SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 25
Download to read offline
Landing Overruns-
Human Factors
Captain David Oliver
General Manager Flight Technical
Qantas Airways Limited




                                   W037c.1
Landing Overruns - Human Factors


                         A review of the events leading to, and lessons
                         learnt from the over-run of flight QF1 at Bangkok
                         Thailand, September 23, 1999.




                                                                             W037c.2
Qantas Airways Limited
Landing Configuration


                         • Operating Boeing 747-400 since 1989
                         • Standard landing configuration up until 1996
                           was “Flap 30, Full Reverse Thrust”




                                                                          W037c.3
Qantas Airways Limited
Landing Configuration
                         (continued)

                         • Review of landing configuration was
                           undertaken due to:
                           – Noise levy at Sydney
                               Flap 25 chosen for lower noise,
                               better fuel economy
                          – Carbon Brake Wear
                              Idle reverse thrust chosen for
                              less noise and longer, harder
                              brake application


                                                                 W037c.4
Qantas Airways Limited
Landing Configuration
                         (continued)

                         • Landing configuration Policy from late 1996 was:
                           – Flap 25, idle reverse thrust provided the
                             runway length was not limiting




                                                                              W037c.5
Qantas Airways Limited
The Landing


                         • F/O was pilot flying
                         • The runway was wet
                           – The last landing airplane had reported
                             “good” braking action
                           – The airplane preceding QF1 executed a
                             Missed Approach due to poor visibility in
                             heavy rain
                           – This was not relayed to the crew of QF1



                                                                         W037c.6
Qantas Airways Limited
The Landing
                         (continued)

                         • Airplane crossed the threshold high and fast
                           (but within Company limits) and “floated” 10ft
                           above the runway in heavy rain
                         • Within a period of just a few seconds:
                           – The Captain called for “Go- Around”
                           – The main gear touched down
                           – The rain eased and visibility improved
                           – Captain reached over and took control of
                             the thrust levers


                                                                            W037c.7
Qantas Airways Limited
The Landing
                         (continued)

                         • The Captain initially only retarded # 2, 3 and
                           4 Thrust Levers
                         • The F/O immediately realized this and retarded
                           #1 to idle, however:
                          – With main gear on the ground and # 1 or
                           4 T/L advanced, the autobrakes disarmed
                          – Speedbrakes deployed automatically after
                           #1 T/L was retarded by the F/O



                                                                            W037c.8
Qantas Airways Limited
The Landing
                         (continued)

                         • The EICAS message “AUTOBRAKES” was not
                           initially noticed by the Flight Crew
                         • Manual braking was not applied until 8 seconds
                           after touchdown, approx 5000 feet down
                           the runway
                         • No reverse thrust was applied for the whole
                           of the landing roll




                                                                            W037c.9
Qantas Airways Limited
The Landing
                         (continued)

                         • When manual braking was applied
                           NO deceleration was felt
                         • Both pilots exerted maximum force on the
                           brake pedals, still with no deceleration
                           – The airplane was aquaplaning
                         • The airplane only began to decelerate as it
                           entered the last 1000 feet of the runway and
                           the groundspeed reduced below 110kts



                                                                          W037c.10
Qantas Airways Limited
Acft drifting left                Nose gear squat                                                         Nose gear
                                SPLR deployed
                                                      of rw y C/L                       sw itch air mode                                                        departs sw y
                                CAS 160 kts
                                                      CAS 158kts                                                                             Acft returning
                                                                                        CAS 143kts                                                              CAS     88kts
                                GS     158 kts
 Touchdow n                                           GS       156kts                                                                        to rw y C/L
                                                                                        GS       141kts                                                         GS       87kts
 Air-gnd logic                                                                                                                               CAS 107kts
                                                            Manual         Nose gear           Nose gear squat                                                 Acft on rw y C/L
 to gnd mode                    SPLR start deploy                                                                                            GS      106kts
                                                            braking        touchdow n          sw itch gnd mode                                                at threshold
 CAS 156 kts                    CAS 160 kts
                                                            indications    CAS 146kts          CAS 139kts                                                      CAS 96kts
 GS      158 kts                GS    158 kts
                                                             V                                                                                            S
                                                            CAS 154kts     GS     145kts       GS      138kts                                                  GS 92kts
                                                                                                                                      W

