Nuclear Weapons Essay

The Effects Of Nuclear Weapons
When nuclear weapons were created everyone was amazed by it. It was a huge accomplishment.
The first nuclear weapons were used in the cold war. Soon after that they were used in about every
war. Till this day they are still used because it helps not having wars go on for so long but is it worth
causing all this damage?
No doubt about it nuclear weapons are the most dangerous weapons on earth. It can kill millions
and destroy a whole city. Even the survivors of the nuclear weapons soon die later on because of
the radiation. There really is no way of getting out alive when it comes to nuclear weapons. They
because so much damage that it takes so many years just to clean up the mess which is the nuclear
waste. Just about all anything that comes close to nuclear weapons get effect really badly. What is
effected the most it the environment. Nuclear weapons is no joke, once used it changes everything.
Nuclear weapons are made by plutonium, a man made element, that is produced in nuclear reaction.
What plutonium is, its transuranic radioactive chemical? Which is why nuclear weapons contain so
much radiation. Enrico Fermi was the main one to make all of this making possible, basically
making the plan go through. Although Albert Einstein was the main one of the process of making
the nuclear weapons created.
Nuclear weapons isn't something any country can have. It takes a lot to have one, to update, to even
maintain. The cost of a nuclear weapon is extremely
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Pros And Cons Of World War II
Today, it is known everywhere that if a nuclear war is waged, it could mean the destruction of our
world as we know it. Nuclear weapons were used to end World War II, and they could very well
be used if WWIII occurred, it may end also using nuclear weapons, which could destroy us. Albert
Einstein once said, "I know not what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV
will be fought with sticks and stones" ("I know not..."Einstein, Albert). Einstein was implying that
WWIII would set humanity to the Stone Age. Our country and the rest of the countries with
nuclear weapons need to get rid of them before one of us start a war. Fears spread in 1939, when it
was discovered that the secrets of splitting a uranium atom was discovered by German physicists.
Enrico Fermi and Albert Einstien fled to the United States and they wrote to President Roosevelt
urging him to create an atomic research program after both deciding that the Roosevelt should be
told about the possible dangers of atomic technology. The Manhattan Project became the name of the
effort to create an Atomic bomb in 1941. Over 120,000 people worked on the Manhattan Project and
nearly two billion dollars were spent on research and development. Secrecy was important, not even
Truman, the Vice–President, knew until he was President. On the 16th of July, the year 1945, near
Alamogordo, New Mexico, the first detonation of an atomic bomb took place.At the end of WWII,
and after Germany had surrendered, Japan had

Persuasive Essay On Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear weaponry has an extensive past. These weapons of mass destruction were introduced in
World War 2 with the bombings of two major cities in Japan as a method to end the war. Then, in
the 1960s, these WMD's acted as a key part of the Cuban Crisis, which almost led to an entire war
between the Soviet Union and America. Recently, the militaristic country of North Korea has
started broadcasting threats to the United States, once again with nukes. History has repeated itself,
as the world fears for its own safety again. Like many other decisions made by governments, the
choice of keeping nuclear weapons poses many questions. Why do we need them? When will we
use them? What do they do? The general answers to these questions, as explained by the
governments around the world, are: A deterrence to other countries from using their own WMD's. A
potential solution to possible events that may happen in the future. A way to prevent war There are
other responses too, unfortunately, these still bears a similarity by being weak too. Many of these
arguments are based upon the fact that there may be a possible future in which there may be a need
for nuclear weapons. The potential solution to a potential problem is not substantial enough to
warrant their continuous support, and by keeping these weapons around, the public is constantly
living in a state of fear and panic. I believe that all governments in possession of nuclear weapons
must disarm their weapons immediately. My argument,

