Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
The Future of the Social Web and How to Stop It
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×
Saving this for later? Get the SlideShare app to save on your phone or tablet. Read anywhere, anytime – even offline.
Text the download link to your phone
Standard text messaging rates apply

The Future of the Social Web and How to Stop It

4,368
views

Published on

Slides from the talk I gave at PARC. …

Slides from the talk I gave at PARC.

Most of them are intentionally left blank.

http://www.parc.com/event/1121/future-of-the-social-web.html

Published in: Technology

5 Comments
16 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Slides 71 - 74 are excellent. And actually, so is slide 75, because it's phrased as an invocation. But it needs to become a call to action soon.
    Thank you for your efforts on behalf of OpenID.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Thanks Marianne!

    Carolyn — if you watch the video, you'll understand why/how I used the blank slides. Basically this is my raw presentation (to include all my notes). I essentially used Keynote as a teleprompter.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Your candor is very much appreciated. I am a writer, engaged in education, and share
    your concern re control of content and criteria.

    In my viewpoint, the collective and individual construction of a knowledge base
    on the social web has an overwhelming effect on the resilience of a democratic society.
    The importance of engaging others outside of the tech and engineering worlds cannot
    be overstated. Humanities and arts are the realms in which human rights issues,
    legal and ethical concerns and cultural bias and propaganda are most carefully
    examined. It's time - and perhaps - overdue - for the implications of social networks
    and the overall construction of the social web to be considered from many more
    complex viewpoints.

