SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Commentary by Gunnar Sivertsen, NIFU, Oslo
1. Recommendations about good practice for the use of bibliometrics on the level of
individuals are certainly needed in our field. The 20 points presented (which I agree with) are
an important step forward in a consensus process in which all of our international community
should take part. But I observe that there is more need for the recommendations outside our
community than within it: The main audience must be the researchers themselves and their
administrators in research organizations as well as funding organizations. In recent years,
especially after the introduction of the H-index, bibliometrics on the individual level has
become widespread and is even practiced by evaluation panels contrary to the guidelines
given by the organizations that employ and/or fund the researchers.
2. Although our community is not completely responsible for evaluation outcomes in all
contexts, I think we are responsible for recommendations on behalf of bibliometric expertise.
Addressing a larger audience, the recommendations should perhaps be fewer and more
general, but with the most used easy ranking measures (JIF and H-index) as illustrations of
good practice/malpractice. The need for normalizations by using reference standards should
be explained in an easily understandable way.
3. The recommendations should not only be about bibliometric indicators. They should be
contextualized by explaining evaluation purposes and procedures in general and
how bibliometrics are properly used in their context.
4. Since most researchers are used to domains where everybody can see and check each
others’ data, some words about the use of commercial data sources (and ready-made
commercial indicators at the individual level) in bibliometrics are needed. If we advise
normalizations for the proper use of indicators, we should also explain how the data needed
for these normalizations are or are not available.

More Related Content

What's hot

Cliks gethin white hslg 2013
Cliks gethin white hslg 2013Cliks gethin white hslg 2013
Cliks gethin white hslg 2013
hslgcommittee
 
香港六合彩
香港六合彩香港六合彩
香港六合彩
weige
 
Ben Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs
Ben Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research OutputsBen Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs
Ben Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs
NeilStewartCity
 

What's hot (20)

Cliks gethin white hslg 2013
Cliks gethin white hslg 2013Cliks gethin white hslg 2013
Cliks gethin white hslg 2013
 
AHRC Guidance on Public Policy Engagement
AHRC Guidance on Public Policy EngagementAHRC Guidance on Public Policy Engagement
AHRC Guidance on Public Policy Engagement
 
The perspective of Research Councils UK
The perspective of Research Councils UK The perspective of Research Councils UK
The perspective of Research Councils UK
 
The culture of research metrics in research organisations
The culture of research metrics in research organisationsThe culture of research metrics in research organisations
The culture of research metrics in research organisations
 
(Analyst Workshop 19) Robert Williams
(Analyst Workshop 19) Robert Williams(Analyst Workshop 19) Robert Williams
(Analyst Workshop 19) Robert Williams
 
PPWNov13- Day 3- S. Babu- IFPRI
PPWNov13- Day 3- S. Babu- IFPRIPPWNov13- Day 3- S. Babu- IFPRI
PPWNov13- Day 3- S. Babu- IFPRI
 
Applying Performance Measurement to Safeguard Budgets: Qualitative and Quanti...
Applying Performance Measurement to Safeguard Budgets: Qualitative and Quanti...Applying Performance Measurement to Safeguard Budgets: Qualitative and Quanti...
Applying Performance Measurement to Safeguard Budgets: Qualitative and Quanti...
 
Evaluating the value of research-by-consortium: Science of Team Science
Evaluating the value of research-by-consortium: Science of Team ScienceEvaluating the value of research-by-consortium: Science of Team Science
Evaluating the value of research-by-consortium: Science of Team Science
 
Stephen Jackson QAA
Stephen Jackson QAAStephen Jackson QAA
Stephen Jackson QAA
 
香港六合彩
香港六合彩香港六合彩
香港六合彩
 
Enhancing livelihoods of poor livestock keepers through increasing use of fod...
Enhancing livelihoods of poor livestock keepers through increasing use of fod...Enhancing livelihoods of poor livestock keepers through increasing use of fod...
Enhancing livelihoods of poor livestock keepers through increasing use of fod...
 
