SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 26
DEDICATION

   Long-term outcome after drug-eluting versus
   bare-metal stent implantation in patients with
        ST-elevation myocardial infarction
3 year follow-up of the randomised DEDICATION trial


Peter Clemmensen, Henning Kelbæk, Anne Kaltoft, Steffen Helqvist,
Jens Flensted Lassen, Lene Kløvgaard, Christian J Terkelsen, Hans
    Henrik Tilsted, Thomas Engstrøm, Lars R Krusell, Evald H.
Christiansen, Kari Saunamäki, Erik Jørgensen, Hans E. Bøtker, Jan
        Ravkilde, Klaus F Kofoed, Lars Køber, Leif Thuesen




               Copenhagen University Hospital
                      Rigshospitalet
                 Aarhus University Hospital
                          Skejby
                         Denmark
DEDICATION
Disclosures



The study has received unrestricted grants from the
Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston
Scientific companies

The presenter has previously or currently been involved in
research contracts, consulting or received research and
educational grants from:
Abbott, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb,
Eli-Lilly, Merck, Myogen, Medtronic, Mitsubishi Pharma,
Nycomed, Organon, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Sanofi-Synthelabo,
Searle, The Medicines Company.
DEDICATION
Background



Implantation of drug eluting stents (DES) has proven to
be both safe and efficient in most patients with coronary
artery disease. However, long-term data are scarce with
regard to their use in STEMI patients treated with PCI
DEDICATION
 Drug-Eluting vs Bare-Metal Stent
 Implantation during Primary PCI

    Previous published studies with ≥ 150 patients

                 Invasive  RS,%   MACE,%    Primary
Study       n       FU    DES/BMS DES/BMS   endpoint    p


STRATEGY   175    133     8/28     18/32    MACCE      0.001
TYPHOON    712    170     7/20      7/14     TVF       0.004
PASSION    619     -        -       9/13    MACE        0.09
SESAMI     320    166     9/21      7/17     RS         0.03
DEDICATION
Purpose



The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical
results 3 years after implantation of DES vs BMS in
STEMI patients treated with primary PCI
DEDICATION
Flow chart
                                     STEMI n=626

                                     Randomization


               + Distal Protection                   - Distal Protection


  Bare Metal Stent     Drug Eluting Stent    Bare Metal Stent      Drug Eluting Stent


        Post Procedure          Angiography - QCA

             1 month                    MACE

             8 months        Angiography - QCA / MACE

             15 months                  MACE

             3 years                    MACE
DEDICATION
Flow chart
                                     STEMI n=626

                                     Randomization


               + Distal Protection                   - Distal Protection


  Bare Metal Stent     Drug Eluting Stent    Bare Metal Stent      Drug Eluting Stent


        Post Procedure          Angiography - QCA

             1 month                    MACE

             8 months        Angiography - QCA / MACE

             15 months                  MACE

             3 years                    MACE
DEDICATION
Endpoints



• MACE (cardiac death, re-infarction, TLR) at 3 years
• Cardiac death at 3 years
• Total mortality
• MI
• TLR
• TVR
• Stroke
DEDICATION
Major inclusion criteria



• Patients who presented with the symptoms and
  signs of a first time large STEMI
• Chest pain ≤ 12 hours duration
• ST-elevation > 4 mm in contiguous leads
• High grade stenosis/occlusion of a native coronary artery
  that could be crossed with a guidewire
DEDICATION
Major exclusion criteria



• History of a previous myocardial infarction
• Left main stem stenosis
• Gastrointestinal bleeding within 1 month
• Expected survival < 1 year
• Linguistic difficulties needing an interpretor
DEDICATION
  Study Flow
                                     Screened patients
                                           1687


     Included patients                                        Excluded patients
           626                                                      1061


                  24 deaths                          - 216 Clinically or psychologically
                                                           instability / unconsciousness
                                                     - 162 ST-elevation < 4 mm
                  83 lost to re-angiography          - 141 Participation in another study
                                                     - 140 Vessel unsuitable for filterwire
                                                     - 78 Onset symptoms >12 hours
                  543 patients for re-angiography    - 72 Linguistic problems
                                                     - 68 Screening log not filled in
602 patients for 8-month FU                          - 58 Previous infarction
                                                     - 43 Severe other disease
                                                     - 35 Refused to participate
                  29 deaths                          - 26 Significant left main stenosis
                                                     - 22 Other
573 patients for 3-year FU
DEDICATION
Number of Patients