                                                            GS 1 2k




    DECELERATION
            ft /sec2




    -7.00
                 Acft accelerating                  Aerodynamic                                             Aerodynamic
                       due to                          braking                                                   and
    -6.00
                  residual thrust                       only                                                w heel braking

    -5.00



    -4.00



    -3.00



    -2.00



    -1.00




             3287ft                   4000f                5000ft              6000ft                  7000ft                8000ft       9000ft              10000ft
             1002m                      t                  1524m               1829m                   2134m                 2438m        2743m                3048m
     Decelerat ion at main gear posit ion
                                                                                Distance from Rwy 21L displaced threshold



                                                                                                                                                                          W037c.11
Qantas Airways Limited
Comparison of rollout deceleration on various runway surfaces and VH-OJH 23 September 1999

                            -14

                                    Dry runw ay
                                    * Mu 0.35 - 0.41
                            -12


                            -10
                                    Wet runw ay
                                    * Mu 0.20
                             -8     * Good braking action
   Deceleration (ft/sec2)




                             -6     Flooded runw ay
                                    * Mu 0.05
                                    * Poor braking action
                             -4
                                                              Manual braking                                                                                                Aircraft on          Aircraft
                                                              indications 5002ft to rw y                                                                                    centreline at        nosegear
                                                                                                                               Aircraft passing     Aircraft
                                                                                           Aircraft passing over   2015ft to
                             -2                               end                                                                                                           start of sw y        departs end
                                                                                                                               over rw y mkgs and   returning to rw y
                                                                                           rw y mkgs and abeam     rw y end
                                                                                                                                                                                                 of sw y
                                                                                                                               approaching tw y S   centreline 770ft
                                                              Aircraft drifting left of    tw y W 2536ft to rw y
                                                                                                                               1100ft to rw y end   to rw y end
                                                              centreline 5522ft to rw y    end
                             0             Autobrakes
                                                              end
                                           disarmed

                             2
                                            Spoilers deploy


                             4
                              160                      150                    140                  130                  120               110                   100                         90                      80
                                                                                                                                                                        Acf tconfig for various runw ay surfaces:
  Ambient conditions:                                                                                         Groundspeed (knots)                                       * 252,000 kg Vref25 + 5 kts
  OAT 25 deg C
                                                                                                                                                                        * Maximum manual braking
  QNH 1013.2                                           23 Sep BKK               Dry Rwy          Contam Rwy (Good brkg)           Contam Rwy (Poor brkg)
                                                                                                                                                                        * Spoilers deployed, Idle forw ard thrust
  WIND 3.6 kt HWC



                                                                                                                                                                                                               W037c.12
Qantas Airways Limited
Human Factors


                         • Why did this happen ?
                         • Accident analysis showed:
                           – A number of significant active failures and
                           – Significant inadequate defences




                                                                           W037c.13
Qantas Airways Limited
Active Failures


                         • The runway was affected by water
                         • Flight Crew failed to use an appropriate risk
                           management strategy for the approach
                           and landing
                         • The F/O did not fly the aircraft accurately
                           during final approach
                         • The Flight Crew were confused over who had
                           control and did not select appropriate level of
                           reverse thrust


                                                                             W037c.14
Qantas Airways Limited
Inadequate Defences


                         • Company published information, procedures and
                           training for landing on water affected runways
                           was inadequate
                         • Flight Crew training in evaluating the procedural
                           and configuration options for approach and
                           landing was deficient
                           – The crew may have been “pre-conditioned” to
                             the use of Flap 25 and idle reverse thrust




