How Nature and Nurture Both Shape Human Behavior

Nature vs Nurture Essay
Nature vs Nurture
In his book, the universally acclaimed and bestseller "The Selfish Gene", Richard Dawkins presents
his viewpoint that living organisms are but "survival machines", that "the individual [is a] selfish
machine, programmed to do whatever is best for its gene as a whole." In fact, this is the central
concept in his book that he brings across. An individual's behaviour and actions are 100%
determined by its genes and the individual behaves in accordance to ensure the best persistence of its
gene in any circumstances. There is no doubt where Dawkins stands on the nature vs nurture issue.
He regards genes– the "replicator" as the brain that determines the resultant individual as a temporary
storage unit until it is next...show more content...
To dispute, the environmental effect on IQ was quite dramatically noted from a number of studies in
the 1920s. For example, a study comparing IQ scores of the same test of native white, black, and
immigrant Italian children by psychologist Ada Arlitt determined that scores were divided along
social status (which reflects quality of upbringing – nature) rather than race (intuitively associated
with the quality of their genetic makeup – nurture). Work by Otto Klineberg in various studies such
as the conclusion that the longer Southern–born black children lived in New York city, the higher
their scores for a given IQ test also gave further evidence of the effect of the environment on IQ
quality of its occupants.
Increasingly, therefore, as noted by psychologist Ann Anastasi from these studies, researchers uphold
the idea that nature and nurture are "interactive and interrelated", not "independent and additive" in
their impact on human development. In my opinion, I also agree that to a certain extent, the inherent
capability of the IQ of an individual is genetically predetermined, but the effects of environmental
effects such as opportunity in education and guidance in learning serve extremely important
considerations in the individual's final IQ capability.
A more concrete example of the interaction that actually occurs over independent additive effects
between
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Nature vs. Nurture Essay
Nature vs. Nurture
Through time, psychologists have argued over whether only our genes control our behaviors in life
or if the environment and the people surrounding us have any effect in our lives. This is called
nature versus nurture. We do not know what dictates our behavior, or if it is acombination of both.
One question is, if genes control our behavior, are we really responsible for our actions? I think that
if we can make choices we are responsible for our actions. While or genes influence various aspects
of our personalities, there is no denying that our environment has some effects too. Our genes make
us, but our experiences and our surroundings shape the way we behave...show more content...
Researchers have also found out that, even though a person may have a certain behavior–controlling
gene, it is not always active. This research puts the responsibility for actions back on the individual.
Humans do have free will, and they can choose if they want to let their body or their mind control
them.
Another question is, if an individual does not have the "bad gene," but they commit a crime, are
they more responsible. To look at this issue from another perspective, judges determine
responsibility for actions by something called blameworthiness. This acknowledges a person of
their actions and their consequences. If a person does not know what they are doing, such as a
mentally ill person who commits a crime, or they are not aware of the consequences, such as a
child who plays with a parent's gun, then they cannot be legally held responsible. This would
answer the previous question with a firm no. Blameworthiness makes no mention of genes, so if
you had the "bad gene" and you committed a crime that you were fully aware of doing and you
knew the consequences if you got caught, you would be fully responsible for your actions. From
my standpoint, all healthy individuals are responsible for their actions. I believe that genes control
our physical characteristics, but have a small role in controlling our behaviors. As I mentioned
before, some people have a certain genes, but they are not active in their bodies. This could mean

