Modes of Originating Process - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes the different modes of originating process in the Malaysian High Court under the Rules of Court 2012, including writs of summons and originating summonses. It outlines when each process is appropriate based on whether substantial disputes of fact are likely to arise. It also discusses cases that demonstrate when certain claims must be commenced by writ, can be determined summarily by originating summons, or are inappropriate for a given mode of process. The document concludes by examining the effects of using the wrong originating process and circumstances where proceedings will continue instead of being set aside.
Contents :
Definition
Importance
Attendance
Appearance
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
Writ, service, appearance & judgment in default (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
Writ - includes endorsement , transfer, issuance of writ
Service - includes substitute/personal service, serve based on contract, serve to solicitor / partnership, AOS
Appearance - includes how and when to insert appearance
JID - includes type and proof of services
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The document summarizes the history and current state of the legal profession in Malaysia. It discusses:
- The legal profession in Malaysia is a fused profession with no distinction between solicitors and barristers.
- The earliest lawyers were known as "law agents" or "advocates and attornies", with the first admission recorded in 1808.
- Various ordinances established regulatory bodies for lawyers in different states, which were consolidated by the Legal Profession Act 1976, establishing the Malaysian Bar and Bar Council. However, Sabah and Sarawak continue to have their own separate legislation and professional bodies.
Preliminary matters to be considered before commencing a civil suitIntan Muhammad
Contents :
Cause of Action
Locus Standi
Limitation Period
Jurisdiction of Court & Mode of beginning (in s separate note, namely bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah2 di malaysia)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Modes of Originating Process - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes the different modes of originating process in the Malaysian High Court under the Rules of Court 2012, including writs of summons and originating summonses. It outlines when each process is appropriate based on whether substantial disputes of fact are likely to arise. It also discusses cases that demonstrate when certain claims must be commenced by writ, can be determined summarily by originating summons, or are inappropriate for a given mode of process. The document concludes by examining the effects of using the wrong originating process and circumstances where proceedings will continue instead of being set aside.
Contents :
Definition
Importance
Attendance
Appearance
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
Writ, service, appearance & judgment in default (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
Writ - includes endorsement , transfer, issuance of writ
Service - includes substitute/personal service, serve based on contract, serve to solicitor / partnership, AOS
Appearance - includes how and when to insert appearance
JID - includes type and proof of services
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The document summarizes the history and current state of the legal profession in Malaysia. It discusses:
- The legal profession in Malaysia is a fused profession with no distinction between solicitors and barristers.
- The earliest lawyers were known as "law agents" or "advocates and attornies", with the first admission recorded in 1808.
- Various ordinances established regulatory bodies for lawyers in different states, which were consolidated by the Legal Profession Act 1976, establishing the Malaysian Bar and Bar Council. However, Sabah and Sarawak continue to have their own separate legislation and professional bodies.
Preliminary matters to be considered before commencing a civil suitIntan Muhammad
Contents :
Cause of Action
Locus Standi
Limitation Period
Jurisdiction of Court & Mode of beginning (in s separate note, namely bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah2 di malaysia)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The appellant, a defense lawyer for Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, filed a motion to disqualify two prosecutors based on supporting documents. The High Court judge held the motion was baseless and proposed holding the appellant in contempt of court. In a summary hearing, the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment. The Federal Court allowed the appeal, finding that: (1) the appellant was justified in filing the motion, so there was no abuse of court process; (2) the contempt charge was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) the appellant should have been granted an adjournment to fully prepare his defense, as denying this deprived him of a fair hearing.
Criminal Procedure I - POWERS OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN MALAYSIA intnmsrh
The document discusses the powers of the Public Prosecutor (PP) in Malaysia regarding criminal procedures. It outlines that the PP has the sole power to institute and conduct criminal proceedings per the Federal Constitution. This power is exercised at the PP's discretion and is limited to criminal proceedings in civil courts. The document also distinguishes between the PP's powers regarding consenting to prosecutions versus sanctioning prosecutions. It notes that lack of consent is fatal to a case, while lack of sanction can potentially be cured. Finally, it discusses limitations on the PP's powers, effects of discontinuing proceedings, and relevant case law on the topic.
This document is a memorandum of appeal filed in the Court of Appeal of Malaysia regarding a civil suit. The appellants are appealing the decision of the High Court judge who dismissed their claim and allowed the respondent's counter-claim. The memorandum sets out 11 grounds of appeal, arguing that the High Court judge made multiple errors in his factual findings and legal analysis. It is argued that the evidence showed the deceased lacked testamentary capacity and the will propounded by the respondent should not have been admitted to probate due to suspicious circumstances surrounding its creation.
Bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah / Civil Jurisdictions of Courts in Malaysia (2018...Intan Muhammad
1. The document discusses the jurisdiction of various Malaysian civil courts, from the Magistrate Court up to the High Court. It outlines the monetary limits, subject matter limits, territorial limits, and appellate/revisionary jurisdiction of each court.
2. The High Court has unlimited original jurisdiction but is generally limited to cases exceeding RM1 million in value. It has appellate jurisdiction over subordinate courts and revisionary/referral jurisdiction to examine lower court decisions.
3. When determining the appropriate court, one must consider the monetary value of the claim, the subject matter, and whether the cause of action arose within the court's territorial limits based on the parties' location.
Order of priority:
1) 'B' - RM150,000 (original loan + further advance)
2) 'C' - RM50,000
So 'B' gets RM150,000 and 'C' gets the remaining RM10,000
The right to tack allows the 1st chargee ('B') to rank the further advance ahead of the 2nd chargee ('C'), even though the 2nd charge was created before the further advance under the 1st charge.
05/07/14 SZA 38
Postponement of Charge
• ‘A’ charges land to ‘B’ for RM100,000
• ‘A’ charges same land to ‘C’ for RM
This presentation is about section 96 of Syariah Criminal Procedure (Fed. Territories) Act, (Malaysia) under the course of Evidence and procedure of shariah court ii
Nota tort fitnah dan pembelaan in Malay. Defamation and defense.
Please do not reupload or misuse for profit. For reading purpose only. Credits belong to the original creator of the slides.
The document discusses the procedures for entering an appearance and obtaining a judgment in default of appearance (JIDA) under Malaysian civil procedure rules.
It explains that once served with a writ, the defendant must enter an appearance within a specified time limit, usually 14 days. Failure to do so allows the plaintiff to obtain a JIDA. A JIDA can be final, for liquidated sums, or interlocutory, requiring damages to be assessed.
The defendant can apply to set aside a JIDA within 30 days. For irregular judgments obtained not in compliance with rules, the JIDA can be set aside as of right. For regular judgments, the defendant must show they have a defense on the merits by disclosing evidence
The document discusses the law on striking out pleadings in Malaysia. It defines what can be struck out, who can apply, the grounds for an application, and the procedure. A party may apply to strike out all or part of the opposing party's pleadings. Grounds for striking out include if there is no reasonable cause of action or defence, or if the pleadings are scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of court process. The application must be made promptly, preferably before the close of pleadings, and state the specific grounds and order sought.
This document summarizes key procedures and considerations regarding the sale of land charged under a land office title in Malaysia. It outlines the process the chargee must take to apply for an order of sale from the Land Administrator, including an inquiry where only the chargor and chargee can attend. It also discusses differences compared to foreclosure on a registry title, the Land Administrator's limited powers, and rights of the chargor and chargee throughout the process.
Syariah Evidence and Procedure. (short notes)intnmsrh
This document discusses various types of evidence in Islamic law including circumstantial evidence (al-qarinah). It defines circumstantial evidence as things that can be heard, seen, or touched, and which allow logical inferences to be made. It outlines five types of circumstantial evidence and discusses the authority for using expert evidence and documentary evidence. It also examines the application of circumstantial evidence in hudud (criminal) cases for offenses like theft, robbery, and zina (sexual relations outside of marriage), noting the conditions and views of different schools of Islamic law on when circumstantial evidence alone can prove guilt.
Prosedur perbicaraan dijelaskan dalam empat tahap: (1) pemeriksaan utama oleh plaintif dengan soal jawab saksi, (2) pemeriksaan balas oleh pihak lawan, (3) pemeriksaan semula oleh plaintif, dan (4) penyediaan hujahan oleh kedua-dua pihak berdasarkan bukti yang dikemukakan. Proses ini memastikan perbicaraan berjalan lancar dan keputusan mahkamah berasask
1) The document discusses the nature and scope of a Registrar's Caveat under Section 320(1) of the National Land Code, which allows the Registrar to enter a caveat on land to protect against fraud or improper dealings or to protect certain interests.
2) It outlines the Registrar's powers to enter a caveat and the circumstances under which a caveat can be entered. An aggrieved party can appeal the Registrar's decision or apply to have the caveat removed.
3) The effect of a caveat is to prevent dealings on the disputed land. A caveat does not have an expiration date and continues until cancelled by the Registrar either on their
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
This document discusses burden and standard of proof in law of evidence. It defines burden of proof as the obligation to provide sufficient evidence to support one's case, and distinguishes between burden of establishing a case and evidential burden of introducing evidence. The standard of proof refers to the degree of probability required to discharge the burden. For criminal cases, the standard is proof beyond reasonable doubt, while for civil cases it is on a balance of probabilities. The more serious the allegation, the higher the standard of proof required.
1. A private caveat is entered on the land title register upon application, to protect a title or interest claimed in the land until any disputes are settled.
