This presentation is about section 96 of Syariah Criminal Procedure (Fed. Territories) Act, (Malaysia) under the course of Evidence and procedure of shariah court ii
Modes of Originating Process - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes the different modes of originating process in the Malaysian High Court under the Rules of Court 2012, including writs of summons and originating summonses. It outlines when each process is appropriate based on whether substantial disputes of fact are likely to arise. It also discusses cases that demonstrate when certain claims must be commenced by writ, can be determined summarily by originating summons, or are inappropriate for a given mode of process. The document concludes by examining the effects of using the wrong originating process and circumstances where proceedings will continue instead of being set aside.
This document provides an outline and explanation of key concepts related to documentary evidence under Malaysian law, including:
- The definition of a document and various examples.
- The process of authenticating documentary evidence, which involves first proving the genuineness of the document and then proving its content.
- Requirements for proving genuineness, including calling the author as a witness or proving handwriting. If these requirements are not met, the document constitutes inadmissible hearsay.
- Requirements for proving content, including introducing the original document as primary evidence and allowing secondary evidence like copies only in certain situations.
The document discusses relevant sections of the Malaysian Evidence Act and case law examples to illustrate proper
The document discusses bail amounts set in three criminal cases in Malaysia. In the first case, bail of RM70,000 was set for a man charged with 14 offenses related to insulting the Johor royal family, which many viewed as excessive given the charges and the man's financial means. In the second case, bail of RM5,000 was set for a sedition charge, which matched the maximum fine amount and was also seen as unjustifiably high. In the third case, bail of RM15,000 was set for a prominent opposition figure charged with criminal defamation, which some argued was still excessive despite being lower than what prosecutors requested. The document analyzes factors courts typically consider for bail amounts and concludes the
Sunn Ang the accused was charged and convicted for the murder of his girl friend Jenny. A Singapore case related to the law of evidence. Circumstantial evidence, Relevancy, Continuity.
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Hearsay evidence refers to statements made out of court that are offered in court as evidence to prove the truth of what was stated. Hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible as evidence because it is not direct evidence and the person who made the original statement cannot be cross-examined. However, hearsay may be allowed if it is not being used to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but rather to show that something was said. The document discusses the definition of hearsay evidence, reasons why it is generally excluded, and examples of cases where hearsay evidence was either admitted or excluded from trials.
Relevancy of evidence under Section 5 of Evidence Act1950Intan Muhammad
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Modes of Originating Process - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes the different modes of originating process in the Malaysian High Court under the Rules of Court 2012, including writs of summons and originating summonses. It outlines when each process is appropriate based on whether substantial disputes of fact are likely to arise. It also discusses cases that demonstrate when certain claims must be commenced by writ, can be determined summarily by originating summons, or are inappropriate for a given mode of process. The document concludes by examining the effects of using the wrong originating process and circumstances where proceedings will continue instead of being set aside.
This document provides an outline and explanation of key concepts related to documentary evidence under Malaysian law, including:
- The definition of a document and various examples.
- The process of authenticating documentary evidence, which involves first proving the genuineness of the document and then proving its content.
- Requirements for proving genuineness, including calling the author as a witness or proving handwriting. If these requirements are not met, the document constitutes inadmissible hearsay.
- Requirements for proving content, including introducing the original document as primary evidence and allowing secondary evidence like copies only in certain situations.
The document discusses relevant sections of the Malaysian Evidence Act and case law examples to illustrate proper
The document discusses bail amounts set in three criminal cases in Malaysia. In the first case, bail of RM70,000 was set for a man charged with 14 offenses related to insulting the Johor royal family, which many viewed as excessive given the charges and the man's financial means. In the second case, bail of RM5,000 was set for a sedition charge, which matched the maximum fine amount and was also seen as unjustifiably high. In the third case, bail of RM15,000 was set for a prominent opposition figure charged with criminal defamation, which some argued was still excessive despite being lower than what prosecutors requested. The document analyzes factors courts typically consider for bail amounts and concludes the
Sunn Ang the accused was charged and convicted for the murder of his girl friend Jenny. A Singapore case related to the law of evidence. Circumstantial evidence, Relevancy, Continuity.
