The document shows Yelp's revenue, adjusted EBITDA, key metrics, and mobile metrics from Q1 2013 to Q2 2015. Revenue grew from $46M in Q1 2013 to $134M in Q2 2015. Adjusted EBITDA increased from $3.2M in Q1 2013 to $22.7M in Q2 2015. The number of local advertising accounts and cumulative reviews increased year-over-year. Mobile usage also increased significantly year-over-year, with over half of new reviews coming from mobile.
The presentations covers the following: GoDaddy Overall Revenues And Profits Analysis Q2'15; GoDaddy Business Segments Revenues Analysis Q2’15 - Domains, Hosting and Presence, Business Applications; GoDaddy Geographic Segments Revenues Analysis Q2'15 - US, International; GoDaddy Key Business Metrics Analysis Q2'15 - Total Bookings, Total Customers at the period end, Average Revenue Per User (ARPU).
Shutterfly Earnings for 1Q 2014 released after market close today. Released in tandem with their conference call - which starts in about 20 minutes: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/o42tycb9
Looks like they beat by $0.05 and gave updated guidance more or less in-line with consensus. Note that Goldman upgraded the stock 2 weeks ago...
The presentations covers the following: GoDaddy Overall Revenues And Profits Analysis Q2'15; GoDaddy Business Segments Revenues Analysis Q2’15 - Domains, Hosting and Presence, Business Applications; GoDaddy Geographic Segments Revenues Analysis Q2'15 - US, International; GoDaddy Key Business Metrics Analysis Q2'15 - Total Bookings, Total Customers at the period end, Average Revenue Per User (ARPU).
Shutterfly Earnings for 1Q 2014 released after market close today. Released in tandem with their conference call - which starts in about 20 minutes: http://www.media-server.com/m/p/o42tycb9
Looks like they beat by $0.05 and gave updated guidance more or less in-line with consensus. Note that Goldman upgraded the stock 2 weeks ago...
This article (in French) explains how Geoflex has developed original PPP-RTK solutions (Precise Point Positioning with Real Time Kinematic capabilities) to reduce the convergence time of PPP (from 30 minutes to a few minutes) by adding a priori atmospheric data in the PPP calculation.
With 50 expert speakers and 170 senior attendees, The Fourth annual ConnecteDriver conference (Feb1-2, 2017) is a must attend event that offers the right mix between the automotive, mobile and consumer electronics industry, with a strong focus on the driver.
Study HERE SBD - How autonomous vehicles could relieve or worsen traffic cong...Ludovic Privat
The utopian vision of autonomous cars and a world where traffic issues are null is a generation away, according to this whitepaper from HERE and SBD research, which also asserts that advancement in autonomous vehicles will be gridlocked without the cooperation of all stakeholders.
Inrix competitive parking lot benchmark against ParkopediaLudovic Privat
Inrix competitive parking lot benchmark against Parkopedia. While SBD is a well respected research firm we see several limitations in this study and the way their results are promoted by INRIX.
2015 UBI Research Results for the Consumer Market - LexisNexisLudovic Privat
The 2015 Annual LexisNexis Consumer UBI Study was conducted with over 4,000 total consumers to test existing and new concepts in the market. Some of the findings included:
Overall consumer awareness has leveled off since 2013, suggesting that carriers should consider alternative ways of presenting UBI to consumers
Discounting deductibles, rather than premiums, could be a more sustainable and profitable way to drive adoption
Messaging around safety may be even more effective than a discount-centric approach
Also included is a case study illustrating how AAMI, a leading Australian insurer, launched a highly successful UBI campaign without a discount.
2. 2
$0
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 Q1'14 Q2'14 Q3'14 Q4'14 Q1'15 Q2'15
Adj.EBITDA($M) Adjusted EBITDA
$25M
$20M
$17M
$9M
$10M
$8M$8M
$3M
$16M
$23M
See slide 6 for reconciliation to GAAP net income (loss) for the periods presented and for information about the limitations of adjusted EBITDA as an
analytical tool.