2. The effect of a private caveat is that it prevents any dealings with the land, such as transfers of ownership, from being registered unless the caveator consents. However, it does not change the ownership of the land or strengthen the caveator's claim.
3. To enter a private caveat, the caveator must have a caveatable interest in the land, such as a claim to ownership or registered interest, and submit the required application form and statutory declaration to the registrar. The registrar's role is administrative and they must
This document is a summons filed in the Federal High Court of Nigeria by Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi against the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and its Executive Secretary. Sanusi claims that the FRCN acted beyond its statutory powers and violated his right to fair hearing by recommending his removal as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria without allowing him to respond to allegations. He is seeking declarations and orders relating to the FRCN's investigation and its recommendations to the President regarding his position at the CBN. The summons is supported by an affidavit detailing the background and Sanusi's claims against the FRCN.
The appellant, a defense lawyer for Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, filed a motion to disqualify two prosecutors based on supporting documents. The High Court judge held the motion was baseless and proposed holding the appellant in contempt of court. In a summary hearing, the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment. The Federal Court allowed the appeal, finding that: (1) the appellant was justified in filing the motion, so there was no abuse of court process; (2) the contempt charge was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) the appellant should have been granted an adjournment to fully prepare his defense, as denying this deprived him of a fair hearing.
Criminal Procedure I - POWERS OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN MALAYSIA intnmsrh
The document discusses the powers of the Public Prosecutor (PP) in Malaysia regarding criminal procedures. It outlines that the PP has the sole power to institute and conduct criminal proceedings per the Federal Constitution. This power is exercised at the PP's discretion and is limited to criminal proceedings in civil courts. The document also distinguishes between the PP's powers regarding consenting to prosecutions versus sanctioning prosecutions. It notes that lack of consent is fatal to a case, while lack of sanction can potentially be cured. Finally, it discusses limitations on the PP's powers, effects of discontinuing proceedings, and relevant case law on the topic.
This document is a memorandum of appeal filed in the Court of Appeal of Malaysia regarding a civil suit. The appellants are appealing the decision of the High Court judge who dismissed their claim and allowed the respondent's counter-claim. The memorandum sets out 11 grounds of appeal, arguing that the High Court judge made multiple errors in his factual findings and legal analysis. It is argued that the evidence showed the deceased lacked testamentary capacity and the will propounded by the respondent should not have been admitted to probate due to suspicious circumstances surrounding its creation.
Bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah / Civil Jurisdictions of Courts in Malaysia (2018...Intan Muhammad
1. The document discusses the jurisdiction of various Malaysian civil courts, from the Magistrate Court up to the High Court. It outlines the monetary limits, subject matter limits, territorial limits, and appellate/revisionary jurisdiction of each court.
2. The High Court has unlimited original jurisdiction but is generally limited to cases exceeding RM1 million in value. It has appellate jurisdiction over subordinate courts and revisionary/referral jurisdiction to examine lower court decisions.
3. When determining the appropriate court, one must consider the monetary value of the claim, the subject matter, and whether the cause of action arose within the court's territorial limits based on the parties' location.
Order of priority:
1) 'B' - RM150,000 (original loan + further advance)
2) 'C' - RM50,000
So 'B' gets RM150,000 and 'C' gets the remaining RM10,000
The right to tack allows the 1st chargee ('B') to rank the further advance ahead of the 2nd chargee ('C'), even though the 2nd charge was created before the further advance under the 1st charge.
05/07/14 SZA 38
Postponement of Charge
• ‘A’ charges land to ‘B’ for RM100,000
• ‘A’ charges same land to ‘C’ for RM
This presentation is about section 96 of Syariah Criminal Procedure (Fed. Territories) Act, (Malaysia) under the course of Evidence and procedure of shariah court ii
Nota tort fitnah dan pembelaan in Malay. Defamation and defense.
Please do not reupload or misuse for profit. For reading purpose only. Credits belong to the original creator of the slides.
The document discusses the procedures for entering an appearance and obtaining a judgment in default of appearance (JIDA) under Malaysian civil procedure rules.
It explains that once served with a writ, the defendant must enter an appearance within a specified time limit, usually 14 days. Failure to do so allows the plaintiff to obtain a JIDA. A JIDA can be final, for liquidated sums, or interlocutory, requiring damages to be assessed.
The defendant can apply to set aside a JIDA within 30 days. For irregular judgments obtained not in compliance with rules, the JIDA can be set aside as of right. For regular judgments, the defendant must show they have a defense on the merits by disclosing evidence
The document discusses the law on striking out pleadings in Malaysia. It defines what can be struck out, who can apply, the grounds for an application, and the procedure. A party may apply to strike out all or part of the opposing party's pleadings. Grounds for striking out include if there is no reasonable cause of action or defence, or if the pleadings are scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of court process. The application must be made promptly, preferably before the close of pleadings, and state the specific grounds and order sought.
