Your SlideShare is downloading. ×
Together B.R._Transit Presentation 2011
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Thanks for flagging this SlideShare!

Oops! An error has occurred.

×

Introducing the official SlideShare app

Stunning, full-screen experience for iPhone and Android

Text the download link to your phone

Standard text messaging rates apply

Together B.R._Transit Presentation 2011

258
views

Published on

Published in: News & Politics, Business

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
258
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
2
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

Report content
Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
No notes for slide

Transcript

  • 1. Public Transit:
    “Fixing a system in crisis”
    St. Mary Baptist Church
    May 10th, 2011
  • 2. We face serious challenges…
    The transit system could run out of funding either in September or October of 2011.
    Chronic budget crises, under-funding and poor public perception have plagued the system.
    The 2010 vote to create a dedicated revenue source for transit failed, 53% to 47%.
  • 3. Who cares?
  • 4. Traffic Congestion
    Avg. delay per year
    22 hours
    U. S. Avg for Mid-size Cities
    37 hours
    Baton Rouge
    33rd
    Baton Rouge rank for congestion among mid-size U.S. cities (2010)?
    # of mid-size cities studied?
    33
  • 5. Projected Traffic Congestion
    FuturEBR projects traffic congestion will increase to over 70 hours per year in 20 years
  • 6. Projected Traffic Congestion
    FuturEBR prediction of congested routes in 20 years
    (Not a pretty picture.)
  • 7. Who cares?
    Mildred.
    Receptionist at local hospital. Makes minimum wage and is a single mother. She and her daughter rely on public transit.
    Dr. Jeanne.
    Jessica.
    Retired PhD in Clinical Psychology.
    Recently visually impaired. Very limited ability to drive.
    Student at a local university. Moving next to a bus route because her car is about to give out.
  • 8. Who cares?
    People who …
    want less traffic congestion.
    need reliable transportation to get to work, appointments, school, entertainment.
    need their employees to have reliable transportation to work.
    would like to reduce overall transportation costs: car insurance, gas, road repair, vehicle repair.
    want economic development:
    $1 in transit investment = $35 in economic development.
  • 9. Tens of thousands of Baton Rouge residents have limited or no access to cars.
    People who are elderly, have disabilities, are low-income, students, young people.
    Hundreds of thousands want options for transportation.
  • 10. Public transit is a popular idea in B.R.
    Percent of residents who say there is a “good” or “great” need for improved public transportation
    70%
    Percent of residents who “would use rapid transit if it were available”
    55%
    But very few people use it…
    Percent of residents who “ever use” transit system in Baton Rouge
    16%
  • 11. If the idea of transit is popular, why don’t more people use it?
    Because the current system is not working.
  • 12. Problem #1: Wait times are too long
    Average wait time at a transit stop?
    75 minutes
  • 13. Problem #2: Overall travel times are too long.
    Average total travel time (including waits)?
    2 hours, 20 minutes
  • 14. Problem #3: The route system is inefficient
    “Spoke” route structure built for cities of 40 years ago.
    Consider Essen to Bluebonnet
    5-10 minutes by car
    Over 2 hours by bus
  • 15. #4: Poor service coverage
    Many highly developed areas are not covered by transit system:
    O’Neal Lane
    Coursey Blvd.
    Essen & Siegan Lane
  • 16. #5: Poor Signage and Stops
    Shelters are in poor condition or do not exist.
    • Poor and uninformative signage at bus stops: no route information; no time information.
  • How did it get this bad?
  • 17. You get what you pay for…
    Baton Rouge vs. Peer cities: Transit funding per resident
    Per capita
    funding
    Peer Cities (2009)
    $134
    Charlotte
    Knoxville
    Little Rock
    Raleigh
    Memphis
    Peer City Average
    Baton Rouge (2009)
    Baton Rouge (2011)
    Includes local taxes, fares and federal funding
    $84
    $84
    $70
    $59
    $86
    $32
    $27
  • 18. You get what you pay for…
    High dependence on rider fares for funding
    Percent of
    Peer Cities (2009)funding from fares
    Peer City Average
    Baton Rouge (2011)
    14%
    25%
  • 19. Other cities with dedicated revenue for transit …
