Quality Streak. Creating Sites That Google Wants To Eat Up. Nom.
We are all in this together now. If you want a site to rank and bring you revenue then you need to big looking at the bigger picture. A dive into Google's quality rater guidelines helps understand what we need to do to help sites rank better.
Google Have BeenGiving Us
Clues For Ages
One Word. Repeated.
Quality.
40.
Quality Content
"One ofthe most
important steps in
improving your site's
ranking in Google search
results is to ensure that it
contains plenty of rich
information that includes
relevant keywords, used
appropriately, that
indicate the subject
matter of your content."
Google :// Every year
since the dawn of time
(https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/66361?hl=en)
41.
Quality Websites
"The mainthing is that
people should avoid
looking for shortcuts. In
competitive market areas
there has always been a
need to figure out how to
differentiate yourself, and
nothing has changed
today. Think about how
you can create compelling
content or a compelling
experience for users."
Matt Cutts :// 2012
(https://www.stonetemple.com/matt-cutts-and-eric-talk-about-what-makes-a-quality-site/)
Google Search Quality
Guidelines,Section 2.3
These are the pages that Google hold to a high standard because they can
impact a persons life.
• Shopping or financial transaction pages
• Pages that offer financial information, for example, investment or tax
information
• Pages that offer medical information about specific diseases or conditions
or mental health
• Pages that offer legal information about topics like child support, divorce,
creating a will, becoming a citizen, etc.
• Any page that has the potential to be dangerous or detrimental if it
possessed low levels of E-A-T (car repair and maintenance, for example)
Google Search Quality
Guidelines,Section 3.1 - 4.1
• Enough main content (MC): content should be ample enough to satisfy the
needs of a user for a page’s unique topic and purpose (broad topics
require more information than narrow topics, for example)
• The page and its associated content is expert, authoritative, and
trustworthy for the topic they discuss
• The website has a positive reputation for its page topics
• The website features enough auxiliary information, for example, “About
us,” “Contact,” or “Customer Service” information
• The website features supplementary content (SC) that enhances the user’s
enjoyment and experience of a web page
• The page is designed in a functional fashion that allows users to easily
locate the information they want
• The website is maintained and edited regularly and frequently
#6 Why are we here today? Gain knowledge and learn something? Make some industry friends? Get some free food?
We all work in digital and we are working towards the same goals – or at least we should be.
What are those goals?
#7 We want more traffic.
We have different ways, different strategies, different tactics. But we all want our websites to succeed.
#8 And what does more traffic lead to? More revenue. Our ultimate goal.
We can of course make more revenue from the same traffic with CRO – but you need the traffic for that.
We have different ways, different strategies, different tactics. Bit we all want our websites to succeed.
#9 This digital thing seems complicated right?
Or so it seems. Lets see if we can some pretty complicated stuff and simplify it in about 100 slides and 20 minutes.
Not possible!
#13 This came from Pedro Dias (ex Google search quality and webspam team, now SEO ;))
Unfair advantage. Never mind.
He has been grabbing this data form hangouts and other sources - this is not official.
#15 Well without going into to much detail they get human opinion and then use machine learning to roll their thoughts and opinions into the algorithm.
#16 These are the quality raters. The raters look as the search results. The raters rate. The sites they rate well are deemed the ones that people want to see in their search results.
Over simplified there by the way ;)
#18 Based on what Google thinks (knows?) people are looking for.
#19 Based on what Google thinks (knows?) people are looking for.
#20 These are the quality rater guidelines. Leaked pretty much 2 years ago to the day. There has been a condensed version around since 2013 but they never released the full ones until the leak happened.
We will come on to this later.
#21 All our disciplines are intertwined nowadays. SEO, Content, Design, Development, PPC, Social. All of them. No matter what anyone else says.
There are people that will fight their corner. There was a massive debate last year (again) about technical SEO being dead. Obviously bullshit.