Nature vs Nurture Essay
Nature or Nurture?
The Determination of Human Behaviour
The nature versus nurture debate has spanned over decades, and is becoming more heated in the
recent years. Following the mapping of the human genome, scientists are pursuing the possibility of
controlling human behaviour such as homicidal tendencies or insanity through the manipulation of
genes. Is this possible for us to ensure that humans behave in certain ways under certain
circumstances in future?
This is highly doubtful, as the determination of human behaviour depends not only on genes (nature),
but also on the environment (nurture). It is usually the "joint product of genes and environment",
one of the first principles in Leda Cosmides and John Tooby in "Evolutionary...show more content...
Behaviour genetics include twin studies, family studies and adoption studies. Adoption studies
focused on how people with different genetic make–up, brought up in a similar environment may or
may not share similar behavioural patterns and family studies on people with the same genetic
make–up. The results are not conclusive, although it is found that the possibility of people who are
genetically similar, sharing similar behavioural traits is higher.
Twin studies remain our interest. Identical twins have 100% identical genes and the same
shared–environment (same home, same parents, same siblings, etc) , and thus any differences
between them will be the non–shared environment (individual friends, own perceptions).
Fraternal twins share about 50% of their genes and the same shared–environment. Studies made by
comparing behavioural traits in these twins are once again not conclusive: about 40% of the
variance in these traits are genetic, 35% non–shared environment and 5% shared environment.
("The Nature/Nurture Controversy, Frank Fujita. Attached)
The chances of similar genes creating similar behaviour is never 100 percent. The one thing that can
be concluded, therefore, is that it takes a combination of nature and nurture to create behavioural
patterns as adherent to our thesis. To make it more evident that nature alone cannot determine human
behaviour, we

Nature vs. Nurture
When we look at the world around us today, we are struck by the amazing diversity that we see in
people. There is a vast diversity in the characteristics of people that are immediately obvious: short,
tall; fat, thin; Asian, Caucasian; and many other characteristics. Each person as an individual is
unique, be it in physical outlook or character. How is it that of the 6 billion people on Earth, there
are no 2 individuals who are exactly alike? Every persons physical and psychological characteristics
are determined by many factors, and these can be divided into 2 main groups: our genes and our
environment, or nature and nurture.
What are our genes? Genes are the chemical blueprint unique to each person. Different...show more
content...
This shows that even in similar environments, differences will still arise regardless of their genetic
constitution, i.e. minor variations will result in large differences in phenotype regardless of genotype.
Human behaviour is a complex interaction between genes and the environment. In its more
advanced forms, behaviour is not determined by genes. For example, the most common behaviour
found in adults of any race is the use of language, whereas in newborns, language must be taught. If
it was genetically determined, then the baby should be able to speak once born: the tongue and
throat would not have to distort into positions they are not used to. Primitive behaviour is more
likely to be genetically programmed into an individual. For example, the sucking and grasping
reflexes of a newborn infant are present even in the womb, before any interaction with the
environment is possible. These behavioural traits may involve reflex arcs present only in newborns
because after some time, the individuals no longer behave in this manner. Perhaps cultural influences
cause an inhibition of the neural pathway (such as the mother telling the infant to stop sucking it's
thumb). The majority of behavioural traits are acquired later in the development of an individual.
Most people go through very strange behavioural changes in the course of their development,
especially during

Essay on Nature vs Nurture Debate
Nature vs Nurture Debate
Nature versus Nurture is the issue of the degree to which environment and heredity influence
behavior and development. In this issue nature can be defined as, behaviors due to heredity. Which
means behaviors are based on the genetic makeup of an individual and is an influence of the
individuals' growth and development throughout life. On the other hand nurture are causes of
behaviors that are environmental. Which means the influence is from, parents, siblings, family,
friends and all other experiences to which the individual is exposed to.
Throughout my childhood, I didn't grow up free of environmental influences nor did I develop
without being affected by my inherited genetic makeup. I think...show more content...
In reading stories about identical twins my point of view is easily understood. Various types of
psychologist have analyzed the study of identical twins. It shows that individuals with the same
genetic make–up can be totally different, when it comes to personality. Nurture promotes the twins
to grow up as separate individuals. Its a lot better if a twin has his or her own personality rather
than the same exact personality of the other half. I think this great debate weighs heavier on the
nurture side. As a child my parents, and sibling overshadowed my genetic make–up. No matter how
much I thought my physical traits made me behave. It did not affect me more than the things that I
had seen and been exposed to. The more things that I had seen around and experienced made me the
person that I am today. If my genetic make–up was totally different, to a certain extent, I am sure
that I?d behave the same way that I do presently. There are exceptions to that. For instance if I
were six foot five and one hundred and ninety pounds, I?d most likely be in the NBA and be really
rich. I think if I was really rich and in the NBA I wouldn?t have the same worries that I have
today. Even if before I were in the NBA I would have lots of attention and have a lot more
confidence. So to an extent I would change a little if my genetic make–up were different. In a sense,
genetic make–up is just a competitor to the environmental factors