Nuclear Weapons And Its Effects On The World
In August 1942, the United states employed 130,000 people and funneled 2 billion dollars into
the production of the world's first nuclear weapons: atomic bombs that would later be used to
devastate the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, effectively ending World War I. Since
then, several countries have effectively worked with nuclear weapons and developed arms of their
own. Currently, there are an estimated 15,000 nuclear weapons in the world today, with 2,000
active and ready to launch. While they were made in effort to keep nations safe, these arms are
exceptionally perilous and carry a multitude of drawbacks with them. Because nuclear weapons
require large sums of money in order to be created and maintained, leave long–lasting negative
effects on the environment when used, and destroy countless human lives, they do not make the
world safer. Over the years, a myriad of money has been spent by numerous countries to develop,
innovate and maintain nuclear weapons. For example, when the United States was first developing
their nuclear arms from 1940–1996, they expended a minimum of 5.8 trillion dollars building the
weapons and preparing to use them. Even now, they average about 20 billion dollars per year solely
on the weapon's upkeep. Additionally, including the US, the top eight countries involved in nuclear
development spent a total of almost 105 billion dollars in 2011 on their weapons. This considerable
sum of money could aid an innumerable amount problems

Nuclear Weapons Essay
Nuclear weapons play a significant role in our understanding of international relations. As seen in
the class lecture slides, states often embark on nuclear weapons programs to counterbalance the
power of other states. This is particularly true for states such as China and Iran, who are trying to
balance the power of the United States. States such as China, Russia, and the United States are all
powerful international influences. This is partially due to the fact that they are a part of the United
Nations Security Council and own nuclear weapons. If they did not have nuclear weapons, it is
hard to gauge if they would be as powerful world leaders in militaristic terms if they did not have
nuclear weapons. These nuclear weapons act as both...show more content...
This is an international treaty that aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology
surrounding it. This treaty also aims to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy, as well as
disarming nuclear weapons all together. There is a total of 191 states in the treaty. China, France,
Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States are all permanent members of the United
Nations Security Council. This treaty is what allows for some states to have nuclear weapons. Other
states, such as developing nations also do not have the funds or technology to create nuclear
weapons. Personally, I cannot envision a world with without nuclear weapons. However, I can
imagine a world with many more states with nuclear weapons. I think that that is a much more
feasible future due to the actions of our past. I support states sharing the technology to create nuclear
weapons, so that each state is on a level playing field. If the states that do not have nuclear weapons
(or the technology to create them) were hit, they would be devastated with little to no way to
retaliate. If the technology was shared, nuclear weapons could act more offensively, in the manner
that states would not launch them knowing that once they did they would be hit right back. Nuclear
weapons play a significant role in our understanding of international relations. They are the weapons
that shape the most powerful governments in the world. These weapons act both defensively and
offensively because they

Argumentative Essay On Nuclear Weapons
Imagine a weapon that can kill 120,000 people in a blink of an eye. A weapon that can produce
power of over 50 megatons of TNT. A weapon that not only the impact of it hitting the ground is
dangerous but the aftermath of the weapon is just as deadly. And if that's not enough to make you
on edge, what if I told you that this weapon can be detonated from multiple different countries in
just a few minutes if they feel like it. Now are you concerned? Well first let's figure out how and
who has this control before we answer if this weapon is a problem. Nuclear energy is the energy
that holds neutrons and protons together in the nucleus of an atom. This energy is an effective
way that can result in the production of electricity. Whenever one of these physical reactions take
place it engenders a slight loss in mass, however this small loss of mass generates a lot of heat
energy. This is the same principles that Albert Einstein explained with his famous equation,
E=mc2. Nuclear energy, or more specifically military nuclear energy is a "super power" or very
special powerful weapon that is seen as really dangerous or defensive in the eyes of the opposing
country. How dangerous? Dangerous to the point that an average regular sized nuclear weapon that
detonates over a city would burn away 40 to 65 square miles in the blink of an eye. some countries
have the privilege or curse of owning nuclear weapons. Some of these countries include: The United
States, Russia, The United Kingdom,