                                                                               W037c.15
Qantas Airways Limited
Change Management


                         • Published the Boeing document “Landing
                           on Slippery Runways” (doc D6-44247) in
                           the Qantas Flying Manual
                         • Provided a flow chart to assist Flight Crew
                           in determining appropriate flap and reverse
                           thrust settings




                                                                         W037c.16
Qantas Airways Limited
Aircraft Weight
                                                        Environmental Conditions


                                                           Evaluate Runway
                                                         Conditions as Reported


                                                                                        Runway Contaminated
                              Runway Dry                      Runway Wet
                                                                                            or Slippery

                                                                                              Reported
                         Determine F25 Landing
                                                                                            Braking Action
                              Field Length

                          Is F25 Landing Field
                                                                                   GOOD        MEDIUM         POOR
                            Length less than
                                                        No
                          Available Distance?
                               Yes

                                                                 Determine F30 Landing Field Length Do not land unless a greater
                          Use Flap 25 and Full
                                                                                                    emergency exists. Hold until
                            Reverse Thrust
                                                                                                    conditions improve or divert
                                        Determine F30
                                     Landing Field Length

                                      Is F30 Landing Field
                                                                    Is F30 Landing Field Length less
                                        Length less than
                                                                        than Available Distance?
                                      Available Distance?
                                                                        No                        Yes
                                     Yes           No
                          Use Flap 30 and Full                                         Use Flap 30 and Full
                                                   Use another Runway
                            Reverse Thrust                                               Reverse Thrust
                                                                                                                             W037c.17
Qantas Airways Limited
Change Management
                         (continued)

                         • Flight Crew use max reverse thrust as the
                           “standard” with idle reverse permitted only
                           under stipulated conditions
                         • Flap 25 is the normal landing flap on
                           dry runways
                         • Flap 30 used on wet runways (no credit taken
                           for grooving or PFC overlay)




                                                                          W037c.18
Qantas Airways Limited
Change Management
                         (continued)

                         • Produced CBT package summarising
                           performance on slippery and contaminated
                           runways
                         • Provided detailed stopping distance information
                           for various surface conditions
                         • Highlighted to crew the importance of using
                           correct techniques for landing on wet, slippery
                           and contaminated runways
                         • Included call of “AUTOBRAKES” each time
                           this is annunciated on EICAS
                                                                             W037c.19
Qantas Airways Limited
Change Management
                         (continued)

                         • Monitoring of landing configurations and
                           touchdown points has shown:
                           – Significant trend towards flap 30 irrespective
                             of runway conditions
                           – Max. reverse thrust used on most occasions
                           – Touchdown points are closer to the “desired”
                             point. i.e. less “float”




                                                                              W037c.20
Qantas Airways Limited
Trend in Landing Flap Setting

                 100%
                 100%


                   80%
                   80%


                                                                             Flap 30
                   60%
                   60%
Percentage
Percentage
of landings
of landings
                   40%
                   40%


                   20%
                   20%
                                       Flap 25

                     0%
                     0%
                         Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02
                         Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02
                            Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02
                            Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02

                                                                                                                         W037c.21
Qantas Airways Limited
Trend in Reverse Thrust Use

               100%
               100%
                 90%
                 90%
                 80%
                 80%
                 70%
                 70%
                                                                       >82%N1
                 60%
                 60%
Percentage
Percentage50%
of landings 50%
of landings
                 40%
                 40%
                 30%
                 30%
                 20%
                 20%                                        40 to 81%N1
                 10%
                 10%
                                                 Idle
                   0%
                   0%
                         Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02
                         Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02
                            Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02
                            Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02

                                                                                                                         W037c.22
Qantas Airways Limited
Trend in Distance From 50’ to TD
                        3000ft +
                        3000ft +
                 100%
                 100%
                       2500 - 2999ft
                   90%
                   90%
                                    2000 - 2499ft
                   80%
                   80%
                                                               1500 - 1999ft
                   70%
                   70%
                   60%
                   60%
Percentage
Percentage 50%
of landings 50%
of landings
                   40%
                   40%                                             1000 - 1499ft
                   30%
                   30%
                   20%
                   20%
                   10%
                   10%
                                                                      Under 1000ft
                     0%
                     0%
                         Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02
                         Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02
                            Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02
                            Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02
                                                                                                                         W037c.23
Qantas Airways Limited
Cabin Communications