Nature Vs Nurture
In the world of psychology, nature and nurture have great meanings as to how it affects an
individual. It is argued on which one affects someone's personality, behavior traits, and thought
process the most. Nature is somebody's genes, physical traits, and biology and nurture is how
someone was raised and how they live including their family, their culture, and the environment in
which they are surrounded with. I agree that both nature and nurture have a great impact on many
things in a person's life. I know that in my own personal life I have been impacted by both in
particular ways. I do know that genes play a part in my personality and thought process in small
ways however, I believe that I am more affected by environmental factors. My reason for that
conclusion is because, if I were to examine both my father and mother's personality, behavior, and
thought process, I would find that my own traits are different in vast ways. It might be argued
that I am a good mixture of both but, I just do not see this to be true. I move, think, and act at my
own pace and in my own ways that are very different from either my mother or my father. If I were
to even go back one more generation, I would still see the many differences between my mother and
her parents or my father and his parents....show more content...
For example, in some cultures, children are expected to start working and doing tasks at a
younger age than in other cultures and it influences their thought process and behavior as well as
their personality and ambitions. In my own personal life I have grown up in a culture where
technology is very involved in everyday life. I first had access to the internet from age twelve and
have had access ever since. I have become almost dependant on using it for everyday things. The
world that I am growing up in is a technological one and it is greatly different from the world ten,
twenty, or even thirty years

Nature Vs Nurture
Nature versus nurture is a popular discussion in this world. Inherited traits or life experiences are
believed to play a greater role in shaping your personality, For example, committing crimes.
Criminals have been studied in the past few years, to determine if their actions are inherited traits.
This debate of nature versus nurture focuses on the relative contributions of genetic inheritance and
environmental factors to human development.
Nature refers to genes and heredity. There are many characteristics within a person. For instance,
nature determines eye color, hair color, genetic diseases and many more things. However, these
characteristics are also influenced by environmental factors and lifestyle. Nurture is tied to
environmental influences,

Nature Vs Nurture Essay
Zachary Hobbs Sheen Cowper Psychology 200 20 October 2017 Nature vs Nurture In today's
society, it has become common to question what exactly makes us human. There are many questions
to ask that pertains to the idealism of mankind, but the most important would be, "what shapes us
into who we are?" The debate of whether nature or nurture molds the character of our being has been
an exhilarating question throughout the history of time. Though this matter is only answered
through individual perception, with nature being genetics and nurture serving as the environment in
which an individual is raised from birth to adolescence. For centuries the argument between nature
and nurture has brewed, yet it can be inferred that nurture has more of an...show more content...
Just as morality, beliefs are molded by the environment that a given individual is raised. In a
study performed, children who were primed with a picture of santa claus, the more likely they
were to share candy. While this is the case in America, a child who lives in India would have no
clue who santa claus is or anything about the Christmas holiday. Fears are important to
acknowledge as well. A study in 1960 tested the depth perception of children between the ages of
six months to a year and two months, in an attempt to see how the children would react to heights
and loud noises. In the study, children were placed on a platform with plexiglass set at the end,
which could be walked on, though wasn't due to the fear of falling off of the platform, while also
showing evidence of what neuroscientist Seth Norrholm of Emory University states as an
individual 's, "...acoustic startle reflex." (kunang) "You're going to duck your head due to loud
noises being startling," (kunang) says Norrholm. The learning of fears can also be evident from the
Little Albert experiment, in which a baby by the name of Albert was introduced to animals,
accompanied by a loud noise that made him cry. After countless times of repeating this process, little
Albert began to not only fear animals, yet anything that had any close relation to fur. The two fears
of falling and loud noises are the only natural, instinctive fears in the human