This document summarizes key procedures and considerations regarding the sale of land charged under a land office title in Malaysia. It outlines the process the chargee must take to apply for an order of sale from the Land Administrator, including an inquiry where only the chargor and chargee can attend. It also discusses differences compared to foreclosure on a registry title, the Land Administrator's limited powers, and rights of the chargor and chargee throughout the process.
Syariah Evidence and Procedure. (short notes)intnmsrh
This document discusses various types of evidence in Islamic law including circumstantial evidence (al-qarinah). It defines circumstantial evidence as things that can be heard, seen, or touched, and which allow logical inferences to be made. It outlines five types of circumstantial evidence and discusses the authority for using expert evidence and documentary evidence. It also examines the application of circumstantial evidence in hudud (criminal) cases for offenses like theft, robbery, and zina (sexual relations outside of marriage), noting the conditions and views of different schools of Islamic law on when circumstantial evidence alone can prove guilt.
Prosedur perbicaraan dijelaskan dalam empat tahap: (1) pemeriksaan utama oleh plaintif dengan soal jawab saksi, (2) pemeriksaan balas oleh pihak lawan, (3) pemeriksaan semula oleh plaintif, dan (4) penyediaan hujahan oleh kedua-dua pihak berdasarkan bukti yang dikemukakan. Proses ini memastikan perbicaraan berjalan lancar dan keputusan mahkamah berasask
1) The document discusses the nature and scope of a Registrar's Caveat under Section 320(1) of the National Land Code, which allows the Registrar to enter a caveat on land to protect against fraud or improper dealings or to protect certain interests.
2) It outlines the Registrar's powers to enter a caveat and the circumstances under which a caveat can be entered. An aggrieved party can appeal the Registrar's decision or apply to have the caveat removed.
3) The effect of a caveat is to prevent dealings on the disputed land. A caveat does not have an expiration date and continues until cancelled by the Registrar either on their
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
This document discusses burden and standard of proof in law of evidence. It defines burden of proof as the obligation to provide sufficient evidence to support one's case, and distinguishes between burden of establishing a case and evidential burden of introducing evidence. The standard of proof refers to the degree of probability required to discharge the burden. For criminal cases, the standard is proof beyond reasonable doubt, while for civil cases it is on a balance of probabilities. The more serious the allegation, the higher the standard of proof required.
1. A private caveat is entered on the land title register upon application, to protect a title or interest claimed in the land until any disputes are settled.
2. The effect of a private caveat is that it prevents any dealings with the land, such as transfers of ownership, from being registered unless the caveator consents. However, it does not change the ownership of the land or strengthen the caveator's claim.
3. To enter a private caveat, the caveator must have a caveatable interest in the land, such as a claim to ownership or registered interest, and submit the required application form and statutory declaration to the registrar. The registrar's role is administrative and they must
This document is a summons filed in the Federal High Court of Nigeria by Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi against the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and its Executive Secretary. Sanusi claims that the FRCN acted beyond its statutory powers and violated his right to fair hearing by recommending his removal as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria without allowing him to respond to allegations. He is seeking declarations and orders relating to the FRCN's investigation and its recommendations to the President regarding his position at the CBN. The summons is supported by an affidavit detailing the background and Sanusi's claims against the FRCN.
Plaintif (Uniasia General Insurance Berhad) menuntut kepemilikan hartanah Lot 951 yang saat ini diduduki defendan tanpa izin, dan meminta mahkamah memerintahkan defendan mengosongkan hartanah tersebut dan membayar biaya permohonan.
Petisyen ini diajukan oleh tiga orang untuk mendapatkan probet atas harta warisan Leong Pak Weng yang meninggal dunia pada tanggal 6 Juni 2010. Petisyen ini dimaksudkan untuk memperoleh probet atas wasiat terakhir Leong Pak Weng yang menunjukkan ketiga petugas sebagai wasiat waris dan penerima manfaat.
Customer relationship management (CRM) helps companies build long-term relationships with customers by removing communication barriers, reducing costs, and enhancing effectiveness. Electronic CRM (e-CRM) systems are web-based and less expensive to implement than traditional CRM. e-CRM offers a customer-centric, flexible, and technology-enabled strategy for relationship building but requires strong leadership.
This document is a deed of settlement between Chan Chee Seng and Tan Gaik Suan, who are getting divorced. It outlines agreements regarding child custody, maintenance payments, division of property including a vehicle and bank accounts, costs of the divorce proceedings, and a statement that this settlement represents the final agreement between the parties. The wife will have primary custody of their minor child, and the husband will have visitation rights and pay monthly maintenance.
