Running head: LOGIC MODEL LOGIC MODEL 2 Logic model Student’s name University affiliation Date References Blue-Howells, J., McGuire, J., & Nakashima, J. (2008). Co-location of health care services for homeless veterans: a case study of innovation in program implementation. Social work in health care, 47(3), 219-231. Output Integrating patient care Communication and collaboration between workers hence resulting to communities of practicing clinicians Attracting new patients to GLA Funding a two-year pilot grant Effective process for psychiatric screening for homeless patients Outcomes Homeless project were integrated The issues of homeless veterans were addressed due to institutional barriers There was creation of coalition and linking the project to legitimate VA-wide goals Good sustained program maintenance, process evaluation and encouraging development of communities. Activities Building a coalition of decision makers Introduction of a new integrated program Inputs The decision to implement Initial implementation Sustained maintenance Termination or transformation Running head: PROGRAM EVALUATION 1 PROGRAM EVALUATION 2 Program Evaluation Institutional Affiliation Insert the student’s name Instructor’s name Course Date Introduction Evaluation of the program is usually done to in order to determine the quality of the program, how effective the program is and how the program is performing. This can help to know if the program is making a significant difference among the targeted people. It can also assist to know if the program is functioning or not. This paper therefore seeks to evaluate the program which is assisting the homeless people within the community. The two program evaluation questions are: what is the reach of the program? And what has been the impact of the program on the homeless people? The answers to these questions would elicit both qualitative and quantitative results. Therefore, the program evaluation will require both quantitative and qualitative data collection plan. This is because the use of mixed-method approach is convenient since the results and findings would be reliable (Creswell, 2017). After identifying the evaluation program questions, the next step will be to come up with plan of evaluating a program. The plan should consist of methods of collecting data, evidences, the person responsible and the duration. Program Evaluation Question Evidence Methods and sources of collecting data Person in charge Duration 1. What is the reach of the program? Number of building materials distributed Records of the program Robert One month 2. What has been the impact of the program on the homeless people? Number of people resettled Number of people not yet re.

1. Running head: LOGIC MODEL
LOGIC MODEL
2
Logic model
Student’s name
University affiliation
Date
References
Blue-Howells, J., McGuire, J., & Nakashima, J. (2008). Co-
location of health care services for homeless veterans: a case
study of innovation in program implementation. Social work in
health care, 47(3), 219-231.
Output
Integrating patient care
Communication and collaboration between workers hence
resulting to communities of practicing clinicians
Attracting new patients to GLA

2. Funding a two-year pilot grant
Effective process for psychiatric screening for homeless
patients
Outcomes
Homeless project were integrated
The issues of homeless veterans were addressed due to
institutional barriers
There was creation of coalition and linking the project to
legitimate VA-wide goals
Good sustained program maintenance, process evaluation and
encouraging development of communities.
Activities

3. Building a coalition of decision makers
Introduction of a new integrated program
Inputs
The decision to implement
Initial implementation
Sustained maintenance
Termination or transformation
Running head: PROGRAM EVALUATION
1
PROGRAM EVALUATION
2
Program Evaluation

4. Institutional Affiliation
Insert the student’s name
Instructor’s name
Course
Date
Introduction
Evaluation of the program is usually done to in order to
determine the quality of the program, how effective the program
is and how the program is performing. This can help to know if
the program is making a significant difference among the
targeted people. It can also assist to know if the program is
functioning or not. This paper therefore seeks to evaluate the
program which is assisting the homeless people within the
community.
The two program evaluation questions are: what is the reach of
the program? And what has been the impact of the program on
the homeless people? The answers to these questions would
elicit both qualitative and quantitative results. Therefore, the
program evaluation will require both quantitative and
qualitative data collection plan. This is because the use of
mixed-method approach is convenient since the results and
findings would be reliable (Creswell, 2017). After identifying
the evaluation program questions, the next step will be to come
up with plan of evaluating a program. The plan should consist
of methods of collecting data, evidences, the person responsible
and the duration.
Program Evaluation Question
Evidence
Methods and sources of collecting data
Person in charge
Duration
1. What is the reach of the program?