Nature Vs Nurture
Nellis 1
Morgan Nellis
Research Article Assessment #1
HDFS 230
09 September 2015
Nature vs. Nurture
The nature vs. nurture is a debate that everyone has probably heard before. The article titled, The
Unnatural Nature of Nature and Nurture: Questioning the Romantic Heritage written by Andrew
Stables in 2008, talks about the debate. In this article nature is described as having potential for
cultivation. It can refer to everything and anything in the biosphere. Nurture is described as
education and the support for growth. It is said that we can never be fully sure about how we should
nurture. In this article Stable explains how he believes that nature and nurture are unstable. He
illustrates the nature vs. nurture debate from the late Renaissance...show more content...
nurture debate from the late Renaissance and early Enlightenment, the natural growth, or nurture,
argument within the Romantic tradition, and the current views on the argument. The article came to
the conclusion about the viewpoint on the debate from each of these eras by looking historical
events during that period and how people from those eras reacted in certain situations. This article
showed me that debates really do change over time and that they are on going. This information is
very important because it shows the complexity of the nature vs. nurture argument and how it is not
just a simple yes or no question. It shows how we should just not accept an answer, but that we
should really try and figure it out for ourselves. Individual's conceptions are always changing and
this topic is

Nature Vs Nurture
Nature vs. Nurture Even though some people just act a certain way because that is how they are,
like my brother. He usually always acts rude because that is how he is. The person you are is
determined by the people you hang out with, because I have personally done this before and it is
not because I'm a liar it is because that is how they know me and I would act more jokingly or
more passionate towards them because they are a different person, I have noticed things like this
in my time on this earth. People can act differently around other people if you paid close enough
attention to them, and As my grandfather always said, "You show me your friends I will tell you
what type of person you are." and I believe him because if you do notice that...show more content...
To be honest I believe that nature and nurture are both contributing factors to your life and
personality. For example in this quote. "The study, published in Nature Genetics, reviewed almost
every twin study done in the last 50 years and found that 49% of the average variation for human
traits and diseases were down to genetics, and the other 51% were due to environmental factors.
When visiting the nature versus nurture debate, there is overwhelming evidence that both genetic
and environmental factors can influence traits and diseases," said lead researcher Dr. Beben
Benyamin, from the Queensland Brain Institute (QBI), in a statement. "The findings show that we
need to look at ourselves outside of a view of nature versus nurture, and instead look at it as nature
and nurture." (IFLScience.) This study supports my argument by bringing things together instead
of keeping them apart. One thing that we as humans do is always separate things so we can
identify ourselves separately because it is easier to process. What we should be doing is try to study
things as a whole first instead of separately the first time given the opportunity to do

The old question about nature versus nurture has made a lot of different opinions in the world. Some
people think that everything that they are, is because genetic. However, other persons think that the
environment makes who they are. In my opinion nature and nurture make people's life different,
depending what factor people take to develop the differences between nature and nurture, it can
explain if all human behavior are learned or is part of it inherited. Nurture is defined by the society
and environment people live in. Most people take their personality or talents from the place where
they use to be. The environment influences people's life. The society can see how the personality of
a person is by knowing who are the people around...show more content...
This research gives a good explanation about how the different environments change the
personality of the twins. They have the same genes but their personalities have changed in a big
way. Besides, the author describes the two twins. ABC claims that "Lily has no siblings; Gillian
has two. Lily's family is Presbyterian; Gillian's is Catholic. Lily's neighborhood is ethnically
mixed; Gillian's is not. Lily's family celebrates some Chinese holidays and plans on sending her to
Chinese educational classes; Gillian's family does not, instead wanting her to become part of
Canadian culture" (ABC NEW). The twins' environment is totally different. It makes that their
personality, way to talk, and express show as they weren't twins. Nurture is described by the
environment that people live in. Depending the place where a person is, can affect or benefit him.
Nature emphasizes in how people acquire things by genetic, hereditary tendencies and biological
factors. Some people use to copy or obtain different characteristics from their family. In many
families, people make hereditary tendencies to the next generations year by year. In addition,
children acquire many things from their parents. Such as, gender, psychological disorders, eye color,
hair, lips, dimples, curled toes, eating habits, and stress. The web site ThoughtCo provides a briefly
explanation of nature using homosexuality as support. Crossman claims that "Homosexuality is
considered a genetic result rather than a