Khor Ah Hooi, the Director of Seleksi Penbina Sdn Bhd, provides testimony regarding contracts between Seleksi Penbina and TF Land Sdn Bhd for construction work. Seleksi Penbina was awarded contracts totaling RM4,356 to construct a walkway and RM368,187 to construct a perimeter drain, and completed both projects as instructed. Official receipts in the Ikatan Dokumen Tambahan [Bahagian C] documentation provide proof of payments made by TF Land Sdn Bhd to Seleksi Penbina Sdn Bhd for the construction work. Khor Ah Hooi confirms that Seleksi Penbina received full payment for the work
Materi kuliah mata kuliah Korespondensi Bahasa Inggris membahas tentang:
1. Jenis-jenis surat bisnis seperti surat permintaan informasi, penawaran, balasan, pesanan, referensi, pelaksanaan pengiriman barang, keluhan, dan penagihan.
2. Bagian-bagian surat seperti heading, dateline, inside address, attention line, salutation, subject line, body, complimentary close, signature, enclosure, dan carbon copy notation.
3. Panduan penulisan surat bisnis se
MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM on civil & criminal exam notesFAROUQ
This document discusses preliminary matters in civil procedure regarding parties in an action. It covers requirements for parties such as being sui juris and compos mentis. It also discusses types of parties like individuals, firms, companies, deceased estates, and representatives. The document then discusses cause of action, locus standi, limitation periods, and commencing an action through a writ. It outlines the process for issuing, serving, renewing and substituting service of a writ, as well as timelines for appearance. The key information provided is on the requirements for valid parties in a civil action and the procedures for commencing a case through issuance and service of a writ.
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & TricksSlideShare
Turbocharge your online presence with SlideShare. We provide the best tips and tricks for succeeding on SlideShare. Get ideas for what to upload, tips for designing your deck and more.
SlideShare is a global platform for sharing presentations, infographics, videos and documents. It has over 18 million pieces of professional content uploaded by experts like Eric Schmidt and Guy Kawasaki. The document provides tips for setting up an account on SlideShare, uploading content, optimizing it for searchability, and sharing it on social media to build an audience and reputation as a subject matter expert.
Borang permohonan pembahagian harta pusaka yang diajukan oleh Guna segaran kepada pengadilan. Harta pusaka tersebut adalah milik Parimalathasan yang telah meninggal dunia dan terdiri dari beberapa properti dan rekening perbankan. Guna segaran mengaku sebagai salah satu pewaris dan meminta pengadilan membagi harta tersebut sesuai dengan hukum Islam atau undang-undang waris di Malaysia.
This document summarizes the background of a civil case between Madasama Goodway Sdn Bhd and Lim Eng Huat regarding the sale of a property. Key points:
- Lim Eng Huat had rented a property from Madasama and wanted to purchase it after a fire damaged the building. They signed an agreement on July 19, 2002 for RM270,000.
- Lim paid a deposit and took steps to obtain financing, but Madasama refused to complete the sale. Lim filed a lawsuit seeking specific performance of the agreement.
- The High Court ruled in Lim's favor, but Madasama appealed. The document outlines the claims and evidence presented by both sides regarding whether the agreement was
This document is an invoice from Arnold Andrew & Co, a law firm, to Mystique Bay Sdn Bhd for professional legal fees and disbursements totaling RM165.90. The fees are in relation to a letter of demand issued on November 11, 2013 regarding Charles Solomon Barker. The invoice breaks down the fees into preparing the letter of demand, a 6% government tax, postage costs, and miscellaneous charges. Payment is due upon receipt of the invoice.
This document outlines the respondent's written submission in response to an appeal filed by the appellants against a High Court decision in favor of the respondent's winding up petition against the 1st appellant company. The respondent argues that the appeal is not valid for two reasons: 1) The company is already wound up so the 2nd appellant does not have authority to file the appeal on the company's behalf. 2) The appellants' affidavit in opposition to the winding up petition was filed late in contravention of mandatory timelines in the Companies Winding Up Rules, so it should be considered inadmissible. The respondent cites several court cases to support the argument that late filing of affidavits cannot be allowed as it violates mandatory requirements.
This curriculum vitae provides details about Nanthini Rajarethinam, including her personal information, education history, work experience, skills, and qualifications. She has a Bachelor of Laws degree from the University of London and 5 years of experience as a Legal Assistant. Her objective is to secure a permanent position as a lawyer or Legal Assistant in order to continue gaining experience in civil litigation.
1. DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PI NANG
GUAMAN SIVIL NO.22- -2011
ANTARA
HOW WEI MING ..PLAINTIF
DAN
1. ROSEZITA AMIR
2. TETUAN FINE ARTS
LIFELONG LEARNING ACADEMY
[NO. SYARIKAT: PG0174570] ..DEFENDAN-DEFENDAN
WRIT SAMAN
YANG AMAT ARIF TAN SRI ARIFIN BIN ZAKARIA, HAKIM BESAR MALAYA,
ATAS NAMA DAN BAGI PIHAK SERI PADUKA BAGINDA YANG DI
PERTUAN AGONG.