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Hearsay evidence refers to statements made out of court that are offered in court as evidence to prove the truth of what was stated. Hearsay evidence is generally inadmissible as evidence because it is not direct evidence and the person who made the original statement cannot be cross-examined. However, hearsay may be allowed if it is not being used to prove the truth of the matter asserted, but rather to show that something was said. The document discusses the definition of hearsay evidence, reasons why it is generally excluded, and examples of cases where hearsay evidence was either admitted or excluded from trials.
Relevancy of evidence under Section 5 of Evidence Act1950Intan Muhammad
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The document discusses the procedures for entering an appearance and obtaining a judgment in default of appearance (JIDA) under Malaysian civil procedure rules.
It explains that once served with a writ, the defendant must enter an appearance within a specified time limit, usually 14 days. Failure to do so allows the plaintiff to obtain a JIDA. A JIDA can be final, for liquidated sums, or interlocutory, requiring damages to be assessed.
The defendant can apply to set aside a JIDA within 30 days. For irregular judgments obtained not in compliance with rules, the JIDA can be set aside as of right. For regular judgments, the defendant must show they have a defense on the merits by disclosing evidence
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
Preliminary matters to be considered before commencing a civil suitIntan Muhammad
Contents :
Cause of Action
Locus Standi
Limitation Period
Jurisdiction of Court & Mode of beginning (in s separate note, namely bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah2 di malaysia)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Legal Burden of Accused in Criminal CasesASMAH CHE WAN
The document discusses the burden of proof in criminal cases. It states that the prosecution primarily has the legal burden to prove the accused's guilt. The accused has a legal burden to prove defenses. Specifically:
1) The prosecution has the initial burden to establish a prima facie case and prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
2) The accused has a legal burden to prove defenses, like alibi, once the prosecution has provided evidence of guilt. The accused must cast doubt on the prosecution's case to be acquitted.
3) The accused does not have to prove defenses beyond a reasonable doubt, but rather on a balance of probabilities or by raising reasonable doubt.
This document outlines the key distinctions and grounds for void and voidable marriages under Malaysian law. It discusses:
1) The differences between void and voidable marriages, such as the need for a decree and who can bring an action. Void marriages are invalid from the start, while voidable marriages can be annulled.
2) The jurisdiction of Malaysian courts to hear nullity petitions, which requires the marriage be registered in Malaysia or the parties reside in Malaysia.
3) The grounds for declaring a marriage void under Section 69, such as polygamy, underage parties, prohibited relationships, and same-sex marriages.
4) The grounds for annulling a marriage as void
Non expert opinion is not covered yeah:)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Order of priority:
1) 'B' - RM150,000 (original loan + further advance)
2) 'C' - RM50,000
So 'B' gets RM150,000 and 'C' gets the remaining RM10,000
The right to tack allows the 1st chargee ('B') to rank the further advance ahead of the 2nd chargee ('C'), even though the 2nd charge was created before the further advance under the 1st charge.
05/07/14 SZA 38
Postponement of Charge
• ‘A’ charges land to ‘B’ for RM100,000
• ‘A’ charges same land to ‘C’ for RM
1. A witness who is inconsistent in giving evidence, especially if the inconsistencies are material contradictions, cannot generally be regarded as a credible witness. However, not all inconsistencies necessarily undermine credibility.
2. For a witness to refresh their memory by referring to notes, certain conditions must be met under Section 159 of the Evidence Act. The writing must have been made by the witness at the time of the event or soon after.
3. Even if the conditions for refreshing memory are satisfied, the opposing party still has the right to inspect the document and cross-examine the witness on it. Referring to a document alone does not necessarily make the witness credible; it depends on whether the statutory safeguards are
This is a comparative study on the concept of illegally obtained evidence between Malaysia, United Kingdom, United States of America and the concept from Islamic Perspective.
