This document summarizes key procedures and considerations regarding the sale of land charged under a land office title in Malaysia. It outlines the process the chargee must take to apply for an order of sale from the Land Administrator, including an inquiry where only the chargor and chargee can attend. It also discusses differences compared to foreclosure on a registry title, the Land Administrator's limited powers, and rights of the chargor and chargee throughout the process.
This document discusses Jual Janji transactions, which are a type of security transaction commonly practiced in the Malay Muslim community. It involves a borrower transferring land to a lender in exchange for a loan, with the promise that the land will be retransferred upon repayment of the loan. The document outlines the origins, characteristics, modus operandi, registration process, and judicial views on Jual Janji transactions. It examines different court opinions that have treated Jual Janji as either a contract, equitable mortgage, or customary transaction. The overall document provides an introduction and analysis of Jual Janji transactions under Malaysian law.
The document discusses private caveats under Malaysian land law. A private caveat is a statutory injunction entered by the Registrar upon application by a person claiming an interest in land. It preserves the status quo of the land and suspends registration until disputes over claims are resolved. A private caveat does not create or enhance the caveator's interest, but rather serves as notice of a claim and prohibits dealings with the land pending litigation. The requirements for entering, extending, and removing a private caveat are outlined according to sections of the National Land Code.
The document discusses liens and lien holder's caveats under Malaysian land law. It provides definitions and discusses key cases that have helped define:
- What constitutes a valid lien under section 281 of the National Land Code, including whether the loan can be to a third party rather than just the registered proprietor.
- The effect of a lien holder's caveat, including that it has a similar prohibitive effect as a private caveat in preventing subsequent dealings on the land.
- Issues around who can create and enter a lien holder's caveat, as well as the requirements and procedures around creating and removing caveats. Cases have found equitable rights can still exist even if statutory requirements are not fully met.
The document discusses bail amounts set in three criminal cases in Malaysia. In the first case, bail of RM70,000 was set for a man charged with 14 offenses related to insulting the Johor royal family, which many viewed as excessive given the charges and the man's financial means. In the second case, bail of RM5,000 was set for a sedition charge, which matched the maximum fine amount and was also seen as unjustifiably high. In the third case, bail of RM15,000 was set for a prominent opposition figure charged with criminal defamation, which some argued was still excessive despite being lower than what prosecutors requested. The document analyzes factors courts typically consider for bail amounts and concludes the
A charge is a security interest created over land to secure repayment of a debt. It does not involve transferring ownership of the land, unlike a mortgage. Key aspects of a charge include the parties (chargor as landowner/borrower and chargee as lender), creation through execution and registration of charge documents, and remedies available to the chargee such as auction if the chargor defaults. An equitable/unregistered charge may also exist through possession of title documents by the lender, though it is not as strong an interest as a registered statutory charge.
Dell executed a will in 2013 and his will established trusts to distribute his property after his death. For Dell's will to be valid, it must meet the five requirements under the Wills Act 1959:
1. Dell must have been of age of majority, which is 18 years old in Malaysia.
2. The will must be in writing on a permanent material.
3. Dell must have signed the will, or a third party under his direction. The signature must be acknowledged by two witnesses present at the same time.
4. The two witnesses must attest the will in Dell's presence.
5. Dell must have had mental capacity and not been influenced by delusion at the
Plaintif (Uniasia General Insurance Berhad) menuntut kepemilikan hartanah Lot 951 yang saat ini diduduki defendan tanpa izin, dan meminta mahkamah memerintahkan defendan mengosongkan hartanah tersebut dan membayar biaya permohonan.
This document summarizes key procedures and considerations regarding the sale of land charged under a land office title in Malaysia. It outlines the process the chargee must take to apply for an order of sale from the Land Administrator, including an inquiry where only the chargor and chargee can attend. It also discusses differences compared to foreclosure on a registry title, the Land Administrator's limited powers, and rights of the chargor and chargee throughout the process.
This document discusses Jual Janji transactions, which are a type of security transaction commonly practiced in the Malay Muslim community. It involves a borrower transferring land to a lender in exchange for a loan, with the promise that the land will be retransferred upon repayment of the loan. The document outlines the origins, characteristics, modus operandi, registration process, and judicial views on Jual Janji transactions. It examines different court opinions that have treated Jual Janji as either a contract, equitable mortgage, or customary transaction. The overall document provides an introduction and analysis of Jual Janji transactions under Malaysian law.
The document discusses private caveats under Malaysian land law. A private caveat is a statutory injunction entered by the Registrar upon application by a person claiming an interest in land. It preserves the status quo of the land and suspends registration until disputes over claims are resolved. A private caveat does not create or enhance the caveator's interest, but rather serves as notice of a claim and prohibits dealings with the land pending litigation. The requirements for entering, extending, and removing a private caveat are outlined according to sections of the National Land Code.
The document discusses liens and lien holder's caveats under Malaysian land law. It provides definitions and discusses key cases that have helped define:
- What constitutes a valid lien under section 281 of the National Land Code, including whether the loan can be to a third party rather than just the registered proprietor.
- The effect of a lien holder's caveat, including that it has a similar prohibitive effect as a private caveat in preventing subsequent dealings on the land.
- Issues around who can create and enter a lien holder's caveat, as well as the requirements and procedures around creating and removing caveats. Cases have found equitable rights can still exist even if statutory requirements are not fully met.