Kepada : 1. Rosezita Amir c/o
Tetuan Fine Arts
No. 75, Tingkat 1,
Lebuh Kota Permai 1,
Taman Kota Permai
14000 Bukit Mertajam
2. Tetuan Fine Arts Lifelong Learning Academy
No. 75, Tingkat 1, Lebuh Kota Permai 1,
Taman Kota Permai,
14000 Bukit Mertajam.
2. Kami perintahkan kamu bahawa dalam tempoh lapan (8) hari selepas
penyampaian Writ ini ke atas kamu, termasuklah hari penyampaian itu, kamu
hendaklah menyebabkan kehadiran dimasukkan untuk diri kamu dalam kausa
atas guaman Plaintif Plaintif yang dinamakan di atas yang diwakili oleh Tetuan
Presgrave & Matthews yang beralamat di Kamar Standard Chartered Bank, No.2
Lebuh Pantai, 10300 Pulau Pinang dan ambil perhatian bahawa, jika kamu
ingkar berbuat demikian, Plaintif boleh meneruskan untuk mendapatkan
penghakiman dan perlaksanaan.
Bertarikh pada hb 2011.
Disaksikan oleh Penolong Kanan Pendaftar
Mahkamah di pada haribulan
2011.
................................ ……………………………….
Peguamcara Plaintif Penolong Kanan Pendaftar
Mahkamah Tinggi
Pulau Pinang.
MEMORANDUM YANG HENDAK DITURUNKAN PADA WRIT
Writ ini tidak boleh disampaikan lebih daripada enam (6) bulan kalender selepas
tarikh ini di atas melainkan jika diperbaharui melalui perintah Mahkamah.
2
3. Defendan (atau Defendan-Defendan) boleh hadir bersama dengan memasukkan
kehadiran (atau kehadiran-kehadiran) sama ada sendiri atau melalui
Peguamcara di Pejabat Pendaftar Tinggi.
Defendan yang hadir sendiri boleh, jika dikehendakinya, memasukkan kehadiran
melalui pos, dan borang-borang yang tertentu bolehlah didapati dengan
menghantar Kiriman Pos berharga RM10.00 berserta sampul surat beralamat
sendiri kepada Pendaftar, Mahkamah Tinggi di Pulau Pinang.
PENGINDORSAN TUNTUTAN
Tuntutan Plaintif terhadap Defendan adalah seperti dalam perenggan 16
Pernyataan Tuntutan:-
(a) Suatu Perintah bahawa Defendan-defendan menarikbalik keseluruhan
kandungan surat bertarikh 22.10.2010 dan membuat permohonan
maaf daripada Plaintif secara bertulis;
(b) Gantirugi di atas keaiban dan/atau distress yang dialami oleh Plaintif
tersebut;
(c) Kos; dan
(d) Relif-relif lanjutan dan/atau lain-lain yang mana Mahkamah yang Mulia
ini anggap suai dan manfaat.
3
4. Dan RM125.00 (atau sekian banyak wang sebagaimana yang dibenarkan
setelah ditetapkan) untuk kos, dan juga, jika Plaintif dapat perintah untuk
penyampaian ganti, jumlah wang selanjutnya sebanyak RM60.00 (atau sekian
banyak wang sebagaimana yang dibenarkan setelah ditetapkan). Jika amaun
yang dituntut dan kos dibayar kepada Plaintif atau Peguamcaranya dalam
tempoh dua belas (12) hari selepas penyampaian Writ ini (termasuklah hari
penyampaian), prosiding seterusnya akan ditangguhkan, tetapi jika ternyata
daripada pengindorsan pada Writ itu bahawa Plaintif akan bermastautin di luar
wilayah terjadual, sebagaimana yang ditaksirkan dalam Akta Pertukaran
Kawalan 1953, atau adalah bertindak mengikut perintah bagi pihak seseorang
yang bermastautin sedemikian, prosiding akan hanya ditangguhkan jika amaun
yang dituntut dan kos dibayar ke dalam Mahkamah dalam masa yang tersebut
itu dan notis pembayaran itu diberi kepada Plaintif atau Peguamcaranya.
PENGINDORSAN TENTANG PEGUAMCARA DAN ALAMAT
Writ itu dikeluarkan oleh Tetuan Presgrave & Matthews, Peguamcara bagi
Plaintif yang dinamakan di atas dan mempunyai alamat penyampaian di Kamar
Standard Chartered Bank, No. 2 Lebuh Pantai, 10300 Pulau Pinang.
