Your group, which needs a company name, is currently embroiled in a bit of a scandal, and it is your job to write your way out of it. The scenario is detailed below, but your group will need to create multiple written works to combat the negative press and damage to the companys reputation that is currently the dominant narrative in both the actual press (news) and in social media (personal statements). To effectively counter the narrative, you need to issue a press release that explains the situation and facts, a social media campaign that combats the negative statements made elsewhere (of at least three distinct posts across a minimum of two platforms), and a negative letter that informs someone (either Dale or Jonathan) that they must cease and desist commenting or face punishment from the company. Scenario Your company has been doing well from a profit standpoint, but it has come under fire for a lack of diversity on the governing board (all but one member presented as white). To counter the lack of diversity on the board, five voting members have been removed and replaced by people who are from a variety of racial and ethnic backgrounds. While this is seen as a positive move by members of the board and by the public, there have been communication problems in the company. A memo should have been released to say thank you to the board members being replaced, but it did not go out. The memo that did go out went to the board only and announced the new members before advising current board members they had been replaced (this is how the existing members of the board found out they had been fired). This has caused serious blowback on social media, as two of the fired members (Johnathan and Dale) have taken to social media to express that after many years of working with the company, they found out they were replaced on the board by being asked to congratulate and welcome new people. Since they were well known and liked by other people in the company (and friends with multiple employees on social media), many people have responded saying how unfair it is and vowing to get to the bottom of what happened. This is compounded by Dale and Jonathan being friends with members of the media (news), and the social media posts have both generated negative public sentiment toward what should be a net positive for the company (increasing the presence of diverse voices as part of the governing board) into a negative (focusing the spotlight on those board members who were removed). Complicating the situation is the fact that one of the new board members (Isabel) is the daughter of an existing board member (Alexandra). This has led to calls of nepotism in social media and has made her a focus of the attacks on the company by people both by employees and others. The parent was present during discussions and interviews regarding whether her daughter would be given a position on the board, and this has run into very complicated legal and ethical territory. While .