                         • Nose gear collapse resulted in loss of all Flight
                           Deck / Cabin communications
                         • Confusion existed as to need for evacuation
                         • Co-location of back-up comms equipment in an
                           area prone to damage is considered undesirable
                         • Provided Flight and Cabin Crew with procedures
                           to use in the event of loss of Cabin Interphone
                           or PA



                                                                               W037c.24
Qantas Airways Limited
Summary

                         • Provide Flight Crew with the appropriate tools
                           to do the job
                         • Train Flight Crew to analyse each landing
                           separately to determine the appropriate landing
                           configuration
                         • Ensure procedures for landing on wet, slippery
                           and contaminated runways are in place and
                           thoroughly understood
                         • ATSB report available at www.atsb.gov.au


                                                                             W037c.25
Qantas Airways Limited

More Related Content

What's hot

Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]
Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]
Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]Gerald Patrick Soriano
 
757 767 study guide
757 767 study guide757 767 study guide
757 767 study guideaviation319
 
Responsibilities of the oow lrg
Responsibilities of the oow  lrgResponsibilities of the oow  lrg
Responsibilities of the oow lrgLance Grindley
 
Restricted visibility lrg
Restricted visibility lrgRestricted visibility lrg
Restricted visibility lrgLance Grindley
 
120421 Oim Presentation Otc Dg 120424
120421 Oim Presentation Otc  Dg 120424120421 Oim Presentation Otc  Dg 120424
120421 Oim Presentation Otc Dg 120424swoolway
 
Oim presentation rev tt nov 2010 vsersion
 Oim presentation  rev tt nov 2010 vsersion Oim presentation  rev tt nov 2010 vsersion
Oim presentation rev tt nov 2010 vsersiontom_toth
 
F22 analysis
F22 analysisF22 analysis
F22 analysisPicard578
 
Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012
Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012
Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012swoolway
 
Climb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & procedures
Climb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & proceduresClimb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & procedures
Climb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & proceduresUPSAirlines
 
Arctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-Briefing
Arctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-BriefingArctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-Briefing
Arctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-BriefingKevin Rahardjo
 
Taking over a navigational watch lrg
Taking over a  navigational watch lrg Taking over a  navigational watch lrg
Taking over a navigational watch lrg Lance Grindley
 
Final 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_res
Final 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_resFinal 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_res
Final 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_resCharles Abell
 
AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...
AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...
AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...hindujudaic
 

What's hot (16)

Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]
Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]
Specification Sheet_H924 - 65.5m OSV [Harkand Harmony]
 
757 767 study guide
757 767 study guide757 767 study guide
757 767 study guide
 
Responsibilities of the oow lrg
Responsibilities of the oow  lrgResponsibilities of the oow  lrg
Responsibilities of the oow lrg
 
Restricted visibility lrg
Restricted visibility lrgRestricted visibility lrg
Restricted visibility lrg
 
120421 Oim Presentation Otc Dg 120424
120421 Oim Presentation Otc  Dg 120424120421 Oim Presentation Otc  Dg 120424
120421 Oim Presentation Otc Dg 120424
 
Oim presentation rev tt nov 2010 vsersion
 Oim presentation  rev tt nov 2010 vsersion Oim presentation  rev tt nov 2010 vsersion
Oim presentation rev tt nov 2010 vsersion
 
Marine Steering Gear and SOLAS Requirements
Marine Steering Gear and SOLAS RequirementsMarine Steering Gear and SOLAS Requirements
Marine Steering Gear and SOLAS Requirements
 
F22 analysis
F22 analysisF22 analysis
F22 analysis
 
Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012
Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012
Tmsm Oim Fpso Overview June 2012
 
