3. Determine the
concept of
educational
innovation that
teachers apply in
their teaching
environments.
Identify the
appreciation of
teachers by
associating
educational
innovation with the
platform
uvirtual.uce.edu.ec
Quantify the use of
the platform by
teachers of the
University.
Establish important
findings related to
good practices in
educational
innovation in the
platform
4. Analysis of the
interactions
• March-August 2017 and
September 2017 to
February 2018, these
periods are six months.
Description of what and
how activities are
developed in the virtual
platform.
• Demography of the
interactions activities
that promote the
interactions.
• Interaction is every
action that teachers or
students
• Select the sample, the
teachers that have the
most interactions on the
platform were
established.
Selected the hundred that
had the greatest number
of interactions.
• Verify if there is a
theoretical orientation in
which the use of the
platform is based on
innovative practices.
• Determine the frequency
and preference of the
use of the platform in
relation to the learning
proposed in its syllables,
Determine innovative
practices
• Interview was applied in
order to find the findings
that characterize an
innovative practice.
• The use of the platform
allowed to identify the
similarities and
constitutive elements of
innovation.
5. Interactions Period 1 Period 2
Assistance 3.050 2.776
Data base 19 8
Questionnaire 4.606 6.651
Lesson 238 98
Book 69 9
System 41.000 28.310
Workshop 897 416
Total 49.879 38.268
6. 36% of the thirty-six responses refer
to using resources to facilitate
learning, have information, access
to knowledge and stand out as a
quality resource.
19% of responses it is affirmed
about the familiarization of the
virtual environment, as a
complementary tool, safe, easy to
handle and modern.
17% resource is designed to work in
collaborative learning, research
development, as the student is an
actor of their training.
17% responses it is recognized that
it is a mechanism that facilitates the
teacher-student relationship,
achieves closeness and improves
communication.
With lower values are the role of
facilitator that the teacher assumes,
the ease of updating knowledge and
the development in students of
higher order skills
8. Conclusion
The growth trend is significant, even when compared with previous periods. At the
beginning of the implementation, 2016, there was a boom, more than 70 percent of
teachers used the platform, and in the period 2017-2018 barely exceeds 60 percent of the
total of teachers.
In the survey the results of the first two questions lead us to recognize that the theoretical
foundation that supports educational innovation is low and innovation is confused as
synonymous with the use of a virtual platform.
A relevant and positive element is knowing that the platform is thought by the teachers
who interact frequently, as a tool that complements its function, the activities proposed by
them are anchored to activate the student as responsible for their learning. Most of the
natural activities of the face-to-face classes are replicated in the middle and autonomous
work is organized.
It is recognized in innovative teachers that good practice in the use of the platform is only
possible if its use is associated with research and that includes the permanent use of
scientific publications and the creation of new documents by students. The student
improvement in the generation of competencies of his profession and this in a
fundamental way when activities are associated with professional cases of study.
Editor's Notes
Educational innovation using technology should be analyzed considering three vertices.
First related to teaching as the driving force of the teaching-learning process
Second related to information and communication technologies as a resource
Third that identifies innovative practices as the dynamic element.
The first vertex arises when the teacher becomes a key actor in the generation of actions that from the teaching ensure the learning, in the support in the actions tending to the improvement of the educational professional formation [1], where he ceases to be the source of all knowledge and acts as a guide for students, facilitating new cognitive and procedural constructions based on the use of resources and tools they need to explore and develop new knowledge and skills [2]; therefore he becomes counselor and mediator.
The second vertex refers to the role of information and communication technologies in educational innovation. The technological innovations are evident when the first users abandon the new products as soon as the masses accept it and the next novelty appears [6]; hhowever, technology is part of society, so the adoption of technologies becomes relevant because it increases the possibility of exploiting new opportunities.
The third corner is related to innovative practices, educational innovation is the selection, organization and creative use of new elements linked to institutional management, curriculum and / or teaching, it is normal for an educational innovation to impact in more than one area , since it usually responds to a need or problem that regularly requires a comprehensive response
Innovation is transversal to university work; however, teacher-student work will be the main core of analysis, considering that it is important to identify successful practices within the classroom in order to improve and project them within the University.
This process will only be possible when a culture of identification, analysis, socialization, evaluation and improvement of innovative practices is created
The present investigation is oriented in identifying the findings of educational innovation practices through the use of the virtual platform.
The interactions in relation to teachers have a positive bias, which means that many teachers have few interactions.
In the period 2017-2017 (Period 1) there were 49,879 interactions. In the period 2017-2018 (Period 2) the total is 38,268.