The appellant, a defense lawyer for Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, filed a motion to disqualify two prosecutors based on supporting documents. The High Court judge held the motion was baseless and proposed holding the appellant in contempt of court. In a summary hearing, the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment. The Federal Court allowed the appeal, finding that: (1) the appellant was justified in filing the motion, so there was no abuse of court process; (2) the contempt charge was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) the appellant should have been granted an adjournment to fully prepare his defense, as denying this deprived him of a fair hearing.
Criminal Procedure I - POWERS OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN MALAYSIA intnmsrh
The document discusses the powers of the Public Prosecutor (PP) in Malaysia regarding criminal procedures. It outlines that the PP has the sole power to institute and conduct criminal proceedings per the Federal Constitution. This power is exercised at the PP's discretion and is limited to criminal proceedings in civil courts. The document also distinguishes between the PP's powers regarding consenting to prosecutions versus sanctioning prosecutions. It notes that lack of consent is fatal to a case, while lack of sanction can potentially be cured. Finally, it discusses limitations on the PP's powers, effects of discontinuing proceedings, and relevant case law on the topic.
The police arrested two men on suspicion of causing a traffic accident that killed one person based on a complaint filed the previous day. The police detained the men overnight without evidence of any wrongdoing. The men sued the police for false imprisonment. The court found that while the police were entitled to make an arrest if reasonable suspicion existed, they did not have grounds to suspect the men were driving recklessly. As such, the arrest and detention were unlawful and the police were liable for false imprisonment. The court ordered judgment accordingly.
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)Hafizul Mukhlis
1. Judicial notice allows courts to accept facts that are either generally known or can be determined from authoritative sources without requiring evidence.
2. There are three forms of judicial notice - without inquiry for notorious facts, after inquiry where courts investigate sources, and by statute for facts legislated.
3. While courts can investigate sources, judges cannot rely on their personal knowledge and must decide cases based solely on admissible evidence presented.
A lien is a right to retain possession of property belonging to another person as security for payment of a debt. A lien is created in two stages: first, the proprietor or lessee deposits the land title or duplicate lease with a lender as security for a loan, creating an equitable lien. Second, the lender enters a lien-holder's caveat on the land title at the land office, creating a statutory lien. Key requirements for a valid lien are that the registered proprietor deposits the title with intent to secure a loan. While express consent is not needed to lodge a caveat, fraud in the creation of security can be an issue. A lien provides a speedy way for businessmen to raise money compared
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
This document discusses the parol evidence rule in contract law in Malaysia. It provides definitions of key concepts like contracts and the parol evidence rule. The main points are:
1) Sections 91 and 92 of Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 govern the parol evidence rule - oral evidence cannot contradict a written contract except in specific exceptions.
2) There have been different interpretations by courts on when oral evidence can be admitted, with some cases taking a stricter view to protect the written terms.
3) Collateral contracts, being separate oral promises existing alongside the written contract, are one way oral evidence can be admitted without violating the parol evidence rule.
Trust Caveat under Land Law II syllabus. Containing definition, nature and effect of Trust Caveat, Duration under Section 333 of the NLC. Express Trust also is included in this slide. Creation of Trust Caveat under NLC, its' effect & the person eligible in entering into Trust Caveat.
A DIFFERENT Gospel - 3: A Different GospelDave Stewart
Synopsis: We must be very careful that in teaching the gospel we do not teach a different gospel that leads souls away from Christ and salvation in Him. Paul warns of teaching a different Jesus, Spirit, and Gospel. This one focus’ on a different gospel.
This document provides a summary and analysis of Surah Al-Bayyinah from Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
1. It explains the context and meaning of key terms and phrases in the surah, such as the "People of the Scripture" referring to Jews and Christians, and the "idolators" being polytheistic Arabs.
2. It analyzes the verses discussing how disbelievers would not cease until the "clear proof" or Quran came to them, and how the People of the Scripture differed after clear proofs were provided to them.
3. It summarizes the surah's message that believers who do righteous deeds will receive eternal reward in Paradise, while dis
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The document discusses the procedures for entering an appearance and obtaining a judgment in default of appearance (JIDA) under Malaysian civil procedure rules.