    Akron, OH
    Alameda, CA
    Albuquerque, NM
    Ames, IA
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Antioch, CA
    Arlington, VA
    Asheville, NC
    Atlanta, GA
    Austin, TX
    Bakersfield, CA
    Batavia, OH
    Bay City, MI
    Bellingham, WA
    Benton Harbor, MI
    Billings, MT
    Birmingham, AL
    Bismarck, ND
    Bloomington, IN
    Bradenton, FL
    Bremerton, WA
    Brunswick, OH
    Buffalo, NY
    Burlington, WA
    Canton, OH
    Cedar Rapids, IA
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Charleston, SC
    Charleston, WV
    Charlotte, NC
    Charlottesville, VA
    Chicago, IL
    Cincinnati, OH
    Cleveland, OH
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Columbus, GA
    Columbus, OH
    Commerce, CA
    Concord, CA
    Corpus Christi, TX
    Corvallis, OR
    Culver City, CA
    Cumberland, MD
    Dallas, TX
    Davenport, IA
    Davis, CA
    Dayton, OH
    Denver, CO
    Detroit, MI
    Duluth, MN
    El Paso, TX
    Elk Grove, CA
    Everett, WA
    Fairfield, CA
    Flagstaff, AZ
    Flint, MI
    Fond du Lac, WI
    Fort Collins, CO
    Fort Myers, FL
    Fort Smith, AR
    Fort Wayne, IN
    Fort Worth, TX
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Gardena, CA
    Gary, IN
    Glendale, AZ
    Grand Forks, ND
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Grand River, OH
  • 20. MORE cities with dedicated revenue for transit …
    Granite City, IL
    Great Falls, MT
    Greensboro, NC
    Gretna, LA
    Hanford, CA
    Hesperia, CA
    Highland Falls, NY
    Holland, MI
    Houston, TX
    Huntington, WV
    Indianapolis, IN
    Iowa City, IA
    Jackson, MI
    Jacksonville, FL
    Jefferson City, MO
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Kansas City, MO
    Kent, OH
    La Mirada, CA
    LaCrosse, WI
    Lafayette, IN
    Lakeland, FL
    Lancaster, CA
    Lansing, MI
    Laredo, TX
    Largo, MD
    Las Cruces, NM
    Lawrence, KS Lewisville, TX
    Lexington, KY
    Livermore, CA
    Logan, UT
    Lompoc, CA
    Long Beach, CA
    Los Angeles, CA
    Medford, OR
    Miami, FL
    Minneapolis, MN
    Missoula, MT
    Moline, IL
    Montebello, CA
    Monterey, CA
    Murfreesboro, TN
    Napa, CA
    New Orleans, LA
    New York, NY
    Norwalk, CA
    Oakland, CA
    Oceanside, CA
    Olympia, WA
    Omaha, NE
    Orange, CA
    Oxnard, CA
    Peoria, IL
    Petaluma, CA
    Phoenix, AZ
    Pinole, CA
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Pompano Beach, FL
    Port Huron, MI
    Port Washington, WI
    Porterville, CA
    Portland, OR
    Providence, RI
    Redondo Beach, CA
    Richland, WA
    Riverside, CA
    Rockville, MD
  • 21. STILL MORE cities with dedicated revenue for transit …
    Sacramento, CA
    Saginaw, MI
    Salem, OR
    San Antonio, TX
    San Bernardino, CA
    San Carlos, CA
    San Diego, CA
    San Francisco, CA
    San Jose, CA
    San Juan, PR
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Santa Clarita, CA
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Santa Fe, NM
    Santa Maria, CA
    Santa Monica, CA
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Savannah, GA
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Seattle, WA
    Sioux City, IA
    South Bend, IN
    Spokane, WA
    Springfield, IL
    St. Cloud, MN
    St. Johns, MI
    St. Joseph, MO
    St. Paul, MN
    St. Petersburg, FL
    Stockton, CA
    Sugar Land, TX
    Tampa, FL
    Tempe, AZ
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Thousand Palms, CA
    Toledo, OH
    Topeka, KS
    Tucson, AZ
    Union City, CA
    Urbana, IL
    Vallejo, CA
    Valparaiso, IN
    Vancouver, WA
    Ventura, CA
    Visalia, CA
    Washington, DC
    Waterloo, IA
    Wenatchee, WA
    West Covina, CA
    West Palm Beach, FL
    Wheeling, WV
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Woodland, CA
    Yakima, WA
    Youngstown, OH
    No dedicated funding means losing millions in federal match funding and grants.
  • 22. So how do we fix it?
  • 23. 4 Reform Proposals
  • 24. Proposal A:
    Basic Reform
    1. Decrease wait times from 75 minutes to 30 minutes.
    2. Increase service from 19 to 31 routes.
    3. Increase peak-hour buses from 32 to 42.
    4. Build 3 new transit hubs to replace “spoke” system with “grid” system.
    5. Overhaul bus stops, with new shelters, covers & benches.
    6. Add tracking to fleet, with exact arrival times accessible on cell phones.
    7. New signage with route and time info.
    8. Dedicated revenue source for transit.
     
