Critique of russell williams

1. Critique of Russell Williams
A southern Baptist pastor on the case of Kim Davis
First: This is not a case of the government forcing anyone to violate their
religious belief.She is free to quit her job. If she quits her job to honor God
surely God would take care of her.
God would take care of her?? He will either way. Shadrach, Meshach, and
Abednegoshould have quit as well by this same logic.
Dan 3
1 Nebuchadnezzar the king made an image of gold, whose height was
threescore cubits, and the breadth thereof six cubits: he set it up in the
plain of Dura, in the province of Babylon. 2 Then Nebuchadnezzarthe king
sent to gather together the princes, the governors,and the captains,
the judges, the treasurers, the counsellors, the sheriffs, and all the
rulers of the provinces, to come to the dedication of the image which
Nebuchadnezzar the king had set up. 3 Then the princes, the governors,
and captains, the judges, the treasurers, the counsellors, the sheriffs, and all
the rulers of the provinces, were gathered together unto the dedication
of the image that Nebuchadnezzar the king had set up; and they stood
before the image that Nebuchadnezzar hadset up.
There was time between v1&2 and “then” time between v2&3 to ‘quit’ or
avoid (notice Daniel is not present).
Time lap is as follows:
V1 an event – made an image (not on a same day service 3d printer)
V2 “then” time between Image made and invitations sent to the big-wigs
V3 “then” time between invitations and travel arrangements [were gathered]
Second:This is not a case of someone trying to uphold the sanctity of
marriage. If she wanted to uphold the sanctity of marriage she should not
have beenmarried four differenttimes. If she is worried about her name

2. being affixed to a marriage license that goes against a biblical definition of
marriage, she should not have her name on the last three marriage
licenses given to her.
How does he know this is not a case of trying to uphold the sanctity of
marriage? It did stop two sodomitesfrom claiming sin as marriage.
We don’t know the details of her previous marriages. If we force this logic
into the Bible we see no one could say or do anything for Christ because
the more you know about Him the more you see yourself as a hypocrite.
The woman at the well should not have converted a complete town by her
witness. (John 4:39)
Peter had no right to preach Pentecost. Only forty days before he was
publicly cursing and denying Christ. Nowhere in Acts 2 does he confess
his formererror. Peter had taken care of that issue between himself and
Jesus in John 21:15-17 and he never mentions it again.
At issue is not whether personal preferenceshould be mandated on others.
God doesn’t have preferencesHe has commands.
It is the job of a Christian to stand on Gods law in the most effective way
possible. Amos was told to keep preaching his message,just don’t do it in
Bethel (Amos 7:10-17).Notice it is Amaziah the priestwho is telling Amos
to take his message to another land (Judah). The priest is responsibleto
enforce Gods law and when he doesn’tGod sends a prophet to expose
error in all parties.
The other issue here is divorce is a legal document too, both in the Bible
and the law to the land.
Third: This seems to be a case of someone looking to cash in on the
religious right. Churches all across the south will throw money at her to
come and tell congregations how the evil American governmentput her in
jail because of her faith in Jesus.
This is why we are losing.
This is why people have such disdain forevangelicals.
Not because we disagree but because we don’t take the bible seriously. If

3. ever there was a case of “he who is without sin cast the first stone”, this is
it. If ever there was a “take the log out of your eye” moment, this is it.
This is 100% a case of he who is without sin cast the first stone. God is
without sin and soonto cast stones on both fools and the companionof
fools (Pr. 13:20).Jeremiah was told to stand in the gap and make up the
hedge not find a place to hide and point to the gap in the wall.
Again I see personalopinion speculation not supported by fact. What is the
proof this is a case of “cashing in on religious right”?
For someone who claims to take the Bible seriously how about quoting it,
and more than two catch phrases without references.
We must stop looking to the governmentto make America a Christian
utopia. Our kingdom is not of this world.
We must abandon all thoughts of fixing others and let Jesus fix us.
If we want sanctity of marriage then stop cheating, stop having affairs, stop
looking at porn, stop getting divorces.That is the way for the church to
stand up for the biblical definition of marriage, not by someone martyring
their self-righteous self.
Acts 5:17-30 Peterwas commanded to not preach in the name of Jesus,
Peter didn’t look for a way around it, he could have preached the same
message without using Jesus’name. Peter knew Jesus was greater than
mans anger. After releasing Peterfrom jail he was told to go back and do it
all over again. The bestthing a man can do is mortify his own self-
righteousness;God thinks it is filthy rags.