 

Similar to Ieee 1902.1 (20)

LTE Training for Abuja Team
LTE Training for Abuja TeamLTE Training for Abuja Team
LTE Training for Abuja Team
 
WPAN According To ZIGBEE
WPAN According To ZIGBEEWPAN According To ZIGBEE
WPAN According To ZIGBEE
 
zigbee technology
zigbee technology zigbee technology
zigbee technology
 
POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS USING R...
POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS  USING R...POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS  USING R...
POWER EFFICIENT SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO FOR DISASTER AFFECTED REGIONS USING R...
 
Ultra_Wide_Band_ppt
Ultra_Wide_Band_pptUltra_Wide_Band_ppt
Ultra_Wide_Band_ppt
 
Zigbee
ZigbeeZigbee
Zigbee
 
IoT Control Units and Communication Models
IoT Control Units and Communication ModelsIoT Control Units and Communication Models
IoT Control Units and Communication Models
 
Zigbee- The Future of Data Communications
Zigbee- The Future of Data CommunicationsZigbee- The Future of Data Communications
Zigbee- The Future of Data Communications
 
Communication protocols
Communication protocolsCommunication protocols
Communication protocols
 
LORA.pptx
LORA.pptxLORA.pptx
LORA.pptx
 
Zigbee intro v5
Zigbee intro v5Zigbee intro v5
Zigbee intro v5
 
Robulink AMI System Technology
Robulink AMI System TechnologyRobulink AMI System Technology
Robulink AMI System Technology
 
BSNL (SUD)
BSNL (SUD)BSNL (SUD)
BSNL (SUD)
 
Zigbee
 Zigbee    Zigbee
Zigbee
 
AWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptx
AWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptxAWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptx
AWMN Ultra-band Advanced wireless and .pptx
 
Bluetooth basics
Bluetooth basics Bluetooth basics
Bluetooth basics
 
fundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IP
fundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IPfundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IP
fundamental of networking course, LAN,WAN,TCP,IP
 
Wireless_Connectivity_BASIC_Linkedin
Wireless_Connectivity_BASIC_LinkedinWireless_Connectivity_BASIC_Linkedin
Wireless_Connectivity_BASIC_Linkedin
 
Visible light communication (vlc) systems
Visible light communication (vlc) systemsVisible light communication (vlc) systems
Visible light communication (vlc) systems
 
Railway ofc training
Railway ofc trainingRailway ofc training
Railway ofc training
 

Ieee 1902.1

  • 3. Introduction • It’s a wireless data communication protocol based on IEEE 1902.1. • RuBee is proposed for high security applications and use in harsh environment. • It uses long wave magnetic signal to send and receive short data packets . • Similar to the IEEE 802 protocols . • But uses low frequency carrier(<450 kHz). • RuBee is networked by using on-demand, peer-topeer, active radiating transceivers.
  • 5. Rubee Physical layer • For modulation ASK and BPSK with phase shifts of 0 degrees or 180 is used. • The Controller must support both modulation but the Responder may only support one. • Bi-phase Mark Coding (BMC), Manchester Encoding technique is used for encoding. • It can operate at other frequencies (< 450 kHz) but 131 kHz is optimal.
  • 6. Power • The IEEE 1902.1 recommends devices to have an average power of less than 10 milli-Watts (mW). • Magnetic signals drop off 1/R3 (R distance from antenna) so will not travel nearly as far as the RF signal. • RuBee tags have very low power consumption. • Operating over medium range (0.5 to 30 meters) and at low data transfer speeds (300-9600 bits per second).
  • 7. Data protocol • The communications between controller devices and responder devices uses near field. • Two kind of Protocol data unit (PDU): Request PDU and Respond PDU . • Controller send Request PDU ,its address and command to responder. • Responder process the command and send response PDU to controller. • Response PDUs are less than half the length of the request PDU. • This facilitates the use of physically smaller and less expensive batteries in responder devices
  • 8. Protocol data unit Request PDU Response PDU
  • 9. Responder states state transitions in responder • The Controller is always "Awake“ connected with a permanent power supply source. • The Responder is used battery and switching between "Listening" and "Sleeping" states. • In the "Listen" state responder tries to detect a carrier and read the command to process. • Responder is always awake If the controller uses oneto-one request PDU.
  • 10. Collision • BMC encoding on BPSK modulation allows synchronizing the listening of the carrier on a specific Responder or Controller signal. • The listener device have two listening channels with 90º phase difference . • No anti-collision mechanism like CSMA/CA . • So Controllers and Responders must be synchronized.
  • 11. Network and Application Layer • Peer-to-Peer network topology is used . • Network size is 8 (node). • RuBee tag use an 8 nibble address (32 bit) like ip address which define tag as a unique. • AES is used for encryption. • Frame checking sequence is done on application layer due to system simplicity .
  • 12. Advantage over RFID Rubee RFID • • RFID work in the VHF, UHF or SHF bands with the electric field. RuBee is 99.99% magnetic waves so not effected by people or animals, mud or water. • Steel can enhance a magnetic signal. Long Wavelength magnetic transmissions (below 1 MHz) is not blocked or reflected by steel so nulls do not occur. • Magnetic signals drop off 1/R3 (R distance from antenna) so noise is also falls off 1/R3. • Due to short range its also safe in security • In harsh environment like steel block the Radio waves and create problems like RF nulls . • Radio signals and RFID power drops off 1/R in far field so noise is also falls off 1/R.
  • 13. Rubee tag Design • A RuBee Tag has a 4 bit CPU • It could optionally have sensors ,displays and buttons. • RuBee is bidirectional, ondemand, and peer-to -peer. • It can operate at other frequencies but 131 kHz is optimal. • The RuBee protocol uses an IP Address and unique MAC to communication with other tags and RuBee routers.
  • 14. Advantage • Long battery life: The IEEE 1902.1 recommends devices to have an average power of less than 10 milli-Watts (mW) . • Human Safety: A RuBee base station produces only nano watts of radio energy. • Cost effective : low frequency is used so less amount of money required for deployment . • Less noise : magnetic signal falls off 1/R3(R distance from antena). • Better transmission distance: RuBee antennas read all tags in a specified volumetric area, regardless of which way the tags are facing, or what is around the tag .
  • 15. Disadvantage • There is no data protection mechanism like CRC etc. • Data range (15 m) and data rate (9.6 kb/s) is low. • Access mode is not available like CSMA/CA.
  • 16. Summary • Rubee is used magnetic single so it can be used in harsh environment . • RuBee has a high degree of security protection. • Also the power consumption of RuBee is low therefore it can be used for a long time.
  • 17. Reference • Design and Application of RuBee-based Telemedicine Data Acquisition System by Xiaohua Yu*, Xiangling Xia, Xuhui Chen* in 2011. • A Comparative Study of Short Range Wireless Sensor • Network on High Density Networks by Mahdi Zareei1*, Azar Zarei2, Rahmat Budiarto3, Mohd. Adib Omar4 in 2011. • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RuBee • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_1902.1 • http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnum ber=6086496 • http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?2436