Nuclear weapons are a plague on society. These weapons have no positive effects or results, yet
many countries today continue to create and stockpile these weapons. The creation and storing of
these weapons have immense costs. They are extremely destructive. The cleanup after the
detonation of one of these bombs can cost millions and the deactivation and decontamination of the
weapon itself is incredibly expensive. What do these weapons actually do? How are they made?
What do they cost? How can we stop the creation and use of them? Are there any alternatives to
nuclear weapons? Nuclear weapons are extremely complex devices. Dictionary.com defines a
nuclear weapon as "an explosive device whose destructive potential derives from the...show more
content...
The third type of nuclear bomb is the neutron bomb. This type of bomb is also referred to as the
"enhanced radiation weapon". This is a small bomb with a relatively small blast area of
approximately two hundred yards, but it has the ability to kill people up to a square mile. Most
people die a very painful death within a week caused by heat and radiation poisoning. This is the
bomb that opponents fear the most because of the potential for use in a smaller area. This bomb is
sometimes referred to as the "Dirty Bomb". These weapons are also extremely expensive to create.
According to world history.ABC–Clio.com, as of 1996, the United States has spent approximately
four–hundred and nine billion dollars on the creation of these weapons. All the money for the
creation and storage of these weapons comes directly out of the taxpayer's pocket. That brings about
another factor in the nuclear arms dilemma, and that is the cost. The economics that are involved are
the manufacturing, the storing, and the upgrading of nuclear weapons. There is also an additional
cost associated with upgrading weapons. This cost involves the disassembling, waste disposal, and
then remanufacturing of a new, more efficient weapon. The estimate for the nuclear weapon
program in the United States since it's inception in the 1940's is a little over 4 trillion dollars. Even
though our arsenal has been downsized to about 14,000 war heads, of which 8,750 are active, the
government

On August 6th, 1945 nearly 80,000 people lost their lives instantly in the bombing of Hiroshima.
Three days later more than 70,000 people died instantly with the bombing of Nagasaki (Hall).
Those two events remain the only two times in history where nuclear weapons were used in
warfare. Less than twenty years later the U.S.S.R tested a nuclear bomb that recorded an explosion
3,333 times as powerful as the ones dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Bennett). The immense
amount of destruction that could be caused by these weapons is why the great powers of the world
should come together and decided to destroy their nuclear arsenals. Nuclear weapons could easily
render the entire race extinct and it is terrifying to think that many countries have the power to cause
a nuclear fallout. Nuclear disarmament would not be easy, it would be very expensive,
time–consuming and nerve–racking. A nuclear warhead on average costs the government about $55
million. This may seem like a lot but the U.S currently has nearly 7,000 nuclear weapons. If you
included production and storing costs of all those nukes the U.S has spent about $5.8 Trillion on its
current arsenal ("The Cost of U.S Nuclear Weapons"). That's an insanely large amount of money.
You might be wondering if it cost that much just to get and hold on to those nukes it must be
incredibly expensive to disarm all those nukes. Not really, it would cost roughly $7 billion a year
per decade to begin disarming our current nuclear

Exam 3 Nuclear weapons play a significant role in our understanding of international relations. As
seen in the class lecture slides, states often embark on nuclear weapons programs to counterbalance
the power of other states. This is particularly true for states such as China and Iran, who are trying to
balance the power of the United States. States such as China, Russia, and the United States are all
powerful international influences. This is partially due to the fact that they are a part of the United
Nations Security Council and own nuclear weapons. If they did not have nuclear weapons, it is
hard to gauge if they would be as powerful world leaders in militaristic terms if they did not have
nuclear weapons. These nuclear weapons act...show more content...
This is an international treaty that aims to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and technology
surrounding it. This treaty also aims to promote the peaceful use of nuclear energy, as well as
disarming nuclear weapons all together. There is a total of 191 states in the treaty. China, France,
Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States are all permanent members of the United Nations
Security Council. This treaty is what allows for some states to have nuclear weapons. Other states,
such as developing nations also do not have the funds or technology to create nuclear weapons.
Personally, I cannot envision a world with without nuclear weapons. However, I can imagine a world
with many more states with nuclear weapons. I think that that is a much more feasible future due to
the actions of our past. I support states sharing the technology to create nuclear weapons, so that
each state is on a level playing field. If the states that do not have nuclear weapons (or the technology
to create them) were hit, they would be devastated with little to no way to retaliate. If the technology
was shared, nuclear weapons could act more offensively, in the manner that states would not launch
them knowing that once they did they would be hit right back. Nuclear weapons play a significant
role in our understanding of international relations. They are the weapons that shape the most
powerful governments in the world. These weapons act most often offensively because they are