Writ ini telah disampaikan oleh
dengan cara penyampaian ke diri kepada Defendan yang saya kenali atau yang
ditunjukkan kepada saya oleh
4
5. atau yang telah mengaku kepada saya bahawa dia telah
haribulan 2011.
Diindorskan pada haribulan 2011.
...............................
Penghantar Saman
Writ ini telah disampaikan oleh
secara penyampaian ganti terhadap Defendan-Defendan melalui tampalan
salinan Writ Saman dan Perintah untuk penyampaian ganti di papan notis
Mahkamah Tinggi di Pulau Pinang.
Diindorskan pada haribulan 2011.
.................................
Penghantar Saman
Writ Saman ini difailkan oleh Tetuan Presgrave & Matthews dari alamat Kamar
Standard Chartered Bank, No. 2 Lebuh Pantai, 10300 Pulau Pinang,
Peguamcara bagi Plaintif yang tersebut di atas.
5
6. DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PI NANG
GUAMAN SIVIL NO.22- -2011
ANTARA
HOW WEI MING ..PLAINTIF
DAN
1. ROSEZITA AMIR
2. TETUAN FINE ARTS
LIFELONG LEARNING ACADEMY
[NO. SYARIKAT: PG0174570
..DEFENDAN-DEFENDAN
PENYATA TUNTUTAN
1. Plaintif adalah seorang individu yang beralamat di Shingo U Sdn Bhd, 2-2-
18, Plaza Ivory Retail, Halaman Bukit Gambir, 11700 Gelugor, Pulau
Pinang.
2. Defendan adalah seorang individu yang beralamat pejabat di Fine Arts, No.
75, Tingkat 1, Lebuh Kota Permai 1, Taman Kota Permai, 14000 Bukit
Mertajam.
3. Plaintif adalah salah seorang Rakan Kongsi bagi Fine Art Life Long
Learning Academy bersama dengan seorang lagi Rakan Kongsi yang
6
7. dikenali sebagai Dr. Choo Kin Fuat bagi Tetuan Fine Arts Life Long
Learning Academy dari tahun September 2006 sehingga Disember 2007.
4. Berdasarkan kepada carian yang telah dibuat oleh juruaudit di antara tahun
2008-2009, Tetuan Fine Arts Life Long Learning Academy sememangnya
berhutang kepada Plaintif komisen bagi sejumlah RM33,962.20 [55%
daripada sejumlah RM61,684.00]. Walaubagaimanapun, setakat pada hari
ini, jumlah tersebut masih terhutang dan belum dibayar oleh Defendan.
5. Selanjutnya, Laporan Audit telah dikemukakan kepada Plaintif di dalam
kehadiran Defendan dan seseorang bernama Dr. Anthony Choo (yang
mana Defendan mempunyai sesalinan Laporan Audit tersebut) setelah
mengambilkira segala hutang yang masih dihutangi oleh Plaintif dan hutang
tersebut sekiranya ada adalah dihutangi oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif dan
bukannya sebaliknya.
6. Bukti keberhutangan Defendan kepada Plaintif adalah disokong oleh
Laporan Polis yang telah dibuat oleh Plaintif pada 27.10.2010.
7. Walaubagaimanapun, ianya telah didapati bahawa Defendan telah menulis
kepada Plaintif menerusi surat mereka bertarikh 22.10.2010 yang telah
dikemukakan kepada Plaintif yang mana menyatakan seperti berikut:-
7
8. “ We understand from our record that you have collected
RM114,069.00 from our 156 Childcare students and have issued
FALLA (Fine Arts Lifelong Learning Academy) receipts to them. But
until today you have not credited that amount to our bank or have not
returned the collected amount to the company”.
8. Dakwaan sepertimana yang telah dinyatakan di dalam surat Defendan
bertarikh 22.10.2010 adalah tidak berasas dan tanpa sebab yang kukuh
memandangkan akaun-akaun yang telah diaudit oleh juruaudit telah
dimulakan, dilantik dan diluluskan oleh Defendan Pertama dan Defendan
Kedua.
9. Plaintif telah menerusi surat peguamcaranya, Tetuan Presgrave &
Matthews bertarikh 19.11.2010 memohon kepada Defendan-defendan agar
mereka menulis surat yang menarikbalik kandungan surat bertarikh
22.10.2010 tersebut atas dasar bahawa kandungan di dalam surat tersebut
telah dibuat tanpa sebarang sebab dan tidak berasas sama sekali dan
mereka meminta maaf atas keaiban dan/atau distres yang disebabkan
terhadap Plaintif.
10. Defendan-defendan telah membalas kepada surat peguamcara Plaintif
bertarikh 19.11.2010 yang mana menyatakan bahawa mereka tidak akan
menarikbalik kandungan surat bertarikh 22.10.2010 atas dasar bahawa
Defendan-defendan adalah patut atau adil [“justified”].