Climb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & procedures
Climb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & proceduresClimb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & procedures
Climb via, descend via, and speed adjustment phraseology & procedures
 
Arctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-Briefing
Arctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-BriefingArctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-Briefing
Arctic-Hydrographic-Research-Vessel-Briefing
 
Taking over a navigational watch lrg
Taking over a  navigational watch lrg Taking over a  navigational watch lrg
Taking over a navigational watch lrg
 
Final 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_res
Final 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_resFinal 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_res
Final 2012 navair_accomplishments_28_mar13_musicl_res
 
Frp boat (7m)
Frp boat (7m)Frp boat (7m)
Frp boat (7m)
 
Havila subsea.pdf
Havila subsea.pdfHavila subsea.pdf
Havila subsea.pdf
 
AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...
AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...
AIM-9 Sidewinder, USA - Short Range Air-To-Air Missile - Gem in US Air Force'...
 

Recently uploaded

What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxFinal demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxAvyJaneVismanos
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Jisc
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxpboyjonauth
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxDr.Ibrahim Hassaan
 
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docxBlooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docxUnboundStockton
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentMeghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentInMediaRes1
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitolTechU
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersSabitha Banu
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupJonathanParaisoCruz
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceSamikshaHamane
 

Recently uploaded (20)

What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERPWhat is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
What is Model Inheritance in Odoo 17 ERP
 
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptxFinal demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
Final demo Grade 9 for demo Plan dessert.pptx
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
Procuring digital preservation CAN be quick and painless with our new dynamic...
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptxIntroduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
Introduction to AI in Higher Education_draft.pptx
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptxGas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
Gas measurement O2,Co2,& ph) 04/2024.pptx
 
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docxBlooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
Blooming Together_ Growing a Community Garden Worksheet.docx
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media ComponentMeghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
Meghan Sutherland In Media Res Media Component
 
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptxCapitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
Capitol Tech U Doctoral Presentation - April 2024.pptx
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginnersDATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
DATA STRUCTURE AND ALGORITHM for beginners
 
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized GroupMARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
MARGINALIZATION (Different learners in Marginalized Group
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in PharmacovigilanceRoles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
Roles & Responsibilities in Pharmacovigilance
 