The Controversy Of Nuclear Weapons Essay
The previously accepted nature of war stemmed from the Clausewitzian trinity: war is emotional, an
experience wrought with passion, violence, and enmity; uncertainty, chance, and friction pervade the
medium of war; however, because war is not an end in itself, and because, as a means, it is
subordinate to its political aims, war must be subject to reason (Clausewitz, 89). With the first
employment of nuclear weapons, however, strategists and military theorists began to question
Clausewitz's foundational ideas (Winkler, 58). Similarly, Allan Winkler, in agreeing with Bernard
Brodie's thesis, opines that the advent of nuclear weapons fundamentally changed the nature of war.
Winkler's assertion stems from his argument that such a nuclear duel would yield a post–war
environment incapable of recovery for any parties involved (62). He further describes Brodie's
realization that "[t]he atomic bomb is not just another and more destructive weapon to be added to
an already long list. It is something which threatens to make the rest of the list relatively
unimportant." (62) Ultimately, Winkler abridges Brodie's assessment in stating that "the United
States was caught in the paradox of having to prepare for a war it did not plan to fight." (63) The
American doctrine of deterrence stemmed from the development of nuclear weapons. Strategic
analysts, using this development as a point of departure, recognized that a nuclear capability
established a defense scenario that was, in fact,

Nuclear weapons are one of, if not the most dangerous weapons in the world today and they are
one of the biggest issues the world faces at this current moment. They have the capability of
destroying entire cities and then some that could result in millions of deaths within seconds.
Radiation from the blasts would kill even more people throughout years to come. They were first
used in 1945 at the end of World War II, when the United States dropped Little Boy and Fat Man
in Hiroshima and Nagasaki to 'save' the lives of American soldiers. Since then, a nuclear arms
race was born and it's becoming more of a concern as time moves forward. Albert Einstein, who
was the creator of the nuclear bomb once said "I know not with what weapons World War III will
be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." Countries should not have access
to nuclear weapons because it destroys the environment, there is a possibility of a nuclear war that
will end in mass destruction of the world, and countries could save both revenue and resources.
There are many nuclear bombing tests that happen throughout each year and it's extremely
unhealthy for the environment let alone if a nuclear war happened. According to scientists, even if
a small percentage of the worlds nuclear bombs were set off during a war, it would have an
extremely devastating effect on humanity (Jha). Temperatures would drop quickly because there
would be so much black smoke in the air that the smoke would absorb

The Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons Essay
Introduction
The emergence of nuclear weapons was brought about by distrust amongst states, following progress
in nuclear research into uranium fission. Fearing that Germany would create a nuclear weapon first,
the United States employed vast resources into nuclear research and developing the first nuclear
weapon. The Soviet Union followed by testing its first atomic bomb in 1949, thereby beginning a
nuclear arms race amongst countries that continues to the present day.
The official nuclear countries, Russia, France, United States, United Kingdom and China have
shown no plans of giving up their nuclear weapons, fueling proliferation by non–nuclear states.
Although numerous non–nuclear countries have sought nuclear weapons, few are...show more
content...
In 'The Clash of Civilizations' Samuel Huntington argues that states will continue to be at
loggerheads as they compete for military and economic power, and control over international
institutions. Religion has also been a source of conflict between states and civilizations, as some
states seek to impose their religious values on others.
These sources of conflict have led to fear by states that the security of nations could be
compromised at any time. This is more so in regions with a poor security record, such as the
Middle East. Fear creates a need to enhance security, and many countries have opted to go nuclear
so as to accomplish this task. A good example is in Pakistan, a country that came to be following it's
secession from India under religious guise. Pakistan has been engaged in confrontations with India
which have led to wars in the past.
The country chose to seek nuclear weapons to protect itself from the threat it felt came from India's
larger military capabilities. Being a smaller economy with less advanced technologies, Pakistan felt
that investment in an atomic bomb would serve to deter India from attacking its sovereignty. This
however began a nuclear weapons race in the region as India also sought to develop nuclear
weapons, which were successfully tested in 1998. India's proliferation of nuclear weapons was
however not