    Again, thanks for your contribution.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • You have a few grammar mistakes in your presentation. However, I did enjoy the presentation. I'm not overly fond of the white screens; Nonetheless, I do understand why you used them.
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
  • Thanks for uploading this, Chris! Matches the video posted at www.slideshare.net/parcinc
       Reply 
    Are you sure you want to  Yes  No
    Your message goes here
No Downloads
Views
Total Views
4,368
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
1
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
227
Comments
5
Likes
16
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. THE FUTURE OF THE SOCIAL WEB AND HOW TO STOP IT Photo by Isaac Hsieh - http://flic.kr/p/5EgDZm Good afternoon. I’m happy to be here today — quite an honor to get to speak at PARC — home of so many critical innovations and contributions to the web.
  • 2. This past weekend I was in Vancouver at Northern Voice and gave a similar talk to this one, but without slides. It was an interesting experience to go without slides for 45 minutes, but it turns out, unicorns do exist: I was able to put together a couple hundred sentences to fill the time and it worked out pretty well. I hope to do the same thing today, but this time with a few visual aids.
  • 3. chris m , og open web advocate parc fo m ri Engi ing Co uniti Acro t Int t #parcfo m Thu y, 13 May 2010 @ 4:00 - 5:00 pm Before I get started, my name IS Chris Messina, and I DO work at Google as an open web advocate, which is partially the topic of conversation today. You can also use the PARCFORUM hashtag if you're tweeting about this.
  • 4. The name of this talk is a gross bastardization of Jonathan Zittrain’s book, is “The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It.” His thinking is well worth checking out if this stuff interests you, and I couldn’t resist a good pun so I called my talk “The Future of the Social Web and How to Stop It.”
  • 5. fu reoft int t.org For those of you interested in reading the book, you can buy it online or if you're a communist, you can download it for free on futureoftheinternet.org. Just kidding about the communist thing.
  • 6. This stuff that I want to talk to you about today is the stuff that keeps me up at night. And I haven't been sleeping much lately, so it’s basically all I think about. But I’m getting ahead of myself. We need to set the context here.
  • 7. So I don’t know how many of you know who I am, and I don’t expect that many of you necessarily do — but there is a piece information that I think is relevant to what I want to you about. Specifically, in January of this year I decided to give up my own company — which I had run for a couple years doing consulting in the social media space — to join Google.
  • 8. This was a big decision for and took me a while to come to. However, the role that I took at Google is a rather curious one. I was fortunate enough to pick my own title, and so I chose the role of Open Web Advocate. Now, I think this is interesting for a couple reasons — least of which is that Google actually entertained the idea of having an open web advocate (whatever that means). If you think about it, nature has environmentalists, women have feminists… but the open web? The web has enthusiasts, advocates, sure, but have we congealed into a solid movement that reaches out beyond the
  • 9. “it’s c nch time for t web” As Tim O’Reilly recently said — it’s crunch time for the web.
  • 10. As the web has become more popular, more infused into our daily lives — something many of us frankly rely upon — for our work, our livelihood, our ability to stay in touch with friends and family… it’s become the target of a number of attacks, from a number of different directions. Whether you want to talk about regulation and net neutrality in the states, or content filtering in Australia and elsewhere, or you want to talk file sharing in France, or censorship in Asia, you’re just hitting the tip of the iceberg. Indeed, there are some who even worry that in the future, there may be more than one web — in fact, there be several webs that may or may or not
  • 11. But what is clear is how important the web has become, in not a very long period of time, especially if you start counting from the days of the first browsers. Now, the crazy thing is that I — and I’m sure many of you — have grown up through the transition from dialup modems and AOL accounts and FTP programs to the modern web which is largely delivered over broadband cables and interacted with using hosted web services and websites. So we actually have some perspective on what it was like before we had Foursquare and Twitter and Facebook and all the iPhone. And we’ve seen how powerful this technology is — and how much it’s changed
  • 12. But I want take you back a decade. I went to high school in Manchester, NH on the east coast.
  • 13. (For those of you don’t know, I thought I’d show you how far away that is from here.) Ok, this next photo is a little embarrassing...
  • 14. credit: megan higgins I graduated in 1999 — right before Y2K — remember that? In high school, I’ll admit it — I was a bit of an outcast. I didn’t exactly get along with my peers; generally had a chip on my shoulder and really didn’t have much use for school. It mostly seemed — as I’m sure it did to a lot of kids my age — like a big fat waste of time.
  • 15. credit: megan higgins My junior year I decided that there really wasn’t much more that my high school courses could offer me — especially when the best technology they had to offer was Adobe Illustrator 5 and Aldus PageMaker 2. I was able to get better software from warez sites over a dialup modem than I could at school. And this greatly frustrated me.
  • 16. credit: megan higgins Fortunately, I ended up getting a couple after school jobs — the first at a print shop doing bindery work — basically stapling annual reports together — and the second, a much more interesting job, doing web design for a small local design company. Now, this part of the story isn’t that interesting, however, my work at the web design company coincided with work that I was doing on a volunteer basis for my high school — namely, I had taken it upon myself to build the school’s website AND create all of the club’s and sports’ homepages.
  • 17. It was an ambitious project, but I was convinced that everything would be SO much better for everyone if parents, students, teachers, and everyone else could keep in touch with each other online. Of course, it didn’t occur me that people weren’t all that interested in the web just yet. Nor that the web wasn’t readily available to everyone. NOR that the browsers that we had back then really weren’t that great or all that stable.