Landing Overruns

  • 1. Landing Overruns- Human Factors Captain David Oliver General Manager Flight Technical Qantas Airways Limited W037c.1
  • 2. Landing Overruns - Human Factors A review of the events leading to, and lessons learnt from the over-run of flight QF1 at Bangkok Thailand, September 23, 1999. W037c.2 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 3. Landing Configuration • Operating Boeing 747-400 since 1989 • Standard landing configuration up until 1996 was “Flap 30, Full Reverse Thrust” W037c.3 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 4. Landing Configuration (continued) • Review of landing configuration was undertaken due to: – Noise levy at Sydney Flap 25 chosen for lower noise, better fuel economy – Carbon Brake Wear Idle reverse thrust chosen for less noise and longer, harder brake application W037c.4 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 5. Landing Configuration (continued) • Landing configuration Policy from late 1996 was: – Flap 25, idle reverse thrust provided the runway length was not limiting W037c.5 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 6. The Landing • F/O was pilot flying • The runway was wet – The last landing airplane had reported “good” braking action – The airplane preceding QF1 executed a Missed Approach due to poor visibility in heavy rain – This was not relayed to the crew of QF1 W037c.6 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 7. The Landing (continued) • Airplane crossed the threshold high and fast (but within Company limits) and “floated” 10ft above the runway in heavy rain • Within a period of just a few seconds: – The Captain called for “Go- Around” – The main gear touched down – The rain eased and visibility improved – Captain reached over and took control of the thrust levers W037c.7 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 8. The Landing (continued) • The Captain initially only retarded # 2, 3 and 4 Thrust Levers • The F/O immediately realized this and retarded #1 to idle, however: – With main gear on the ground and # 1 or 4 T/L advanced, the autobrakes disarmed – Speedbrakes deployed automatically after #1 T/L was retarded by the F/O W037c.8 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 9. The Landing (continued) • The EICAS message “AUTOBRAKES” was not initially noticed by the Flight Crew • Manual braking was not applied until 8 seconds after touchdown, approx 5000 feet down the runway • No reverse thrust was applied for the whole of the landing roll W037c.9 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 10. The Landing (continued) • When manual braking was applied NO deceleration was felt • Both pilots exerted maximum force on the brake pedals, still with no deceleration – The airplane was aquaplaning • The airplane only began to decelerate as it entered the last 1000 feet of the runway and the groundspeed reduced below 110kts W037c.10 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 11. Acft drifting left Nose gear squat Nose gear SPLR deployed of rw y C/L sw itch air mode departs sw y CAS 160 kts CAS 158kts Acft returning CAS 143kts CAS 88kts GS 158 kts Touchdow n GS 156kts to rw y C/L GS 141kts GS 87kts Air-gnd logic CAS 107kts Manual Nose gear Nose gear squat Acft on rw y C/L to gnd mode SPLR start deploy GS 106kts braking touchdow n sw itch gnd mode at threshold CAS 156 kts CAS 160 kts indications CAS 146kts CAS 139kts CAS 96kts GS 158 kts GS 158 kts V S CAS 154kts GS 145kts GS 138kts GS 92kts W GS 1 2k DECELERATION ft /sec2 -7.00 Acft accelerating Aerodynamic Aerodynamic due to braking and -6.00 residual thrust only w heel braking -5.00 -4.00 -3.00 -2.00 -1.00 3287ft 4000f 5000ft 6000ft 7000ft 8000ft 9000ft 10000ft 1002m t 1524m 1829m 2134m 2438m 2743m 3048m Decelerat ion at main gear posit ion Distance from Rwy 21L displaced threshold W037c.11 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 12. Comparison of rollout deceleration on various runway surfaces and VH-OJH 23 September 1999 -14 Dry runw ay * Mu 0.35 - 0.41 -12 -10 Wet runw ay * Mu 0.20 -8 * Good braking action Deceleration (ft/sec2) -6 Flooded runw ay * Mu 0.05 * Poor braking action -4 Manual braking Aircraft on Aircraft indications 5002ft to rw y centreline at nosegear Aircraft passing Aircraft Aircraft passing over 2015ft to -2 end start of sw y departs end over rw y mkgs and returning to rw y rw y mkgs and abeam rw y end of sw y approaching tw y S centreline 770ft Aircraft drifting left of tw y W 2536ft to rw y 1100ft to rw y end to rw y end centreline 5522ft to rw y end 0 Autobrakes end disarmed 2 Spoilers deploy 4 160 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 Acf tconfig for various runw ay surfaces: Ambient conditions: Groundspeed (knots) * 252,000 kg Vref25 + 5 kts OAT 25 deg C * Maximum manual braking QNH 1013.2 23 Sep BKK Dry Rwy Contam Rwy (Good brkg) Contam Rwy (Poor brkg) * Spoilers deployed, Idle forw ard thrust WIND 3.6 kt HWC W037c.12 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 13. Human Factors • Why did this happen ? • Accident analysis showed: – A number of significant active failures and – Significant inadequate defences W037c.13 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 14. Active Failures • The