Nature vs. Nurture It is a matter of concern whether human behaviors and characteristics are
determined by nature or nurture. If a person's behavior is inherited directly from the genes of his/her
parents or other biological factors, then it is the nature that determines his character. But if the
environment that a person grew up in, affects his behavior, then it is the nurture that determines his
/her character. It became a great matter of controversy among scientists, psychologists and
sociologists. Previously, many people believed that human behavior was instinctive. It can neither be
taught nor learned. But later some psychologists came to the conclusion that human behavior is
learned throughout the lifetime which is not instinctive....show more content...
This may not be because of particularly being a black man, but because of the culture he has
adopted since his childhood. Here he somehow takes the side of nurture. Many black people are
assumed to be criminals. People judge them just by their appearance and the impression black
people have made in today's world. But this does not always mean that every black people are
criminals and it's their biological factor that makes them do crimes. We can take the example of
Brent Staple. Even though he was an educated and good person, many people and especially
white women fear of him. But he was neither an uneducated person nor a criminal. He was brought
up in a good family and properly nurtured by his parents. Therefore, nurturing became the factor for
his behavior. Similarly, there are examples given by another author Amy Cunningham in her essay,
"Why Women Smile". Although she focuses primarily on a smile, she tends to explain the actual
cause of one's behavior. She explains that a smile or particularly a women's smile comes from both
natural happiness as well as the hope of people living around them, "The behavior seems to be an
equal blend of nature and nurture" (Cunningham 190). She further explains that both a normal baby
and a blind baby smiles, although it may take a little longer for the blind one. It means that the
smiles are natural and should not be taught in all cases. However, there are situations where

Nature vs Nurture
What makes a woman a woman and a man a man? Are we who we are because we are raised
differently from others? Many of our physical traits such as gender, skin colour and blood group are
rather straightforward in that they are directly attributed to our genes which have been mapped out
in recent years. However, certain human traits remains a biological mystery. These traits have been
studied on the "outside" but whose "inside" origins remain unclear. Such "mysterious" traits can be
anything like intelligence, athletic ability, skin tone and muscle mass. They are traits that some
claim to be acquired later in life.
One such trait, which has brought about much political, religious and social sensitivity, is that of
...show more content...
However the same theory can be applied in the reverse way –– the same weak father may cause
strong male identification in the son by way of compensation.
Human behavioural traits cannot always be explained by popular social theories. Even within the
field of genetics, a complicated behavioural trait such as homosexuality is likely to be caused by a
host of genetic factors as opposed to simply one gay gene. Research shows that the basic template
for the body and brain of a human foetus is female in its structure. It is the influxes of male androgen
hormones in male foetuses that forms the testes and alters the brain to a male configuration. It is
commonly believed that effeminate gay men suffer from the lack of androgens during this critical
period. However this belief fails to explain why some athletes have effeminate behaviour while many
homosexuals are not effeminate.
The controlled male twins study of Bailey and Pillard (1991) showed a 52% concordance of
homosexuality in monozygotic twins, 22% for dizygotic twins, and 11% for adoptive brothers of
homosexual men. This research seems to suggest that "gay gene" has a 50% penetrance factor, a
measure of the likelihood of gene expression. In 1993, Dean Hamer of the National Cancer Institute
in the USA discovered that 33 out of 40 pairs of homosexual brothers had the same genetic markers
in the Xq28 region of their X chromosome. This finding,

