nr 506 week 5 discussion drivers of high performance healthcare systems new,nr 506 week 5 planning your visit part a new,nr 506,chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 5 tutorial,nr 506 week 5 assignment,chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 5 help
Chamberlain college of nursing nr 506 week 5 planning your visit
1. Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 5
Planning Your Visit (Part A) NEW
http://www.uopassignments.com/nr-506-
chamberlain-college-of-nursing/506-week-5-
planning-your-visit-part-a-recent
For more classes visit
http://www.uopassignments.com
Planning Your Visit(Part A)
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify
communication strategies that support an
effective policy making-presentation/visit(CO #2);
(b) deliver a message andmake recommendations
(CO #2,3), and (c) communicate ideas in a clear,
succinct, and scholarly manner. (CO#3)
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the
following course outcomes:
(CO #2) Employ strategies to affect the
2. development, implementation, and consequences
of policies at the institutional, local, national, and
international levels. (PO 4, 8, 10)
(CO #3) Communicate with policymakers to
advocate for effective policies that affect nurses
and nursing, consumers, or the health care system.
(PO 2,3,10)
(CO #4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and
political contexts of health care policy and the
consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)
(CO #5) Advocate for institutional, local, national,
and international policies that influence health
care and its consumers and nurses and their
nursing practice. (PO2,10)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of
Week 5
Total Points: 100points
Requirements
Assignment Criteria for Presentation
1. Introduce your chosen policy issue, the current
status, and an overview of your plan for a
legislative visit.
2. Articulate key communication strategies
involved in your approach to the legislator
including plan, message, and recommendations;
see Worksheet 2 and again, the focus is on
evidence-based communication techniques for
3. effective healthcare policy visit to the legislator.
3. Provide an analysis of empirical evidence of
effective communication strategies and techniques
to support an effective visit and follow-up to the
legislator.
4. Provide specific examples of the impact and/or
importance of a successful visit/presentation to
nursing.
5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe
content.
6. Paper will be 2-3 pages, excluding title and
reference pages, and in APA format 6thedition.
7. Five non-text book references are required as
minimum.
Preparing the Paper
Following completion of Planning Your Visit
Ungraded Worksheet 2, target communication
strategies that support an effective policymaking
visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic
references or current references (published
within the past 5 years) that support your policy
plan, the message, recommendations, and follow-
up.
Category Points % Description
Introduction and Conclusion 10 10
Introductionbriefly identifies your healthcare
policy-priority issue, the policy itself and legislator
4. with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation.
Concluding statements summarize content.
Empirical Evidence 50 50 Empirical evidence
identifies effective communication strategies and
techniqueswith follow-up supporting your visit to
the legislator.
Specific Examples 20 20 Provide specific examples
of the impact and/or importance of a successful
visit/presentation to nursing.
APA Format 10 10 Text, title page, and references
are consistent with APA format 6thedition.
Writing Quality 10 10 Rules of grammar, word
usage, sentence and paragraph format, and
punctuation are followed. Paper length
appropriate.
Total 100 100 A quality assignment will meet or
exceed all of the above requirements.
Grading Rubric
Assignment Criteria Exceptional
(100%)
Outstanding or highest level of performance
Exceeds
(88%)
Very good or high level of performance Meets
(80%)
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
Needs Improvement
5. (38%)
Poor or failing level of performance Developing
(0)
Unsatisfactory level of performance
ContentPossible Points = 100 Points
Introduction and Conclusion 10 Points 9 Points 8
Points 4 Points 0 Points
Introduction briefly identifiesyour
healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and
legislator with a plan for the policymaker
visit/presentation.Concluding statements
summarizing content have no inaccuracy.
Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority
issue, policy itself, and legislatorwith a plan for
policymaker visit/presentation has rare
inaccuracy.Concluding statements lack occasional
important element or specificity.
Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority
issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for
policymaker visit/presentation lacks occasional
important element or specificity.Concluding
statements lack occasional important element or
specificity.
Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority
issue, policy itself and legislator with a plan for a
policymaker visit/presentation has multiple
instances of inaccuracies or is lacking
6. content.Concluding statements have multiple
instances of inaccuracies or lacks content.
No attempt at introduction or conclusion.
Empirical Evidence 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points
19 Points 0 Points
Empirical evidence ofeffective communication
strategies and techniques with follow-up
supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to
the legislator is clearly articulated.
Empirical evidence ofeffective communication
strategies and techniques with follow-up
supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to
the legislator has a few inaccuracies.
Empirical evidence ofeffective communication
strategies and techniques with follow-up
supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to
the legislator has multiple instances of
inaccuracies or lacks detail/articulation.
Empirical evidence of effective communication
strategies and techniques with follow-up
supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to
the legislator is missing.
No attempt at providing Empirical evidence.
Specific Examples 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8
Points 0 Points
Provides specific examples of the impact and/or
importance of a successful visit/presentationto
7. nursing and has no inaccuracy and is clearly
articulated.
Provides specific examples of the impact and/or
importance of a successful visit/presentation to
nursing and lacks occasional important elements
or specificity and/or lacks clarity.
Provides specific examples of the impact and/or
importance of a successful visit/presentation to
nursing and has multiple instances of inaccuracies
and/or lacks clarity.
No specific examples of the impact OR importance
of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.
No specific examples of the impact AND
importance of a successful visit/presentation to
nursing.
Content Subtotal_____of80 points
Format Possible Points = 20 Points
APA Format: 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0
Points
Text, title page, and reference page(s) are
completely consistent with APA format.
There are 1–2 APA format errors in the text, title
page, and/or reference page(s).
There are 3–4 APA format errors in the text, title
page, and/or reference page(s).
There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title
page, and/or reference page(s).
8. There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text,
title page, and/or reference page(s).
Writing Quality.
10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
Paper is appropriate in length. References include
the minimum of five (5) scholarly
references,excluding the course text.Rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation
are consistent with formal written work.
Paper is short or long in length and/or contains
fewer than 5 but more than 1 scholarly reference,
excluding course text, or references utilized are
not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word
usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal
written work with1–2 exceptions.
Paper is short or long in length and contains only 1
scholarly reference. Additional references are not
scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage,
and punctuation are consistent with formal
written work with 3–4 exceptions.
Paper is two or more pages short or long in length
and does not contain scholarly references.
References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of
grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation
are not followed with 5 errors Paper is two or
more pages short or long in length and does not
contain scholarly references. References utilized
9. are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word
usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or
more errors.
Format Subtotal_____of 20 points
Total Points_____of 100 points
10. are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word
usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or
more errors.
Format Subtotal_____of 20 points
Total Points_____of 100 points