Integrating gender analysis into the sustainable intensification assessment f...
Integrating gender analysis into the sustainable intensification assessment f...Integrating gender analysis into the sustainable intensification assessment f...
Integrating gender analysis into the sustainable intensification assessment f...
 
Ben Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs
Ben Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research OutputsBen Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs
Ben Ryan: Going for Gold? The RCUK Policy on Access to Research Outputs
 
Introduction To Conference[1]
Introduction To Conference[1]Introduction To Conference[1]
Introduction To Conference[1]
 
Les Ebdon OFFA
Les Ebdon OFFALes Ebdon OFFA
Les Ebdon OFFA
 
Monitoring MDGs and influencing policy – practical approaches and experience ...
Monitoring MDGs and influencing policy – practical approaches and experience ...Monitoring MDGs and influencing policy – practical approaches and experience ...
Monitoring MDGs and influencing policy – practical approaches and experience ...
 
Illustration of a proposed ReSAKSS-Asia website tool
Illustration of a proposed ReSAKSS-Asia website toolIllustration of a proposed ReSAKSS-Asia website tool
Illustration of a proposed ReSAKSS-Asia website tool
 
ISMTE 2016 Breakout Session: Should You Consider Transitioning Your Journal t...
ISMTE 2016 Breakout Session: Should You Consider Transitioning Your Journal t...ISMTE 2016 Breakout Session: Should You Consider Transitioning Your Journal t...
ISMTE 2016 Breakout Session: Should You Consider Transitioning Your Journal t...
 
JUSP for CPD25 eCollections Management workshop
JUSP for CPD25 eCollections Management workshopJUSP for CPD25 eCollections Management workshop
JUSP for CPD25 eCollections Management workshop
 
Innovation platforms for land and water management in the Nile Basin
Innovation platforms for land and water management in the Nile BasinInnovation platforms for land and water management in the Nile Basin
Innovation platforms for land and water management in the Nile Basin
 

Similar to Standards for individual level bibliometrics

Three pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docx
Three pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docxThree pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docx
Three pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docx
juliennehar
 
Research methodology
Research methodologyResearch methodology
Research methodology
Akhtar Alam
 

Similar to Standards for individual level bibliometrics (20)

Вэбінар "Асноўныя індыкатары прыязнасці да сталых людзей"
Вэбінар "Асноўныя індыкатары прыязнасці да сталых людзей"Вэбінар "Асноўныя індыкатары прыязнасці да сталых людзей"
Вэбінар "Асноўныя індыкатары прыязнасці да сталых людзей"
 
Three pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docx
Three pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docxThree pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docx
Three pages total· Complete sentences (0.5 point) Write answers.docx
 
A Step By Step Guide To Monitoring And Evaluation
A Step By Step Guide To Monitoring And EvaluationA Step By Step Guide To Monitoring And Evaluation
A Step By Step Guide To Monitoring And Evaluation
 
Introduction to COPE and Publication Ethics
Introduction to COPE and Publication EthicsIntroduction to COPE and Publication Ethics
Introduction to COPE and Publication Ethics
 
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)
 
evaluation of the Route to Success resources
evaluation of the Route to Success resourcesevaluation of the Route to Success resources
evaluation of the Route to Success resources
 
social media analysis.docx
social media analysis.docxsocial media analysis.docx
social media analysis.docx
 
Communicating About Standards: Creating A Technical Infrastructure That Every...
Communicating About Standards: Creating A Technical Infrastructure That Every...Communicating About Standards: Creating A Technical Infrastructure That Every...
Communicating About Standards: Creating A Technical Infrastructure That Every...
 
Projecting Friendly and Usefully: Guidelines for the Design of Consumer Goods...
Projecting Friendly and Usefully: Guidelines for the Design of Consumer Goods...Projecting Friendly and Usefully: Guidelines for the Design of Consumer Goods...
Projecting Friendly and Usefully: Guidelines for the Design of Consumer Goods...
 