The document discusses bail amounts set in three criminal cases in Malaysia. In the first case, bail of RM70,000 was set for a man charged with 14 offenses related to insulting the Johor royal family, which many viewed as excessive given the charges and the man's financial means. In the second case, bail of RM5,000 was set for a sedition charge, which matched the maximum fine amount and was also seen as unjustifiably high. In the third case, bail of RM15,000 was set for a prominent opposition figure charged with criminal defamation, which some argued was still excessive despite being lower than what prosecutors requested. The document analyzes factors courts typically consider for bail amounts and concludes the
A charge is a security interest created over land to secure repayment of a debt. It does not involve transferring ownership of the land, unlike a mortgage. Key aspects of a charge include the parties (chargor as landowner/borrower and chargee as lender), creation through execution and registration of charge documents, and remedies available to the chargee such as auction if the chargor defaults. An equitable/unregistered charge may also exist through possession of title documents by the lender, though it is not as strong an interest as a registered statutory charge.
Dell executed a will in 2013 and his will established trusts to distribute his property after his death. For Dell's will to be valid, it must meet the five requirements under the Wills Act 1959:
1. Dell must have been of age of majority, which is 18 years old in Malaysia.
2. The will must be in writing on a permanent material.
3. Dell must have signed the will, or a third party under his direction. The signature must be acknowledged by two witnesses present at the same time.
4. The two witnesses must attest the will in Dell's presence.
5. Dell must have had mental capacity and not been influenced by delusion at the
Plaintif (Uniasia General Insurance Berhad) menuntut kepemilikan hartanah Lot 951 yang saat ini diduduki defendan tanpa izin, dan meminta mahkamah memerintahkan defendan mengosongkan hartanah tersebut dan membayar biaya permohonan.
A private caveat is an interim procedure that allows a person claiming a title or registrable interest in land to freeze the land title registration until their claim can be resolved. A private caveat is entered by the Registrar upon application showing the claimant's caveatable interest. It has the effect of prohibiting any dealings with the land, including transfers or mortgages, except with the caveator's consent. To enter a caveat, the claimant must have a potential legal claim to the land, such as under a contract of sale, gift, or trust, that could ultimately result in registration of their interest.
Order of priority:
1) 'B' - RM150,000 (original loan + further advance)
2) 'C' - RM50,000
So 'B' gets RM150,000 and 'C' gets the remaining RM10,000
The right to tack allows the 1st chargee ('B') to rank the further advance ahead of the 2nd chargee ('C'), even though the 2nd charge was created before the further advance under the 1st charge.
05/07/14 SZA 38
Postponement of Charge
• ‘A’ charges land to ‘B’ for RM100,000
• ‘A’ charges same land to ‘C’ for RM
The document discusses the concepts of bare trust and stakeholder under Malaysian law. It begins by explaining that a solicitor stakeholder temporarily holds money or property while its owner is still being determined, such as money paid by a purchaser pending registration of a property transfer. It then summarizes two key Malaysian cases on stakeholders. The document also discusses the English common law position on bare trusts, where the vendor becomes a bare trustee once a valid sale contract exists. However, under Malaysian law bare trustee status only arises after full payment and execution of a valid transfer, as established in another case summarized. The key differences between the common law and Malaysian positions on bare trusts are also outlined.
Restraints on dealings prevent transactions related to disputed land from being registered. The main types of restraints in Malaysia are lis pendens, injunctions, caveats, and prohibitory orders. Caveats freeze the land register until the dispute is resolved, protecting the caveator's claim. Unlike caveats, injunctions are court orders that do not register on the land title but can still prevent dealings. While caveats and injunctions both restrain transactions, injunctions require court approval and can protect a broader range of interests.
This document summarizes key provisions related to land charges under the National Land Code of Malaysia. It discusses the fixed obligations of a chargor, the remedies available to a chargee upon default of a charge (sale or possession of the land), and the procedures for obtaining a court order for sale. These include serving notice of demand, making an application to the High Court, public auction of the land, and issuance of a certificate of sale. It also analyzes several cases related to issues like serving the proper notice, specifying the breach, duration of notice periods, and valid service of notices.
The document discusses the meaning and effects of a prohibitory order (PO) under Malaysian law. A PO is a court order obtained by a judgment creditor against a judgment debtor to restrain the debtor from disposing of land subject to execution proceedings to recover a judgment debt. It prohibits registration of dealings on the land. Case law discussed establishes that a PO only binds the interest still held by the debtor and cannot override prior interests, and an extension requires proof of special circumstances. The document provides definitions and explanations of key terminology and procedures regarding POs under the relevant laws and rules of court.
This document provides an overview of security dealings recognized under the National Land Code 1965 in Malaysia, specifically charges or Torrens charges. It defines a charge as a security transaction where a landowner pledges their land as collateral for a loan. If the borrower defaults, the lender can foreclose and sell the land. The key requirements for creating a valid charge are using the prescribed statutory form and registering it with the relevant land office. The document outlines the differences between charges and common law mortgages, as well as restrictions and various cases related to charges under the National Land Code.
The document discusses whether an order for sale should be granted to Bank Indah Berhad due to Oren's failure to remedy a breach. It explains that a charge is a transaction where land or a lease is used as security for a loan. For a charge to be valid, it must be registered under the National Land Code. The document outlines the process for an order of sale, which includes serving a statutory notice on the chargor regarding the breach. If the breach is not remedied, the chargee can apply for an order of sale to recover the outstanding amount through an auction of the charged property. As Oren failed to remedy the breach after notice, Bank Indah Berhad would be entitled to an order for
This document summarizes the background of a civil case between Madasama Goodway Sdn Bhd and Lim Eng Huat regarding the sale of a property. Key points:
- Lim Eng Huat had rented a property from Madasama and wanted to purchase it after a fire damaged the building. They signed an agreement on July 19, 2002 for RM270,000.