Nuclear Weapons Research Papers
A nuclear explosion is a reaction when the atoms split in half, this give off tons of energy and
particles collide with more atoms causing massive explosions. The best way to create a nuclear
bomb is by using enriched uranium and plutonium, which are extremely reactive. Nuclear weapons
today are larger, more explosive, and more dangerous than what we saw in Hiroshima during world
war II. More countries also have nuclear weapons than in WWII as well including: USA, Russia,
Britain, France, Pakistan, North Korea, India, China, and Israel. These are the countries that we
know for certain. Colorado, Montana, Wyoming, Nebraska, and North Dakota have the Minuteman
III missiles in the US, this missile is projected to go around 15,000 miles an hour....show more
content...
The US has 94 nuclear bombers, including the B–2 and B–52 bombers. The US has one of the
largest missile stockpiles in the US, the W88, is measured out to be 455 kilotons of TNT. There
is an Estimated total of 4650 nuclear weapons in the US stockpile. Costs about 10 billion dollars
for a life extension program for the B61. In the world today there is an estimated 16,000 nuclear
weapons, Russia and the US have around 1800 ready to launch at any given time, so they can be
launched in just minutes. Two different types of bombs are A–Bombs, and H–Bombs. A–Bomb
being atomic, H–Bombs being hydrogen. A–Bombs use only nuclear fission, while H–Bombs use
nuclear fusion. H–Bombs tend to be much more explosive and deadly than the A–Bombs. There
have been 2053 nuclear test bombs in the world. The largest bomb ever tested was the Tsar bomb by
russia. 24 countries in the world contain uranium mines, the largest are in Canada, Russia, Australia,
Namibia, Nigeria, South Africa, and the Us. Uranium miners are much more likely to get lung
cancer, and waste from the mine keep 85% of the radioactivity behind. 31 countries have 440
nuclear power plants across the world to generate electricity. Iran is looking to build nuclear weapon
in the next couple of

The Effects of Nuclear Weapons Essay
The Effects of Nuclear Weapons The United States is the most powerful country in the World.
They have the biggest army, navy, and airforce, but that is not why other countries fear them. The
reason the United States is feared, is because of its nuclear capabilities. The United States has the
power to blow up the entire World without even using half of their nuclear bombs. Having all of
this nuclear power is good, because it prevents other countries from trying to go to war with the
United States. The problem with these bombs is that in order to make sure they work, the United
States has to test them. There is only one way to test a nuclear bomb, and that is by letting it off.
When they test these bombs, it send radiation flying...show more content...
This bomb was tested in Los Alamos, and it was not successful. Another atomic bomb was
constructed in Chicago. This bomb manufactured plutonium by bombarding uranuim–238, with
neurons. This was tested in Alamogordo, New Mexico, on July 16, 1945, and was the first
explosion of an atomic bomb1. By this time, the United States were well into World War II. They
had lost thousands of men, and wanted to end this war as soon as possible. Japan was on its last
leg. Their navy had ceased to exist as an effective fighting force and the air corps had been
decimated. After the losses at Iwo Jima, and Okinawa, it looked like Japan would surrender, but
they kept fighting. The United States continued bombing runs over military targets on the
Japanese mainland an integral part of their air campaign. Japan would not give up, so United
States President Harry Truman authorized the use of the atomic bomb on the morning of August
6, 1945. It was dropped on Hiroshima, and it killed over 70,000 people. Three days later, the
United States dropped another bomb on Nagasaki, killing 20,000 people instantly. Thousands more
died from the after effects of the radiation 2. The idea was that this would end the war quickly, and
to save American lives. Truman's plan worked, Japan did surrender, and the war did end shortly
after, and no more American soldiers were killed. This was not the end to the

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear weaponry has quite an extensive past. These weapons of mass destruction were
introduced in World War 2 with the bombings of two major cities in Japan as a method to end the
war. Then, in the 1960s, these WMD's acted as a key part of the Cuban Crisis, which almost led to
an entire war between the Soviet Union and America. Recently, the militaristic country of North
Korea has started displaying threats to the United States, once again with nukes. This recent event
(that's still happening), along with past occurrences once again makes the world fear for its own
life. Like many other decisions made by governments, the choice of keeping nuclear weapons
poses many questions. Why do we need them? When will we use them? What do they do? The
general answers to these questions, as explained by the governments around the world, are: a)A
deterrence to other countries from using their own WMD's. b)A potential solution to possible events
that may happen in the future. c)A way to prevent war There are other responses too, however, it is
quite clear that these answers are not strong. Many of these arguments are based upon the fact that
there may be a possible future in which there may be a need for nuclear weapons. The potential
solution to a potential problem is not substantial enough to warrant their continuous support, and by
keeping these weapons around, the public is constantly living in a state of fear and panic. I believe
that all governments in possession of nuclear