  • 18. But, this was a labor of love and it was important and — hell — gave me something to do. So I built the site and I even added a rotating ad banner. No, I didn’t charge and the ads weren’t commercial in nature, but I did promote local student events and organizations like the National Art Honor Society. Now this was all well and good — and in fact, I was hosting the site on my own server, the librarian and the principal all knew what I was going. It was fine. In fact, in the meantime the principal decided to take a special interest in me, to see if he could reignite my interest in academics. Terrific.
  • 19. So one day, I get called down to the principal’s office and I’m brought in to his office and he sits me down and starts yelling at me. “How could I betray him like this? How could I do this to him?” I was shocked — what had I done? I was completely confused. And then he showed me a printout with the Gay-Straight Alliance banner ad that I’d put up on the site three months prior.
  • 20. You see, where I come from, people are both libertarian AND conservative. And the fact that a bunch of snot-nosed kids at the public high school wanted to have their own little support club for gay kids just didn’t sit well with the administration. So he suspended me. For five days. Now I mentioned that I graduated in 1999. BUT — that was almost not the case. As it turned out, the issue of the Gay-Straight Alliance — or GSA — at my high school was just about to become a full on court case in Boston, involving the ACLU and GLAD. As a result, the administration really didn’t have much extra attention to pay to my mom when she threatened to sue the school for
  • 21. My suspension ended up being reduced to just a couple days on the condition that I cut a deal: I had to turn over the entire website and all of my source files and agree not to make any more sites related to the high school. I refused and argued that I wasn’t about to put another student in my position by handing over the site’s source code without clear guidelines from the administration on what was, and wasn’t, allowable on the site. They refused to play ball and so I shut the site down and the issue… somehow passed.
  • 22. It later on turned out that the librarian with whom I’d worked had secretly made a partial copy of the site — and to this day — you can actually still see pages that I designed and wrote on my high school’s site. Oh, and as it turned out, the GSA won the court case and the school district was compelled to allow the group to meet on school property.
  • 23. I tell you this story not because it’s terribly interesting necessarily — but because it demonstrates two things: • First, a shift in power. If the principal had believed that no one would ever see the website, then he probably wouldn’t have gotten all that upset. As it happened, the principal had plans at the time to run for mayor of the city. And so he clearly was concerned that people might stumble upon the high school website with a nice big Gay-Straight Alliance banner right at the top!
  • 24. • The second thing was that this whole scenario probably couldn’t happen today, what with Facebook and sophistication around website access and control… I mean, it’s possible, sure, but unlikely. I mean, I hosted the site on my own server. So think about it: if my high school, let’s say, had decided to outsource all their web needs to, say, Facebook… well, there really wouldn’t have been that much room for me to make the kind of statement that I made.
  • 25. And yet the medium of the web, is perfectly suited to provide a venue for all kinds of voices and perspectives. And it’s important that, in the technology that we create, that we make sure that we preserving freedom, choice, and the ability to disagree. That said, I’d argue that there are actually several more subtle threats at work — that are less obvious, and possibly — because of how they’re being baked into the interfaces that we use to interact with the web — potentially more dangerous to the health, wellbeing, and longevity of the web.
  • 26. p mputing ge tivity There are two concepts that I want to use to counterbalance what I see going on on the web today: The first is what I call “pop computing”. The second is “generativity”. Think of these as the yin and yang of the modern, open web: two competing forces driving the way that we are able to use — or not use — technology.
  • 27. p mputing I have yet to write my blog post — that of course has been lingering in my drafts folder for months — about this idea of “pop computing”. But there are several symptoms that I’d like to highlight today. ...
  • 28. d th of t url The first is described in a post that I actually did write called The Death of the URL where I called out how the potential demise of the address bar in web browsers could cause a great shift in the way that we access the internet. In particular, I cited four exhibits: • WebTV • “lean back computing” devices • app stores • short URLs (which I won’t be covering today)
  • 29. web tv
  • 30. WebTV is like the canary in the coal mine because people are used to a very simple “change the channel” modality in how they control and manipulate the device. TiVo gives you a little more control — but for most people, channel surfing is still where it’s at. There’s no “channel surfing” on the web. Certainly there are scores of directories that list sites that you can visit, but ultimately you aren’t punching in numerical ID (like Channel 12) to get to content… you’re typing a URL. So check out this quote from a story in USA Today about WebTV:
  • 31. “Manufac r s say t y ar d an im rtant on from r n rgence failur : View s want relate ts as te vi ons, t mput s. “T t’s why t w Web TV dels don’t me th brow t t uld gi peop t fr dom surf t fu Int t, e n though t TVs ect t Web via an et r t cab or home re t rk. T mpani want pro te nsum a eptance of Web TV by making t tech logy mp u : T t m ns keyboard or u .” —USA Y “Manufacturers say they learned an important lesson from earlier convergence failures: Viewers want to relate to sets as televisions, not computers. “That’s why the new Web TV models don’t come with browsers that would give people the freedom to surf the full Internet, even though the TVs connect to the Web via an ethernet cable or home wireless network. The companies want to promote consumer acceptance of Web TV by making the technology simple to use: That means no keyboard or mouse.”
  • 32. So if WebTV takes off, and it very well may — that means that a generation will grow up with a very limited set of expectations for how big the web truly is.
  • 33. “ an- ” mputing devic