                  STEMI - PPCI
                     n: 626


                 Randomization



     Drug Eluting Stent    Bare Metal Stent
          n: 313                n: 313
DEDICATION
Baseline clinical characteristics

                                     DES     BMS          p
                                     n=313   n=313
Age (years)                           62       63        0.41
Male gender (%)                      72.8     73.5       0.93
Diabetes Mellitus (%)                9.3      11.5       0.30
Hypertension (%)                     32.3     34.0       0.67
Hyperlipidemia (%)                   18.7     21.4       0.54
Current smoker (%)                   52.7     54.7       0.88
Family history of CAD (%)            37.3     38.2       0.87
Left ventricular ejection fraction   0.48     0.47       0.45
Previous myocardial infarction (%)   6.1      7.1        0.20
Previous PCI / CABG (%)              4.5      5.4        0.56
Symptom onset to arrival, min        197      200        0.69
Door-to-balloon, min                  25       25        0.63
DEDICATION
Baseline lesion characteristics

                                      DES     BMS          p
                                      n=313   n=313
Infarct related coronary artery (%)
    LAD                                44       38
    CX                                 11       14        0.57
    RCA                                45       48
Number of diseased vessel (%)
    1 vessel disease                   65       61
    2 vessel disease                   25       29        0.47
    3 vessel disease                   10       10
Baseline TIMI flow
    TIMI 0-1                           65       70
    TIMI 2-3                           35       30        0.27
DEDICATION
Procedural results

                                  DES     BMS          p
                                  n=313   n=313
Use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, %     97      95        0.21
Visible thrombus,%                  74      72        0.33
Filterwire used, %                  40      42        0.38
Stent implanted, %                  99      98        0.29
Number of stents per lesion        1.3      1.3       0.52
Stented length, mm                 22.2    21.0       0.13
Stent diameter, mm                 3.54    3.53       0.86
Max deployment pressure, mm Hg     16.7    16.3       0.20
TIMI III post procedure             90      90        1.00
Procedural success, %               98      99        0.73
DEDICATION
MACE during 3 years

            30
                          DES
            25
                          BMS
                                                                          P<0.001
            20                                                                                P=0.024
                                                                            19.8
                                                                P<0.001
Events, %




                                                                                                  18.2
            15                                                    16.3

                 P=0.084
            10                                                                                 11.5
                 10.5
                           P=0.013     P=0.58                             8.9

             5      6.4    6.1                      P=0.45      6.1                 P=0.64
                                             5.4
                                       4.2
                                                          3.2                       3.2 2.6
                                 1.9                1.9
             0
                 Death     Cardiac      MI            Re-        TLR       TVR      Stroke     MACE
                            death                  infarction
DEDICATION
Freedom from MACE



                         100
     Freedom from MACE




                         80



                         60           DES
                                      BMS
                                   P=0.028

                         40

                               0   200 400   600    800 1000 1200
                                             Days
DEDICATION
Freedom from all-cause mortality



                                             100
      Freedom from all-cause mortality (%)




                                             80



                                             60           DES
                                                          BMS
                                                       P=0.059

                                             40

                                                   0   200 400   600    800 1000 1200
                                                                 Days
DEDICATION
Freedom from cardiac mortality



                                           100
      Freedom from cardiac mortality (%)




                                           80



                                           60           DES
                                                        BMS
                                                     P=0.008

                                           40

                                                 0   200 400   600    800 1000 1200
                                                               Days
DEDICATION
Any stent thrombosis



                                10
                                            DES
     Cumulative incidence (%)




                                8           BMS
                                         P=0.511
                                6

                                4

                                2

                                0

                                     0   200 400   600    800 1000 1200
                                                   Days
DEDICATION
Definite stent thrombosis



                                 10
                                             DES
      Cumulative incidence (%)




                                 8           BMS
                                          P=0.296
                                 6

                                 4

                                 2

                                 0

                                      0   200 400   600    800 1000 1200
                                                    Days
DEDICATION
Subgroup analysis
  Group                  n Rate of MACE (%)
                               DES    BMS      Odds Ratio (95% CI)

  All                    626   11.5   18.2
  Age < 63               315    9.4   19.4
  Age ≥ 63               311   13.7   17.1
  Male                   458   11.8   16.1
  Female                 168   10.6   24.1
  DM                      65   13.8   22.2
  no DM                  561   11.3   17.7
  Ref D > 3.1 mm         317    9.6   15.6
  Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm         299   12.0   20.8
  Visible thrombus       458   11.6   15.9
  No visible thrombus    168   11.1   24.1
  Stent length > 18 mm   309   12.9   17.8
  Stent length ≤ 18 mm   310    9.5   17.9
  LAD                    258   14.8   20.6
  CX / RCA               368    9.4   16.4
                                               0   0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0
                                             DES better    BMS better
DEDICATION
Subgroup analysis
  Group                  n Rate of MACE (%)
                               DES    BMS      Odds Ratio (95% CI)

