The OECD Directorate for Education and Skills offers tailored support for countries to develop and implement their school education policies in ways that guarantee the quality and equity of their education system.
2. Education policy implementation is a purposeful and multidirectional
change process aiming to put a specific policy into practice and which
may affect a given education system on several levels.
Our aim is to ensure policies reach schools, students and classrooms
2
3. 3
The process of policy making in education is complex
From theory…
Problem
definition
Agenda
setting
Policy
options
Policy
development
Policy
implementation
Policy
evaluation
4. 4
The process of policy-making in education is complex
… to practice
Contextual
factors
• Politics, socioeconomic and timing
factors
• Changing governance and institutions
Policy-
making
• Piecemeal approaches (lacking
coherence)
• Lack of flexibility between top-
down and co-construction
• Lack of capacity
Actors
• Multiple actors
• Potential resistance to reform
5. Even after surmounting political challenges, once
programmes are implemented:
-Teacher training can be insufficient or too superficial.
-Context is not conducive (schedule, timing, lack of
resources…).
-Other policies are not considered (reform fatigue).
Source: OECD (2015), Education Policy Outlook 2015: Making Reforms Happen, Chapter 9, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264225442-en.
Research shows school improvement programmes often don’t reach
the classroom
5
6. Design of the policy:
coherent
Implementation:
aligned and planned
Education reform is a balancing act beyond evidence-based policy-
making
6
7. 7
For policy success, both the content and the policy process are
important
Viennet, R. and B. Pont (2017), "Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework", OECD Education Working
Papers, No. 162, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/fc467a64-en.
8. • The policy at least partially defined before implemented. Its
justification, validity of its causal theory and goals,
complementarity with other policies and feasibility affect
whether it can be effectively implemented.
Smart policy design
• Actors can interpret, react and influence implementation.
Including them throughout the process facilitates long-term
success and prevent reactions against reforms.
Inclusive stakeholder
engagement
• The process’ features are adapted to the structures and
governance of its system at a given time, to the particular
actors, and around the specific educational policy.
Conducive context
• A coherent plan outlines concrete measures to make the
policy design operational, with sufficient resources,
capacity building, communications, and engaging
stakeholders.
Coherent
implementation
strategy
8
A framework for policies to reach schools and classrooms
9. Germany
SwitzerlandBelgium
AustriaFrance
Czech Republic
Luxembourg
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Chile
New Zealand
Slovenia
Australia
Netherlands
IrelandPoland
Portugal United States
SwedenSpain
Lithuania
Israel
Greece
Mexico
Japan
Estonia
Finland Canada
Korea
United Kingdom
Denmark Norway
Latvia
Italy
Iceland
Turkey
350
400
450
500
550
600
0510152025
Mean science
score
Percentage of variation in performance
explained by socio-economic status
Strength of the relationship between performance and socio-economic status is above the average
Strength of the relationship between performance and socio-economic status is not statistically significantly different from the average
Strength of the relationship between performance and socio-economic status is below the average
OECD
average
OECD
average
Above-average science performance
Below-average equity in education
Above-average science performance
Above-average equity in education
Below-average science performance
Below-average equity in education
Below-average science performance
Above-average equity in education
Mean performance in science and strength of the socio-economic gradient
9
• The policy at least partially defined before implemented. Its justification, validity of
its causal theory and goals, complementarity with other policies and feasibility
affect whether it can be effectively implemented.
Smart policy design
OECD (2016) PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education,
PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
10. 10
5-year National Education Plan: Japan (2018-2022)
White Paper “Desire to Learn”: Norway (2017-)
Our National Mission: Wales (2017-2021)
Letter on the Purpose of Education: Mexico (2014-2018)
Is the vision defined? clear? justified and motivational?
related to education outcomes?
• The policy at least partially defined before implemented. Its justification, validity of
its causal theory and goals, complementarity with other policies and feasibility
affect whether it can be effectively implemented.
Smart policy design
11. 0 10 20 30 40
Student truancy
Students skipping classes
Students lacking respect for teachers
Student use of alcohol or illegal drugs
Students intimidating or bullying other students
Teachers not meeting individual students’ needs
Teacher absenteeism
Staff resisting change
Teachers being too strict with students
Teachers not being well-prepared for classes
OECD average
OECD (2016), "Student and teacher behaviour hindering learning: Results based on school principals' reports", in PISA 2015 Results
(Volume II): Policies and Practices for Successful Schools, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264267510-
graph26-en.
11
Percentage of students in schools where the school principal reported that the
following phenomena hinder student learning to some extent or a lot:
• Actors can interpret, react and influence implementation. Including them
throughout the process facilitates long-term success and prevent reactions against
reforms.
Inclusive
stakeholder
engagement
13. 13
Political environment
Governance
Complementary policies
• Assessment policies
• Curriculum reform
• Initial teacher education
Institutions
System and school leadership
Research and knowledge use
• The process’ features are adapted to the structures and governance of its system at
a given time, to the particular actors, and around the specific educational policy.Conducive context
15. 15
Communication
• Is there a vision with clear objectives?
• Are they shared by all actors?
Timing
Clarity in the roles and responsibilities
Resources
Monitoring and feedback for improvement
• A coherent plan outlines concrete measures to make the policy design operational,
with sufficient resources, capacity building, communications, and engaging
stakeholders.
Coherent
implementation
strategy
16. 16
Implementing education policies: Supporting effective change in
education
Strategic Advice
Policy
Assessments
Implementation
Seminars
OECD education policy implementation support from a
comparative perspective
17. 17
Tailored OECD Implementing Education Policies Support: Selected
examples
• 3 years
• Schools as Learning Organisations (SLO) model
• 2 Policy Assessments
• Strategic Advice and Implementation Seminars
• SLO Survey, School Self-evaluation Toolkit
Wales
• 2 years
• Competence Development Model for Schools
• Policy Assessment
• Participation in meetings, doc. review, reference group
• Implementation Seminars
Norway
• 1 year
• Senior Cycle Review
• Policy Assessment
• Participation in national consultation meetings, steering group
Ireland
18. 18
Publications and other deliverables: Selected examples
The School as Learning
Organisation model in Wales
Frameworks
Policy Assessment
Reports
Briefs Seminars
We discussed this earlier: Data refers to the percentage of "yes" answers to the question: "In the city or area where you live, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the educational system or the schools?“
Source: Gallup World Poll (database) 2007 & 2016, in OECD (2017) Government at a Glance, OECD Publishing.
Credits
Laptop by Ziyad Al Junaidi from the Noun Project
Dialogue by Vectors Market from the Noun Project