The document discusses civility and civil discourse in three parts - context, curation, and community. It notes that in 2010 only 24% of US high school seniors had a proficient understanding of civics and government, and finding reliable information online can be difficult without proper context and curation. It concludes that while technology enables sharing information, civil discourse requires digital literacy and a sense of community to have constructive discussions.
Civility and The Three Cs: Context, Curation and Community
1. You liberals hate America!
You’re an idiotic wing-nut!
You feminazis are all alike!
Fascist pig!
T
Civility and The
Three Cs: Context,
Curation,
Community
16. Conclusion
• We are living in an age of disruption
• Technology, alone, cannot ensure civil
discourse
• Digital literacy is essential for a
functioning democracy
17. Credits
• “The Role of Traditional and Social Media”
Civil Discourse to Resolve Governmental Crises
October 10, 2012
• Copyrighted images are examples of Facebook shares; FairUse
exemption claimed; firehose is Flickr CC
• Kathy E. Gill, University of Washington
Contact:
@kegill, http://wiredpen.com/ ,
http://facebook.com/kathygill
Editor's Notes
http://www.cms-ca.org/disengagement_and_lack.pdfNational Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Report Card in CivicsThe Proficient level represents solid academic performance to which all students at each grade assessed should aspire. Students reaching this level have demonstrated competency over challenging subject matter. Twenty-seven percent of fourth-graders, 22 percent of eighth-graders, and 24 percent of twelfth-graders performed at or above the Proficient level in civics in 2010. The percentages of students at or above Proficient in 2010 were higher than in 2006 and 1998 at grade 4, not significantly different from the percentages in the previous assessment years at grade 8, and lower than 2006 at grade 12.http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pubs/main2010/2011466.asp