- Lim paid a deposit and took steps to obtain financing, but Madasama refused to complete the sale. Lim filed a lawsuit seeking specific performance of the agreement.
- The High Court ruled in Lim's favor, but Madasama appealed. The document outlines the claims and evidence presented by both sides regarding whether the agreement was
Criminal Procedure I - POWERS OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN MALAYSIA intnmsrh
The document discusses the powers of the Public Prosecutor (PP) in Malaysia regarding criminal procedures. It outlines that the PP has the sole power to institute and conduct criminal proceedings per the Federal Constitution. This power is exercised at the PP's discretion and is limited to criminal proceedings in civil courts. The document also distinguishes between the PP's powers regarding consenting to prosecutions versus sanctioning prosecutions. It notes that lack of consent is fatal to a case, while lack of sanction can potentially be cured. Finally, it discusses limitations on the PP's powers, effects of discontinuing proceedings, and relevant case law on the topic.
A lien is a right to retain possession of property belonging to another person as security for payment of a debt. A lien is created in two stages: first, the proprietor or lessee deposits the land title or duplicate lease with a lender as security for a loan, creating an equitable lien. Second, the lender enters a lien-holder's caveat on the land title at the land office, creating a statutory lien. Key requirements for a valid lien are that the registered proprietor deposits the title with intent to secure a loan. While express consent is not needed to lodge a caveat, fraud in the creation of security can be an issue. A lien provides a speedy way for businessmen to raise money compared
This document discusses security dealings recognized under the National Land Code 1965 (NLC), specifically charges or Torrens charges. It defines a charge as a security transaction where a registered landowner uses their land as collateral for a loan. If the borrower defaults, the lender can foreclose and sell the land. Key requirements for creating a valid charge include using the prescribed statutory form and registering the charge at the relevant land office. The document outlines differences between charges and common law mortgages, what types of land can be charged, restrictions on charging, and requirements like amending statutory forms in annexures.
An easement is a right over another's land, such as a right of way. It must be created by express grant between proprietors and registered. An unregistered easement gives no rights. Alternatively, if the neighbor refuses a registered easement, one can apply to the Land Administrator for a right of way (LAROW), though the Administrator is reluctant if other access exists. The document discusses these concepts and differences between an easement and LAROW under the National Land Code.
This document provides an overview of the legal definition and interpretation of charity in England and Wales. It discusses how charity has traditionally been defined by reference to the preamble of the Statute of Charitable Uses 1601, which lists several charitable purposes. The document also summarizes Lord MacNaghten's four principal categories of charity and notes that to be charitable, a purpose must satisfy certain tests of public benefit. It concludes by noting how charity law has developed in England and Wales and how it is interpreted in Malaysia.
1. Jual janji is a traditional Malay practice where land is transferred to a lender as security for a loan, with the understanding that it will be returned to the borrower upon repayment.
2. Malaysian courts initially treated jual janji strictly as a sale, ignoring evidence it was intended as security. However, exceptions developed where time was not of the essence or the lender evaded repayment.
3. Recent cases and the National Land Code have recognized jual janji can operate as an equitable security transaction, balancing title rights with contractual obligations.
Security dealing remedies for registered chargeeHafizul Mukhlis
The document discusses statutory remedies available to a registered chargee under the National Land Code upon default by the chargor in repaying a loan. There are two main remedies: (1) obtaining an order for sale of the charged property by public auction from the High Court or Land Administrator; and (2) taking possession of the charged property. The document outlines the procedures for applying for an order of sale, the Land Administrator's role in inquiries, and cases that may establish "cause to the contrary" to prevent an order for sale.
This document provides an overview of the Torrens land registration system in Malaysia and the key principles of registration of dealings under this system. It discusses how registration is the cornerstone of the Torrens system and how it aims to overcome the defects of the previous deeds system. It outlines the types of dealings that can and cannot be registered, and explains the requirements and process for valid registration. Key topics covered include the duties of the registrar, effects of registration and unregistered dealings, and how errors are corrected in the register. The overall purpose is to explain how registration confers indefeasible title under the Torrens system.
Toman can challenge the indefeasibility of the charge in favor of Bank Haruan Berhad on the grounds of forgery or fraud. Forgery occurred when Mahmud used a forged power of attorney to charge Toman's property to the bank without Toman's knowledge. The bank cannot claim to be a bona fide purchaser for value because as an immediate chargee, the title is still defeasible under Malaysian law which applies deferred indefeasibility. Toman was not aware of the transaction and did not consent to the charge.
LL1 slides extent of ownership and enjoyment of land part 2xareejx
This document discusses the extent of ownership and enjoyment of land under Malaysian law. It addresses ownership rights below the surface as well as the right to support of land.
The owner has exclusive use and enjoyment of the land below the surface as is reasonably necessary. Trespassing below another's surface, such as by mining or inserting anchors, is actionable. However, ownership rights below a specified depth belong to the state.
A landowner also has the right to support of his land from adjacent land in its natural state. The owner of adjacent land cannot withdraw natural support. This right does not extend to land that has been excavated or weakened. Some jurisdictions like Singapore interpret this right of support to also apply to buildings
This chapter is listed under Land Law II.
Containing:
1. Introduction
2. Creation & effect of LHC
3. Procedures to Enter LHC
4. Function of Registrar
5. Effect of LHC
6. Failure in caveating the land
7. Cancellation of LHC
This document is a summons filed in the Federal High Court of Nigeria by Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi against the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and its Executive Secretary. Sanusi claims that the FRCN acted beyond its statutory powers and violated his right to fair hearing by recommending his removal as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria without allowing him to respond to allegations. He is seeking declarations and orders relating to the FRCN's investigation and its recommendations to the President regarding his position at the CBN. The summons is supported by an affidavit detailing the background and Sanusi's claims against the FRCN.
