Alun Davies
Where are we based?
Why should KEMRI CGMR-Coast
engage with schools?
Large research institute - scientists from Kenya and
worldwide – opportu...
Project Objective
Develop and pilot, through a PAR process, elements
of a schools engagement programme aimed at
improving...
Project Overview
Possible School Interventions
For sustainability and buy-in, interventions to be
decided upon in participatory planning m...
Pilot evaluation
Mixed methods to measure any impact on students’
knowledge and attitudes about health research and
scien...
Survey design continued
School 1
70
pre
School 3
70
pre
School 2
70
pre
School 1
70
post
School 3
70
post
School 2
70
post...
Selection of three pilot schools
Consensus with DEO using
the following criteria:
Attempt to be representative
of school...
Selected Schools
Shariani SS Kilifi Township SS Bahari Girls SS
School type District – Mixed Provincial - Boys Provincial ...
Performance in 2006 KCSE
(total of 34 schools)
Shariani SS
Position / Grade index
Kilifi Township SS
Position / Grade inde...
The potential of school
engagement
“During the district tetanus campaign, clinicians from the
district hospital came to i...
Barriers to understanding
science/research
In school factors – (Fuller & Heyneman 1989)
Length of instructional programme...
Bahari Girls Laboratory
Shariani Laboratories
Barriers to understanding
science/research
Student factors – (Jegede, Aikenhead, Ogunniyi, Le Grange)
Science students wo...
Acknowledgements
KEMRI-CRMR-Coast - Community liaison group
Dorcas Kamuya, Sassy Molyneux, Vicki Marsh
Sam Kinyanjui, G...
Survey design
School 1
70
pre
70
post
School 3
70
pre
70
post
School 2
70
pre
70
post
•Since small pilot intended to set u...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Action Research to develop a schools engagement strategy to promote science and research in Kilifi District

1,738 views

Published on

Presented by Alune Davies (Kenyan Medical Research Institute) at the Public Engagement Workshop, 2-5 Dec. 2008, KwaZulu-Natal South Africa, http://scienceincommunity.wordpress.com/

Published in: Education, Technology
0 Comments
0 Likes
Statistics
Notes
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

No Downloads
Views
Total views
1,738
On SlideShare
0
From Embeds
0
Number of Embeds
10
Actions
Shares
0
Downloads
31
Comments
0
Likes
0
Embeds 0
No embeds

No notes for slide

Action Research to develop a schools engagement strategy to promote science and research in Kilifi District

  1. 1. Alun Davies
  2. 2. Where are we based?
  3. 3. Why should KEMRI CGMR-Coast engage with schools? Large research institute - scientists from Kenya and worldwide – opportunity to address beneficence in research and contribute to school science Communication strategy drafted in 2005 Schools engagement identified but not yet implemented Previous studies have worked with schools – but for study recruitment purposes - no structured schools programme Community members suggest that schools and communities would welcome a school engagement programme “What is KEMRI doing to advise our schoolchildren on what subjects to choose to become scientists?” (Roka chief, annual debriefing workshop, 25th October 2007)
  4. 4. Project Objective Develop and pilot, through a PAR process, elements of a schools engagement programme aimed at improving mutual understanding between researchers and the local community.  Develop and pilot one or more interventions  Assess the impact of the piloted intervention(s)  Describe the process, facilitating factors and challenges  Build partnerships with relevant stakeholders at local, district and national levels
  5. 5. Project Overview
  6. 6. Possible School Interventions For sustainability and buy-in, interventions to be decided upon in participatory planning meeting with teachers but could include: Integrating with / strengthening existing structures eg science congress Establishing a resource centre Centre tours, competitions, school based student journal clubs / ethics committee role plays, debating/drama competitions, talks from scientists Semester break attachment
  7. 7. Pilot evaluation Mixed methods to measure any impact on students’ knowledge and attitudes about health research and science Quantitative – pre and post intervention survey Qualitative – pre and post intervention FGDs with teachers and students, interviews with stakeholders, scientists Participatory evaluation – teachers and students to give input to the evaluation process
  8. 8. Survey design continued School 1 70 pre School 3 70 pre School 2 70 pre School 1 70 post School 3 70 post School 2 70 post Survey Survey
  9. 9. Selection of three pilot schools Consensus with DEO using the following criteria: Attempt to be representative of schools in the district wrt: gender mix performance in national exams school size distance from the unit Day and boarding schools Provincial and District
  10. 10. Selected Schools Shariani SS Kilifi Township SS Bahari Girls SS School type District – Mixed Provincial - Boys Provincial – Girls Students 210 540 406 Day/Boarding Day Boarding Boarding Streams 2 4 3 Science Teachers 3 14 (sci and maths) 5 Laboratories 2 2 1
  11. 11. Performance in 2006 KCSE (total of 34 schools) Shariani SS Position / Grade index Kilifi Township SS Position / Grade index Bahari Girls SS Position / Grade index Overall 17th / 4.6000 7th / 5.8049 6th / 5.8462 Biology 23rd / 3.4736 7th / 6.0333 8th / 6.0273 Physics 19th / 3.8182 11th / 4.7073 4th / 6.2414 Chemistry 18th / 3.1333 6th / 5.2564 7th / 4.6231
  12. 12. The potential of school engagement “During the district tetanus campaign, clinicians from the district hospital came to immunize women of reproductive age. Rumors emerged that the vaccines contained chemicals that make our women infertile. Many women refused to be immunized. We educated our students of the importance of the tetanus vaccine. When the clinicians returned to our school all targeted students received the immunization willingly.” Head teacher Shariani secondary “What will the project require of the students? What impact will it have on the students’ academic performance?” Bahari Girls head mistress.
  13. 13. Barriers to understanding science/research In school factors – (Fuller & Heyneman 1989) Length of instructional programme Pupil feeding programmes School library activity Years of teacher training Textbooks and instructional materials
  14. 14. Bahari Girls Laboratory
  15. 15. Shariani Laboratories
  16. 16. Barriers to understanding science/research Student factors – (Jegede, Aikenhead, Ogunniyi, Le Grange) Science students world view is different to western science world view Assisting students to cross cultural borders through Collateral learning – integration of indigenous science STS – Science-Technology-Society Education “Any western science curriculum in a non-western classroom environment which does not take particular consideration of the traditional worldview of the learner risks destroying the framework through which concepts are likely to be interpreted.” (Jegede, INT. J. SCI. EDUC., 1997, VOL. 19, NO. 1, 1-20)
  17. 17. Acknowledgements KEMRI-CRMR-Coast - Community liaison group Dorcas Kamuya, Sassy Molyneux, Vicki Marsh Sam Kinyanjui, Greg Fegan, Norbert Peshu The Wellcome Trust Thank you
  18. 18. Survey design School 1 70 pre 70 post School 3 70 pre 70 post School 2 70 pre 70 post •Since small pilot intended to set up links and test acceptability of involvement – justified in not using control groups •Initial simultaneous sample of pre and post test groups to give each individual an equal statistical opportunity ob being selected for either pre or post survey group

×