The	first	Passivhaus Archive	in	the	UK
HARC	Hereford
Presented	at:
The	20th International	Passivhaus Conference	Darmstadt
AECB	Annual	Conference	Norwich	July	2016
Nick	Grant
Alan	Clarke
Elemental	Solutions
@ecominimalnick
@AR_Clarke
Architect: Architype Ltd, Contractor: Kier Construction,M&E Consultants:E3, Cost Consultants:Arcadis,Energy & Environment:Alan
Clarke and Nick Grant, Structural Engineers:Eastwood and Partners, Certifier:WARM, Client:Herefordshire Council.
Image	Nick	Grant
Datum40.00
50.97
50.97
d ashe
dline ind icates
p ossibil
ee xten sionto
r epository
EPDM Single ply roof
Single ply roof
Ground Floor Signed Fire Exit
Clear footpath from building to muster point
- minimum 1800mm from building
& 1050mm wide
M M
M Fire assembly point
Fire engine access & turning zone
Fire management plan to include provision
for egress through secure gates
Disaster recovery acces
(all floors)
45000
45000
45000
45000
Drawn by
Scale
Dwg no.
Dwg Title
Client
Project
Revision
Checked by
Date
@ A1
Check this drawing is the latest revision.
Do not scale from this drawing.
Do not use the information on this drawing without checking all dimensions on
site.
Do not use any areas indicated for either valuation, puchase, sale or any other
form of legally binding contract.
Do not reproduce any part of this drawing withour prior written consent.
Notes
4
1 : 200
Herefordshire Archive & Records Centre
Herefordshire Council
Site Fire Strategy Plan
GA020
02 Jul 12
MBTMc
6920
CONSTRUCTION
Revision Schedule
Rev Date Description Drawn Checked
1 28 Sep 12 Stage E issue NA MB
2 22 Apr 13 VE issue NA MB
3 09 Aug 13 Issued for Stage F RE MB
4 04 Mar 14 General amendments to bring in line with recommended VE
proposal
LM MB
14 - 20 temp
40-60 RH
18-25 temp
Many	considerations:
Security
Fire
Logistics
Quarantine
Daylight
Public	access,	attractive
Multifunction
Future	expansion
etc etcetc .	.	.	
Photo	store:
12°C	
30%	RH
I	will	just	consider	
temperature	and	RH!
Repository:
13-20°C	
35-60%	RH
Image	Architype
Easily	isolated	zones
0 Ground Floor
0
1 First Floor
4590
1
2 Second Floor
8330
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
3 Office roof
8715
Parapet
13445
Lower External
Ground level
-170
Level 11
10138
1
DD235
Top of foundation
-725
DPM Course
Airtightness course
4 Repository roof
11870
1
DD205
1
DD204
1
DD213
1
DD050
1
DD150
1
DD051
1
DD215
14 - 20 temp
40-60 RH
18-25 temprepositories service atrium offices
Image	Architype
Records	Centre,	offices,	
conservation	labs,	teaching	etc
1130m2
1321m2
Key	design	strategy:
Office	isolated	from	repository
20—22°C	
this	side	all	
year
13-18°C	
this	side	
is	ideal
Image	Nick	Grant
<0.04	ach	@	100Pa with	doors	sealed
(Final	test	0.4	ach	included	doors	to	office	– air	leakage	route)
Airtight	details	developed	with	contractor	
– their	first	Passivhaus
Image	Nick	Grant
Cost	effective	construction	– concrete	blocks	and	planks	– no	frame
Larsen	trusses	and	blown	cellulose.
Arts	Council	suggest	£3,500/m2
HARC	was	£1,980/m2 (turnkey).
Image	Nick	Grant
Image	Nick	Grant
Records	Centre	- timber	frame.
Same	details	as	developed	for	the	earlier	schools.
(glass	area	is	for	architecture	not	Passivhaus)
Image	Nick	Grant
Image	Nick	Grant
Atrium	exhibition	area	between	
repositories	and	offices
Repository	energy	balance
• Simplest	form
• Low	IHGs	0.6W/m2
• c.a.	1	air	change/day supply	air	vent
• No	HRV
• Temp	13-20°C
• No	cooling(except	photo	store)
• Inspired	by	Tim	Padfield &	Danish	
archives
www.conservationphysics.org
PHPP	7
Moisture	balance - monthly	model
Annual	average	humidity	is	about	
right	+/- depending	on	English	
weather.
Options:
1. Close	control	air	conditioning
2. Passive	buffering
3. Control	vent	on	phychrometrics
4. Trim	supply	air	humidity	in	
summer	(100m3/h,	<	10-15	litres	
H2O/day
Buffering	(roughly)
13
Max	vent	air	H20	imbalance:
≈	+/-10	kg/day
EMC	@	40%	RH	≈	6.5%
EMC	@	60%	RH	≈	8%
=	13	%RH/%	EMC	change
c.a.	150,000*	kg	of	paper	etc.