A private caveat is an interim procedure that allows a person claiming a title or registrable interest in land to freeze the land title registration until their claim can be resolved. A private caveat is entered by the Registrar upon application showing the claimant's caveatable interest. It has the effect of prohibiting any dealings with the land, including transfers or mortgages, except with the caveator's consent. To enter a caveat, the claimant must have a potential legal claim to the land, such as under a contract of sale, gift, or trust, that could ultimately result in registration of their interest.
Order of priority:
1) 'B' - RM150,000 (original loan + further advance)
2) 'C' - RM50,000
So 'B' gets RM150,000 and 'C' gets the remaining RM10,000
The right to tack allows the 1st chargee ('B') to rank the further advance ahead of the 2nd chargee ('C'), even though the 2nd charge was created before the further advance under the 1st charge.
05/07/14 SZA 38
Postponement of Charge
• ‘A’ charges land to ‘B’ for RM100,000
• ‘A’ charges same land to ‘C’ for RM
The document discusses the concepts of bare trust and stakeholder under Malaysian law. It begins by explaining that a solicitor stakeholder temporarily holds money or property while its owner is still being determined, such as money paid by a purchaser pending registration of a property transfer. It then summarizes two key Malaysian cases on stakeholders. The document also discusses the English common law position on bare trusts, where the vendor becomes a bare trustee once a valid sale contract exists. However, under Malaysian law bare trustee status only arises after full payment and execution of a valid transfer, as established in another case summarized. The key differences between the common law and Malaysian positions on bare trusts are also outlined.
Restraints on dealings prevent transactions related to disputed land from being registered. The main types of restraints in Malaysia are lis pendens, injunctions, caveats, and prohibitory orders. Caveats freeze the land register until the dispute is resolved, protecting the caveator's claim. Unlike caveats, injunctions are court orders that do not register on the land title but can still prevent dealings. While caveats and injunctions both restrain transactions, injunctions require court approval and can protect a broader range of interests.
This document summarizes key provisions related to land charges under the National Land Code of Malaysia. It discusses the fixed obligations of a chargor, the remedies available to a chargee upon default of a charge (sale or possession of the land), and the procedures for obtaining a court order for sale. These include serving notice of demand, making an application to the High Court, public auction of the land, and issuance of a certificate of sale. It also analyzes several cases related to issues like serving the proper notice, specifying the breach, duration of notice periods, and valid service of notices.
The document discusses the meaning and effects of a prohibitory order (PO) under Malaysian law. A PO is a court order obtained by a judgment creditor against a judgment debtor to restrain the debtor from disposing of land subject to execution proceedings to recover a judgment debt. It prohibits registration of dealings on the land. Case law discussed establishes that a PO only binds the interest still held by the debtor and cannot override prior interests, and an extension requires proof of special circumstances. The document provides definitions and explanations of key terminology and procedures regarding POs under the relevant laws and rules of court.
This document provides an overview of security dealings recognized under the National Land Code 1965 in Malaysia, specifically charges or Torrens charges. It defines a charge as a security transaction where a landowner pledges their land as collateral for a loan. If the borrower defaults, the lender can foreclose and sell the land. The key requirements for creating a valid charge are using the prescribed statutory form and registering it with the relevant land office. The document outlines the differences between charges and common law mortgages, as well as restrictions and various cases related to charges under the National Land Code.
The document discusses whether an order for sale should be granted to Bank Indah Berhad due to Oren's failure to remedy a breach. It explains that a charge is a transaction where land or a lease is used as security for a loan. For a charge to be valid, it must be registered under the National Land Code. The document outlines the process for an order of sale, which includes serving a statutory notice on the chargor regarding the breach. If the breach is not remedied, the chargee can apply for an order of sale to recover the outstanding amount through an auction of the charged property. As Oren failed to remedy the breach after notice, Bank Indah Berhad would be entitled to an order for
This document summarizes the background of a civil case between Madasama Goodway Sdn Bhd and Lim Eng Huat regarding the sale of a property. Key points:
- Lim Eng Huat had rented a property from Madasama and wanted to purchase it after a fire damaged the building. They signed an agreement on July 19, 2002 for RM270,000.
- Lim paid a deposit and took steps to obtain financing, but Madasama refused to complete the sale. Lim filed a lawsuit seeking specific performance of the agreement.
- The High Court ruled in Lim's favor, but Madasama appealed. The document outlines the claims and evidence presented by both sides regarding whether the agreement was
Criminal Procedure I - POWERS OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN MALAYSIA intnmsrh
The document discusses the powers of the Public Prosecutor (PP) in Malaysia regarding criminal procedures. It outlines that the PP has the sole power to institute and conduct criminal proceedings per the Federal Constitution. This power is exercised at the PP's discretion and is limited to criminal proceedings in civil courts. The document also distinguishes between the PP's powers regarding consenting to prosecutions versus sanctioning prosecutions. It notes that lack of consent is fatal to a case, while lack of sanction can potentially be cured. Finally, it discusses limitations on the PP's powers, effects of discontinuing proceedings, and relevant case law on the topic.
