Making Sense of Social Network Sites

Loading...

Flash Player 9 (or above) is needed to view presentations.
We have detected that you do not have it on your computer. To install it, go here.

0 comments

Post a comment

    Post a comment
    Embed Video
    Edit your comment Cancel

    1 Favorite

    Making Sense of Social Network Sites - Presentation Transcript

    1. Making Sense of Social Network Sites Fred Stutzman UNC School of Information and Library Science
    2. Adoption Use Privacy Identity
    3. 2005-Present
    4. 300 Million Users 180 Countries 70 Translations 70% International
    5. (Lenhart 2009)
    6. http://bit.ly/32xwPF 46% Americans use SNS 65% Teens 12-17 73% Adult SNS users have FB Account Pew Internet and American Life Project
    7. (InsideFacebook.com, 2009)
    8. Value?
    9. Social Ties http://bit.ly/Soi27
    10. Offline to Online http://bit.ly/1eaqGm
    11. Support http://bit.ly/1wH6ax
    12. Participation http://bit.ly/1V6gRB
    13. Challenges?
    14. Privacy
    15. Context Privacy Disclosure
    16. Managing Contexts • Presence of multiple social groups • Behavioral Strategies • Mental Strategies • “Least Common Denominator” http://bit.ly/yS8yI (Lampinen et. al., 2009)
    17. Context Tension • Connections across status and power boundaries • Propriety, work/ family • Inadvertent disclosures leading to harms http://bit.ly/6HTDB (Skeels and Grudin, 2009)
    18. Two Studies
    19. Study Goals • Why are motives for using multiple profiles? • What strategies to people employ in managing multiple profiles? • Is this an effective strategy? Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    20. Motives • Privacy • Identity • Utility • Propriety http://www.flickr.com/photos/gi/435888435/ Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    21. Forms of Regulation • Multiple identities in a single space • Single account, highly segmented privacy controls • Segmentation by site • Different social media for different audiences Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    22. Concealment • Three genres identified • Pseudonymity • Practical Obscurity • Obscure name variants, non- disclosure of identity • Transparent Separations Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    23. Going Friends Only
    24. Friend Network • No Steps Significant • People with less friends were less likely to go friends- only (411 vs 500, p=.003)
    25. Expectancy Violations Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    26. Discursive Privacy • Active Privacy • Deleted a wall post left on someone else’s wall, Deleted a wall post someone left on your wall (α=.73) • Conversant Privacy • Advised someone to change their FB profile, Changed FB profile based on advice, Asked someone to make private a FB photo containing your image,Asked someone to completely remove FB image (α=.69)
    27. Directions
    28. Participants • 15 participants, two in 40’s, six in 50’s, seven in 60’s, nine females and six males • Semi-structured interviews, in-person and by phone • TOLA (Transitional, Older, Late Adopting Users) Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    29. Framework • Adoption, Experience • Audience, Connections, Motivation • Social Support • Privacy Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    30. Adoption • Reconnection drives adoption and use • Real names the norm, searching important • Reconstruction of the life story “[In Facebook] I will click on one of my friends and I will see two other people that I have not heard from in years and be able to get in touch with them and I think it’s a great thing for that.” Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    31. Connections • Networks are close; small in size • Attention focused on “important” others • Reconnections, old crushes • Observing the extended family • Attention shifts; the “dance” of reconnection Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    32. Contexts • Family, friends, reconnections and co- workers main cited contexts • The “time gap” as unique boundary • Lack of common ground • Shifting norms and identities • Bridging “different lives” Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    33. Support • SNS is a supportive place • Emotional and informational support provisioned most commonly “One of my nieces’ parents has been rather ill, and people have been just giving her messages of support. She’s someone who is regularly on Facebook and talking about her mother’s condition and the surgeries she’s had, and people were voicing support for how she was doing.” Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    34. Asking for support? • SNS is not a place where the sample goes for support • Privacy; Multiple groups; Compromising disclosures • Established modes for connection with supportive others Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    35. Reciprocity • SNS is full of supportive givers; fewer “askers” • Users are willing to mobilize “In other words posting on the Wall where all of my friends can see it – everyone on my friends list can see it – I would not do that. And that is because of this mix of people, different kinds of relationships.” Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu
    36. Implications
    37. Transitions http://bit.ly/34H8uY
    38. Information Grounds http://bit.ly/3LMJXF
    39. Mobile http://bit.ly/2iEmDa
    40. Thank you! Fred Stutzman: fred.stutzman@unc.edu Twitter @fstutzman http://fredstutzman.com Fred Stutzman, fred.stutzman@unc.edu

    + Fred  StutzmanFred Stutzman, 3 weeks ago

    custom

    163 views, 1 favs, 0 embeds more stats

    A high-level overview of some research perspectives more

    More info about this document

    © All Rights Reserved

    Go to text version

    • Total Views 163
      • 163 on SlideShare
      • 0 from embeds
    • Comments 0
    • Favorites 1
    • Downloads 4
    Most viewed embeds

    more

    All embeds

    less

    Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
    Flag as inappropriate

    Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

    Cancel
    File a copyright complaint
    Having problems? Go to our helpdesk?

    Categories