More Related Content
Similar to Chapter 028 (20)
More from stanbridge (20)
Chapter 028
- 1. 1Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Chapter 28
Writing Research Proposals
- 2. 2Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Research Proposal
Written plan identifying
Research problem
Research purpose
Methods
Written for
Institutional review board approval process
Funding request
Sometimes to request intramural approval to
conduct study
Formally written, concise
- 3. 3Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Writing a Research Proposal
Involves
Developing ideas logically
Determining the depth or detail of the proposal’s
content
Identifying critical points in the proposal
Developing an aesthetically appealing copy
- 4. 4Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Developing Ideas Logically
An organized argument establishing
background, a plan, and the expected
outcome
All steps well justified
Online guides for proposal development
available
- 5. 5Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Determining the Depth of a
Proposal
Dictated by the group/institution to which the
proposal will be submitted
Hospitals usually post requirements online
Universities provide lists of requirements
- 6. 6Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Identifying Critical Points
Highlight in bold and italics
Headings, tables, or graphs
Detail
Background/significance of research problem
Purpose
Methodology/research design
Research production plans
- 7. 7Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
An Aesthetically Appealing
Proposal
Formatted according to specifications; APA if
not otherwise specified
Submit online, in person, or by mail, as
specified
Neat
Without spelling, punctuation, or grammar
errors
Ask a peer to read and critique
- 8. 8Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Content of a Research Proposal
Varies according to the purpose of the
proposal:
Student proposal: for university permission to
conduct research
For institutional review board permission to
conduct research
A competitive request for funding
- 9. 9Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Content of a Student Proposal
Purpose: to communicate planned projects to
Faculty and members of university or agency IRBs
Written to satisfy requirements for a degree
Format and contents usually specified by
faculty
- 10. 10Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Format of a Student Proposal
(Cont’d)
More detailed than a funding proposal
Often consists of the first few chapters of the
student’s thesis/dissertation
Title should accurately reflect the planned
study’s design and methods
- 11. 11Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Content of a Quantitative
Research Proposal
Table of contents—usually rather detailed
Three or four chapters:
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Literature review
Chapter 3: Framework (sometimes combined with
chapter 2)
Chapter 3 or 4: Methods and procedures
- 12. 12Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Introduction
Research problem—includes background
information
Purpose statement, based on the research
problem And the need for the study
(justification)
Usually includes
Conceptual definitions and operational definitions
of variables
Assumptions
- 13. 13Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Review of Relevant Literature
Overview of essential information
Theoretical (conceptual literature)
Empirical (actual related research)
Master’s thesis: usually a limited literature
review
Doctoral dissertation: an exhaustive literature
review
Reiteration of how proposed study will fill
research gap
- 14. 14Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Literature Review
First purpose is to let the reader know
What has Already been done
What methodologies have been used before
What is known or suspected
What has been disproven
Second purpose is to build a logical trail of
evidence
- 15. 15Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Literature Review (Cont’d)
Narrative or pinch table
Sometimes critiques individual studies
Sometimes synthesizes previous studies as a
group
- 16. 16Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Framework
Theoretical explanation of how study
concepts are connected
Conceptual definitions included here, if not in
introduction
Must be coherent with the study variables and
study measurements
Map or design optional
Middle-range (practice) theories often used
For doctoral dissertation, Alternative theories
considered may also be required
- 17. 17Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures
Description of the design/general strategy for
conducting the study
Sometimes a map or diagram of the design
Operationalizations of variables (if not in
introduction)
Pilot study information (if any)
- 18. 18Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures (Quasi-
Experimental and Experimental Studies)
Describing how research situation will be
structured
Detailing treatment to be implemented
Explaining how effect of treatment will be
measured
Specifying variables to be controlled and
methods for controlling them
- 19. 19Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures (Quasi-
Experimental and Experimental Studies)
(Cont’d)
Identifying uncontrolled extraneous variables
and determining their probable impact on the
findings
Subject assignment plan
Exploring strengths and weaknesses of
design
- 20. 20Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures
Identification of target population and
accessible population
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Rationale for these sample criteria
Expected sample size/sampling method
Justification for sample size (power analysis, if
performed)
- 21. 21Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures
(Cont’d)
Identification of study setting
Agency name
Description of the setting
Advantages and disadvantages
Letter of support from site
- 22. 22Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures
(Cont’d)
Ethical considerations
Protection of human subjects
Risks and benefits
The consent form (in appendix)
Protection of clients served by the agency
Protection of the agency (if applicable)
Signed authorization form (per HIPAA)
Security of data after obtained
- 23. 23Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures
(Cont’d)
Data collection plan
What data are to be collected
Process for collecting data
Who will collect data (consistency, if more than
one person collecting)
How the data will be collected
Data collection schedule
Special equipment
Data security/methods of data storage
- 24. 24Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Methods and Procedures
(Cont’d)
Data analysis