A lien is a right to retain possession of property belonging to another person as security for payment of a debt. A lien is created in two stages: first, the proprietor or lessee deposits the land title or duplicate lease with a lender as security for a loan, creating an equitable lien. Second, the lender enters a lien-holder's caveat on the land title at the land office, creating a statutory lien. Key requirements for a valid lien are that the registered proprietor deposits the title with intent to secure a loan. While express consent is not needed to lodge a caveat, fraud in the creation of security can be an issue. A lien provides a speedy way for businessmen to raise money compared
This document discusses security dealings recognized under the National Land Code 1965 (NLC), specifically charges or Torrens charges. It defines a charge as a security transaction where a registered landowner uses their land as collateral for a loan. If the borrower defaults, the lender can foreclose and sell the land. Key requirements for creating a valid charge include using the prescribed statutory form and registering the charge at the relevant land office. The document outlines differences between charges and common law mortgages, what types of land can be charged, restrictions on charging, and requirements like amending statutory forms in annexures.
An easement is a right over another's land, such as a right of way. It must be created by express grant between proprietors and registered. An unregistered easement gives no rights. Alternatively, if the neighbor refuses a registered easement, one can apply to the Land Administrator for a right of way (LAROW), though the Administrator is reluctant if other access exists. The document discusses these concepts and differences between an easement and LAROW under the National Land Code.
This document provides an overview of the legal definition and interpretation of charity in England and Wales. It discusses how charity has traditionally been defined by reference to the preamble of the Statute of Charitable Uses 1601, which lists several charitable purposes. The document also summarizes Lord MacNaghten's four principal categories of charity and notes that to be charitable, a purpose must satisfy certain tests of public benefit. It concludes by noting how charity law has developed in England and Wales and how it is interpreted in Malaysia.
1. Jual janji is a traditional Malay practice where land is transferred to a lender as security for a loan, with the understanding that it will be returned to the borrower upon repayment.
2. Malaysian courts initially treated jual janji strictly as a sale, ignoring evidence it was intended as security. However, exceptions developed where time was not of the essence or the lender evaded repayment.
3. Recent cases and the National Land Code have recognized jual janji can operate as an equitable security transaction, balancing title rights with contractual obligations.
Security dealing remedies for registered chargeeHafizul Mukhlis
The document discusses statutory remedies available to a registered chargee under the National Land Code upon default by the chargor in repaying a loan. There are two main remedies: (1) obtaining an order for sale of the charged property by public auction from the High Court or Land Administrator; and (2) taking possession of the charged property. The document outlines the procedures for applying for an order of sale, the Land Administrator's role in inquiries, and cases that may establish "cause to the contrary" to prevent an order for sale.
This document provides an overview of the Torrens land registration system in Malaysia and the key principles of registration of dealings under this system. It discusses how registration is the cornerstone of the Torrens system and how it aims to overcome the defects of the previous deeds system. It outlines the types of dealings that can and cannot be registered, and explains the requirements and process for valid registration. Key topics covered include the duties of the registrar, effects of registration and unregistered dealings, and how errors are corrected in the register. The overall purpose is to explain how registration confers indefeasible title under the Torrens system.
Toman can challenge the indefeasibility of the charge in favor of Bank Haruan Berhad on the grounds of forgery or fraud. Forgery occurred when Mahmud used a forged power of attorney to charge Toman's property to the bank without Toman's knowledge. The bank cannot claim to be a bona fide purchaser for value because as an immediate chargee, the title is still defeasible under Malaysian law which applies deferred indefeasibility. Toman was not aware of the transaction and did not consent to the charge.
LL1 slides extent of ownership and enjoyment of land part 2xareejx
This document discusses the extent of ownership and enjoyment of land under Malaysian law. It addresses ownership rights below the surface as well as the right to support of land.
The owner has exclusive use and enjoyment of the land below the surface as is reasonably necessary. Trespassing below another's surface, such as by mining or inserting anchors, is actionable. However, ownership rights below a specified depth belong to the state.
A landowner also has the right to support of his land from adjacent land in its natural state. The owner of adjacent land cannot withdraw natural support. This right does not extend to land that has been excavated or weakened. Some jurisdictions like Singapore interpret this right of support to also apply to buildings
This chapter is listed under Land Law II.
Containing:
1. Introduction
2. Creation & effect of LHC
3. Procedures to Enter LHC
4. Function of Registrar
5. Effect of LHC
6. Failure in caveating the land
7. Cancellation of LHC
This document is a summons filed in the Federal High Court of Nigeria by Mallam Sanusi Lamido Sanusi against the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria and its Executive Secretary. Sanusi claims that the FRCN acted beyond its statutory powers and violated his right to fair hearing by recommending his removal as Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria without allowing him to respond to allegations. He is seeking declarations and orders relating to the FRCN's investigation and its recommendations to the President regarding his position at the CBN. The summons is supported by an affidavit detailing the background and Sanusi's claims against the FRCN.
Petisyen ini diajukan oleh tiga orang untuk mendapatkan probet atas harta warisan Leong Pak Weng yang meninggal dunia pada tanggal 6 Juni 2010. Petisyen ini dimaksudkan untuk memperoleh probet atas wasiat terakhir Leong Pak Weng yang menunjukkan ketiga petugas sebagai wasiat waris dan penerima manfaat.
Khor Ah Hooi, the Director of Seleksi Penbina Sdn Bhd, provides testimony regarding contracts between Seleksi Penbina and TF Land Sdn Bhd for construction work. Seleksi Penbina was awarded contracts totaling RM4,356 to construct a walkway and RM368,187 to construct a perimeter drain, and completed both projects as instructed. Official receipts in the Ikatan Dokumen Tambahan [Bahagian C] documentation provide proof of payments made by TF Land Sdn Bhd to Seleksi Penbina Sdn Bhd for the construction work. Khor Ah Hooi confirms that Seleksi Penbina received full payment for the work
This document is a deed of settlement between Chan Chee Seng and Tan Gaik Suan, who are getting divorced. It outlines agreements regarding child custody, maintenance payments, division of property including a vehicle and bank accounts, costs of the divorce proceedings, and a statement that this settlement represents the final agreement between the parties. The wife will have primary custody of their minor child, and the husband will have visitation rights and pay monthly maintenance.