  All                    626   11.5   18.2
  Age < 63               315    9.4   19.4
  Age ≥ 63               311   13.7   17.1
  Male                   458   11.8   16.1
  Female                 168   10.6   24.1
  DM                      65   13.8   22.2
  no DM                  561   11.3   17.7
  Ref D > 3.1 mm         317    9.6   15.6
  Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm         299   12.0   20.8
  Visible thrombus       458   11.6   15.9
  No visible thrombus    168   11.1   24.1
  Stent length > 18 mm   309   12.9   17.8
  Stent length ≤ 18 mm   310    9.5   17.9
  LAD                    258   14.8   20.6
  CX / RCA               368    9.4   16.4
                                               0   0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0
                                             DES better    BMS better
DEDICATION
Subgroup analysis
  Group                  n Rate of MACE (%)
                               DES    BMS      Odds Ratio (95% CI)

  All                    626   11.5   18.2
  Age < 63               315    9.4   19.4
  Age ≥ 63               311   13.7   17.1
  Male                   458   11.8   16.1
  Female                 168   10.6   24.1
  DM                      65   13.8   22.2
  no DM                  561   11.3   17.7
  Ref D > 3.1 mm         317    9.6   15.6
  Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm         299   12.0   20.8
  Visible thrombus       458   11.6   15.9
  No visible thrombus    168   11.1   24.1
  Stent length > 18 mm   309   12.9   17.8
  Stent length ≤ 18 mm   310    9.5   17.9
  LAD                    258   14.8   20.6
  CX / RCA               368    9.4   16.4
                                               0   0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0
                                             DES better    BMS better
DEDICATION
Subgroup analysis
  Group                  n Rate of MACE (%)
                               DES    BMS      Odds Ratio (95% CI)

  All                    626   11.5   18.2
  Age < 63               315    9.4   19.4
  Age ≥ 63               311   13.7   17.1
  Male                   458   11.8   16.1
  Female                 168   10.6   24.1
  DM                      65   13.8   22.2
  no DM                  561   11.3   17.7
  Ref D > 3.1 mm         317    9.6   15.6
  Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm         299   12.0   20.8
  Visible thrombus       458   11.6   15.9
  No visible thrombus    168   11.1   24.1
  Stent length > 18 mm   309   12.9   17.8
  Stent length ≤ 18 mm   310    9.5   17.9
  LAD                    258   14.8   20.6
  CX / RCA               368    9.4   16.4
                                               0   0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0
                                             DES better    BMS better
DEDICATION
Conclusions

In the DEDICATION trial implantation of DES
(compared with BMS) in STEMI patients

 • reduced the rate of MACE and the need for repeat
 revascularization

 • was not associated with an increased rate of myocardial
  infarction or stent thrombosis

 • was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death

More Related Content

What's hot

Aspirin and plavix
Aspirin and plavixAspirin and plavix
Aspirin and plavix
maaaziz
 
Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013
Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013
Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013
Gianfranco Tammaro
 
Trial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slides
Trial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slidesTrial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slides
Trial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slides
Marilyn Mann
 
Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Endeavor...
Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent 	 Endeavor...Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent 	 Endeavor...
Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Endeavor...
MedicineAndFamily
 
Rupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological Factors
Rupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological FactorsRupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological Factors
Rupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological Factors
guest629cef
 

What's hot (19)

Jose miguel vegas valle sec sept2015
Jose miguel vegas valle sec sept2015Jose miguel vegas valle sec sept2015
Jose miguel vegas valle sec sept2015
 
Resolute International 09.21
Resolute International 09.21Resolute International 09.21
Resolute International 09.21
 
Eluting balloons, the mechanism of action, indications for use Ivan. G. Horvath
Eluting balloons, the mechanism of action, indications for use Ivan. G. HorvathEluting balloons, the mechanism of action, indications for use Ivan. G. Horvath
Eluting balloons, the mechanism of action, indications for use Ivan. G. Horvath
 
Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...
Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...
Биодеградирующие стенты расширение показаний, отдаленные результаты применен...
 