runway was affected by water • Flight Crew failed to use an appropriate risk management strategy for the approach and landing • The F/O did not fly the aircraft accurately during final approach • The Flight Crew were confused over who had control and did not select appropriate level of reverse thrust W037c.14 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 15. Inadequate Defences • Company published information, procedures and training for landing on water affected runways was inadequate • Flight Crew training in evaluating the procedural and configuration options for approach and landing was deficient – The crew may have been “pre-conditioned” to the use of Flap 25 and idle reverse thrust W037c.15 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 16. Change Management • Published the Boeing document “Landing on Slippery Runways” (doc D6-44247) in the Qantas Flying Manual • Provided a flow chart to assist Flight Crew in determining appropriate flap and reverse thrust settings W037c.16 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 17. Aircraft Weight Environmental Conditions Evaluate Runway Conditions as Reported Runway Contaminated Runway Dry Runway Wet or Slippery Reported Determine F25 Landing Braking Action Field Length Is F25 Landing Field GOOD MEDIUM POOR Length less than No Available Distance? Yes Determine F30 Landing Field Length Do not land unless a greater Use Flap 25 and Full emergency exists. Hold until Reverse Thrust conditions improve or divert Determine F30 Landing Field Length Is F30 Landing Field Is F30 Landing Field Length less Length less than than Available Distance? Available Distance? No Yes Yes No Use Flap 30 and Full Use Flap 30 and Full Use another Runway Reverse Thrust Reverse Thrust W037c.17 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 18. Change Management (continued) • Flight Crew use max reverse thrust as the “standard” with idle reverse permitted only under stipulated conditions • Flap 25 is the normal landing flap on dry runways • Flap 30 used on wet runways (no credit taken for grooving or PFC overlay) W037c.18 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 19. Change Management (continued) • Produced CBT package summarising performance on slippery and contaminated runways • Provided detailed stopping distance information for various surface conditions • Highlighted to crew the importance of using correct techniques for landing on wet, slippery and contaminated runways • Included call of “AUTOBRAKES” each time this is annunciated on EICAS W037c.19 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 20. Change Management (continued) • Monitoring of landing configurations and touchdown points has shown: – Significant trend towards flap 30 irrespective of runway conditions – Max. reverse thrust used on most occasions – Touchdown points are closer to the “desired” point. i.e. less “float” W037c.20 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 21. Trend in Landing Flap Setting 100% 100% 80% 80% Flap 30 60% 60% Percentage Percentage of landings of landings 40% 40% 20% 20% Flap 25 0% 0% Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02 Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02 Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02 Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02 W037c.21 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 22. Trend in Reverse Thrust Use 100% 100% 90% 90% 80% 80% 70% 70% >82%N1 60% 60% Percentage Percentage50% of landings 50% of landings 40% 40% 30% 30% 20% 20% 40 to 81%N1 10% 10% Idle 0% 0% Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02 Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02 Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02 Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02 W037c.22 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 23. Trend in Distance From 50’ to TD 3000ft + 3000ft + 100% 100% 2500 - 2999ft 90% 90% 2000 - 2499ft 80% 80% 1500 - 1999ft 70% 70% 60% 60% Percentage Percentage 50% of landings 50% of landings 40% 40% 1000 - 1499ft 30% 30% 20% 20% 10% 10% Under 1000ft 0% 0% Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02 Mar-00 May-00 Jul-00 Sep-00 Nov-00 Jan-01 Mar-01 May-01 Jul-01 Sep-01 Nov-01 Jan-02 Mar-02 May-02 Jul-02 Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02 Apr-00 Jun-00 Aug-00 Oct-00 Dec-00 Feb-01 Apr-01 Jun-01 Aug-01 Oct-01 Dec-01 Feb-03 Apr-02 Jun-02 W037c.23 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 24. Cabin Communications • Nose gear collapse resulted in loss of all Flight Deck / Cabin communications • Confusion existed as to need for evacuation • Co-location of back-up comms equipment in an area prone to damage is considered undesirable • Provided Flight and Cabin Crew with procedures to use in the event of loss of Cabin Interphone or PA W037c.24 Qantas Airways Limited
  • 25. Summary • Provide Flight Crew with the appropriate tools to do the job • Train Flight Crew to analyse each landing separately to determine the appropriate landing configuration • Ensure procedures for landing on wet, slippery and contaminated runways are in place and thoroughly understood • ATSB report available at www.atsb.gov.au W037c.25 Qantas Airways Limited