Customer relationship management (CRM) helps companies build long-term relationships with customers by removing communication barriers, reducing costs, and enhancing effectiveness. Electronic CRM (e-CRM) systems are web-based and less expensive to implement than traditional CRM. e-CRM offers a customer-centric, flexible, and technology-enabled strategy for relationship building but requires strong leadership.
This document is a memorandum of appeal filed in the Court of Appeal of Malaysia regarding a civil suit. The appellants are appealing the decision of the High Court judge who dismissed their claim and allowed the respondent's counter-claim. The memorandum sets out 11 grounds of appeal, arguing that the High Court judge made multiple errors in his factual findings and legal analysis. It is argued that the evidence showed the deceased lacked testamentary capacity and the will propounded by the respondent should not have been admitted to probate due to suspicious circumstances surrounding its creation.
Materi kuliah mata kuliah Korespondensi Bahasa Inggris membahas tentang:
1. Jenis-jenis surat bisnis seperti surat permintaan informasi, penawaran, balasan, pesanan, referensi, pelaksanaan pengiriman barang, keluhan, dan penagihan.
2. Bagian-bagian surat seperti heading, dateline, inside address, attention line, salutation, subject line, body, complimentary close, signature, enclosure, dan carbon copy notation.
3. Panduan penulisan surat bisnis se
MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM on civil & criminal exam notesFAROUQ
This document discusses preliminary matters in civil procedure regarding parties in an action. It covers requirements for parties such as being sui juris and compos mentis. It also discusses types of parties like individuals, firms, companies, deceased estates, and representatives. The document then discusses cause of action, locus standi, limitation periods, and commencing an action through a writ. It outlines the process for issuing, serving, renewing and substituting service of a writ, as well as timelines for appearance. The key information provided is on the requirements for valid parties in a civil action and the procedures for commencing a case through issuance and service of a writ.
How to Make Awesome SlideShares: Tips & TricksSlideShare
Turbocharge your online presence with SlideShare. We provide the best tips and tricks for succeeding on SlideShare. Get ideas for what to upload, tips for designing your deck and more.
SlideShare is a global platform for sharing presentations, infographics, videos and documents. It has over 18 million pieces of professional content uploaded by experts like Eric Schmidt and Guy Kawasaki. The document provides tips for setting up an account on SlideShare, uploading content, optimizing it for searchability, and sharing it on social media to build an audience and reputation as a subject matter expert.
1. DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI ALOR SETAR
DALAM NEGERI KEDAH DARULAMAN
SAMAN PEMULA NO: 24- -2013
Dalam perkara mengenai Gadaian
bertarikh 8.12.2010 yang didaftarkan
pada 29.12.2010 di bawah Perserahan No.
24766/2010 ke atas tanah dan
hereditamen yang dikenali sebagai Lot
13655, Mukim Sungai Petani (sekarang
jadi Bandar Sungai Petani), Daerah
Kuala Muda, Kedah yang dipegang di
bawah Geran 17044 (sekarang jadi Geran
72019)
Dan
Dalam perkara mengenai Seksyen-seksyen
256 dan 257 dan 267A Kanun Tanah Negara
1965
Dan
Dalam perkara mengenai Aturan 83,
Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012
Antara
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad
(No. Syarikat 127776-V) ... Plaintif
Dan
Arasu a/l Subramaniam ... Defendan
SAMAN PEMULA
Benarkan Arasu a/l Subramaniam beralamat di 46, Lorong 19A,
Taman Bandar Baru, Sungai Lalang, 08100 Bedong, Kedah dan/atau
2. 11, Lorong Jati 17A, Taman Bandar Baru, Sungai Lalang, 08100
Bedong, Kedah dan/atau Lot 236, 238 & 240, Kawasan Perindustrian
LPK, Taman Ria Jaya, 08000 Sungai Petani, Kedah hadir di hadapan
Hakim (atau Pendaftar) Dalam Kamar pada hari pada
haribulan 2013 pada pukul pagi/petang
untuk pendengaran suatu permohonan oleh Plaintif untuk perintah-
perintah berikut:-
1. Bahawa hartanah kepunyaan Defendan yang dikenali sebagai
Lot 13655, Mukim Sungai Petani (sekarang jadi Bandar Sungai
Petani), Daerah Kuala Muda, Kedah yang dipegang di bawah
Geran 17044 (sekarang jadi Geran 72019) [kemudian daripada
ini dirujuk sebagai “hartanah tersebut”] dan digadaikan
oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif di bawah peruntukan-
peruntukan Kanun Tanah Negara 1965 dengan Gadaian
Perserahan No. 24766/2010 (kemudian daripada ini dirujuk
sebagai “Gadaian tersebut”) dijual melalui lelongan awam di
bawah Seksyen-seksyen 256, 257 dan 267A Kanun Tanah Negara
1965 dan hasil jualan seterusnya dibayar kepada Plaintif
untuk menyelesaikan jumlah wang sebanyak RM64,453.12
(Ringgit Malaysia Enam Puluh Empat Ribu Empat Ratus Lima
Puluh Tiga dan Sen Dua Belas) sahaja yang merupakan jumlah
keseluruhan yang tertunggak dan terhutang kepada Plaintif
seperti pada 31.7.2013.