It explains that once served with a writ, the defendant must enter an appearance within a specified time limit, usually 14 days. Failure to do so allows the plaintiff to obtain a JIDA. A JIDA can be final, for liquidated sums, or interlocutory, requiring damages to be assessed.
The defendant can apply to set aside a JIDA within 30 days. For irregular judgments obtained not in compliance with rules, the JIDA can be set aside as of right. For regular judgments, the defendant must show they have a defense on the merits by disclosing evidence
Uploaded notes in my SlideShare are limited to the basic principles based on personal understanding and subject to few amendments. Comments and updates are welcomed! If the notes benefited you, kindly let me know :)
Preliminary matters to be considered before commencing a civil suitIntan Muhammad
Contents :
Cause of Action
Locus Standi
Limitation Period
Jurisdiction of Court & Mode of beginning (in s separate note, namely bidang kuasa sivil mahkamah2 di malaysia)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Legal Burden of Accused in Criminal CasesASMAH CHE WAN
The document discusses the burden of proof in criminal cases. It states that the prosecution primarily has the legal burden to prove the accused's guilt. The accused has a legal burden to prove defenses. Specifically:
1) The prosecution has the initial burden to establish a prima facie case and prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
2) The accused has a legal burden to prove defenses, like alibi, once the prosecution has provided evidence of guilt. The accused must cast doubt on the prosecution's case to be acquitted.
3) The accused does not have to prove defenses beyond a reasonable doubt, but rather on a balance of probabilities or by raising reasonable doubt.
This document outlines the key distinctions and grounds for void and voidable marriages under Malaysian law. It discusses:
1) The differences between void and voidable marriages, such as the need for a decree and who can bring an action. Void marriages are invalid from the start, while voidable marriages can be annulled.
2) The jurisdiction of Malaysian courts to hear nullity petitions, which requires the marriage be registered in Malaysia or the parties reside in Malaysia.
3) The grounds for declaring a marriage void under Section 69, such as polygamy, underage parties, prohibited relationships, and same-sex marriages.
4) The grounds for annulling a marriage as void
Non expert opinion is not covered yeah:)
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Order of priority:
1) 'B' - RM150,000 (original loan + further advance)
2) 'C' - RM50,000
So 'B' gets RM150,000 and 'C' gets the remaining RM10,000
The right to tack allows the 1st chargee ('B') to rank the further advance ahead of the 2nd chargee ('C'), even though the 2nd charge was created before the further advance under the 1st charge.
05/07/14 SZA 38
Postponement of Charge
• ‘A’ charges land to ‘B’ for RM100,000
• ‘A’ charges same land to ‘C’ for RM
1. A witness who is inconsistent in giving evidence, especially if the inconsistencies are material contradictions, cannot generally be regarded as a credible witness. However, not all inconsistencies necessarily undermine credibility.
2. For a witness to refresh their memory by referring to notes, certain conditions must be met under Section 159 of the Evidence Act. The writing must have been made by the witness at the time of the event or soon after.
3. Even if the conditions for refreshing memory are satisfied, the opposing party still has the right to inspect the document and cross-examine the witness on it. Referring to a document alone does not necessarily make the witness credible; it depends on whether the statutory safeguards are
This is a comparative study on the concept of illegally obtained evidence between Malaysia, United Kingdom, United States of America and the concept from Islamic Perspective.
The appellant, a defense lawyer for Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, filed a motion to disqualify two prosecutors based on supporting documents. The High Court judge held the motion was baseless and proposed holding the appellant in contempt of court. In a summary hearing, the appellant was found guilty and sentenced to 3 months imprisonment. The Federal Court allowed the appeal, finding that: (1) the appellant was justified in filing the motion, so there was no abuse of court process; (2) the contempt charge was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and (3) the appellant should have been granted an adjournment to fully prepare his defense, as denying this deprived him of a fair hearing.