Nuclear Weapons & Nuclear Warfare Essay
Nuclear Weapons & Nuclear Warfare
Throughout half the century of the 19's hundreds a period of new advancements in the creations
of a bomb had arisen. On August 8th, 1939 President Roosevelt received a letter from Albert
Einstein which ended up being the fundamental support in the creation of the Atomic Bomb.
There are two types of atomic bombs fusion and fission, the first atomic bomb was created in
1939 by the Manhattan Project, three weeks later after its first test, it was used in an actual war.
It's capable of wiping out a whole entire city and killing instantly anyone in its way. Now we have
better more precise bomb know as hydrogen bombs, these bomb use the energy released when the
nuclei of a hydrogen come...show more content...
The two types of nuclear energy would be fission and fusion. As for nuclear fission it gets its
energy from the collision of atoms with other atoms breaking apart with heavy elements such as
plutonium or uranium releasing vast energy. Scientist were quick to realize that they could create
a better most efficient more precise bomb, this would be known as the fusion bomb this bomb
would acquire its energy when two nuclei of two atoms combine or fuse together with gases, such
as tritium and deuterium. The bomb used on Hiroshima has the energy equivalent to 15,000 tons
of TNT. The one used on Nagasaki was named the "Fat Man" for its more power, being able to
produce the energy equivalent to 21,000 tons of TNT. There are now bombs capable of producing
much more power, but are not fueled by nuclear energy
With great achievements came problems, and that is exactly what happen in the early 1940–2007. In
1942 the Manhattan project was established to produce the first atomic weapon, this project
created a whopping 100,000 jobs, costing 2 billion, equivalent to 25 billion in today's money. On
august 6, 1945 the us drops a uranium bomb over Hiroshima killing over 140,000, following a
second bomb being dropped on Nagasaki. On august 29, 1949 the Soviet Union would be the second
nation to successfully create and test a nuclear weapon. In the late 1950's the UK test its first nuclear
weapon, later the next month the

Nuclear Weapons Make The World A Safer Place
Debate Leadership Presentation October 21: "Nuclear weapons make the world a safer place"
POSITION: NO In order to determine whether or not nuclear weapons create a safer world, one
must consider what it means to be safe. According to Oxford Dictionaries, the word safe is
defined as being "protected from or not exposed to danger or risk, not likely to be harmed or lost."
How can something so powerfully destructive be associated with safety? In addition to this, one may
ask – safe for who? Nuclear weapons pose a legitimate threat to many aspects of life, both immediate
and long–term. These intense consequences have been documented over time. The World Health
Organization has stated that nuclear weapons can create the greatest human catastrophe, "for which
health services in the world could not alleviate the situation in any significant way." It is not
possible to win a nuclear war. There is no effective outcome and certainly no safe outcome. When a
confrontation takes place between alliances that possess nuclear weapons, there is the possibility of
unintentional escalation created by a false warning or unauthorized launch. This almost took place
in 1979 due to the fact that a training tape by NATO was mistaken as being real. Even an alliance
with many nuclear weapons is not safe against attack. A successful "first strike," if able to even
target one–hundred nuclear bursts, has the potential to abolish any nation's civilization. The first and
perhaps most obvious threat is