Zest Park
Zest ParkZest Park
Zest Park
 
Seguimiento de pacientes con FA y SCA tras intervención coronaria percutánea....
Seguimiento de pacientes con FA y SCA tras intervención coronaria percutánea....Seguimiento de pacientes con FA y SCA tras intervención coronaria percutánea....
Seguimiento de pacientes con FA y SCA tras intervención coronaria percutánea....
 
Esct 18th
Esct 18thEsct 18th
Esct 18th
 
MAGELLAN trial - Summary & Results
MAGELLAN trial - Summary & ResultsMAGELLAN trial - Summary & Results
MAGELLAN trial - Summary & Results
 
Aspirin and plavix
Aspirin and plavixAspirin and plavix
Aspirin and plavix
 
Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013
Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013
Pepe R. Nuovi Anticoagulanti. ASMaD 2013
 
Reunion Anual Madeira 2015 A randomised comparison of reservoir-based polymer...
Reunion Anual Madeira 2015 A randomised comparison of reservoir-based polymer...Reunion Anual Madeira 2015 A randomised comparison of reservoir-based polymer...
Reunion Anual Madeira 2015 A randomised comparison of reservoir-based polymer...
 
Trial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slides
Trial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slidesTrial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slides
Trial to assess chelation therapy (tact) slides
 
How to Use Cangrelor - Dr. Geisler
How to Use Cangrelor - Dr. GeislerHow to Use Cangrelor - Dr. Geisler
How to Use Cangrelor - Dr. Geisler
 
Local drug delivery with balloons eluting a liquid paclitaxel formulation. Yo...
Local drug delivery with balloons eluting a liquid paclitaxel formulation. Yo...Local drug delivery with balloons eluting a liquid paclitaxel formulation. Yo...
Local drug delivery with balloons eluting a liquid paclitaxel formulation. Yo...
 
Acc2002 thermography
Acc2002 thermographyAcc2002 thermography
Acc2002 thermography
 
067 the holy grail of cardiology
067 the holy grail of cardiology067 the holy grail of cardiology
067 the holy grail of cardiology
 
Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Endeavor...
Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent 	 Endeavor...Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent 	 Endeavor...
Endeavor IV-A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Endeavor...
 
Vertebroplastia
VertebroplastiaVertebroplastia
Vertebroplastia
 
Rupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological Factors
Rupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological FactorsRupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological Factors
Rupture Risk Based On Anatomical And Morphological Factors
 

Viewers also liked

qwest communications Q3 04
qwest communications Q3 04qwest communications Q3 04
qwest communications Q3 04
finance19
 
Community development and networks
Community development and networksCommunity development and networks
Community development and networks
Leif Rasmussen
 
Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011
Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011
Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011
Nordea Bank
 
Nets_annual report_2015_FINAL
Nets_annual report_2015_FINALNets_annual report_2015_FINAL
Nets_annual report_2015_FINAL
Klaus Madsen
 
Danske kreds 0115WEB
Danske kreds 0115WEBDanske kreds 0115WEB
Danske kreds 0115WEB
Rasmus Hach
 
0007 br bdo_2011-08-31
0007 br bdo_2011-08-310007 br bdo_2011-08-31
0007 br bdo_2011-08-31
dmidmsa
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique spring12
Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique spring12Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique spring12
Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique spring12
 
qwest communications Q3 04
qwest communications Q3 04qwest communications Q3 04
qwest communications Q3 04
 
Proposed FY2012 Commonwealth Budget :: ANALYSIS
Proposed FY2012 Commonwealth Budget :: ANALYSISProposed FY2012 Commonwealth Budget :: ANALYSIS
Proposed FY2012 Commonwealth Budget :: ANALYSIS
 
2009: Særmagasin: Kina - det nye nærmarked. Opgøret med Vesten
2009: Særmagasin: Kina - det nye nærmarked. Opgøret med Vesten2009: Særmagasin: Kina - det nye nærmarked. Opgøret med Vesten
2009: Særmagasin: Kina - det nye nærmarked. Opgøret med Vesten
 
Heading for the Digital Single Market - Carsten Schmidt
Heading for the Digital Single Market - Carsten SchmidtHeading for the Digital Single Market - Carsten Schmidt
Heading for the Digital Single Market - Carsten Schmidt
 
Community development and networks
Community development and networksCommunity development and networks
Community development and networks
 
Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique winter12
Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique winter12Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique winter12
Anesthesia Business Consultants: Communique winter12
 
9th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
9th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency9th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
9th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency
 
