This document summarizes biological, psychological, and social explanations for attraction. Biologically, we are attracted to potential mates who can produce healthy offspring, as shown in a study where women found the scents of men with dissimilar immune systems most pleasant. Psychologically, the attraction-similarity model suggests we are attracted to similar others, as a 1971 study found. Socially, proximity increases relationship formation, as seen in a 1950 college dorm study, and social proof influences attractiveness perceptions, as demonstrated in a 2007 face preference experiment.
3. +
Biological Explanation
Based on Evolutionary Theory:
We find potential mates attractive based on whether we think they
will produce healthy offspring.
4. +
Wedekind (1995)-The Dirty Shirt Study
Aim: To determine how scent impacts attraction.
Method: Recruited 49 females and 44 men with a wide variety
of the MHC Gene (which impacts the immune system).
Asked men to sleep in a shirt for two nights while avoiding and
odour impacting behaviors (using odor free soap, no spicy
food, etc).
Women smelled 7 shirts (3 similar MHC, 3 dissimilar MHC, one
control) and ranked each from pleasant to unpleasant.
5. +
Biological: Wedekind (1995)
Findings: Women generally ranked the smell of shirts from men
who had dissimilar immune systems as more pleasant.
Conclusion: Women are attracted to the scents of men with
dissimilar genes as their own. This allows their potential
offspring a stronger and more diverse immune system.
6. +
Cognitive Explanation
We process information on a cognitive level and determine our
feelings of love.
Attraction-Similarity Model - Byrne (1971)
We are attracted to people who we believe share common traits as
us.
Our perception of our partners is dependent on our relationship with
them.
Relationships can impact our own self-concept
7. +
Cognitive: Byrne (1971)
Aim: To determine if humans are more attracted to people they
perceive to be similar to themselves.
Method: Participants completed a questionnaire on personal
characteristics. They then were shown a list of description of
fictional people and asked to rate their attractiveness.
8. +
Byrne (1971)
Findings: Participants ranked people they perceived similar to
themselves as being more attractive and desirable.
Conclusions:
We are attracted to people who we believe share common
traits as us.
Our perception of our partners is dependent on our relationship
with them.
Relationships can impact our own self-concept
10. +
Proximity Theory:
Festinger et al (1950)
Aim: To investigate the formation of friendships within a college
dorm.
Method: Conducted regular interviews and observations with
residents at a dorm at MIT.
Findings: Living close to another person increased the chances
of forming friendships with them.
Conclusion: Proximity is an essential part of the formation of
relationships. Being close to another person increases the
chances that you will bump into them and spend time with
them.
Critical Thinking: How might the internet change this theory?
13. +
Social Proof:
Jones et al (2007)
Aim: To investigate the role that mate choice
copying impacts women's’ perceptions of
attractiveness.
Method:
Control: Showed male faces to male and female
participants
Treatment: Showed the same male faces with either a
smiling or neutral female face looking at the model.
14. +
Jones et al (2007) continued
Findings:
Female: Women were more likely to view men who were
smiled at as being more attractive than the neutral or control
groups.
Men: Preferred the male faces where neutral women looking
at them in comparison to smiling faces.
Conclusions:
Females: Social transmission impact the perceptions of
attraction towards potential mates.
Males: Social transmission of face preferences influences
judgments of men's attractiveness, potentially demonstrating
a mechanism for social transmission of mate preferences.
Critical Thinking?