1. WP 2
TV Metadata Interoperability
Peter Altendorf, IRT
with BBC, TVN and Polymedia

2. Outline
• Technical achievements in year 3
• Evaluations
• Dissemination
• Summary and Lessons Learned
• List of WP Results
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 2

3. Introduction
Produced by Kerry O’Connor and Robert A. Arkeilpane at IRT in collaboration with the University of Cincinnati/Munich Summer
Curriculum 2011 at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München.
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 3

4. TV Metadata Interop in NoTube
egtaMETA egtaMETA2Tva
PrestoSpace Presto2Bmf BMF TV-Anytime
Bmf2Tva Tva2RaiNic RAI-NIC
FESAD* Fesad2Bmf*
Bmf2BmfOwl
RDF XML
BMF-OWL
Programme Production Programme Distribution
*not in the scope of NoTube
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 4

5. Technical Achievements Y3
• Integration of metadata conversion and access
services with Use Case partners (in iterative
process)
• Modifications of mappings and services
according to evaluation reports
• Update of metadata formats
– BMF 1.2  BMF 2.0 (2012)
– TVA 1.4.1  TVA 1.7.1 (2011)
• Generation of a BMF Ontology
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 5

6. Detailed Evaluations
• Objective: ensure consistency in metadata transformations
• Second evaluation in Year 3 (based on Year 2 evaluations):
– Re-run of evaluation by inspection for modified egtaMETA2Tva
with new test instances from EBU (TVN)
– Evaluation PrestoSpace2Tva through service integrator (RAI)
• Detailed reporting
– In internal reports
– summary in D2.4
• Bug fixing
– In close collaboration with EBU for egtaMETA2Tva conversion
– required specific mappings for PrestoSpace  RAI-NIC
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 6

7. Professional TV Metadata
- going semantic…
• 3 years ago: semantic applications was no
topic for most broadcasters
• Today: more awareness for web applications,
smart tools for media production etc.
• Input from NoTube: access to the rich
production metadata available at broadcasters
(from internally and externally) requires
structures and permissions
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 7

8. Why BMF?
Designed for metadata
Abstract semantic exchange in the
model professional media
production
Restrictive but Also useful for
flexible model applications in the
distribution area
Usable as XML
Schema Will be used by ARD for
Possible database the exchange of
baseline …or OWL information for
programmes distribution
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 8

9. Example „Tatort“
Program
Maintitle: Tatort – Im Netz
Maintitle der Lügen
ParticipantBatch
ParticipantBatch
Program
Program
„include“
Participant
ParticipantFunction:
ParticipantFunction Actor
RoleName: Klara Blum
RoleName
RoleDescription
Participant
Participant
Model Instance
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 9

10. Example „Tatort“
ContactList Person
GivenName: Matthes
Framework ProductionElementBatch
FamilyName: Eva
MainTitle: Tatort – Im Netz
der Lügen
ParticipantBatch:
ContactReference
Program
ParticipantFunction: Actor
RoleName: Klara Blum
Participant
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 10

11. BMF-OWL
• Use of Semantic Web standards to provide
access to the semantics of BMF metadata for
Semantic Web applications
• Translation of BMF model into an OWL
ontology with support from VUA
• Metadata documents need to be connected
with the BMF ontology to query the
information: BMF-XML  RDF (using XSLT)
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 11

12. BMF-OWL
BMF Model
BMF XML BMF Ontology DBpedia etc.
DBpedia etc.
DBpedia
Schema (OWL)
LOD Data Sets
BMF BMF
BMF BMF
XML XSLT RDF
XML RDF
Doc Doc
Doc Doc e.g. Sparql
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 12

13. Example Tatort
Person
Participant
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 13

14. Example Tatort
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 14

15. Example Tatort
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 15

16. Dissemination
Presentation@“Semantics and Media“
Provision of metadata mappings
Article in „FKT“
Metadata Video
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 16

17. Summary + Lessons Learned
• TV metadata interoperability achieved with
existing metadata models/formats
• TV-A supports all elaborated requirements
• Specific mappings required to solve remaining
issues
• BMF-OWL allows provision of TV metadata in an
open standard  machine readable and
Semantic Web compliant metadata allows linking
to the LOD cloud
• Several sustainable results achieved…
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 17

18. WP Results (1/2) – Life after
NoTube
• Metadata Mappings:
– egtaMETA  TVA 1.4.1
– PrestoSpace  BMF 1.2
– PrestoSpace  BMF 2.0
– BMF 1.2  TVA 1.4.1
– BMF 2.0  TVA 1.7
– TVA 1.4.1  RAI-NIC
– TVA 1.7.1  BMF 2.0
– BMF 2.0  BMF-OWL
• All available at www.notube.tv
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 18

19. WP Results (2/2) – Life after
NoTube
• Extension of Metadata API
– Import and export of BMF data supported
• Conversion Services
– Metadata mappings implemented as loosely coupled software components
– Implemented as web service
– Service used in UC 7a demonstrator
• CRUD Service
– Data manipulation of news-related metadata
– Implemented as web service
– Service used in UC 7a demonstrator
– Service also used for Loudness Normalisation
• Services available at
http://notube.irt.de:8080/NoTube-IRT-Services/services/listServices
http://demos.polymedia.it/Notube/Egta2TvaConversion/services/Egta2TvaCo
nversionWebService?wsdl
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 19

20. WP2
TV Metadata Interoperability
Thank you for
your attention!
Peter Altendorf
Production Systems Television, IRT
…and the WP2-Team.
Institut für Rundfunktechnik
Floriansmühlstraße 60
80939 München
Tel. +49-(0)89-32399-271
Fax +49-(0)89-32399-200
E-Mail: altendorf@irt.de
26-27 March 2012 NoTube 3rd review 20