This is my proposal to the Locator ID Separation of Future Internet. The proposed idea is to develop a host ID from device unique ID. Please let me know your suggessions or recommendations. :)

1. LOCATOR ID SEPARATION USING
DEVICE UNIQUE ID
SOK Phearin
Computer Science and Information Engineering
MBC Laboratory
Konkuk University

2. CONTENTS
 Introduction
 ID/Locator Split-based Mobility
 Problem Statement
 Critical Idea
 Conclusion
 Key Reference

3. INTRODUCTION
 IP address is used as:
 Host Identifier (ID) – identify
communication session in transport and
upper layer protocol
 Locator – locate the destination host and
forward packets in network layer protocol

4. INTRODUCTION
 Many researches on Future Internet or Next Generation
Network:
 FIND and GENI – United States
 AKARI – Japan
 FIF – Korea
 EIFFEL – Europe
 Researches focus on new designs of:
 Routing/addressing architectures
 Mobility
 Security

5. ID/LOCATOR SPLIT-BASED MOBILITY
ILNP (IDENTIFIER LOCATOR NETWORK PROTOCOL)
 A derived concept of GSE/8+8, by using IPv6 address with:
 64-bit Locator – routing prefix for routing and forwarding
 64-bit Identifier – indicate a host, instead of Interface ID
 Like IPv6, ILNP separates an IP address as a locator and
identifier
 Support mobility and multi-homing
 Unlike Mobile IP, ILNP stores locators in DNS, not Home
Agent
 Difficult in dealing with rapid changes of a locator of a mobile host

6. ID/LOCATOR SPLIT-BASED MOBILITY
LISP (LOCATOR ID SEPARATION PROTOCOL)
 Proposed by CISCO, LISP is a network based solution.
 Tunnel Router (TR) is used to connect edge network and
backbone network.
 RLOC (Routing Locator) – Address of TR used in backbone network
 EID (Endpoint Identifier) – Address used in the edge network
 Mapping systems between RLOC and EID:
 LISP-ALT
 LISP-DHT
 Difficult in host mobility

7. PROBLEM STATEMENT
HIMALIS (HETEROGENEITY INCLUSION AND MOBILITY ADAPTATION
THROUGH LOCATOR ID SEPARATION )

8. CRITICAL IDEA
 When users change their hostname
 Insufficient in joining the domain
 A heavy load to host performance and process in order to
generate the host ID and redo the mapping between IDs and
locators
 May lower the reliability and mobility support for the user
 Use Device Unique ID (i.e. Serial Number, Product
Unique ID,…) and generate the Host ID

9. CONCLUSION
 Future Internet is the main concept for improving the
mobility and security performance over the current
Internet.
 Device Unique ID would be a good idea to connect not
only computers to the Internet in mobility manners, but
also various communication devices to meet the future
requirement of Internet Of Things.

10. KEY REFERENCE
 [1] Kafle, V.P.; Inoue, M.; , "Mobility Management in
HIMALIS Architecture," Consumer Communications
and Networking Conference (CCNC), 2010 7th
IEEE , vol., no., pp.1-5, 9-12 Jan.
 [2] Joon-Suk Kang; Okamura, K.; , "Mobility support
through locator/ID split architecture," Information
Networking (ICOIN), 2011 International Conference
on , vol., no., pp.404-409, 26-28 Jan. 2011

11. THANK YOU…