Pharma Market 45
Pharma Market 45Pharma Market 45
Pharma Market 45
 
Noise Networks in Europe - Colin Nugent [en]
Noise Networks in Europe - Colin Nugent [en]Noise Networks in Europe - Colin Nugent [en]
Noise Networks in Europe - Colin Nugent [en]
 
Lakhvir singh 30 oct
Lakhvir singh 30 octLakhvir singh 30 oct
Lakhvir singh 30 oct
 
Cloud on PureSystems, Botond Kiss
Cloud on PureSystems, Botond KissCloud on PureSystems, Botond Kiss
Cloud on PureSystems, Botond Kiss
 
Solution57 company presentation
Solution57   company presentationSolution57   company presentation
Solution57 company presentation
 
Putting Digital Solutions in Place: e-SES real-life testing - Lefteris Leonta...
Putting Digital Solutions in Place: e-SES real-life testing - Lefteris Leonta...Putting Digital Solutions in Place: e-SES real-life testing - Lefteris Leonta...
Putting Digital Solutions in Place: e-SES real-life testing - Lefteris Leonta...
 
Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011
Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011
Responsible investment & governance annual report 2011
 
Nets_annual report_2015_FINAL
Nets_annual report_2015_FINALNets_annual report_2015_FINAL
Nets_annual report_2015_FINAL
 
2011 Proposed Pennsylvania Budget Analysis scranton
2011 Proposed Pennsylvania Budget Analysis   scranton2011 Proposed Pennsylvania Budget Analysis   scranton
2011 Proposed Pennsylvania Budget Analysis scranton
 
Danske kreds 0115WEB
Danske kreds 0115WEBDanske kreds 0115WEB
Danske kreds 0115WEB
 
Accelerate America Issue 11 (Dec 2015_Jan 2016)
Accelerate America Issue 11 (Dec 2015_Jan 2016)Accelerate America Issue 11 (Dec 2015_Jan 2016)
Accelerate America Issue 11 (Dec 2015_Jan 2016)
 
0007 br bdo_2011-08-31
0007 br bdo_2011-08-310007 br bdo_2011-08-31
0007 br bdo_2011-08-31
 

Similar to Dedication clemmensen

ClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdf
ClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdfClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdf
ClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdf
Irving Torres Lopez
 
Ppci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbai
Ppci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbaiPpci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbai
Ppci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbai
cardiositeindia
 
AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA luqmani marrakesh
AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA  luqmani marrakesh AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA  luqmani marrakesh
AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA luqmani marrakesh
020359
 
2014session5 3
2014session5 32014session5 3
2014session5 3
acvq
 
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy revascularisation how when and why
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy  revascularisation how when and whyIschaemic cardiomyopathy  revascularisation how when and why
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy revascularisation how when and why
cardiositeindia
 

Similar to Dedication clemmensen (20)

Crest
CrestCrest
Crest
 
Jan-Malte Sinning: The role of pMCS – Which patients benefit from hemodynamic...
Jan-Malte Sinning: The role of pMCS – Which patients benefit from hemodynamic...Jan-Malte Sinning: The role of pMCS – Which patients benefit from hemodynamic...
Jan-Malte Sinning: The role of pMCS – Which patients benefit from hemodynamic...
 
Kedev S - AIMRADIAL 2014 Endovascular - Carotid stenting development
Kedev S - AIMRADIAL 2014 Endovascular - Carotid stenting developmentKedev S - AIMRADIAL 2014 Endovascular - Carotid stenting development
Kedev S - AIMRADIAL 2014 Endovascular - Carotid stenting development
 
ClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdf
ClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdfClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdf
ClinicalOutcomesFollowingCoronary BifurcationPCITechniques.pdf
 
Ppci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbai
Ppci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbaiPpci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbai
Ppci culprit vs mv acad card 2013 mumbai
 
Blister aneurysms- Evolution of Endovascular management
Blister aneurysms- Evolution of Endovascular management Blister aneurysms- Evolution of Endovascular management
Blister aneurysms- Evolution of Endovascular management
 
OOG/ZOG: Van huet foveal sparing in patienten met m. stargardt
OOG/ZOG: Van huet   foveal sparing in patienten met m. stargardtOOG/ZOG: Van huet   foveal sparing in patienten met m. stargardt
OOG/ZOG: Van huet foveal sparing in patienten met m. stargardt
 
Dr. Alexander Parkhomenko. Utilidad de las nuevas técnicas de imagen invasivas
Dr. Alexander Parkhomenko. Utilidad de las nuevas técnicas de imagen invasivasDr. Alexander Parkhomenko. Utilidad de las nuevas técnicas de imagen invasivas
Dr. Alexander Parkhomenko. Utilidad de las nuevas técnicas de imagen invasivas
 
Resolute international 09 21
Resolute international 09 21Resolute international 09 21
Resolute international 09 21
 
Rol actual del cardiodesfibrilador implantable subcutáneo en la prevención de...
Rol actual del cardiodesfibrilador implantable subcutáneo en la prevención de...Rol actual del cardiodesfibrilador implantable subcutáneo en la prevención de...
Rol actual del cardiodesfibrilador implantable subcutáneo en la prevención de...
 