  • 34. credit: apple On top of that, we’re see a rise of what I would call “Lean-back computing” devices. These are devices like the iPad, or JoliCloud or Kindle or even ChromeOS (to some extents) that trade freedom and self-determination for simplicity and a certain brand of usability.
  • 35. credit: litl And the popularity of these devices, especially of course the iPhone and iPad, indicates a strong desire for computing to become more simple. And you really blame people. I think the PC — in so many ways — has been a failure because it left much of the computer’s core systems vulnerable to malware and viruses that people really didn’t know any better to avoid. So you have devices like like the Litl that are more like “managed appliances” that look more and more like TV.
  • 36. And so to avoid that fate, and to create more stable computing experiences, people are now more willing to accept using a tethered device that restricts their freedom in exchange for someone else dealing with the hard stuff. As a designer, it is hard for me to suggest that this is really a bad thing… I mean, it means that more people will be using computing devices and experiencing a taste for how useful computers can be. But the reliance on central authorities — like Apple or Amazon — to control what goes on or doesn’t go on the devices is something that worries me.
  • 37. a s r Which brings me to my third exhibit which of course is the rise of App Stores. The thing that worries me about most of the App Stores is that the gatekeepers tend to act erratically, and sometimes unfairly. The App Store, like the Web TV experience, also only provides a subset of the material and options that exist on the open web.
  • 38. So the question becomes: who gets to determine what is acceptable for a given app store? And if something that you want is not allowed to be part of that App Store, how can you get it? This kind of “ask permission” model of content access has a deleterious effect over time, such that, eventually, people stop asking for things that aren’t there. They become inured to the idea that someone else knows better and is effectively keeping them safe.
  • 39. This has all sorts of ramifications for startups, businesses that want to compete with the gatekeepers, and again, for individual freedom.
  • 40. obso scence of view source Another aspect of “pop computing” — is the gradual obsolescence of view source. • More complicated web apps • Code obfuscation • Data services and APIs • Default to private rather than public
  • 41. So in a browser like Chrome, view source has been deemed a “developer feature” — rather than a tinkerer’s feature — and relegated to the status of serving as the appendix of the browser, stuck deep in the View > Developer menu, when it used to be a first level menu item under the “View” menu.
  • 42. instant p so tion The last aspect of “pop computing” that I want to describe is “instant personalization”, the term that Facebook uses to describe some of its new platform features. Specifically, these are social features that are designed to work without your involvement… that is, if you’re logged into Facebook in one tab, and you visit another site like Yelp in a different tab, you’ll automatically be signed in to Yelp, and your friends will be there waiting for you.
  • 43. On the face of it (no pun intended) I think this functionality is awesome. It’s exactly how user-centric identity should be experienced. However — the problem is that the act of signing in to your Facebook account is not necessarily the same thing as saying that you want your Facebook account to be available to every site that you visit.
  • 44. So by disintermediating you from that decision point — that is, where the “instant” in “Instant Personalization” comes from — it’s essentially as though Facebook and Yelp got together in a smoke filled backroom and invited you in to the party, without exactly letting you in on what they’d been saying about you before you arrived. And that’s not to suggest that they had been talking about you, only that you just don’t know. And so, like the iPad is magic, instant personalization creates a situation where you are no longer in control of where your profile shows up or which profile you get to use in different contexts.
  • 45. And that choice — your ability to put whatever face forward that you desire in different contexts — should be essential. You should be making that decision, not Facebook. It isn’t that the feature is the wrong feature — it all comes down to the implementation.
  • 46. p mputing And so stacked up together: • the death of the URL • the dying of view source • instant personalization ...these are all trends that are giving rise to a generation of people for whom computing will be a simple, clean, sterile experience. And that threatens all of us.
  • 47. ge tivity So if we have pop computing on the one hand, then we have this notion of “generativity” on the other.
  • 48. prin p s In his book, “The Future of the Internet and How to Stop It”, Jonathan Zittrain introduced this term “generativity” which he articulated in five principles:
  • 49. 1. how exten ly a system or tech logy g a t of ib tasks; 2. how we it can a pted a nge of tasks; 3. how ly w ntribu can mast it; 4. how a b it is tho r dy and ab build on it; 5. how t ns b any c ng are ot — including (and p ps pe a y) xp ts. • how extensively a system or technology leverages a set of possible tasks; • how well it can be adapted to a range of tasks; • how easily new contributors can master it; • how accessible it is to those ready and able to build on it; • how transferable any changes are to others — including (and perhaps especially) nonexperts.
  • 50. Generativity is the quality of a technology — and I mean “technology” in the broadest sense — that allows others to benefit from your work — without first asking you permission. This is largely the quality that has lead to the overwhelming success of open source.
  • 51. Now I want to talk about three examples, that are personal to me, that demonstrate both the power and importance of generativity in the technologies that you create: • BarCamp • Coworking • Hashtags
  • 52. rcamp
  • 53. Story of BarCamp; first BarCamp in August 2005. Planned in six days. 300 people. $3000. Documented on the wiki. Some basic rules that were self-evident if you attended one of these events. I made the logos in the beginning and then other people just started making them for themselves and being much more creative than I ever was!
  • 54. There have easily been over a thousand of these events since 2005 — and more are organized everyday. And the secret of BarCamp — and why it was generative — was because it was accessible to novices.
  • 55. Just by attending a BarCamp you could figure out how to run your own.
  • 56. rking