8
9. 11. Tambahan pula, Defendan-defendan menerusi surat peguamcara mereka
bertarikh 29.12.2010 juga telah menyatakan bahawa akaun-akaun tersebut
tidak diluluskan oleh Defendan-defendan dan bahawa lanjutan masa telah
dipohon bagi maklumat lanjutan boleh dibekalkan kepada juruaudit sebelum
Laporan Audit bersih boleh dikemukakan.
12. Defendan-defendan juga telah menafikan bahawa mereka berhutang
dengan Plaintif bagi wang berjumlah RM33,692.00 dan oleh itu, Defendan-
defendan tidak akan memberikan surat pengampunan mereka kepada
Plaintif sepertimana yang dipohon oleh Plaintif.
13. Plaintif seterusnya telah membalas kepada surat peguamcara Defendan-
defendan bertarikh 29.12.2010 tersebut yang menyatakan bahawa tuntutan
Defendan-defendan bagi wang sejumlah RM114,069.00 terhadap Plaintif
adalah tidak sah. Defendan-defendan telah menafikan keesahan Laporan
Audit tersebut dengan menyatakan bahawa mereka tidak meluluskan
Laporan Audit tersebut. Maka, Plaintif telah menyatakan bahawa tuntutan
Defendan-defendan adalah tidak sah memandangkan mereka tiada
sebarang dokumen selain daripada Laporan Audit untuk menyokong
tuntutan mereka terhadap Plaintif.
14. Defendan-defendan telah gagal untuk membuktikan tuntutan mereka
setakat pada hari ini.
9
10. 15. Akibat daripada kandungan surat bertarikh 22.10.2010 daripada Defendan-
defendan tersebut, Plaintif terpaksa mengalami keaiban dan/atau distress.
16. Justeru, tuntutan Plaintif terhadap Defendan-defendan adalah seperti
berikut:-
(a) Suatu Perintah bahawa Defendan-defendan menarikbalik
keseluruhan kandungan surat bertarikh 22.10.2010 dan membuat
permohonan maaf daripada Plaintif secara bertulis;
(b) Gantirugi di atas keaiban dan/atau distress yang dialami oleh
Plaintif tersebut;
(c) Kos; dan
(d) Relif-relif lanjutan dan/atau lain-lain yang mana Mahkamah yang
Mulia ini anggap suai dan manfaat.
Bertarikh pada hb 2011.
………………………
…….
Peguamcara bagi Plaintif
10
11. Pernyataan Tuntutan ini difailkan oleh Tetuan Presgrave & Matthews,
Peguamcara Plantif tersebut dan beralamat di Tingkat Satu, Kamar Standard
Chartered Bank, No.2 Lebuh Pantai, 10300 Pulau Pinang.
11
12. DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PI NANG
GUAMAN SIVIL NO.22- -2011
ANTARA
HOW WEI MING ..PLAINTIF
DAN
1. ROSEZITA AMIR
2. TETUAN FINE ARTS
LIFELONG LEARNING ACADEMY
[NO. SYARIKAT: PG0174570] ..DEFENDAN-DEFENDAN
********************************************************************************************
WRIT SAMAN
********************************************************************************************
Peguamcara Plaintif
Tetuan Presgrave & Matthews
Peguambela & Peguamcara
Tingkat Satu
Kamar Standard Chartered Bank
No.2 Lebuh Pantai
10300 Pulau Pinang
(NR/20100878)
Box No.79
Difailkan pada haribulan 2011.
12
![DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI PULAU PI NANG
GUAMAN SIVIL NO.22- -2011
ANTARA
HOW WEI MING ..PLAINTIF
DAN
1. ROSEZITA AMIR
2. TETUAN FINE ARTS
LIFELONG LEARNING ACADEMY
[NO. SYARIKAT: PG0174570] ..DEFENDAN-DEFENDAN
WRIT SAMAN
YANG AMAT ARIF TAN SRI ARIFIN BIN ZAKARIA, HAKIM BESAR MALAYA,
ATAS NAMA DAN BAGI PIHAK SERI PADUKA BAGINDA YANG DI
PERTUAN AGONG.
Kepada : 1. Rosezita Amir c/o
Tetuan Fine Arts
No. 75, Tingkat 1,
Lebuh Kota Permai 1,
Taman Kota Permai
14000 Bukit Mertajam
2. Tetuan Fine Arts Lifelong Learning Academy
No. 75, Tingkat 1, Lebuh Kota Permai 1,
Taman Kota Permai,
14000 Bukit Mertajam.](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/f3e2aeea-f8fa-4618-978d-156fd9fe7fdf-160403130330/85/Writ-Saman2-1-320.jpg)