2
3. Faedah pada masa ini terakru pada kadar 1.80% setahun di
bawah Kadar Pinjaman Asas Semasa Plaintif iaitu 6.60%
[tertakluk kepada perubahan] atas hentian harian dikira
atas dasar 30/360 sehingga penyelesaian penuh.
2. Bahawa pada masa Perintah Penjualan diperintahkan, Mahkamah
Yang Mulia ini menetapkan tarikh penjualan hartanah
tersebut melalui lelongan awam sebagai satu tarikh yang
tidak kurang dari satu (1) bulan selepas tarikh Perintah
yang akan dibuat di sini atau pada tarikh secepat yang
boleh selepas itu seperti yang diluluskan oleh Penolong
Kanan Pendaftar Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini.
3. Bahawa Penolong Kanan Pendaftar Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini
meluluskan syarat-syarat jualan dan menetapkan harga rizab
bagi maksud jualan lelongan awam hartanah tersebut
berpandukan laporan penilaian yang akan dikemukakan kelak.
4. Bahawa tiada orang yang dibenarkan membuat tawaran di dalam
jualan kecuali jika pegawai Mahkamah berpuas hati bahawa
orang yang membuat tawaran itu memiliki, pada masa jualan
itu, sejumlah wang yang bersamaan dengan sepuluh peratus
3
4. (10%) daripada harga rizab yang dinyatakan di bawah
perenggan 3.
5. Bahawa di mana keseluruhan jumlah daripada harga belian
tidak dibayar setelah jatuhnya penukul oleh orang yang
telah berjaya membuat tawaran, jumlah yang dinyatakan di
bawah perenggan 4 hendaklah dibayar sebagai deposit kepada
pemegang gadaian dan seterusnya dikreditkan ke dalam akaun
penggadai sementara menunggu penyelesaian baki harga belian
tersebut.
6. Bahawa baki harga belian hendaklah diselesaikan pada tarikh
tidak lewat daripada satu ratus dua puluh (120) hari dari
tarikh jualan dan bahawa hendaklah tiada apa-apa lanjutan
bagi tempoh yang telah ditetapkan.
7. Bahawa di mana baki harga belian tidak diselesaikan pada
tarikh yang dinyatakan di bawah perengan 6, jumlah yang
dibayar sebagai deposit di bawah perenggan 5 kepada
pemegang gadaian hendaklah dilucuthak dan pelupusan
hendaklah dilakukan di bawah cara-cara yang diperuntukkan
di bawah Seksyen 267A Kanun Tanah Negara 1965.
8. Bahawa penjualan melalui lelongan awam hartanah tersebut
dikendalikan oleh pelelong berlesen dan berkeupayaan untuk
4
5. diluluskan oleh Mahkamah ini dan kos pelelong dibayar dari
hasil jualan hartanah tersebut.
9. Bahawa semasa jualan lelongan awam tersebut, Plaintif
diberi kebebasan untuk membuat tawaran tanpa perlu membayar
sebarang deposit dan dinamakan sebagai pembeli sekiranya
tawarannya merupakan tawaran tertinggi dan bahawa Plaintif
bebas untuk menolak harga tawaran daripada jumlah yang
terhutang oleh Defendan di bawah Gadaian tersebut pada
tarikh jualan dan kos serta perbelanjaan jualan dan segala
kos permohonan ini.
10. Bahawa Penolong Kanan Pendaftar Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini
diberikuasa untuk melaksanakan dan menyempurnakan mana-mana
dokumen yang diperlukan untuk memindahmilik hartanah
tersebut kepada pembeli di jualan itu.
11. Bahawa sekiranya jualan secara lelong itu diteruskan, hasil
jualan tersebut hendaklah digunakan untuk menyelesaikan
jumlah wang yang masih terhutang kepada Plaintif di bawah
Gadaian tersebut dan mana-mana denda, kos, perbelanjaan dan
caj menurut peruntukan Seksyen 268 Kanun Tanah Negara 1965
dan baki wang, sekiranya ada, dibayar kepada Penggadai
tertakluk kepada sub-seksyen (3), Seksyen 339 Kanun Tanah
Negara 1965.
5
6. 12. Bahawa segala kos, perbelanjaan dan kos perbelanjaan
sampingan permohonan ini dan bagi jualan lelongan awam
tersebut ditetapkan atas dasar peguamcara dan anakguaman
oleh Penolong Kanan Pendaftar dan ditambah kepada jumlah
yang terhutang di bawah Gadaian tersebut dan dibayar oleh
Defendan kepada Plaintif dari hasil jualan tersebut.
13. Bahawa Defendan atau penghuni atau pihak-pihak yang
menuntut hak, hakmilik dan kepentingan hartanah tersebut
meninggalkan dan menyerahkan milikan kosong hartanah
tersebut kepada pembeli dalam tempoh tujuh (7) hari dari
tarikh perintah jualan lelong tersebut dikeluarkan.
14. Jika jualan tersebut tidak berjaya atau tidak dapat
dijalankan pada tarikh yang ditetapkan oleh Mahkamah atas
apa-apa alasan, Plaintif berhak dan bebas untuk memohon
kepada Penolong Kanan Pendaftar untuk arahan dan perintah
selanjutnya berkenaan dengan lelongan tersebut.
15. Bahawa pihak-pihak berkuasa yang berkenaan mendaftar
pindahmilik hartanah tersebut apabila hartanah tersebut
dijual di lelongan awam.
6
7. 16. Lain-lain perintah atau relif atau arahan berkaitan jualan
tersebut yang dianggap sebagai patut, adil dan suaimanfaat
oleh Mahkamah Yang Mulia ini.