5. Number of building materials distributed
Records of the program
Robert
One month
2. What has been the impact of the program on the homeless
people?
Number of people resettled
Number of people not yet resettled
Community leaders
Program coordinators
Homeless people
John
One Month
After coming up with the plan, the instruments of data
collection should be identified. These include: questionnaires,
reviewing existing program records, interviews and
observations. The use of these multiple instruments of
collecting data is to ensure that the findings are reliable and
valid. The data collected from different sources can allow for
comparison of the findings.
The key determinant of finding accurate program evaluation
results lies with the approach used to answer the program
evaluation questions. This important because the wrong
approach used may not answer effectively the program
evaluation questions. (McCusker & Gunaydin, 2015) compares
the quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method approaches in
program evaluation. The best approach is the one which
combines both qualitative and quantitative approaches since it
enables the program evaluator to obtain data from different
many sources.
The next step is to plan for analysis of findings after collecting
the data. The qualitative results from the respondents will be
analyzed so as to know the major arguments of the respondents.

6. This is based on the responses during surveys and the responses
filled in the questionnaires. In order to get the qualitative
results, different responses will be statistically analyzed. This
involves calculation of mean and percentages. Other statistical
manipulation such as regression and variance analysis will be
done. This can be done in order to determine the effect of one
variable on another variable. Results will also be computed. The
final step of program evaluation will be to interpret the
quantitative and qualitative results. The results will then be
interpreted to determine whether it answered the program
evaluation questions.
Conclusion
Program evaluation is an important activity that is undertaken to
know whether the human services program is achieving its
objectives or not. In order for the process to be meaningful, it
should adopt an effective program evaluation approach. This
will ensures that the process is successful the program
evaluated. As indicated above, the program evaluators should
apply the best approach during the evaluation.
References
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017), Research design:
Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage
publications
McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015). Research using
qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on
the research. Perfusion, 30(7), 537-542.
Running head: CASE STUDY
1
Case study

7. 2
Case study
Insert student’s name
Institutional affiliation
Professor’s name
Course
Date
Creating a Needs Assessment
· Summarize the purpose of conducting a needs assessment for
the population in the case study.
The purpose of conducting the need assessment is to determine
is to determine the current state of the problem. This is crucial
in in setting the desired goals to the intended condition of the
homeless population. The other purpose is planning. the needs
assessment is key for planning such as in determining the
amount of resources required for the plan to succeed (Witkin &
Altschuld, 2015) .
· Identify several methods for performing a needs assessment of
the population in the case study (homeless families).
The methods that can be used to perform need assessment for

8. the population are such as extrapolation from existing studies.
This means drawing data from secondary sources or other
surveys that has been previously done and generalizing the
results. The other method is use of resource inventories. The
third applicable method is social survey. This entail collecting
of raw data from the population and analyzing it.
· Explain how you would find the normative, expressed,
perceived, and relative needs of the population, and outline the
data collection procedure(s) for each of the methods you
identify.
To find out the normative, expressed and relative needs I would
use survey. In the survey I would make good use of
questionnaires. It’s in the questionnaires that I would frame
questions that would help me determine the needs. From there I
would code the qualitative information to make it easy for
analysis and obtaining quantitative data about the needs.
· Formulate a set of goals and objectives for the program in the
case study based on the apparent needs of the population as
outlined in the case study.
The main goal is providing houses or homes for the homeless
population. The other goal is making sure the homeless
population is able to afford rental houses and are able to have
the houses at a lower price.
· Finally, provide a brief explanation of the importance of
having a cohesive mission statement and set of goals within an
organization.
A cohesive mission statement is essential in increasing goal
visibility. Such a mission promotes unity between the
employees and the administration making it easy to achieve set
objectives. The other importance of a cohesive mission
statement is that it guides decision making in such a way that

9. they will be goal oriented. The importance of set goals within
an organization is that they help in resource allocation and
alignment (Jung & Sosik, 2002).
Reference
Jung, D. I., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership
in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and
collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small
group research, 33(3), 313-336.
Witkin, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (2015). Planning and
conducting needs assessments: A practical guide. Sage.
Running Head: TYPESOF NEEDS
1
TYPES OF NEEDS
3
Types of Needs
Name
Institution Affiliation
Hawaii State being a place with the sun it is a good place for
relaxation; this attracts more homeless people to the state.
Although the exact number of homeless people in this state is
not known, the number is approximate to be 6000 to 15000
people falling into homelessness at any given point annually.
The normative needs in O'ahu in Hawaii State are that the
homeless persons suffer more health challenges compared to
other people and they experience high rates of premature
deaths.