Nature Vs Nurture
The debate on nature versus nurture is an old philosophical issue in psychology. Nature involves all
genes as well as hereditary factors, which influence who we are. These range from the physical
appearance to the personality features of a person. Nurture involves all environmental variables,
which determine who we are: experiences during early childhood, how one is raised, the surrounding
culture, and one's social relationships. Biological psychology today insists on the significance of
genet is as well as biological influences. When it comes to behavioral psychology, the most important
thing is how the environment affects behavior. Unlike earlier when debates on relative contributions
of the concept took a one–sided approach, experts currently

The Concept Of Nature Vs. Nurture
The concept of "nature vs. nurture" is well–discussed in both society and sociological communities,
in the context of personality, mental health disorders, and sexuality, amongst other topics.
Regardless of one's personal philosophies on the subject, it can be argued that conditions of one's
life have impact on who they may be and what they may become. If a child enjoys math and
science in school, he or she may pursue careers involving those subjects, a decision impacting the
child's whole life. If a child has divorced parents, he or she is more likely than his or her peers
without divorced parents to get a divorce later in life, something that dramatically alters a person's
standing in society and among their peers (Dennison). The purpose of this paper is to call attention
to the correlation between life events and aspects of a person's personality, specifically sexual
identity. Although sexuality is thought to be innate in humans, negative life events and conditions,
such as abuse and neglect, disabilities, and substance use disorders, correlate with one's "sexually
diverse" identity. To clarify before proceeding: in this thesis, "negative" is meant to refer to having
poor effects on the social standing, social skills, and mental health of a person. In addition, the
definition of...show more content...
The philosophy of this "intersection" of identities is often overlooked because of society's tendency
to categorize people into merely one identity. This can result in the asexualizing of disabled people
and the assumption that all sexually diverse–identifying people are able–bodied (Higgins). Despite
these conclusions about people with disabilities, "LGBT adults...were more likely to have
disabilities, and were more likely to demonstrate mental health problems than heterosexual adults"
(Richmond

Nature Vs. Nurture Issues
The nature vs. nurture issues is the most important study of human development for many reasons.
In fact, both issues play an important role in human development over time. One main reason why
nature vs. nurture is an important study in psychology today is because of its developmental traits.
Traits are characteristics inherited from your parents. Also, a trait is something that is passed down
from generation, such as a person's personality. The article stated many different interactions
between nature and nurture. One nurtures interaction the article stated was that human traits are
biologically pasted down by parents. I agree with the fact that some traits are biologically pasted
down by parents. In fact, some traits can become adopted

Nature Vs. Nurture Essay
Nature vs. Nurture Essay Throughout many years, scientists have been debating about whether
nature or nurture is the driving force that shapes a person's cognitive abilities and personal traits.
Before the ongoing debate can be explained, it is necessary to understand what nature and nurture
actually are. Nature is loosely defined as the genetics one inherits and tendencies that influence
development. Many things in an individual are hereditary, for instance; gender, disease, height, eye
color, natural talent for an activity, and many more. Nurture can be defined as various environmental
factors that a person is exposed to, which can influence how a person develops. Nurture affects an
individual's growth through multiple ways such as: stressors, activities, intellect and experiences,
physically, emotionally, and socially through peers. Progressively, many are realizing that asking to
what extent environment or genetics influence a person's traits is not necessarily the correct way to
approach the debate. In all actuality there is not an easy way to sort through the multiple forces that
exist in these situations. However, numerous researchers are now looking at how the two factors
intertwine and influence one another because only one of them could not simply exist alone without
the other very well. Nature and nurture coexist and work together to help shape a person, whether
that is from the two working equally or one being slightly more predominant over the other, however