Understanding household water in northern Ghana from a user's point of view
Understanding household water in northern Ghana from a user's point of viewUnderstanding household water in northern Ghana from a user's point of view
Understanding household water in northern Ghana from a user's point of view
 
Research Manual
Research ManualResearch Manual
Research Manual
 
Putting well being metrics into policy action, Nancy Hey
Putting well being metrics into policy action, Nancy HeyPutting well being metrics into policy action, Nancy Hey
Putting well being metrics into policy action, Nancy Hey
 
Top Tips_Research Communications: Effective Communication for Southern Resear...
Top Tips_Research Communications: Effective Communication for Southern Resear...Top Tips_Research Communications: Effective Communication for Southern Resear...
Top Tips_Research Communications: Effective Communication for Southern Resear...
 
7 ps marketing strategies of Libraries
7 ps  marketing strategies of Libraries7 ps  marketing strategies of Libraries
7 ps marketing strategies of Libraries
 
EU Draft mHealth App Assessment Guidelines
EU Draft mHealth App Assessment GuidelinesEU Draft mHealth App Assessment Guidelines
EU Draft mHealth App Assessment Guidelines
 
Linking Research to Practice
Linking Research to PracticeLinking Research to Practice
Linking Research to Practice
 
TESTING NEW SOCIAL INNOVATION POLICIES ON LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL
TESTING NEW SOCIAL INNOVATION POLICIES ON LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVELTESTING NEW SOCIAL INNOVATION POLICIES ON LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL
TESTING NEW SOCIAL INNOVATION POLICIES ON LOCAL AND REGIONAL LEVEL
 
RESEARCH 2.0 IT’S ALL THE BUZZ, BUT WHAT DRIVES MEMBER ENGAGEMENT? HOW TO ENS...
RESEARCH 2.0 IT’S ALL THE BUZZ, BUT WHAT DRIVES MEMBER ENGAGEMENT? HOW TO ENS...RESEARCH 2.0 IT’S ALL THE BUZZ, BUT WHAT DRIVES MEMBER ENGAGEMENT? HOW TO ENS...
RESEARCH 2.0 IT’S ALL THE BUZZ, BUT WHAT DRIVES MEMBER ENGAGEMENT? HOW TO ENS...
 
Research methodology
Research methodologyResearch methodology
Research methodology
 
Studio YouTube (Zenodo) D.1.3 Towards an enhanced and aligned institutional p...
Studio YouTube (Zenodo) D.1.3 Towards an enhanced and aligned institutional p...Studio YouTube (Zenodo) D.1.3 Towards an enhanced and aligned institutional p...
Studio YouTube (Zenodo) D.1.3 Towards an enhanced and aligned institutional p...
 

Standards for individual level bibliometrics

  • 1. Commentary by Gunnar Sivertsen, NIFU, Oslo 1. Recommendations about good practice for the use of bibliometrics on the level of individuals are certainly needed in our field. The 20 points presented (which I agree with) are an important step forward in a consensus process in which all of our international community should take part. But I observe that there is more need for the recommendations outside our community than within it: The main audience must be the researchers themselves and their administrators in research organizations as well as funding organizations. In recent years, especially after the introduction of the H-index, bibliometrics on the individual level has become widespread and is even practiced by evaluation panels contrary to the guidelines given by the organizations that employ and/or fund the researchers. 2. Although our community is not completely responsible for evaluation outcomes in all contexts, I think we are responsible for recommendations on behalf of bibliometric expertise. Addressing a larger audience, the recommendations should perhaps be fewer and more general, but with the most used easy ranking measures (JIF and H-index) as illustrations of good practice/malpractice. The need for normalizations by using reference standards should be explained in an easily understandable way. 3. The recommendations should not only be about bibliometric indicators. They should be contextualized by explaining evaluation purposes and procedures in general and how bibliometrics are properly used in their context. 4. Since most researchers are used to domains where everybody can see and check each others’ data, some words about the use of commercial data sources (and ready-made commercial indicators at the individual level) in bibliometrics are needed. If we advise normalizations for the proper use of indicators, we should also explain how the data needed for these normalizations are or are not available.