3. Key Metrics
3
Local Advertising Accts3
Q2'14 Q2'156/30/14 6/30/15
83M
83M
97K
Cumulative Reviews1
Mobile Unique
Visitors2
61M
68M 69K
35%
y/y 22%
y/y
40%
y/y
1 Cumulative number of reviews since inception, including reviews that had been removed or were not recommended, as of the date indicated
2 Monthly average number of mobile unique visitors for the period indicated, calculated as number of “users,” as measured by Google Analytics, accessing Yelp via mobile web
plus unique devices accessing the app, each on a monthly average basis
3 Number of local business accounts from which we recognized local revenue in the period
4. Cohort Analysis – Local Revenue
U.S. Cohort
Number of
Yelp
Communities (1)
Average
Cumulative
Reviews
As of June 30,
2015 (2)
Year-Over-Year
Growth in
Average
Cumulative
Reviews (3)
Average Local
Advertising
Revenue Q2 2015
(4)
Year-Over-Year
Growth in
Average Local
Advertising
Revenue (5)
2005 – 2006
Cohort
6 5,381 30% $7,449 36%
2007 – 2008
Cohort
14 1,184 33% $2,109 45%
2009 – 2010
Cohort
18 408 41% $546 45%
(1) A Yelp community is defined as a city or region in which we have hired a Community Manager.
(2) Average cumulative reviews is defined as the total cumulative reviews for businesses in the
cohort as of June 30, 2015 (in thousands) divided by the number of communities in the cohort.
(3) Year-over-year growth in average cumulative reviews compares the average cumulative reviews
as of June 30, 2015 with that of June 30, 2014.
(4) Average local advertising revenue is defined as the total local advertising revenue
from businesses in the cohort over the three-month period ended June 30, 2015 (in
thousands) divided by the number of communities in the cohort.
(5) Year-over-year growth in average local advertising revenue compares the average
local advertising revenue in the three-month period ended June 30, 2015 with that of
the same period in 2014.
4
5. Key Metrics - Mobile
5* Number of unique devices accessing the app on a monthly average basis for the period indicated, according to internal Yelp logs.
** Metrics for the current quarter. Clicks to call and clicks for directions and map views from the app and mobile web; reviews from mobile app only.
Q2'14 Q2'15
18M
App Unique Devices*
12M
~55% new
reviews from
mobile**
~104M clicks
for directions
and map
views**
~52M clicks
to call**
51%
y/y
6. Adjusted EBITDA reconciliation
6
($M) Q1'13 Q2'13 Q3'13 Q4'13 2013 Q1'14 Q2'14 Q3'14 Q4'14 2014 Q1’15 Q2’15
Adjusted EBITDA Bridge
Net Income / (Loss) ($4.8) ($0.9) ($2.3) ($2.1) ($10.1) ($2.6) $2.7 $3.6 $32.7 $36.5 ($1.3) ($1.3)
+ Tax & Other Expenses 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.2 1.2 (2.0) 0.4 0.9 (24.7) (25.4) (3.0) 1.4
+ Depreciation &
Amortization
2.5 2.6 2.8 3.5 11.5 3.7 4.0 4.6 5.3 17.6 6.9 7.2
+ Stock Based
Compensation*
4.6 5.7 7.0 8.8 26.1 9.5 10.1 10.9 11.8 42.3 13.7 15.5
+ Restructuring &
Integration
0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Adjusted EBITDA $3.2 $7.8 $8.1 $10.4 $29.4 $8.5 $17.2 $20.1 $25.1 $70.9 $16.3 $22.7
* Stock-based compensation for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 excludes approximately $0.6 million of stock-based compensation
already included in restructuring and integration costs.
This presentation includes adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure that Yelp uses to evaluate its business. Yelp includes adjusted EBITDA because it
is a key measure used by Yelp’s management and board of directors to understand and evaluate core operating performance and trends, to prepare and
approve its annual budget and to develop short- and long-term operational plans. In particular, the exclusion of certain expenses in calculating adjusted EBITDA
can provide a useful measure for period-to-period comparisons of Yelp’s core business. Accordingly, Yelp believes that adjusted EBITDA provides useful
information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating Yelp’s operating results in the same manner as its management and board of directors.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of Yelp’s results as reported under
GAAP. You can read more about the limitations of adjusted EBITDA in Yelp’s most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q at www.yelp-ir.com or the SEC’s
website at www.sec.gov. Because of these limitations, you should consider adjusted EBITDA alongside other financial performance measures, including various
cash flow metrics, net income (loss) and Yelp’s other GAAP results.
Additionally, Yelp has not reconciled its adjusted EBITDA outlook for the full year 2015 to its net income (loss) outlook because it does not provide an outlook for
other income (expense) and provision for income taxes, which are reconciling items between net income (loss) and adjusted EBITDA. As items that impact net
income (loss) are out of Yelp’s control and cannot be reasonably predicted, Yelp is unable to provide such an outlook. Accordingly, reconciliation to net income
(loss) outlook for the full year 2015 is not available without unreasonable effort.