  • 57. Photo by superfluity - http://flic.kr/p/75SVAU Started coworking in 2006. Name came from Brad Neuberg who had started “coworking” in a women’s center in the Mission in San Francisco. It started modest: every Thursday a group of folks would get together, set out card tables in this small space, and “cowork”... just to have some companionship so that they didn’t have to work alone.
  • 58. I believe I met Brad at a SuperHappyDevHouse and when we discussed his idea, it coincided perfectly with an idea that I’d had for some time about creating open, collaborative spaces largely targeted at independent information workers and who I might call, “people of the web”.
  • 59. That is, we didn’t need much in the way of infrastructure besides a wifi network, a decent place to sit, and some company from our peers. The first coworking space was called The Hat Factory… But it wasn’t until we opened Citizen Space in SOMA in San Francisco that the idea really started to resonate outwards…
  • 60. shtags I tweeted the first hashtag on August 23, 2007. It was casual, unassuming — another one of my hair-brained ideas. I asked: “how do you feel about using # (pound) for groups. As in #barcamp [msg]”? That was it. That’s all I said. And then I started doing. I would tag my tweets at events or about different topics or subjects. I was doing it for myself, but also to demonstrate the concept.
  • 61. here’s what the first hashtag looked like.
  • 62. There were other microsyntaxes around that time and shortly thereafter that other people tried to get off the ground, and a few them have stuck — for example using the dollar sign to indicate a stock ticker — but some of the other more esoteric that required people to think more like machines than like people, didn’t.
  • 63. And so the hashtag is a great example of a generative technology because, according to the principles: • they can be applied to many different tasks (or topics) • new contributors can master it very easily — though admittedly some people take it a little too far when they’re first getting started
  • 64. • it was accessible and available for anyone to use — mostly within Twitter — but of course, this design (a stupidly simple one) can apply to just about any context — including events like this one! • and it’s also “transferrable” insomuch as people can watch other using hashtags and then adopt them. Or, if a hashtag, let’s say, starts getting spammed… people can transfer the momentum around a hashtag to a new one… and so this folksonomic system can breathe in and out as necessary. It doesn’t require a central index or authority to function.
  • 65. Some popular examples? • #barcamp • #sandiegofire (nate ritter) • #pman and #iranelection • #swineflu
  • 66. p mputing ge tivity So again, we have these two trends in the marketplace: pop computing and generativity. I pit them against each other because they are actually two logical halves of a whole. That is, we need technologies — social technologies — that are simple and easy to use and don’t take too much for granted and that make it possible for the uninitiated, or nonexperts, to benefit from. The iPhone is, after all, a great device. Is it great because it restricts our freedom and reduces complexity and choice? I’m not so sure.
  • 67. On the other hand, we can see that simple social technologies like BarCamp, Coworking, and hashtags, can be generative in that they provide a simple structure or foundation — a protocol if you will — that is adaptable to new uses and environments — beyond the original conception or context. The web is a generative structure. It is quite simple in its architecture, and through the playing out of chaos theory, has given rise to much much more complex structures.
  • 68. In the beginning of this talk, I told you about an experience that I had in high school where I encountered both the power of authority and its desire to control my ability to influence my environment. I also, however, realized the power of the web — and its this power that I want to make sure continues to be available and distributed to more and more people — NOT fewer.
  • 69. t fu re of t so al web
  • 70. And so I want to end by describing what I see as a challenge for the open source, and open web communities. As I pointed out in the beginning of my talk, Earth has environmentalists, women have feminists, animals have PETA, et… but the web — the web has us…
  • 71. And I worry about what’s happening to our community. Moreover, I worry about the open web community, and it’s ability to adapt and to modernize itself. I think that, with the onslaught of pop computing — more and more new developers will be spending their time developing apps for closed ecosystems rather than building apps that are available to anyone on the web. And so we as a community need to diversify — we need to think very critically about who our audience, and how we interact and engage with the world.
  • 72. Y’know there was an interesting story on NPR recently about how girls in grade school think of engineers as these stinky boys who work in dungeons and sit in front of computers all day. Well, that’s not a terribly compelling vision for sure… and the real problem is that if we don’t attract more women into this industry, ironically or NOT ironically, we’re going to end up just building software for ourselves — which becomes increasingly marginalized, as more and more people opt for controlled, sterile devices to access the web.
  • 73. Now, it isn’t just that bringing more women into technology and open source is going to solve the problem. That’s not what I’m saying. What I am saying is that learning to be more open minded and inclusive — of people unlike the majority in our community is the only chance we have to perpetuate our culture and our community in such a way that we might be able to make an impact on the changes that are coming to computing.
  • 74. Dial it back to my experience in high school… my ability to view the source of some random webpage and hack around and figure out how to upload it to some web server and to get people involved in the project and to be aware of it to the point where the school principal fears for his reputation because of this stupid little project…. that’s important. That means that people of authority and people who are used to having more control are going to increasingly want to exercise that control into the domain of the web… as I pointed out earlier, it’s already happening… and it’s only going to get worse and so we need to think seriously about these threats and mobilize
  • 75. Now, those technologies aren’t perfect — but they are social technologies. And we need more of them, and it’s up to us to create them. After all, if we’re not going to be the advocates of an open and free social web — who will be?
  • 76. t end.
  • 77. answ s & qu tions

×