Criminal Procedure I - POWERS OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR IN MALAYSIA intnmsrh
The document discusses the powers of the Public Prosecutor (PP) in Malaysia regarding criminal procedures. It outlines that the PP has the sole power to institute and conduct criminal proceedings per the Federal Constitution. This power is exercised at the PP's discretion and is limited to criminal proceedings in civil courts. The document also distinguishes between the PP's powers regarding consenting to prosecutions versus sanctioning prosecutions. It notes that lack of consent is fatal to a case, while lack of sanction can potentially be cured. Finally, it discusses limitations on the PP's powers, effects of discontinuing proceedings, and relevant case law on the topic.
The police arrested two men on suspicion of causing a traffic accident that killed one person based on a complaint filed the previous day. The police detained the men overnight without evidence of any wrongdoing. The men sued the police for false imprisonment. The court found that while the police were entitled to make an arrest if reasonable suspicion existed, they did not have grounds to suspect the men were driving recklessly. As such, the arrest and detention were unlawful and the police were liable for false imprisonment. The court ordered judgment accordingly.
EVIDENCE LAW 1(12) judicial notice (pengiktirafan penghakiman)Hafizul Mukhlis
1. Judicial notice allows courts to accept facts that are either generally known or can be determined from authoritative sources without requiring evidence.
2. There are three forms of judicial notice - without inquiry for notorious facts, after inquiry where courts investigate sources, and by statute for facts legislated.
3. While courts can investigate sources, judges cannot rely on their personal knowledge and must decide cases based solely on admissible evidence presented.
A lien is a right to retain possession of property belonging to another person as security for payment of a debt. A lien is created in two stages: first, the proprietor or lessee deposits the land title or duplicate lease with a lender as security for a loan, creating an equitable lien. Second, the lender enters a lien-holder's caveat on the land title at the land office, creating a statutory lien. Key requirements for a valid lien are that the registered proprietor deposits the title with intent to secure a loan. While express consent is not needed to lodge a caveat, fraud in the creation of security can be an issue. A lien provides a speedy way for businessmen to raise money compared
CONTOH MOOTING OLEH PELAJAR TAHUN AKHIR DI UUMASMAH CHE WAN
Appeal on criminal case which is a rape case. we are acting on behalf of appellant (accused). This case was based on real situation in the case of Azahan bin Aminallah v PP.
This document discusses the parol evidence rule in contract law in Malaysia. It provides definitions of key concepts like contracts and the parol evidence rule. The main points are:
1) Sections 91 and 92 of Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 govern the parol evidence rule - oral evidence cannot contradict a written contract except in specific exceptions.
2) There have been different interpretations by courts on when oral evidence can be admitted, with some cases taking a stricter view to protect the written terms.
3) Collateral contracts, being separate oral promises existing alongside the written contract, are one way oral evidence can be admitted without violating the parol evidence rule.
Trust Caveat under Land Law II syllabus. Containing definition, nature and effect of Trust Caveat, Duration under Section 333 of the NLC. Express Trust also is included in this slide. Creation of Trust Caveat under NLC, its' effect & the person eligible in entering into Trust Caveat.
A DIFFERENT Gospel - 3: A Different GospelDave Stewart
Synopsis: We must be very careful that in teaching the gospel we do not teach a different gospel that leads souls away from Christ and salvation in Him. Paul warns of teaching a different Jesus, Spirit, and Gospel. This one focus’ on a different gospel.
This document provides a summary and analysis of Surah Al-Bayyinah from Tafsir Ibn Kathir.
1. It explains the context and meaning of key terms and phrases in the surah, such as the "People of the Scripture" referring to Jews and Christians, and the "idolators" being polytheistic Arabs.
2. It analyzes the verses discussing how disbelievers would not cease until the "clear proof" or Quran came to them, and how the People of the Scripture differed after clear proofs were provided to them.
3. It summarizes the surah's message that believers who do righteous deeds will receive eternal reward in Paradise, while dis
The document summarizes the Bersih movement in Malaysia which advocates for clean and fair elections. It notes that while the movement claims to be non-partisan, it is endorsed by the opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim and has received foreign funding from organizations like the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and George Soros' Open Society Institute (OSI), which are in turn funded by the US government. It suggests the movement is being used to stir unrest and ultimately implement regime change to install a US-friendly government, as the current ruling party has criticized US policies. Recent Bersih protests turned violent as police cracked down on demonstrators.