Editor's Notes

  1. The controller devices initiate communications and make requests or commands of responder devices. The responder device performs the requested action and transmits a response back to the controller device. A single responder device can take on both controller and responder roles, providing the option of peer to peer communications.
  2. Amplitude-shift keying (ASK) is a form of amplitude modulation that represents digital data as variations in the amplitude of a carrier wave. In an ASK system, binary symbol 1 is represented by transmitting carrier wave of fixed amplitude and fixed frequency for the bit duration T seconds.Any digital modulation scheme uses a finite number of distinct signals to represent digital data. ASK uses a finite number of amplitudes, each assigned a unique pattern of binary digits. Usually, each amplitude encodes an equal number of bits. Each pattern of bits forms the symbol that is represented by the particular amplitude. The demodulator, which is designed specifically for the symbol-set used by the modulator, determines the amplitude of the received signal and maps it back to the symbol it represents, thus recovering the original data. Frequency and phase of the carrier are kept constant.Faraday&apos;s law describes how a time varying magnetic field creates (&quot;induces&quot;) an electric fieldAmpère&apos;s law with Maxwell&apos;s correction states that magnetic fields can be generated in two ways: byelectrical current (this was the original &quot;Ampère&apos;s law&quot;) and by changing electric fields (this was &quot;Maxwell&apos;s correction&quot;).
  3. This power limits the area of the network to a piconet, between 0.5 metres (1.6 ft) and 30 metres (98 ft)
  4. The Controller is considered permanently &quot;Awake&quot; and to have a power supply provided by a permanent source. The Responder is made to work on battery and alternate between &quot;Listening&quot; and &quot;Sleeping&quot; states.The Responder, in the &quot;Listen&quot; state, tries to detect a carrier at 131 kHz and to read its commands. An emitting Controller in ASK sends a low power carrier for a zero bit whereas in BPSK the carrier is always present at the maximum emitting power. Thus, the Responder can detect the communicating Controller and stay listening. If there are many Responders and if the Controller uses only the one-to-one Request PDU, the Responder will stay listening for all commands sent and received on the network, and therefore may stay permanently awake. The use of responder groups, multicast or broadcast, help to better manage battery life for the Responders. An optimization for the cost and sleeping period of the Request PDUs must be done on the application layer.
  5. and help to distinguish even signals with orthogonal interference.Controller and responder must be Syncronize otherwise network not able to distinguish between different -2 signal
  6. Mesh networks generally refer to wireless networks. Mesh networks are networks where each wireless node talks to one or more wireless nodes. Each node will repeat packets of information, thus increasing the effective range of the network. Communication between nodes will travel in hops between nodes to (ideally) achieve the shortest number of hops, between 2 points.P2P generally refers to &apos;Peer to Peer&apos; filesharing networks. Each user shares and downloads files from and to each other. P2P sometimes refers to a &apos;Point to Point&apos; wireless network. That is each node communicates exclusively with another node. This is generally done with directional antennas over larger distances.
  7.  By &apos;harsh environment&apos; we mean situations in which one or both ends of the communication is near steel or waterseparated by &quot;nulls&quot;, angles where the radiation falls to zero.