• Share
  • Email
  • Embed
  • Like
  • Save
  • Private Content
Leesman be2 talks copy
 

Leesman be2 talks copy

on

  • 587 views

 

Statistics

Views

Total Views
587
Views on SlideShare
515
Embed Views
72

Actions

Likes
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0

6 Embeds 72

http://be2camp.com 48
http://www.be2awards.com 13
http://be2awards.com 5
http://storify.com 4
http://be2awards.co.uk 1
http://www.be2awards.co.uk 1

Accessibility

Categories

Upload Details

Uploaded via as Apple Keynote

Usage Rights

© All Rights Reserved

Report content

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate.

Cancel
  • Full Name Full Name Comment goes here.
    Are you sure you want to
    Your message goes here
    Processing…
Post Comment
Edit your comment
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • \n
  • our model is to be open\n
  • \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • \n
  • independence at the centre of an industry, \n\nmeasuring WP effectiveness - the ability of a WP to support the activities important to those it houses \n
  • \n
  • \n

Leesman be2 talks copy Leesman be2 talks copy Presentation Transcript

  • Tim OldmanFounder - The Leesman Index
  • @Leesman_Index#coffee #Lmi #workplace
  • 2012 - 24hr Le Mans 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 5th places
  • Audi R18 e-tron Quattro2012 - 24hr Le Mans 1st, 2nd, 3rd & 5th places Turbo Diesel Hybrid
  • race telemetry300+ engineers in 6 countries
  • a standardised measure of workplace effectiveness
  • 23.06.101st survey 186 respondents
  • 14.06.1210,000 respondents
  • 14.06.1210,000th respondent
  • 3600 employees, 24 buildings, 17 countries.Establishes Leesman Index as truly
  • 11,500+ respondents750,000 lines of datais workplace is doing it’s job?
  • activities +features +facilities
  • Leesman activities by importance Individual focused work desk based Telephone conversations Planned meetings Informal un-planned meetings Business confidential discussions Collaborating on focused work Reading Relaxing / taking a break Individual routine tasks Thinking / creative thinking Informal social interaction Spreading out paper or materials Hosting visitors clients or customers Learning from others Audio conferences Larger group meetings or audiences Collaborating on creative work Individual focused work away from your desk Video conferencesUsing technical / specialist equipment or materials Private conversations 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Not supported at all Very under-supported Under-supported Supported Well supported Very well supported
  • 94 individual %focused work desk based
  • 77 individual %focused work desk based
  • Leesman activities by satisfaction Individual routine tasks Individual focused work desk based Planned meetings Learning from others Informal social interaction Collaborating on focused work Telephone conversations Collaborating on creative work Individual focused work away from your desk Informal un-planned meetingsUsing technical / specialist equipment or materials Audio conferences Reading Relaxing / taking a break Larger group meetings or audiences Hosting visitors clients or customers Spreading out paper or materials Private conversations Thinking / creative thinking Business confidential discussions Video conferences 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 Not supported at all Very under-supported Under-supported Supported Well supported Very well supported
  • 31video %conferencing
  • 56 workplace is %not supporting activity
  • ‘Lmiability of the workplace ’ to support important activities
  • workplacefitness for purpose
  • Leesman features by importance Desk Chair Computing equipment Telephone equipment Temperature control Printing / copying / scanning equipment Personal storage Natural light Meeting rooms (small) Noise levels In-office network connectivity Office lighting Meeting rooms (large) Air quality General décor Remote access to work files or network Dividers (between desks / areas)Quiet rooms for working alone or in pairs Informal work areas / break-out zones People walking past your desk Space between work-settings Greenery Ability to personalise my workstation Desk / room booking systems Accessibility of colleagues Shared storage Art or photography Archive storage Audio-Visual equipment Variety of different types of workspace Guest / visitor network access 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 Not provided Highly dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Highly satisfied
  • Leesman features by importanceTea coffee and other refreshment facilities General cleanliness Washroom facilities / showers Restaurant / canteen General tidiness Parking (car motorbike or bicycle) Security Reception areas Mail & post-room services Atriums and communal areas Access (e.g. lifts stairways ramps etc) Health and safety provisions Leisure facilities onsite or nearby Internal signage Hospitality services 0 3000 6000 9000 12000 Not provided Highly dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Highly satisfied
  • 91tea, coffee and % other refreshment facilities
  • it’s important to people
  • 61tea, coffee and % other refreshment facilities
  • How much do you agree or disagree with the following statementsabout the design of your organisations office? All respondents Lmi58.9The design of my workspace is important to meIt contributes to a sense of community at work It creates an enjoyable environment to work in It enables me to work productively Its a place Im proud to bring visitors to 0 3,125 6,250 9,375 12,500 Disagree Strongly Disagree Disagree Slightly Neutral Slightly Agree Agree Agree Strongly
  • 90the design of %workspace is important
  • 48a place I’m proud %to bring visitors
  • 54 enables me to %work productively
  • Leesman Lmi against positive sense of productivityWorkplace “Lmi” % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman Lmi against positive sense of productivity 100 90 80Workplace “Lmi” 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman Lmi against positive sense of productivity 100 90 80Workplace “Lmi” 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman Lmi against positive sense of productivity 100 90 80Workplace “Lmi” 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman Lmi against positive sense of productivity 100 90 Lmi 84.1 94% 80Workplace “Lmi” 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman Lmi against positive sense of productivity 100 90 Lmi 84.1 94% 80Workplace “Lmi” Lmi 54.3 44% 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • fuelling productivity
  • Leesman refreshment facilities against positive sense of productivity% satisfaction with tea, coffee refreshment facilities % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman refreshment facilities against positive sense of productivity 100% satisfaction with tea, coffee refreshment facilities 90 80 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman refreshment facilities against positive sense of productivity 100% satisfaction with tea, coffee refreshment facilities 90 80 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • Leesman refreshment facilities against positive sense of productivity 100% satisfaction with tea, coffee refreshment facilities 90 80 70 60 50 40 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % agreement (agree slightly, agree, agree strongly) that the design of the workplace enables them
  • 44/4 tea, coffee and other 5refreshment facilities
  • its emotive