Techniques used to summarize data and answer
research questions
Organized by study questions
Statistical tests and levels of significance
Very limited projection of results and conclusions
• Study limitations
• How the findings will be shared, applied
Budget and timetable
- 25. 25Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Content of a Qualitative
Research Proposal
Structure is university-dependent
Usually includes
Introduction
Research philosophy and general method
Applied method of inquiry
Current knowledge, limitations, and plans for
communication of study findings
- 26. 26Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Qualitative Introduction
Research problem—includes background
information
Problem statement, based on research
problem And need for the study
Usually conceptual definitions here
Usually assumptions here
Evolution of study and significance to nursing
practice, patients, health care system, and/or
health policy
- 27. 27Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Philosophical and Conceptual
Foundation and General Methods
Rationale for use of this method
The philosophy, its essential elements, and its
assumptions
Provision of a theoretical perspective for
study that influences focus of study, data
collection and analysis, and articulation of
findings
- 28. 28Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Method of Inquiry
Tentative plan for study
Site and access
Sample
Sampling plan
Approximate sample size and how final size will be
determined
- 29. 29Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Method of Inquiry (Cont’d)
Ethical concerns
Protection of human subjects
Risk minimization
Consent
Protection of data
- 30. 30Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Method of Inquiry (Cont’d)
Data collection
How and by whom data will be collected
What will constitute “data”
Where data will be collected
What interview questions (if any) will be used
If multiple persons collecting data, how they will be
trained
Data storage
- 31. 31Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Method of Inquiry (Cont’d)
Data analysis plan
If simultaneous collection and analysis, state this
Identify any software program to be used
- 32. 32Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Current Knowledge Base, Limitations,
and Plans for Communication of Study
Summarizes and documents all literature
reviewed for the study
Might be the second chapter, and might
follow data analysis (method-specific)
Establishes significance of study, parallel
research
Anticipated limitations of the proposed study
Communication plans, budget, timetable
- 33. 33Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Content of a Condensed
Proposal
For clinical agencies, funding institutions
Same pieces but shorter in length
Review of the literature much more brief
Theoretical framework much more brief, or
even absent
Usually documentation of researcher’s
background and ability to perform study
Substantiation of support from hospitals,
clinics, universities, and so forth
- 34. 34Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Content of a Preproposal
Short document that explores the funding
possibilities
Like a query letter with more detail
Letter of transmittal
Short proposal for research
Personnel
Facilities
Budget
Sent to Many funding sources
- 35. 35Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Seeking Approval for a Study
Institutional review
Justification for conduct of the study
Ethical considerations
Impact of the study on the reviewing institution
Most committees require verification of
clinical access (nurse manager, medical
director, or both)
- 36. 36Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Approval Process
All studies require permission from somebody
To determine process, access web sources
First
Obtaining approval from both a university and
a hospital might take up to eight weeks
- 37. 37Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Co-Authorship
Established before submission of the
proposal anywhere
First author should be the person who does
the most amount of work, in the study
Students should ask faculty whether they
expect co-authorship
- 38. 38Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Approval Process (Cont’d)
Nurses conducting research in an agency
where they are employed must seek approval
only at that agency
Graduate students
Thesis/dissertation committee
University IRB
Agency IRB
- 39. 39Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Preparing Proposals for Review
Committees
University: use online resources, or thesis or
dissertation chair, for information
Clinical agency: use online resources, and
clarify with personnel in institutional review
office
- 40. 40Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Preparing Proposals for Review
Committees (Cont’d)
Clinical institutional review considerations:
Scientific merit
Protection of human rights
Congruence of the study with the agency's
research agenda
Impact of the study on patient care
- 41. 41Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Social and Political Factors
(University)
When choosing a committee, match
participants for their knowledge base and
potential contribution to the final product
Known ability to work well with one another is
extremely desirable
- 42. 42Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Social and Political Factors
(Clinical Site) (Cont’d)
For clinical research, elicit cooperation of staff
Talk up the planned research and its possible
clinical applications
If possible, ask staff nurses for input/wisdom
Talk up positive effect of research on magnet
status, if that is a consideration
- 43. 43Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Verbal Presentation of a Proposal
Thesis or dissertation proposal—part of the
academic process
Most clinical agencies require researchers to
meet with IRB to discuss proposals
Neat business attire
Rehearse: practice, practice, practice
- 44. 44Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Verbal Presentation of a Proposal
(Cont’d)
Usually, committee will ask questions such as
Tell us about your study.
Why is your study necessary/valuable?
What other literature is out there?
What are the study limitations?
Why did you choose this method?
Say thank you
- 45. 45Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Revising a Proposal
Before the study
Do what is needed to gain access
Argue only about things that potentially affect the
study results
Adhere to all negotiated agreements
- 46. 46Copyright © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Revising a Proposal (Cont’d)
After the study begins
Rarely necessary
Must Really fix a problem or enhance the study
Students Must discuss these with advisors