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
Impact of contralateral carotid or vertebral artery occlusion in patients und...
 
AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA luqmani marrakesh
AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA  luqmani marrakesh AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA  luqmani marrakesh
AMIM Février 2017 New diagnostic tools for GCA luqmani marrakesh
 
Carotid Artery Stenting
Carotid Artery StentingCarotid Artery Stenting
Carotid Artery Stenting
 
ROLE OF MRI AND MRS IN RING ENJANCING LESIONS OF BRAIN
ROLE OF MRI AND MRS IN RING ENJANCING LESIONS OF BRAINROLE OF MRI AND MRS IN RING ENJANCING LESIONS OF BRAIN
ROLE OF MRI AND MRS IN RING ENJANCING LESIONS OF BRAIN
 
2014session5 3
2014session5 32014session5 3
2014session5 3
 
Journal club 11 1-2012 woest trial
Journal club 11 1-2012 woest trialJournal club 11 1-2012 woest trial
Journal club 11 1-2012 woest trial
 
Lancelot acs final
Lancelot acs finalLancelot acs final
Lancelot acs final
 
CAROTID WEB.pptx
CAROTID WEB.pptxCAROTID WEB.pptx
CAROTID WEB.pptx
 
Wivon
WivonWivon
Wivon
 
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy revascularisation how when and why
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy  revascularisation how when and whyIschaemic cardiomyopathy  revascularisation how when and why
Ischaemic cardiomyopathy revascularisation how when and why
 

More from Trimed Media Group

Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf finalAos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Trimed Media Group
 
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Trimed Media Group
 
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care CoordinationKuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Trimed Media Group
 
Safran info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran  info sage & disruptive innovationSafran  info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran info sage & disruptive innovation
Trimed Media Group
 
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
Trimed Media Group
 
Hamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community careHamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community care
Trimed Media Group
 
Hongsermeier app store for health
Hongsermeier  app store for healthHongsermeier  app store for health
Hongsermeier app store for health
Trimed Media Group
 
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Trimed Media Group
 
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social mediaCrotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Trimed Media Group
 

More from Trimed Media Group (20)

HRS.15 Sessions to Attend
HRS.15 Sessions to AttendHRS.15 Sessions to Attend
HRS.15 Sessions to Attend
 
Himss cvb sessions
Himss cvb sessionsHimss cvb sessions
Himss cvb sessions
 
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
Top 5 Sessions to attend at HIMSS.15 (CVB)
 
Innovative technologies at ACC.15
Innovative technologies at ACC.15Innovative technologies at ACC.15
Innovative technologies at ACC.15
 
Imaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
Imaging at ACC.15: Session SpotlightImaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
Imaging at ACC.15: Session Spotlight
 
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.1510 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
10 Sessions You Can’t Miss at ACC.15
 
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
6 simple tips to help you avoid a lawsuit
 
RSNA 2014
RSNA 2014RSNA 2014
RSNA 2014
 
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf finalAos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
Aos 213 01 nelson rivaroxaban effectiveness and safety in nvaf final
 
Acep 10-15-13
Acep 10-15-13Acep 10-15-13
Acep 10-15-13
 
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...Shorr and bria  innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
Shorr and bria innovation at the point-of-care rethinking the doctor-patient...
 
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care CoordinationKuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
Kuperman Health Information Exchange & Care Coordination
 
Safran info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran  info sage & disruptive innovationSafran  info sage & disruptive innovation
Safran info sage & disruptive innovation
 
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
[Hongsermeier] clinical decision support services amdis final
 
[Teich] amdis
[Teich] amdis[Teich] amdis
[Teich] amdis
 
Hamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community careHamann big institution to community care
Hamann big institution to community care
 
Hongsermeier app store for health
Hongsermeier  app store for healthHongsermeier  app store for health
Hongsermeier app store for health
 
Mandl app store for health
Mandl  app store for healthMandl  app store for health
Mandl app store for health
 
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
Kibbe expect direct health information exchange in the context of state 2 mea...
 
