SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Logic Model Scoring Rubric
Beginner (1) Developing (2) Accomplished (3)
Criteria
Documenting Need Claims there is a
problem or need but
fails to quantify the
issue
Identifies a
reasonable measure
of the problem or
need but it is not
directly related to
the target population
Identifies both the problem
or need as well as the
degree to which the issue is
impacting the target
population – Establishes a
clear need based on data
Proposing a Solution Proposes a solution
or approach to
solving the problem
or addressing the
need identified
The proposed
solution is a model
or evidence-based
program
The identified solution
includes evidence of
effectiveness or is proven
to work in the target
population
Identifying
Indicators of
Success
Outcome measures
or indicators of
success are included
Proposed outcome
measures or
indicators of success
are logically linked
or associated with
the identified need
or problem
The proposed outcome
measures or indicators of
success are based on past
experience, industry
standards or research that
demonstrates a relationship
between the solution and
the identified problem,
need or issue – the selected
measures fully support
checking the solution
against identified issue
Assess the Solution Targeted level(s) of
change are included,
although the basis
for the target is not
stated
Targets for change
are logical but may
still be based on
assumptions –
targets are not fully
vetted
Targets for change are
justified based on
documented similar or past
results achieved, either by
the proposer or in related
research
Overall Impression The logic model
presents an
unsupported
prediction about a
possible solution to
an identified
problem, need or
issue
The logic model
presents a logical,
loosely supported
guess at a solution
to an identified
problem, need or
issue
The logic model presents a
solution to an identified
problem, need or issue that
is fully justified with
practical and logical
reasoning based on
experience, data and/or
research
Average rating

More Related Content

What's hot

Reliability & validity
Reliability & validityReliability & validity
Reliability & validityAmin Altayeb
 
Lecture 9 single subject designs ii (in lab)
Lecture   9   single subject designs ii (in lab)Lecture   9   single subject designs ii (in lab)
Lecture 9 single subject designs ii (in lab)Brittany Milbourn
 
Single Subjects Research
Single Subjects ResearchSingle Subjects Research
Single Subjects ResearchPelangi Suria
 
Impact evaluation
Impact evaluationImpact evaluation
Impact evaluationCarlo Magno
 
Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference
Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference  Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference
Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference Maria Kapsali
 
Psyc 321_12 small n research
Psyc 321_12 small n researchPsyc 321_12 small n research
Psyc 321_12 small n researchRyan Sain
 
Dev com methodological framework
Dev com methodological frameworkDev com methodological framework
Dev com methodological frameworkUmer Ikram
 
Improving the roi of software quality assurance activities
Improving the roi of software quality assurance activitiesImproving the roi of software quality assurance activities
Improving the roi of software quality assurance activitieskhush bakhat
 
Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D)
Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D) Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D)
Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D) SarahG_SS
 
CHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measurs
CHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measursCHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measurs
CHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measurskasperhornbaek
 
Consumer Oriented Evaluation Ppt
Consumer Oriented Evaluation PptConsumer Oriented Evaluation Ppt
Consumer Oriented Evaluation PptSpeedballjr
 
Multiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessments
Multiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessmentsMultiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessments
Multiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessmentsMhairi Mcalpine
 
H+E Creating Impact Project Guidelines
H+E Creating Impact Project GuidelinesH+E Creating Impact Project Guidelines
H+E Creating Impact Project GuidelinesAlbert
 
Team Problem Solving Disciplines
Team Problem Solving Disciplines Team Problem Solving Disciplines
Team Problem Solving Disciplines Strong-Oak
 
Product Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Product Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation SlidesProduct Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Product Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
 
Contoh: P R O G R A M L O G I C
Contoh: P R O G R A M  L O G I CContoh: P R O G R A M  L O G I C
Contoh: P R O G R A M L O G I Cirwansyah.yahya
 

What's hot (20)

Reliability & validity
Reliability & validityReliability & validity
Reliability & validity
 
Lecture 9 single subject designs ii (in lab)
Lecture   9   single subject designs ii (in lab)Lecture   9   single subject designs ii (in lab)
Lecture 9 single subject designs ii (in lab)
 