10. Though there are set houses in Hawaii State the homeless
community don't find it comfortable being there. They say the
conditions are not conducive and also even the number of
houses is far much less than the total number of homeless
individuals. This is an expressive need.
Most of the homeless population reported physical health care
as the most important need. Both the old and young are more
concerned about their health which according to the survey is at
questionable states. Though other perceived needs as the need
for the job by the youth were recorded in several surveys they
number of did not emerge to be as large as those who are
concerned with their health.
Relative needs in this homeless community, first of all, are the
food, shelter, and sanitation. In this homeless people in Hawaii
people live in tents at the beaches which results to various
infections from sunburns.
The most important need of the above needs is the normative
need in thee homeless people in Hawaii since the health
conditions are cutting short the lives of the homeless people and
also denying them chances of trying to make their lives better.
References
Suarez, T. M. (1996). Needs assessment. International
Encyclopedia Teaching and Teacher Education.
Moroney, R. (1986). Shared responsibility. New York: Aldine
Modell, J. (1997). Housing the Homeless in Hawaii. Home in
the islands: housing and social change in the Pacific, 194.

11. Running Head: TYPESOF NEEDS
1
TYPES OF NEEDS
2
Types of Needs
Name
Institution Affiliation
Hawaii State being a place with the sun it is a good place for
relaxation; this attracts more homeless people to the state.
Although the exact number of homeless people in this state is
not known, the number is approximate to be 6000 to 15000
people falling into homelessness at any given point annually.
The normative needs in O'ahu in Hawaii State are that the
homeless persons suffer more health challenges compared to
other people and they experience high rates of premature
deaths.
Though there are set houses in Hawaii State the homeless
community don't find it comfortable being there. They say the
conditions are not conducive and also even the number of
houses is far much less than the total number of homeless
individuals. This is an expressive need.
Most of the homeless population reported physical health care
as the most important need. Both the old and young are more
concerned about their health which according to the survey is at
questionable states. Though other perceived needs as the need
for the job by the youth were recorded in several surveys they
number of did not emerge to be as large as those who are
concerned with their health.

12. Relative needs in this homeless community, first of all, are the
food, shelter, and sanitation. In this homeless people in Hawaii
people live in tents at the beaches which results to various
infections from sunburns.
The most important need of the above needs is the normative
need in thee homeless people in Hawaii since the health
conditions are cutting short the lives of the homeless people and
also denying them chances of trying to make their lives better.
References
Suarez, T. M. (1996). Needs assessment. International
Encyclopedia Teaching and Teacher Education.
Moroney, R. (1986). Shared responsibility. New York: Aldine
Modell, J. (1997). Housing the Homeless in Hawaii. Home in
the islands: housing and social change in the Pacific, 194.
Running head: THE NEED TO EVALUATE IN HUMAN
SERVICES 1
THE NEED TO EVALUATE IN HUMAN SERVICES
2
The need to evaluate in human services
Insert student’s name
Institutional affiliation
Professor’s name
Course
Date

13. The need to evaluate in human services
Introduction
Some human services organizations have been developed to
address human needs. The human services professionals are
advised to come up with goals and plans that can help solve
human needs. The challenge has been time and costs involved in
coming up with new programs and the increasing number of
potential needs to be addressed. The human services
professionals have a huge task to develop achievable goals and
plans. Evaluation should be done to determine both the extent of
the problem and the success of the program in implementing it.
This paper will examine a case study of the evaluation of a
program designed to help juvenile offenders. This work will
also look into the purpose of evaluating the program and assess
the importance of that evaluation.
The case study selected is the co-location of health care
services for homeless veterans. What motivated the
development of the program is the need to have veterans access
timely health care services by co-locating clinics in one house
and ensuring there is adequate availability of services needed.
After evaluating the program, it is evident that it did meet the
needs of clients and stakeholders in many ways. The programs
served many homeless veterans and help improve their access to
health care and social services. The program nevertheless faced
some challenges. Some plans and goals of the program were not
fully implemented. An example is that management systems to
assist veterans with acute diseases were unable to be
implemented. It is suggested that each problem which may arise
at the course of implementation of the program be dealt with
and solved so that the program can be successful.
The program designed to assist the juvenile offenders must

14. capture all aspects of the case study program above. According
to (Weiss,1998) evaluation report should outline the nature of
the program and give necessary details.
Conclusion
Human services professionals are supposed to evaluate to know
if the programs are supposed to be existence and also suggest
areas to be expanded and improved. In the case study selected,
human services’ professionals were able to pass information
concerning results and outcomes of the program. The program
was able to realize most of its goals and plans despite the few
challenges encountered. They were also able to recommend
similar programs in other communities and ensured the target
population’s needs are being achieved in the most efficient way.
References
Healthcare for the Homeless Information Resource Center.
(2004). Health Care for the
Homeless Grantee Profiles. Delmar, NY: PRAINC/HRSA.
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Weiss, C. H. (1998). Evaluation: Methods for studying
programs and policies (2nd ed.). Upper