Nuclear Weapons Research Paper
The United States Nuclear Weapons Program
As you can imagine, the US Nuclear Weapons Program is a complicated entity. There are a number
of players on the nuclear weapons team, so to speak, each with their own task to fulfil.
The National Nuclear Security Administration is the main agency tasked with making sure we
sustain an effective nuclear weapons program. They perform research in order to maintain the
quality of our programs and insure they are the very best in the world. The NNSA operates under
the Department of Energy, who is responsible for the oversight of all nuclear based programs of any
kind.
The Department of Defense is the other main agency with responsibility for our nuclear weapons.
The personnel that operate these weapons...show more content...
The daily responsibility of this falls on the Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and
International Security. This office works with other agencies and foreign governments to insure that
non–nuclear weapon possessing countries do not acquire them or the technology to build them.
The Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security have a role regarding nuclear
weapons from and export and licensing view. They handle licensing of all US companies
transporting items to foreign countries. Many times the items may not be military in nature but can
be associated with nuclear technology. Many times materials being shipped may not be a threat, but
can be made into components for a nuclear weapon.
From a protective standpoint, the Department of Homeland Security plays a role in defending
against and preparing for a nuclear weapon detonation or disaster. The Customs and Border
Protection Agency monitors incoming and outgoing materials and people. FEMA (Federal
Emergency Management Agency) is responsible for disaster response in the event of a nuclear
detonation. The US Coast Guard works along with the Customs and Border Protection Agency to
monitor our borders from a maritime point of

Evolution Of Nuclear Weapons
Over the course of the last 80 years nuclear weapons have transformed how countries conduct
warfare, politics and economic development. In World War 2 the first nuclear bomb ever was
dropped on the city Hiroshima, Japan showing the true devastation that man could develop11. Since
then, the power that nuclear weapons hold has shaped the US and Russia relations and relationships
throughout the world. However, how were these weapons developed and what is the chemistry
behind them that makes them the most deadly weapons known to man?
History
On December 7th, 1941 the United States was dragged into one of the most deadly conflicts in the
history of the world with the attack on the naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. After four years of
constant...show more content...
As explained earlier Uranium–235 is the main isotope used, being found in nature only .709% of the
time, however other isotopes such as Uranium–238, being found 97% of the time, and Uranium–239,
at about 2% of the time, are given off9. The name of an isotope is determined by the mass of that
isotope. For example, uranium–235 has a certain number of protons and neutrons that add up to 235
hence the name. The only difference between the isotopes is the number of neutrons and protons
each one has which determines its reactivity; all isotopes have the same atomic number12. The more
neutrons and protons difference there is within an element the more reactive it will be in
thermodynamics and nuclear forces that act upon it. Isotopes however are used in more than just
nuclear chemistry; they are used in medicine for treating brain tumors and in determining the age of

Nuclear Weapons Research Paper
Nuclear Weapons
A Nuclear weapon is any weapon that gets its destructive power from the transformation of matter in
atoms into energy. They include missiles, bombs, artillery shells, mines and torpedoes. Another
name for nuclear weapons are
Atomic bombs or Hydrogen bombs. The United States was the first country to ever use a Nuclear
weapon in battle against Japan.
The major arguments for a test ban was first proposed in the 1950Г•s.
Today, however, the stopping of radioactive fallout and the superpower arms race are still in
negotiation. Nations have sought to limit the testing of nuclear weapons to protect people and the
environment from nuclear radiation and to slow...show more content...
They find their reason as a lame excuse to start setting off explosions again. The treaty plays a
very important role in creating a barrier to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. The two biggest
problems are with nuclear weapons nowadays is that testing isnГ•t necessary to develop a workable,
Hiroshima–type fission bomb in this age of computers and wide spread access to nuclear data, and
India nor Pakistan, the two most worrisome nuclear powers is likely to sign any deal at all.
The United States, Great Britain, Russia, and France have joined a moratorium on all testing. Only
China continues to develop lightweight, multiple warheads that could be deployed on submarine
based missiles. Claiming discrimination, India insists it will not accede to a test ban unless the
declared nuclear states agree to give up their nuclear arsenals by a certain date. Pakistan also says if
India does not sign, they wonГ•t either. One frequently mentioned scenario is for India to conduct a
quick series of tests to develop a thermonuclear weapon and only then give in to international
pressure to sign the treaty.
The Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty if eventually agreed to, might not be so comprehensive after all.
Meeting in Geneva the 61 nation conference on
Disarmament again failed to produce an agreed treaty before breaking up.
Negotiators will return again to produce another final effort for a test ban

Nuclear Weapons Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Services

More from Custom Paper Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Nuclear Weapons Essay