Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Smart phone development
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

Smart phone development


Published on

There is no denying that the Apple App Store is huge, but who wants to have to deal with Objective-​​C? Thank fully, tech nologies like PhoneGap and Sencha allow web devel opers to work in languages …

There is no denying that the Apple App Store is huge, but who wants to have to deal with Objective-​​C? Thank fully, tech nologies like PhoneGap and Sencha allow web devel opers to work in languages they know (HTML/​CSS/​JavaScript) while still making them look native. PhoneGap also allows us to port our apps to other plat forms, like Android.

This session will look at the mobile web devel opment life cycle from building a prototype in the browser, inte gration with the phone, app submission and some basic marketing tricks.

Published in: Technology

1 Comment
  • Thank you... :)
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

No notes for slide

  • Transcript

    • 1. Smart Phone Development Using Web Technologies
    • 2. Apple Cupcakes Apple have 250,000 apps. 6.5 billion downloads Android have 30,000 apps Upcoming: Windows 7 Phone
    • 3. Толку многу јазици, толку малку време iPhone: Objective C Android: Java Nokia: C++ Windows 7: .NET Palm Pre: HTML + CSS + JS
    • 4. I already know how to do HTML, CSS and JavaScript
    • 5. PhoneGap
    • 6. PhoneGap Runs on iPhone, iPad, Android, Palm Pre, Nokia and Blackberry Loads embedded web browser (Usually Webkit) Adds JS bridge
    • 7. PhoneGap APIs Accelerometer Camera Contacts Geolocation
    • 8. Advantages Fast to develop 70-80% done in a browser Use existing development tools
    • 9. Disadvantages Much slower than native Harder to look native Can’t access everything (yet) No position:
fixed support No debugger! File system support is limited
    • 10. Lifecycle e Start Up vic ! De dy a Re Load Web Browser Load HTML Load JS Load CSS
    • 11. Webkit or go home HTML 5 + CSS 3 SQLite Hardware accelerated animations Use your favourite framework jQuery ExtJS
    • 12. Frameworks jqTouch (jQuery based) SenchaTouch (ExtJS + jqTouch + Raphaël) iScroll 3.0
    • 13. jqTouch Combination of HTML, CSS and JavaScript libraries Designed to emulate native look and feel HTML + CSS kind of clunky Worth it for the JS
    • 14. SenchaTouch Combination of HTML, CSS and JavaScript libraries Uses ExtJS (better for app development) Better performance than jqTouch Weird license
    • 15. iScroll Not a full framework Fixes the scroll problem Uncanny valley problem Author working on full framework (GhostTouch)
    • 16. Go Speed Racer! Image loading is slow Rendering a gradient, makes an image (use canvas) Accelerated CSS animations opacity translate3d (NOT translate) Use native touch events
    • 17. Pretending to go Native Input fields have additional types (email, phone, search) Turn on/off auto correction and auto capitalize Notification API provides alert, confirm
    • 18. In the Wild Memory and CPU are an issue There is some arbitrary 10Mb image limit Only handles text files (base64 FTW) Working Asynchronously is hard
    • 19. Titanium
    • 20. Actually go native Compiles JavaScript down to symbols Symbols link to either Obj-C libraries or Java classes Effectively running natively
    • 21. Wait!
    • 22. Apple vs. Adobe Flash CS5 was supposed to do something similar Apple EULA changed to stop 3rd party compilers It’s now OK!
    • 23. Development not as we know it Even though it's JavaScript, it's still Desktop* development No HTML or CSS. Just JavaScript.
    • 24. Advantages Uses native UI widgets Much faster than WebKit No crazy square bracket notation Pretty good abstractions
    • 25. APIs Much bigger API than PhoneGap Mainly generic, some platform specific Threaded UI means file & database functions return synchronously
    • 26. What it looks like
    • 27. Disadvantages Documentation is a little lacking. (Though forums are pretty good) Structuring code is less defined than on the web Again, no debugger Code - Build - Crash cycle much slower than Code - Refresh cycle Unit testing is hard
    • 28. Conclusion PhoneGap better for non-native UIs, fast prototyping, simple apps, and web based apps Titanium better for native UIs. Nice gateway drug for those of use that don't understand C-pointers
    • 29. Thanks