• Save
Creating Buy In for Sustainability Programs
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5

Like this? Share it with your network


Creating Buy In for Sustainability Programs

Uploaded on

In this lecture, I speak about the importance of creating buy in for sustainability, ways that champions can traverse internal structures, and how to then engage external partners.

In this lecture, I speak about the importance of creating buy in for sustainability, ways that champions can traverse internal structures, and how to then engage external partners.

More in: Business
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Be the first to comment
No Downloads


Total Views
On Slideshare
From Embeds
Number of Embeds



Embeds 33

http://www.linkedin.com 18
http://www.slideshare.net 6
https://www.linkedin.com 6
http://www.agentsofsustainability.com 3

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

    No notes for slide


  • 1. Creating Buy-In
  • 2. Buy-in
    What does it mean to create “buy in”?
    Getting people to agree with, and support, a …….
    • Project proposal
    • 3. New product
    • 4. Training program
    • 5. Process
    • 6. Way of thinking….
    Major types of buy in:
  • Determinants/ Constraints
    Core Reason for Action:
    Source of action:
    • Top-down or bottom-up
    Motives for action
    • Global Directive
    • 14. Improvement in product of service
    • 15. Non-critical process improvement
    • 16. Critical regulatory Change
    • Global, regional, local
    • 17. Corporate vs. Business Unit
    • 18. Supply Chain/ Distribution Channels impact
    • Business as usual or Crisis
    Duration of action
  • Why do people buy in?
    Why Firms Are Not…
    Why Firms Are Going “Green”
    Strategic Interests Supplier Performance Customer Satisfaction
    Lack of Expertise. Lack of Incentives. Lack of Regulation???
  • 23. Keys to Success of Internal Buy-in
    • Internal Champions
    • 24. Higher level support is a must
    • 25. Internal Guanxi to get proposals into the right hands
    • 26. Can help navigate politics, report lines, and approve budgets
    • 27. Can review proposal before pitch and provide feedback
    • 28. Collaboration over coercion
    • 29. The less a proposal is “forced”, the better it will be to develop buyin.
    • 30. Isolating the director of a business unit will almost guarantee isolating that BU
    • 31. …. Even if it is the CEO pushing down.
    • 32. Communication.. Communication… communication
    • 33. Developing broad based buy in requires communicating to stakeholders (internal/ external)
    • 34. Providing a forum for Q&A, feedback, and engagement
    • 35. Executive calls, newsletters, emails, forums
    • 36. Time
    • 37. Planning, rollout, and measurements require time
    • 38. Rome was not built in a day.
  • Win/ Win Propositions
    • Creating the “Win / Win”
    • 39. Goal Alignment
    • 40. Developing proposals and conversations that balance need of parties
    • 41. Making money approach always beats spending money
    • 42. Saving money is good too…
    • 43. Willingness of parties to do what it takes to achieve goals
    • 44. Rewards outweigh cost
    Easy to do with low hanging fruit
    BYD’s Move to Electric Cars
    • Executives developing shred goal to focus on building electronic systems
    • 45. Droving finance, R&D, and human resource departments to act
    • 46. Developed key support from government officials, banks, and industry
    Imagine the resistance of the move was away from batteries towards combustibles
  • 47. Win/ Lose Propositions
    • Dealing with the “Win / Lose”
    • 48. When Goals are Alignment, or lacking natural alignment
    • 49. One party is going to lose more the other…
    • 50. Pain of loser can be minimized
    • 51. Reasons for Win/ Lose programs succeeding
    • 52. Winner has significantly more power/ leverage over “loser”
    • 53. Top down pressure and decision making
    • 54. “Common Good”
    • 55. No Choice
    • 56. Weaknesses of Win/ Lose Programs
    • 57. Requires more effort to enforce – particularly if changing human behavior
    • 58. Long term stability requires acknowledgement of results (has to have had impact)
    • 59. Examples:
    • 60. Macroeconomic policies that restrain growth of new loans
    • 61. Wal-Mart Sustainability Program
    • 62. Employee Anti-graft campaign restricting gifts to external, dinners, etc
  • Win/ Lose Example
    Shanghai EXPO
    • Like Olympics – considered a “common good” and requires lots of buy in
    • 63. Upside include:
    • 64. EXPO Run-up investment in city
    • 65. Direct EXPO impact to Shanghai economy
    • 66. Local pride and
    • 67. Hotel, restaurants, and retail
    • 68. Downside included
    • 69. Relocation of Huangpu/ Pudong residents
    • 70. Construction related inconvenience and noise
    • 71. New regulations: No Smoking, security in metros
    • 72. Increased traffic from 300,000 visitors
    • 73. Required constant communication
    • 74. 5th, 15th, and 25th “better citizen” activities
    • 75. EXPO is worth the noise – be a good citizen
    • 76. Line up on right/ walk on left
  • Wal-Mart: Reduction of Packaging
    October 2008 Announce Sustainability Revolution
    • Comprehensive effort across supply chain and stores
    • 77. Alternative Energy, Transportation, Packaging, Recycling
    Not spontaneous. It was planned for years. Wal-Mart is Serious
    Over 200 Associates who will:
    monitor factories, educates suppliers and buyers, and works with others in our industry to implement effective ethical sourcing programs.
    2008 Wal-Mart Home Entertainment Design Challenge
    • Great design that attracts consumers.
    • 78. Product innovation that reduces the environmental impact for its product category.
    • 79. Packaging design that facilitates reuse and recycling, reduces waste, and reduces or eliminates the use of toxic materials.
    HP Reduces wins – reduces packaging 97%
    Win/ Lose to Win/ Win
    Breaking Barriers, Changing Habits, & Encouraging Change
  • 80. External Buy In
    … Taking complexity up a notch
  • 81. Externals are Different than Internals
    • Champions Won’t do it
    • 82. For big changes, it can only be done through executive to executive relationships
    • 83. Driver will not be a single champion, but a common path to profit, sharing, markets, etc
    • 84. Primary decision makers will have hidden agendas and may not be in position to make the call
    • 85. Collaboration over coercion
    • 86. Requires collaboration as, unlike an internal buy in, externals can push back
    • 87. “partners” always have options, and self preservation ultimately will rule
    • 88. Higher level of compromise and increased number of steps
    • 89. Communication.. Communication… communication
    • 90. Clear communication of goals, partnership, and steps is a must
    • 91. Any miscommunication can lead to the tabling of idea
    • 92. Requires each actor build internal buy in as well
    • 93. Time
    • 94. Planning, rollout, and measurements require more time
    • 95. Speed is determined by slowest player
  • Building Buy-in Internally