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social mediaCrotty  engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
Crotty engaging patients in new ways from open notes to social media
 

Dedication clemmensen

  • 1. DEDICATION Long-term outcome after drug-eluting versus bare-metal stent implantation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction 3 year follow-up of the randomised DEDICATION trial Peter Clemmensen, Henning Kelbæk, Anne Kaltoft, Steffen Helqvist, Jens Flensted Lassen, Lene Kløvgaard, Christian J Terkelsen, Hans Henrik Tilsted, Thomas Engstrøm, Lars R Krusell, Evald H. Christiansen, Kari Saunamäki, Erik Jørgensen, Hans E. Bøtker, Jan Ravkilde, Klaus F Kofoed, Lars Køber, Leif Thuesen Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Aarhus University Hospital Skejby Denmark
  • 2. DEDICATION Disclosures The study has received unrestricted grants from the Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Abbott, and Boston Scientific companies The presenter has previously or currently been involved in research contracts, consulting or received research and educational grants from: Abbott, AstraZeneca, Aventis, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Myogen, Medtronic, Mitsubishi Pharma, Nycomed, Organon, Pfizer, Pharmacia, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Searle, The Medicines Company.
  • 3. DEDICATION Background Implantation of drug eluting stents (DES) has proven to be both safe and efficient in most patients with coronary artery disease. However, long-term data are scarce with regard to their use in STEMI patients treated with PCI
  • 4. DEDICATION Drug-Eluting vs Bare-Metal Stent Implantation during Primary PCI Previous published studies with ≥ 150 patients Invasive RS,% MACE,% Primary Study n FU DES/BMS DES/BMS endpoint p STRATEGY 175 133 8/28 18/32 MACCE 0.001 TYPHOON 712 170 7/20 7/14 TVF 0.004 PASSION 619 - - 9/13 MACE 0.09 SESAMI 320 166 9/21 7/17 RS 0.03
  • 5. DEDICATION Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results 3 years after implantation of DES vs BMS in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI
  • 6. DEDICATION Flow chart STEMI n=626 Randomization + Distal Protection - Distal Protection Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Post Procedure Angiography - QCA 1 month MACE 8 months Angiography - QCA / MACE 15 months MACE 3 years MACE
  • 7. DEDICATION Flow chart STEMI n=626 Randomization + Distal Protection - Distal Protection Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Bare Metal Stent Drug Eluting Stent Post Procedure Angiography - QCA 1 month MACE 8 months Angiography - QCA / MACE 15 months MACE 3 years MACE
  • 8. DEDICATION Endpoints • MACE (cardiac death, re-infarction, TLR) at 3 years • Cardiac death at 3 years • Total mortality • MI • TLR • TVR • Stroke
  • 9. DEDICATION Major inclusion criteria • Patients who presented with the symptoms and signs of a first time large STEMI • Chest pain ≤ 12 hours duration • ST-elevation > 4 mm in contiguous leads • High grade stenosis/occlusion of a native coronary artery that could be crossed with a guidewire
  • 10. DEDICATION Major exclusion criteria • History of a previous myocardial infarction • Left main stem stenosis • Gastrointestinal bleeding within 1 month • Expected survival < 1 year • Linguistic difficulties needing an interpretor
  • 11. DEDICATION Study Flow Screened patients 1687 Included patients Excluded patients 626 1061 24 deaths - 216 Clinically or psychologically instability / unconsciousness - 162 ST-elevation < 4 mm 83 lost to re-angiography - 141 Participation in another study - 140 Vessel unsuitable for filterwire - 78 Onset symptoms >12 hours 543 patients for re-angiography - 72 Linguistic problems - 68 Screening log not filled in 602 patients for 8-month FU - 58 Previous infarction - 43 Severe other disease - 35 Refused to participate 29 deaths - 26 Significant left main stenosis - 22 Other 573 patients for 3-year FU
  • 12. DEDICATION Number of Patients STEMI - PPCI n: 626 Randomization Drug Eluting Stent Bare Metal Stent n: 313 n: 313
  • 13. DEDICATION Baseline clinical characteristics DES BMS p n=313 n=313 Age (years) 62 63 0.41 Male gender (%) 72.8 73.5 0.93 Diabetes Mellitus (%) 9.3 11.5 0.30 Hypertension (%) 32.3 34.0 0.67 Hyperlipidemia (%) 18.7 21.4 0.54 Current smoker (%) 52.7 54.7 0.88 Family history of CAD (%) 37.3 38.2 0.87 Left ventricular ejection fraction 0.48 0.47 0.45 Previous myocardial infarction (%) 6.1 7.1 0.20 Previous PCI / CABG (%) 4.5 5.4 0.56 Symptom onset to arrival, min 197 200 0.69 Door-to-balloon, min 25 25 0.63