    A
    Preliminary Estimates Only
    Total Transit Budget: $25 million
    Required from dedicated revenue source: $15m
    Federal & Other Funds leveraged:
    $10m per year
     
     
  • 25. Proposal B:
    Ridership Expansion
    1. Decrease wait times from 75 minutes to 20 minutes.
    2. Increase service from 19 to 37 routes.
    3. Increase peak-hour buses from 32 to 57.
    4. Build 3 new transit hubs to replace “spoke” system with “grid” system.
    5. Overhaul bus stops: shelters & benches.
    6. Add tracking to fleet, with exact arrival times accessible on cell phones.
    7. New signage with route and time info.
    8. Dedicated revenue source for transit.
    9. 3 New Express Lines: a) Downtown to LSU, b) Florida Blvd. & c) Plank Rd. (servicing Airport).
     
     
     
    B
    Preliminary Estimates Only
    Total Transit Budget: $29.9 million
    Required from dedicated revenue source:
    $18.3 million
    Federal & Other Funds leveraged:
    $11.6m per year
     
     
  • 26. Proposal C:
    Broad “rider-of-choice” appeal
    1. Decrease wait times from 75 to 15 minutes.
    2. Increase service from 19 to 39 routes.
    3. Increase peak-hour buses from 32 to 98.
    4. Build 3 new transit hubs to replace “spoke” system with “grid” system.
    5. Overhaul bus stops (shelters/benches).
    6. Add tracking to fleet, with exact arrival times accessible on cell phones.
    7. New signage with route and time info.
    8. Dedicated revenue source for transit.
    9. Bus Rapid Transit on Florida.
    10. Start-up for Street Car downtown to LSU.
    11. SIX New Express Service Lines for Florida Blvd, Airline Hwy, Scenic Hwy (serving Southern Univ), Plank Rd. (serving Airport), Acadian Thruway (serving BRCC) and O’Neal Lane.
    12. New Limited Stop Routes for Zachary/Baker, Denham Springs & Highland Rd.
     
     
     
    C
    Preliminary Estimate Only
    Total Transit Budget: $55.4 million
    Required from dedicated revenue source: $38.7million
    Fed & other funds leveraged: $16.7m
     
  • 27. Proposal C:
    Broad “rider-of-choice” appeal
    Double click
    image for video
    Bus Rapid Transit
    1. Decrease wait times from 75 to 15 minutes.
    2. Increase service from 19 to 39 routes.
    3. Increase peak-hour buses from 32 to 98.
    4. Build 3 new transit hubs to replace “spoke” system with “grid” system.
    5. Overhaul bus stops (shelters/benches).
    6. Add tracking to fleet, with exact arrival times accessible on cell phones.
    7. New signage with route and time info.
    8. Dedicated revenue source for transit.
    9. Bus Rapid Transit on Florida.
    10. Start-up for Street Car downtown to LSU.
    11. SIX New Express Service Lines for Florida Blvd, Airline Hwy, Scenic Hwy (serving Southern Univ), Plank Rd. (serving Airport), Acadian Thruway (serving BRCC) and O’Neal Lane.
    12. New Limited Stop Routes for Zachary/Baker, Denham Springs & Highland Rd.
     
     
     
    C
    Preliminary Estimate Only
    Total Transit Budget: $55.4 million
    Required from dedicated revenue source: $38.7million
    Fed & other funds leveraged: $16.7m
     
  • 28. Proposal D:
    No Reform
    1. No dedicated revenue source or
    additional funding for transit.
    2. Current or declining level of service:
    • 75 minute wait times
    • 29. 2hr 20min average trip time
    • 30. Current state of stops, signage and amenities.
    • 31. Decrease routes from 19 to 17.
    • 32. No weekend service.
    • 33. Fare increases.
    • 34. Reduction in service area by 50%.
    • 35. Reduce peak buses from 32 to 26.
     
     
    D
    Total Transit Budget: $12 m
    Additional revenue: $0
    Additional Federal & other funds leveraged: $0m
  • 36. It’s our choice…
    PROPOSAL A
    Basic Reform
    .
    PROPOSAL B
    Ridership Expansion
    PROPOSAL C
    Broad “Rider-of-choice” Appeal
    PROPOSAL D
    No
    Reform
    D
    C
    A
    B
    Total Budget: $25 million
    Dedicated revenue: $15 million
     
    Total Budget: $29.9 million
    Dedicated revenue: $18.3 million
     
    Total Budget: $55.4 million
    Dedicated revenue: $38.7million
     
    Total Budget: $12 m
    Dedicated revenue: $0.
     
  • 37. Transit Meeting: May 2nd