Basic Guidelines for Discussion
• How can we enhance the competition and
  review so that it yields the best possible netw...
Single Cohort Competition
• How will MCHB manage 40+ reviews?
  – That’s their problem, but it increases our
    anxiety
 ...
Single Cohort Competition
• How can we help MCHB find competent,
  unbiased reviewers who understand
  LEND?
  – A list of...
ASD and Related
    Neurodevelopmental Disabilities
•   Lumping or splitting?
•   Where should the emphasis be? Balance?
•...
Insight Policy Research, Inc.
• Does Insight’s review have any relevance
  to the new guidance?
• Timing of release of the...
Finances
• Are there enough resources for meaningful
  LEND expansion?
• How will additional programs impact individual
  ...
Other Issues
•   Emphasis on Life Course Approach
•   Ties to other CAAI programs
•   Expectations of ASD-related research...
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Health Care Reform
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in...5
×

Health Care Reform

367

Published on

Health Care Reform, Joe Caldwell, PhD
Manny Jimenez, MD

0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total Views
367
On Slideshare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
0
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Transcript of "Health Care Reform"

  1. 1. Basic Guidelines for Discussion • How can we enhance the competition and review so that it yields the best possible network of LEND programs? • Don’t spend time on what we cannot control • Possible outcomes of this discussion – Letter of recommendations from AUCD to MCHB? – AUCD-MCHB meeting to discuss recommendations? – Both – Other suggestions?
  2. 2. Single Cohort Competition • How will MCHB manage 40+ reviews? – That’s their problem, but it increases our anxiety – They successfully managed a large review for the supplement applications
  3. 3. Single Cohort Competition • How can we help MCHB find competent, unbiased reviewers who understand LEND? – A list of suggestions from programs? – AUCD to compile, edit and forward? – Other sources?
  4. 4. ASD and Related Neurodevelopmental Disabilities • Lumping or splitting? • Where should the emphasis be? Balance? • What are the boundaries of “related NDD”? • Is this a minigrant (ASD) within a larger grant? • Is this a consolidated, seamless proposal? • How should current activities be best reported? • Does LEND ASD training require 300++ hours?
  5. 5. Insight Policy Research, Inc. • Does Insight’s review have any relevance to the new guidance? • Timing of release of their findings to MCHB? • Will/Should Insight information be used to inform the guidance? • Will Insight’s review process change data reporting requirements and program cost?
  6. 6. Finances • Are there enough resources for meaningful LEND expansion? • How will additional programs impact individual programs and the network as a whole? • How will an expanded network better address the mission of MCHB and “the MCH population?” • Justification for higher program funding? – More disciplines? More trainees? – National vs. Regional/Local impact?
  7. 7. Other Issues • Emphasis on Life Course Approach • Ties to other CAAI programs • Expectations of ASD-related research • And . . . .

×