Richard (Information Architect @f1000) talks about web 3.0, post-publication peer review, literature metrics and the failure of the journal impact factor

1. Web 3.0comes to the library‘I still haven’t found what I’m looking for’ Richard P. Grant f1000.com

2. Overload Jason Hoyt—mendeley.com/blog/

3. Measuring it

6. We won’t talk about him today…

7. Journal Impact Factor

8. Impact Factor Is it relevant to collections? Is it relevant to researchers? ‘There’s nothing better’

9. What people use http://www.mesur.org/services/maps.html

10. Crowd-sourcing Apache log files Comments Blogs (yeah, right) Citeulike Connotea Delicious ‘Anal sex’ ‘Accelerating the Armageddon of peer-reviewed science’

11. Molecular dissection, tissue localization and Ca2+ binding of the ryanodine receptor of C. elegans ‘CeRyR was found in the body wall, pharyngeal, vulval, anal and sex muscles of adult worms…’ Hamada et al. J Mol Biol. 2002 Nov 15;324(1):123-35.

12. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions ‘Ligand-binding affinities were determined by titration, monitoring ligand-dependent changes in fluorescence emission intensity…’ Loogeretal. Nature. 2003 May 8;423(6936):132-3. .

13. Problem

14. Learned opinion?

15. Add some focus

16. Collated opinion

17. How measure (relevant) value? How do we find it?

18. It finds you