This document discusses the duty of confidentiality that banks owe to their customers. It references the 1924 UK court case Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of England, where the court found the duty of confidentiality to be a legal one arising from contract between a bank and its customer. However, the duty was found to be qualified rather than absolute. The document requests a critical discussion of this statement from the referenced court case in an essay formatted according to Oscola referencing standards, including footnotes and a bibliography with 20-30 sources.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptx
Banking Law Critically Discuss.docx
1. Banking Law – Critically Discuss Statement.
Banking Law – Critically Discuss Statement.“At the present day, It may be asserted with
confidence that the duty (of confidentiality) is a legal one arising out of contract, and that
the duty is not absolute but qualified”. Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of
England [1924] 1 KB 473.Critically discuss.1. Oscola Referencing!2. 20-30 Sources3. Include
Footnotes in Essay (Oscola)4. Inlude Bibliography in Essay (Oscola)
![Banking Law – Critically Discuss Statement.
Banking Law – Critically Discuss Statement.“At the present day, It may be asserted with
confidence that the duty (of confidentiality) is a legal one arising out of contract, and that
the duty is not absolute but qualified”. Tournier v National Provincial and Union Bank of
England [1924] 1 KB 473.Critically discuss.1. Oscola Referencing!2. 20-30 Sources3. Include
Footnotes in Essay (Oscola)4. Inlude Bibliography in Essay (Oscola)](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/bankinglawcriticallydiscuss-230522234304-f263af77/85/Banking-Law-Critically-Discuss-docx-1-320.jpg)