  • 14. DEDICATION Baseline lesion characteristics DES BMS p n=313 n=313 Infarct related coronary artery (%) LAD 44 38 CX 11 14 0.57 RCA 45 48 Number of diseased vessel (%) 1 vessel disease 65 61 2 vessel disease 25 29 0.47 3 vessel disease 10 10 Baseline TIMI flow TIMI 0-1 65 70 TIMI 2-3 35 30 0.27
  • 15. DEDICATION Procedural results DES BMS p n=313 n=313 Use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, % 97 95 0.21 Visible thrombus,% 74 72 0.33 Filterwire used, % 40 42 0.38 Stent implanted, % 99 98 0.29 Number of stents per lesion 1.3 1.3 0.52 Stented length, mm 22.2 21.0 0.13 Stent diameter, mm 3.54 3.53 0.86 Max deployment pressure, mm Hg 16.7 16.3 0.20 TIMI III post procedure 90 90 1.00 Procedural success, % 98 99 0.73
  • 16. DEDICATION MACE during 3 years 30 DES 25 BMS P<0.001 20 P=0.024 19.8 P<0.001 Events, % 18.2 15 16.3 P=0.084 10 11.5 10.5 P=0.013 P=0.58 8.9 5 6.4 6.1 P=0.45 6.1 P=0.64 5.4 4.2 3.2 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.9 0 Death Cardiac MI Re- TLR TVR Stroke MACE death infarction
  • 17. DEDICATION Freedom from MACE 100 Freedom from MACE 80 60 DES BMS P=0.028 40 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Days
  • 18. DEDICATION Freedom from all-cause mortality 100 Freedom from all-cause mortality (%) 80 60 DES BMS P=0.059 40 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Days
  • 19. DEDICATION Freedom from cardiac mortality 100 Freedom from cardiac mortality (%) 80 60 DES BMS P=0.008 40 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Days
  • 20. DEDICATION Any stent thrombosis 10 DES Cumulative incidence (%) 8 BMS P=0.511 6 4 2 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Days
  • 21. DEDICATION Definite stent thrombosis 10 DES Cumulative incidence (%) 8 BMS P=0.296 6 4 2 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Days
  • 22. DEDICATION Subgroup analysis Group n Rate of MACE (%) DES BMS Odds Ratio (95% CI) All 626 11.5 18.2 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 Age ≥ 63 311 13.7 17.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Female 168 10.6 24.1 DM 65 13.8 22.2 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6 Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 Stent length ≤ 18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 DES better BMS better
  • 23. DEDICATION Subgroup analysis Group n Rate of MACE (%) DES BMS Odds Ratio (95% CI) All 626 11.5 18.2 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 Age ≥ 63 311 13.7 17.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Female 168 10.6 24.1 DM 65 13.8 22.2 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6 Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 Stent length ≤ 18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 DES better BMS better
  • 24. DEDICATION Subgroup analysis Group n Rate of MACE (%) DES BMS Odds Ratio (95% CI) All 626 11.5 18.2 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 Age ≥ 63 311 13.7 17.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Female 168 10.6 24.1 DM 65 13.8 22.2 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6 Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 Stent length ≤ 18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 DES better BMS better
  • 25. DEDICATION Subgroup analysis Group n Rate of MACE (%) DES BMS Odds Ratio (95% CI) All 626 11.5 18.2 Age < 63 315 9.4 19.4 Age ≥ 63 311 13.7 17.1 Male 458 11.8 16.1 Female 168 10.6 24.1 DM 65 13.8 22.2 no DM 561 11.3 17.7 Ref D > 3.1 mm 317 9.6 15.6 Ref D ≤ 3.1 mm 299 12.0 20.8 Visible thrombus 458 11.6 15.9 No visible thrombus 168 11.1 24.1 Stent length > 18 mm 309 12.9 17.8 Stent length ≤ 18 mm 310 9.5 17.9 LAD 258 14.8 20.6 CX / RCA 368 9.4 16.4 0 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 DES better BMS better
  • 26. DEDICATION Conclusions In the DEDICATION trial implantation of DES (compared with BMS) in STEMI patients • reduced the rate of MACE and the need for repeat revascularization • was not associated with an increased rate of myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis • was associated with an increased risk of cardiac death