Review of syariah court decisions by the high courtNoor Atikah
The document summarizes two court cases regarding the jurisdiction of civil and syariah courts in Malaysia to determine matters relating to a person's religion.
In the first case, the High Court held that under the Federal Constitution, civil courts cannot interfere with or set aside orders from Syariah courts, as their jurisdictions are separate.
The second case involved competing claims over the body of a deceased man from his Hindu wife and the Majlis Agama Islam. The Syariah Court had ordered the body be buried according to Islamic rites, but the High Court dismissed the wife's attempt to nullify his conversion to Islam, holding that it had no jurisdiction to review Syariah Court decisions or determine matters of Islamic
Al Bakhtiar bin Ab Samat v Public Prosecutor [2012] 4 MLJ 713
Evidence -- Similar fact evidence -- Admission of -- First charge was for possession of 30.40g of cannabis and second charge for trafficking dangerous drugs -- Whether any similarity in respect of both charges -Whether trial judge misdirected himself when acted on evidence of first charge to prove knowledge of trafficking charge -- Principles relating to similar fact evidence -- Evidence Act 1950 ss 14 & 15
Michael O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police [2005] UKHL 26Ikram Abdul Sattar
This document summarizes the case Michael O'Brien v Chief Constable of South Wales Police. It discusses:
- The respondent's murder conviction was overturned after 11 years in prison. He claimed damages against the police for oppressive and dishonest investigation.
- The respondent sought to present evidence of similar misconduct by the same two officers in other cases. The chief constable appealed, arguing similar evidence required an enhanced probative value.
- The Court of Appeal ruled the evidence was admissible, applying the same test as in criminal cases. The House of Lords dismissed the appeal, finding no rule that similar evidence in civil cases required enhanced probative value to be admitted. The appropriate test was relevance to the issues in
The appellant was charged with raping his 15-year old daughter in 1996. During the trial, the prosecution's main witness, the daughter, testified about additional incidents of sexual intercourse with the appellant in 1991 and 1995. Based on this, additional charges were brought against the appellant. The Court of Appeal found issues with how the case was investigated and prosecuted, including that trying the appellant for multiple offenses over several years violated criminal procedure rules. The sessions court also did not properly evaluate whether the prejudicial effect of the earlier testimony outweighed its probative value as required. Due to these serious errors, the Court of Appeal quashed the conviction and set aside the sentence.
A stranger who receives or deals with trust property, having actual or constructive notice that the property is subject to a trust, may incur liability as a constructive trustee. There are three types of strangers: 1) a stranger under no liability, 2) an innocent volunteer, and 3) a liable constructive trustee. A trustee de son tort is a person who knows that property they have received is trust property and is therefore liable as a constructive trustee. There are two categories of liability for strangers - knowing receipt or dealing (recipient liability) and knowing assistance (accessory liability). A person who is not a trustee but takes on trustee functions or acts like a trustee with respect to trust matters can make themselves a trustee de son tort.
This document discusses the law around charitable trusts in several areas:
1) It defines religion broadly and notes that monotheistic beliefs are an essential qualification for advancement of religion.
2) It examines cases around religious and ethical organizations and finds that religion requires faith and worship of a higher power.
3) It explores trusts for satellite purposes of religion like maintenance of religious buildings and support of clergy. Such trusts can be charitable if they provide public benefit or improve access to places of worship.
Presumed resulting trusts arise when the facts are unknown regarding the ownership of property. There are three types of presumed resulting trusts: 1) voluntary conveyances to strangers, where property transferred without consideration results in a trust for the transferor, 2) presumption in favor of the purchaser, where property purchased in another's name results in a trust for the purchaser, and 3) presumption of advancement, where a voluntary conveyance to a spouse or child results in the property belonging to the spouse or child absolutely unless rebutted. The presumptions can be rebutted by evidence showing a different intention for the ownership of the property.