10kg	H20	x	30	days		=	0.2%	change	in	EMC	
=	2.6%	change	in	RH
(*	Half	of	archivist’s	estimate	and	ignoring	building	fabric	
moisture	capacity)
EMC	of	a	paper	sample	from	repository	
measured	at	6.9%	@	45%	RH
How	long	to	dry	1,800	t	of	concrete??
September	2014
Image	Nick	Grant
Alan	Clarke	
working	the	
antique	
chemistry	
balance
Home	brew	test	kit
March	2016
They	said	it	wouldn't	work:
Sceptical	client	in	design	meeting:
“The	Titanic	was	said	to	be	unsinkable”
Alan	Clarke’s	reply:
“We	are	designing	the	iceberg”
Compromise:	an	iceberg	with	a	BMS	controlled	heating	system	.	.	.
Titanic	Versus	Iceberg
Image	Nick	Grant
4	sensors/store,	alarms,	
duplex	boilers,	duplex	
pumps	etc.	.	.		
An	airtight	concrete	box	
wrapped	in	old	newspaper.	.	.
L
April May June
Troubleshooting	1
Unwanted	hot	water	
running	through	repository	
pipework.
Losses	from	insulated	pipe	
was	enough	to	heat	the	
building!
- Fix	- valves	shut	manually
(Large	fan	coils	to	meet	1kW	peak	
heat	load/floor!)
Troubleshooting	2
Photostore	dehumidifier	installed	
backwards	so	running	inefficiently	
and	generating	unwanted	heat	in	the	
service	core.	Fixed	in	June	2015
Troubleshooting	3
Faulty	sensor	wiring	made	the	
heating	come	on	when	already	
above	set-point.
A	year	to	fix	but	heating	isolated	
so	not	a	problem	for	now.
How	fast/automatic		does	heating	
response	need	to	be?
J
L
Valves	to	repository	shut,	fans	turned	off
Smart	building Stupid	building
February	2016	(no	heating	since	June)
Did	we	really	need	an	emergency	standby	boiler??	
Very	slight	fluctuations	in	RH	
with	outside	conditions.
March	2016,	vent	reduction	experiment
Vent	rate	reduced	from	250	to	100m3/h	for	whole	repository	 building	 and	
dehumidification	 switched	off	on	4/3/16	as	an	experiment.
RH	crept	up	+2%	but	even	more	stable.	In	equilibrium	 with	walls?	Time	will	
tell!
Punch	thanks	to	Lloyd	Alter
Very	even	conditions
Original	M&E	consultants	argued	for	circulating	fans,	
standard	practice	to	avoid	“cold	spots“	.
Would	have	required	cooling	for	the	fan	gains.
Ground	floor	 17.00°C 50%	RH
First	floor 17.86°C 46%	RH
Top	floor 17.87°C 49%	RH
25
Supply	air	Dehumidification
(if	needed)
• Ventilation	is	the	main	source	of	H2O
• So	make	building	as	tight	as	possible
• Supply	c.a.	1	air-change	per	day
• Trim	supply	air	when	outside	air	humidity	is	‘high’
• Don’t	try	and	control	on	room	RH.
What	we	imagined
DX coil for seasonal
dehumidification – on/off
control
Small fan 100 – 150m3/h
1.2 air changes/day
(c.a. 30W)
Filter
Uninsulated duct
Uninsulated duct
What	we	got
Now	we	know	it	works	we	can	just	use	the	cooling	coil.
(but	because	it	uses	chilled	water	we	need	to	protect	from	frost	somehow)
Energy use – inc’ labs & offices
June	2014	– March	2016	- whole	building
Gas		 11kWh/(m2.a) c.a.	£1,000/a
Electricity 34kWh/(m2.a) c.a.	£11,000/a
PE	 ≈	100	kWh/(m2.a)
Hopefully	electricity	use	will	decrease	as	building	dries	out	and	
lighting	and	other	controls	are	sorted??
TFA:
Records	Centre	 1321m2
Repository	 1130m2
Total 2451m2
Lessons
Reducing	ventilation,		heat,	cooling	and	dehumidification	load	to	
a	very	low	level	allows	radically	simplified	control	strategies	– a	
gentle	nudge.
Supply	air	dehumidification	@	about	2	air	changes/day	
successfully	stabilised	RH	before	the	building	was	fully	dry.
Simple	is	really	hard	to	get	built!
PD	5454	range
Open	Energy	Monitor	remote	access	by	Alan	Clarke	
Temperature	°C
Outside	air
supply	air		settings	changed	17/6/16
>	a	month	later
Offered	to	change	settings
PD	5454	range
Open	Energy	Monitor	remote	access	by	Alan	Clarke
Next	time
• No	BMS	– save	money	and	improve	reliability
• Simpler	dehumidification	of	air	supply
• No	frost	coil	(uninsulated	ducts,	turn	fan	off	in	extreme)
• Apply	lessons	learnt	to	the	cooled	photo-store
• Simpler	heating	– electric	panel	heaters?
Image	Nick	Grant
Questions?

Passivhaus Archive Hereford