• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Systems thinking in innovation project management
 

Systems thinking in innovation project management

on

  • 814 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
814
Views on SlideShare
814
Embed Views
0

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
12
Comments
0

0 Embeds 0

No embeds

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Microsoft PowerPoint

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment

    Systems thinking in innovation project management Systems thinking in innovation project management Presentation Transcript

    • Systems Thinking in Innovation Project Management: a match that works SIG: PROJECT ORGANIZING TRACK 19: Project Futures - in Research and Practice
      Dr Maria Kapsali
    • Outline
      Research Questions
      1. Theory 2. Evidence 3. Recommendations
      1. Why are conventional PM methods not effective to manage innovation projects? 2. What can we improve?
      3. How can we apply Systems Thinking concepts? Which are the obstacles to do this? Which is the way to do this?
    • Theory
      1. Why are conventional PM methods not effective to manage innovation projects?
      Because
      Conventional project management methodologies are not adequate tools to manage the serendipitous, evolutionary and experimental nature of innovation projects
      Overemphasis on operational control and lack of flexibility to manage relations and operational change not suitable for non-linear processes
      Because
      Conventional methodologies result in a closed systems mentality where the influences from the environment are locked in due to the hard boundaries of the system
      Because
      Conventional methodologies were designed to manage linear activities in engineering and construction projects
    • Evidence
      12 Multiple Embedded Case studies
      12 embedded multiple case studies (3 EARSS and 9 eTEN projects). 9
      Within and cross-case comparative analysis.
    • Evidence
      12 Multiple Embedded Case studies
      Focus of analysis:
      Project Management Tasks – as planning, communicating and task control-coordination
      The results of the projects (outcomes like the rate of deployment and operationalization of the technology)
      Changes and change management(Nature of changes in the plans and activities, Dealing with change issues , Priority of project performance objectives)
      The link between tasks- change management- results (Elements to be developed in their projects – flexibility-dependability- relations-other)
    • Evidence
      12 Multiple Embedded Case studies
      EARSS
      • Systemic Project Management
      • Manage relationships to satisfy stakeholders and achieve as many of the objectives as possible – compromise - calibrate
      • Flexibility to make decisions according to circumstances
      eTEN
      • Normative Project Management
      • Manage the process in order to satisfy the main stakeholder at the expense of the project goals
      • Limits the project manager as a leader
      Outcome over Process
      Process over Outcome
    • Evidence
      2. What can we improve?
      When project practices (plan, communications and control activities) are built upon Systems Thinking constructs the projects achieve goals better
      Evidence from the case studies reveal that the when the constructs of causal connectedness to manage external relations and equifinality to manage operational change are the most successful to be embedded in managerial practice
    • Recommendations
      3. How can we apply these Systems Thinking concepts?
      Causal connectedness has to be studied through the dynamic interactions and boundary management embedded in the relations between systemic actors
      Equifinality can be studied through flexibility - the slack given to activities in terms of resources and action to change in an agile way
    • Recommendations
      3. Which are the obstacles to do this?
      Systems Thinking constructs are difficult to be built in project practices-activities because of their over generalized nature that makes them difficult to operationalize and measure
      Reasons for that are the insufficient definition and analysis of the issues of holism, flexibility and causality that are the basis of Systems constructs like causal connectedness and equifinality.
    • Recommendations
      3. Which are the obstacles to do this?
      The application of open Systems Thinking constructs in empirical studies is inhibited by the lack of metrics that are easily operationalisable and measurable.
      Different perspectives suffer from lack of consensus on measures, factors of success and research analysis units.
    • Recommendations
      3. Which is the way to do this?
      Study holism, flexibility and causality as they are applied in operational activities and relations in projects
      Project boundary relations and operational activities should be the target of new research projects
      Conventional methodologies should be infused with ST constractsto achieve more flexible and responsive operations to alter practices
    • © Imperial College Business School
      Thank you for your attention
      Questions?