The document discusses the legal concept of res gestae, or things done, which is an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. Under res gestae, spontaneous statements made during or immediately after an event may be admissible in court. The document outlines several conditions and case law examples related to determining what statements can be considered part of res gestae, including the need for contemporaneity, spontaneity, and connection to the facts in issue. It also compares the common law approach to res gestae versus the definition under Malaysian law.
This document discusses breach of trust and defenses for trustees. It defines breach of trust as failing to comply with duties outlined in the trust instrument or by equity. Trustees can be personally liable to beneficiaries for losses caused by their breaches. However, trustees have several defenses that may allow them to avoid personal liability, including: consent of beneficiaries, approval of beneficiaries after the breach, expiration of the limitation period, statutory relief if the trustee acted honestly and reasonably, advice of a solicitor, breach by a single trustee alone, and exemption clauses in the trust document. The document analyzes these defenses in detail using case examples.
The cy-près doctrine allows charitable trusts whose purposes have become impossible or impractical to fulfill their original goals to have their funds reapplied to similar charitable purposes. In Malaysia, courts refer to case law when addressing cy-près issues due to a lack of statutory provisions. For cy-près to apply, the settlor's intention must have been for general charity rather than a specific purpose. Initial failures occur before a gift takes effect if the intended charity no longer exists, while subsequent failures happen after a gift has already vested in a charity that then ceases to exist.
This document discusses the law of evidence in Malaysia. It defines evidence as oral statements and documentary evidence presented in court. Evidence may consist of facts in issue and relevant facts according to Section 5 of the Evidence Act 1950. Facts in issue are identifiable from pleadings in civil cases and include everything in criminal cases where a not guilty plea is entered. Relevant facts are connected to facts in issue under the Act. Only facts that are logically and legally admissible under the Act may be introduced as evidence.
This document discusses non-charitable purpose trusts (NCPTs), which are trusts that do not directly benefit individuals. It outlines several objections to the validity of NCPTs, including lack of enforceability since there is no human beneficiary, uncertainty of purposes, excessive delegation of powers, and violation of the rule against perpetuities. However, NCPTs have been upheld in some exceptional cases where the purpose is narrow, such as maintenance of a specific animal, building/maintaining a particular tomb/monument, or fox hunting. Unincorporated associations present another exception if the gift is made for the members of the association.
The document discusses secret and half secret trusts. A secret trust occurs when a testator leaves property to someone in their will who has privately agreed to hold the property in trust for a third party beneficiary. The identity of the beneficiary is kept secret. A half secret trust is similar but the existence of the trust is disclosed in the will, though not its terms or beneficiaries. For a secret or half secret trust to be valid there must be intention, communication of the trust terms to the trustee before death, and acceptance by the trustee. English law requires communication for half secret trusts to occur before the will's execution. The basis for enforcing such trusts is to prevent fraud.
1. Remedies for breach of trust by a trustee include personal remedies against the trustee and proprietary remedies available to beneficiaries. Personal remedies hold trustees liable for losses caused by unauthorized actions, require them to return unauthorized profits, and pay compensation including interest.
2. Proprietary remedies allow beneficiaries to claim specific trust property as their own if it can be identified, even if the trustee is insolvent. This includes tracing trust property that has been sold and used to purchase other assets, which beneficiaries can claim or use as security.
3. If trust funds have been mixed with other money in investments or bank accounts, beneficiaries have priority claims to recover the original trust funds from the mixed assets or their proceeds based on legal pres
This document discusses the three certainties required to create an express private trust: (1) certainty of intention, (2) certainty of subject matter, and (3) certainty of objects. It provides examples from case law rulings that help define these certainties. No particular words are needed to create a trust as long as the intention is clear from examining the trust document as a whole. The subject matter and objects must also be clear and ascertainable for the trust to be valid. Discretionary trusts provide flexibility by allowing trustees discretion over distributions.
I. The document summarizes the trial procedures under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for different types of criminal cases in India.
II. It discusses the trial procedures for sessions trials, warrant cases (instituted on police report and otherwise), and summons cases.