Bertarikh pada haribulan 2013.
…………………………………………………………………
Penolong Kanan Pendaftar
Mahkamah Tinggi
Alor Setar
7
8. Saman Pemula ini disokong oleh Afidavit yang diikrarkan oleh
Sukvender Kaur a/p Daljit Singh Chima dan difailkan di sini.
Saman ini diambil oleh Tetuan Presgrave & Matthews yang
beralamat di Kamar Standard Chartered Bank, No.2 Lebuh Pantai,
10300 Pulau Pinang, peguam kepada Plaintif tersebut yang
beralamat berdaftar di No.2 Leboh Ampang, 50100 Kuala Lumpur dan
beralamat perniagaan di 69, Jalan Ibrahim, 08000 Sungei Petani,
Kedah.
Nota: Saman ini tidak boleh disampaikan lebih daripada enam
(6) bulan kalendar selepas tarikh di atas melainkan
jika diperbaharui oleh Perintah Mahkamah.
Sekiranya Defendan tidak hadir secara sendiri atau melalui
peguam atau peguamcaranya di waktu dan tempat yang disebut di
atas perintah akan dibuat sebagaimana yang difikirkan adil dan
suai manfaat oleh Mahkamah.
8
9. DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI ALOR SETAR
DALAM NEGERI KEDAH DARULAMAN
SAMAN PEMULA NO: 24- -2013
Dalam perkara mengenai Gadaian bertarikh
8.12.2010 yang didaftarkan pada 29.12.2010
di bawah Perserahan No. 24766/2010 ke atas
tanah dan hereditamen yang dikenali sebagai
Lot 13655, Mukim Sungai Petani (sekarang
jadi Bandar Sungai Petani), Daerah Kuala
Muda, Kedah yang dipegang di bawah Geran
17044 (sekarang jadi Geran 72019)
Dan
Dalam perkara mengenai Seksyen-seksyen 256
dan 257 dan 267A Kanun Tanah Negara 1965
Dan
Dalam perkara mengenai Aturan 83, Kaedah-
Kaedah Mahkamah 2012
Antara
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad
(No. Syarikat 127776-V) ... Plaintif
Dan
Arasu a/l Subramaniam ... Defendan
****************************************************************
SAMAN PEMULA
****************************************************************
Peguamcara bagi Plaintif
Tetuan Presgrave & Matthews
Kamar Standard Chartered Bank
No. 2 Lebuh Pantai
10300 Pulau Pinang
[Ruj: NR/20120917]
Difailkan pada haribulan 2013.
9
10. DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI ALOR SETAR
DALAM NEGERI KEDAH DARULAMAN
SAMAN PEMULA NO: 24- -2013
Dalam perkara mengenai Gadaian bertarikh
8.12.2010 yang didaftarkan pada 29.12.2010
di bawah Perserahan No. 24766/2010 ke atas
tanah dan hereditamen yang dikenali sebagai
Lot 13655, Mukim Sungai Petani (sekarang
jadi Bandar Sungai Petani), Daerah Kuala
Muda, Kedah yang dipegang di bawah Geran
17044 (sekarang jadi Geran 72019)
Dan
Dalam perkara mengenai Seksyen-seksyen 256
dan 257 dan 267A Kanun Tanah Negara 1965
Dan
Dalam perkara mengenai Aturan 83, Kaedah-
Kaedah Mahkamah 2012
Antara
HSBC Bank Malaysia Berhad
(No. Syarikat 127776-V) ... Plaintif
Dan
Arasu a/l Subramaniam ... Defendan
****************************************************************
SAMAN PEMULA
****************************************************************
Peguamcara bagi Plaintif
Tetuan Presgrave & Matthews
Kamar Standard Chartered Bank
No. 2 Lebuh Pantai
10300 Pulau Pinang
[Ruj: NR/20120917]
Difailkan pada haribulan 2013.
9
![11, Lorong Jati 17A, Taman Bandar Baru, Sungai Lalang, 08100
Bedong, Kedah dan/atau Lot 236, 238 & 240, Kawasan Perindustrian
LPK, Taman Ria Jaya, 08000 Sungai Petani, Kedah hadir di hadapan
Hakim (atau Pendaftar) Dalam Kamar pada hari pada
haribulan 2013 pada pukul pagi/petang
untuk pendengaran suatu permohonan oleh Plaintif untuk perintah-
perintah berikut:-
1. Bahawa hartanah kepunyaan Defendan yang dikenali sebagai
Lot 13655, Mukim Sungai Petani (sekarang jadi Bandar Sungai
Petani), Daerah Kuala Muda, Kedah yang dipegang di bawah
Geran 17044 (sekarang jadi Geran 72019) [kemudian daripada
ini dirujuk sebagai “hartanah tersebut”] dan digadaikan
oleh Defendan kepada Plaintif di bawah peruntukan-
peruntukan Kanun Tanah Negara 1965 dengan Gadaian
Perserahan No. 24766/2010 (kemudian daripada ini dirujuk
sebagai “Gadaian tersebut”) dijual melalui lelongan awam di
bawah Seksyen-seksyen 256, 257 dan 267A Kanun Tanah Negara
1965 dan hasil jualan seterusnya dibayar kepada Plaintif
untuk menyelesaikan jumlah wang sebanyak RM64,453.12
(Ringgit Malaysia Enam Puluh Empat Ribu Empat Ratus Lima
Puluh Tiga dan Sen Dua Belas) sahaja yang merupakan jumlah
keseluruhan yang tertunggak dan terhutang kepada Plaintif
seperti pada 31.7.2013.
2]()