In the summer the golden age of UX was deemed to be over. There are loads of CRO is dead posts out there.
Instead of proclaiming another part of the industry to be dead lets figure out a way to work together.
#23 And want to use. And want to come back. And use again.
#25 Web developers, web designers, social media managers, ppc managers and practitioners, seo managers, copywriters, community managers, ecommerce managers, crm managers, email marketing managers, link builders, content editors, creative directors, ux managers....
#26 Web developers, web designers, social media managers, ppc managers and practitioners, seo managers, copywriters, community managers, ecommerce managers, crm managers, email marketing managers, link builders, content editors, creative directors, ux managers....
#27 Web developers, web designers, social media managers, ppc managers and practitioners, seo managers, copywriters, community managers, ecommerce managers, crm managers, email marketing managers, link builders, content editors, creative directors, ux managers....
#28 Web developers, web designers, social media managers, ppc managers and practitioners, seo managers, copywriters, community managers, ecommerce managers, crm managers, email marketing managers, link builders, content editors, creative directors, ux managers....
#29 Web developers, web designers, social media managers, ppc managers and practitioners, seo managers, copywriters, community managers, ecommerce managers, crm managers, email marketing managers, link builders, content editors, creative directors, ux managers....
#33 Drive you crazy trying to learn everything. Is not possible. Add into that our own cognitive bias.
#35 The IKEA effect is a cognitive bias in which consumers place a disproportionately high value on products they partially created.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IKEA_effect
Don't fall into this trap. You need a lot of specialists to create a truly great website. Just don't let too many cooks spoil the broth. You still need leaders.
#36 The IKEA effect is a cognitive bias in which consumers place a disproportionately high value on products they partially created.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IKEA_effect
Don't fall into this trap. You need a lot of specialists to create a truly great website. Just don't let too many cooks spoil the broth. You still need leaders.
#37 But so many parts.
So many things to think about.
Can it be simpler? Should it be simpler?
#46 Google has even told us straight out what to do.
Its out there.
Quality Rater Guidelines
#47 The quality rater guidelines. Do you really wanna read these? Do you have time?
Nope. Of course you don't.
So here we go.
#49 I think it was Rand Fishkin that said that Bullet points kill kittens.
But sometimes you need a few bullet points.
#50 Also I think you will find it is bullets that do the killing not bullet points.
#52 (shortened version via https://www.semrush.com/blog/eat-and-ymyl-new-google-search-guidelines-acronyms-of-quality-content/ :// Julia Spence McCoy )
If low quality “potentially negatively impact users’ happiness, health, or wealth,” then Google doesn't want to rank them.
#53 If you have experts in your business, people trusted in your industry then you need associated with and writing for your site.
You don't think Google can work this out?
#54 3 year experiment in which Google tried to get us to mark up our pages with author information.
Most people didn't and a lot of people that did… did it wrong.
A failed experiment?
Or did Google use the authorship tagging as a way to train their algorithms? Once it was working they turned them off?
#57 Google +’s best feature – you could see how people shared your content over time and how it spread. Google was figuring out the connections between people. You could also summise that it was working on finding out who the influencers were or at least figuring how influencer profiles might look. Machine Learning anyone?
#58 That’s dead now. Or at least publicly ;)
I'm not saying any of this is true. I'm just playing Devils advocate.
#59 If your site wants to compete in YMYL areas then you need to play ball. Your site needs to be secure, the information you provide needs to legit, you need to be trusted and well referenced in your industry.
#60 If your site wants to compete in YMYL areas then you need to play ball. Your site needs to be secure, the information you provide needs to legit, you need to be trusted and well referenced in your industry.
#65 (shortened version via https://www.semrush.com/blog/eat-and-ymyl-new-google-search-guidelines-acronyms-of-quality-content/ :// Julia Spence McCoy )
#68 What is enough? What is quality?
Look at the sites that rank and see what they have. We don't wanna be doing this by hand though.
Words, readibility, topics, traffic