Nature Vs. Nurture : Nature Versus Nurture Essay
Nature versus Nurture
You got your dark brown hair from your father and you got your looks from your mother, but
where did you get your excitement for sports and your love for all animals? A person's physical
characteristics lean more towards genes and heredity, but our genes are not mentioned as much when
behavior is the topic. This is how the nature versus nurture debate first began. Scientists who believe
in the nature theory believe that people behave the way they do due to heredity and genes. On the
other hand, nurture scientists believes behavior is taught and influenced by the environment and the
surrounding people. Many say that behavior results from nature, while others believe in the opposite,
the environment. Human development has been viewed as one of the most highly controversial
topics in the world of psychology today, and the debate of nature versus nurture is at the top of the
discussion list.
Discussion
Nature There are two types of believers regarding human development: nativists and empiricists.
Nativists are those who believe that specific skills or abilities are "native" or engrained into the
brain in the womb or at birth. Each person has their own unique genetic code that is specific to that
individual as a whole. Therefore, some people are born with a more superior genetic makeup than
others (McLeod, 2007). Bowlby's theory of attachment is an example of a strong nature position in
psychology. His theory illustrates the bond between a mother and her

Nature vs Nurture
For the past five weeks we have studied three different but influential people in our perspective on
human nature class. They are Freud, Plato and Tzu. The main discussion between all of them is
nature versus nurture. I will discuss the difference between nature and nurture and then I'll apply to
each of these philosophers and how they react to it.
When looked up in the dictionary the term nature means the universe and its phenomena or one's
own character and temperament. When discussed with these philosophers it is meant as one's own
character revolved around the universe for which they live in, basically they're surroundings. At the
same time when I looked up the word nurture it said the upbringing,...show more content...
Not because we were taught those things but for the fact that they are instincts embedded in our
minds for survival. For nurture the psychosexual development is due majorly because of nurture.
From oral to anal–retentive these are all due to expressive characteristics that are given or raised
from birth. The one that has the most effect is the structural model. Reasons for me stating this is
because the id is the primitive part of the mind that is basically a natural instinct. At the same time
the ego is also because of natural instinct simply because of the reality principle. Freud even went as
far as stating, "..adults ego–feeling can't have been the same from beginning. It must have gone
through a process of development"(13). The part where it changes is the superego, which is the only
form of nurture in the psychoanalytic perspective, which is because the superego only developed
because the child began to incorporate parental values and also operates according to the raising and
discipline of the parents.
Now if you look at Plato's point of view Plato supports nurture more than nature. The only points
that Plato made that would seem to support nature is the point he made for example is when he
talks about female guards. The reason for this is also because he feels that women should be given
lighter

Differences Between Nature Vs Nurture Essay
Throughout this paper, we will be comparing similarities and differences between our seven
members based on the Big Five Inventory test results to our Zodiac sign attributes. Each member
of Psychology 101 Group 14 was required to take the OCEAN Big Personality Quiz, and then
compare the results to the other members of the team. Then after looking at the results individual
members compared their scores to their Zodiac signs to see if they could identify similarities. To
begin, while looking at our comparatives scores of the OCEAN Big 5 Personality quizzes, we
found that a few group members were similar, although there was many differences in the group
too. For example, Gabe and Damon were similar in Openness, with a score of 41 and 35
respectively. On the other hand, Socoro and Vivianna were outliers in the group, with Vivianna
having a score of 5, and Socoro with a score of 59. We believe while the scores are closely related,
our reasons for being close together in Openness value more shows the debate between nature vs
nurture. Gabe's belief on being in the 35th percentile is how he was raised throughout his family
environment similar to Kaitlyn in the 41st percentile, while Damon's belief for being in the 41st
percentile was more so being born into the statistic rather than recalling any events that contributed
to his score. Rachael scored in the 16th percentile, which indicates a preference of a more regular
schedule. She believes that this is because of how she

How Nature and Nurture Both Shape Human Behavior

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Custom Paper Writing Service

More from Custom Paper Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

How Nature and Nurture Both Shape Human Behavior