Decisionmaking
Decisionmaking Decisionmaking
Decisionmaking
 
Single Subjects Research
Single Subjects ResearchSingle Subjects Research
Single Subjects Research
 
Impact evaluation
Impact evaluationImpact evaluation
Impact evaluation
 
Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference
Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference  Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference
Policy Design @ HSREPP 2010 Hague conference
 
Psyc 321_12 small n research
Psyc 321_12 small n researchPsyc 321_12 small n research
Psyc 321_12 small n research
 
Dev com methodological framework
Dev com methodological frameworkDev com methodological framework
Dev com methodological framework
 
Improving the roi of software quality assurance activities
Improving the roi of software quality assurance activitiesImproving the roi of software quality assurance activities
Improving the roi of software quality assurance activities
 
Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D)
Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D) Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D)
Utilization focused evaluation: an introduction (Part 1 - ROER4D)
 
CHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measurs
CHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measursCHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measurs
CHI2007: Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measurs
 
Consumer Oriented Evaluation Ppt
Consumer Oriented Evaluation PptConsumer Oriented Evaluation Ppt
Consumer Oriented Evaluation Ppt
 
Free PMP Sample Q & A
Free PMP Sample Q & AFree PMP Sample Q & A
Free PMP Sample Q & A
 
Multiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessments
Multiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessmentsMultiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessments
Multiple Response Questions - Allowing for chance in authentic assessments
 
Default Credit Loss
Default Credit LossDefault Credit Loss
Default Credit Loss
 
H+E Creating Impact Project Guidelines
H+E Creating Impact Project GuidelinesH+E Creating Impact Project Guidelines
H+E Creating Impact Project Guidelines
 
Data literacy
Data literacyData literacy
Data literacy
 
Team Problem Solving Disciplines
Team Problem Solving Disciplines Team Problem Solving Disciplines
Team Problem Solving Disciplines
 
Product Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Product Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation SlidesProduct Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Product Evaluation PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
Contoh: P R O G R A M L O G I C
Contoh: P R O G R A M  L O G I CContoh: P R O G R A M  L O G I C
Contoh: P R O G R A M L O G I C
 

Similar to Logic Model Scoring Rubric

Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docxEvaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docxelbanglis
 
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docxEvaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docxturveycharlyn
 
Policy Analysis Process by Willy Ruin
Policy Analysis Process by Willy RuinPolicy Analysis Process by Willy Ruin
Policy Analysis Process by Willy RuinWilfredo Ruin
 
Evaluation of health programs
Evaluation of health programsEvaluation of health programs
Evaluation of health programsnium
 
Learning from Evaluation
Learning from EvaluationLearning from Evaluation
Learning from EvaluationOlivier Serrat
 
IHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docx
IHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docxIHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docx
IHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docxflonayrton46696
 
11 problem solving with sara
11 problem solving with sara11 problem solving with sara
11 problem solving with saraJim Gilmer
 
OBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptx
OBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptxOBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptx
OBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptxSitiHafidah1
 
Evaluation & Performance Measurement
Evaluation & Performance MeasurementEvaluation & Performance Measurement
Evaluation & Performance Measurementstephengranatin
 
Insights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulations
Insights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulationsInsights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulations
Insights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulationsNick Hart, Ph.D.
 
Outline model Impact Evaluation toolkit
Outline model Impact Evaluation toolkitOutline model Impact Evaluation toolkit
Outline model Impact Evaluation toolkitNIDA-Net
 
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptx
COMMUNITY  EVALUATION 2023.pptxCOMMUNITY  EVALUATION 2023.pptx
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptxgggadiel
 
Concept Evaluation And Selection
Concept Evaluation And SelectionConcept Evaluation And Selection
Concept Evaluation And SelectionQRCE
 
Executive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic Experimentation
Executive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic ExperimentationExecutive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic Experimentation
Executive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic ExperimentationMetre22
 
Chapter 13 An evaluation framework
Chapter 13 An evaluation frameworkChapter 13 An evaluation framework
Chapter 13 An evaluation frameworkvuongdq93
 
Key presentation on Analytics.ppt
Key presentation on Analytics.pptKey presentation on Analytics.ppt
Key presentation on Analytics.pptJamesMajok1
 
A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)
A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)
A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)TKMG, Inc.
 
Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models
Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models
Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models Jo Balucanag - Bitonio
 

Similar to Logic Model Scoring Rubric (20)

Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docxEvaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
 
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docxEvaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
Evaluation Research and Policy AnalysisChapter 11.docx
 
Logic Models
Logic ModelsLogic Models
Logic Models
 
Policy Analysis Process by Willy Ruin
Policy Analysis Process by Willy RuinPolicy Analysis Process by Willy Ruin
Policy Analysis Process by Willy Ruin
 
Evaluation of health programs
Evaluation of health programsEvaluation of health programs
Evaluation of health programs
 
Learning from Evaluation
Learning from EvaluationLearning from Evaluation
Learning from Evaluation
 
IHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docx
IHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docxIHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docx
IHP 430 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview As .docx
 
11 problem solving with sara
11 problem solving with sara11 problem solving with sara
11 problem solving with sara
 
OBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptx
OBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptxOBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptx
OBJEKTIF PPT MODEL.pptx
 
Evaluation & Performance Measurement
Evaluation & Performance MeasurementEvaluation & Performance Measurement
Evaluation & Performance Measurement
 
Human performance technology (hpt)
Human performance technology (hpt)Human performance technology (hpt)
Human performance technology (hpt)
 
Insights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulations
Insights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulationsInsights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulations
Insights from Program Evaluation for Retrospective Reviews of regulations
 
Outline model Impact Evaluation toolkit
Outline model Impact Evaluation toolkitOutline model Impact Evaluation toolkit
Outline model Impact Evaluation toolkit
 
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptx
COMMUNITY  EVALUATION 2023.pptxCOMMUNITY  EVALUATION 2023.pptx
COMMUNITY EVALUATION 2023.pptx
 
Concept Evaluation And Selection
Concept Evaluation And SelectionConcept Evaluation And Selection
Concept Evaluation And Selection
 
Executive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic Experimentation
Executive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic ExperimentationExecutive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic Experimentation
Executive Briefing: Introduction to Strategic Experimentation
 
Chapter 13 An evaluation framework
Chapter 13 An evaluation frameworkChapter 13 An evaluation framework
Chapter 13 An evaluation framework
 
Key presentation on Analytics.ppt
Key presentation on Analytics.pptKey presentation on Analytics.ppt
Key presentation on Analytics.ppt
 
A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)
A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)
A3 Management (Part 2 of 2)
 
Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models
Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models
Strategic Planning Typology and Process Models
 

Logic Model Scoring Rubric

  • 1. Logic Model Scoring Rubric Beginner (1) Developing (2) Accomplished (3) Criteria Documenting Need Claims there is a problem or need but fails to quantify the issue Identifies a reasonable measure of the problem or need but it is not directly related to the target population Identifies both the problem or need as well as the degree to which the issue is impacting the target population – Establishes a clear need based on data Proposing a Solution Proposes a solution or approach to solving the problem or addressing the need identified The proposed solution is a model or evidence-based program The identified solution includes evidence of effectiveness or is proven to work in the target population Identifying Indicators of Success Outcome measures or indicators of success are included Proposed outcome measures or indicators of success are logically linked or associated with the identified need or problem The proposed outcome measures or indicators of success are based on past experience, industry standards or research that demonstrates a relationship between the solution and the identified problem, need or issue – the selected measures fully support checking the solution against identified issue Assess the Solution Targeted level(s) of change are included, although the basis for the target is not stated Targets for change are logical but may still be based on assumptions – targets are not fully vetted Targets for change are justified based on documented similar or past results achieved, either by the proposer or in related research Overall Impression The logic model presents an unsupported prediction about a possible solution to an identified problem, need or issue The logic model presents a logical, loosely supported guess at a solution to an identified problem, need or issue The logic model presents a solution to an identified problem, need or issue that is fully justified with practical and logical reasoning based on experience, data and/or research Average rating