III. The key stages of a sessions trial are - opening of the case by prosecution, framing of charges, examining prosecution/defense witnesses, examination of accused, arguments, judgment and dealing with previous convictions.
The formal appearance of an accused person to hear, and to receive a copy of, the charge against him or her, in the presence of a judge, and to then enter a plea of guilty or not guilty.
This document discusses petition to review, which allows a person to contest a final court judgment. It defines a petition to review and outlines the cases where one can be filed, such as if new evidence casts doubt on a conviction. It explains that the minister of justice, convicted person, or their representatives can file a petition. It also describes the procedures for filing, including a 30 day timeframe, registration with the supreme court clerk, and a public hearing held by the supreme court to decide the petition.
The document outlines the rights of the accused in criminal prosecutions under Philippine law, including the right to be presumed innocent, to be informed of charges, to present a defense, not to testify against oneself, confront witnesses, and have a speedy and public trial. It also describes the procedures for arraignment and plea, including the ability to plead guilty to a lesser offense. The accused may file a motion to quash the complaint or information before entering a plea based on grounds such as lack of an offense or lack of jurisdiction.
Cpc learning module 4 appearance, examination and trialDr. Vikas Khakare
This document provides an overview of various topics related to the Code of Civil Procedure in India, including appearance and examination of parties, adjournments, commissions, arrest before judgment, attachment before judgment, temporary injunction, appointment of receivers, interest, and costs. It discusses the relevant sections and orders of the Code and provides details on the procedures and grounds for each topic. The document is presented as teaching materials on the Code of Civil Procedure for law students.
The document discusses the wide powers that trial courts have under Section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to order re-investigations and investigate further during criminal trials. It notes that trial courts can charge new accused persons and summon them if the court believes they may have been involved in the offense based on evidence presented. However, the document argues that trial courts do not always make full use of these powers and provides several examples from a specific case where important witnesses were not examined or summoned. It emphasizes that courts have a duty to actively oversee proceedings and ensure a fair trial, rather than just acting as passive observers. The document advocates that trial courts should play a more proactive role in collecting evidence to arrive at the truth
This document outlines the rules and procedures for arraignment and pleas under Philippine law. It discusses when and how arraignment must take place, the process for entering pleas of guilty or not guilty, allowing pleas to lesser offenses, withdrawal of improper pleas, appointment of counsel, and suspension of arraignment under certain circumstances such as pending review or if the accused has an unsound mental condition.
when all the facts of a case are heard, and a judge or jury makes the final decision about the court case. An offender can waive their rights to a jury trial and just have the judge make the ruling in a bench trial.
The petitioner filed a criminal original petition in the High Court of Madras seeking to quash the charges framed against him in session case no. 128 of 2017 before the Fast Track Mahila Court in Tiruppur. The prosecution argued that there were specific allegations against the petitioner to attract the offenses of abetment of suicide and cruelty by husband or relatives under sections 306 and 498A of IPC. While the petitioner claimed to be innocent, the High Court held that the trial court had applied its judicial mind properly and found a prima facie case against the petitioner based on the materials on record. Referring to a previous judgment, the High Court dismissed the petition, noting that the correctness of the allegations must be decided during trial
This document outlines the procedures and considerations around bail in the criminal justice system. It discusses where a person can be detained after arrest (police station or court), the presumption of bail prior to conviction, factors considered in granting bail pending trial or appeal, and the tests and criteria applied by courts. Key points include that bail is the rule pre-conviction, the prosecution must show why bail should be denied, and courts examine likelihood of appearance, interference with investigations, and commission of further offenses.
The document discusses rules and procedures related to motions for new trial or reconsideration in criminal cases. It outlines the grounds for granting a new trial, such as errors during the trial or newly discovered evidence. It also discusses exceptions, such as recantation by a witness generally not being sufficient for a new trial. The effects of granting a new trial and procedures for appeals are also covered.
The document outlines procedures and authorities for addressing public nuisances and disputes under the Code of Criminal Procedure, including orders for removing nuisances, procedures for disputes over land or property possession that could lead to a breach of peace, and requirements for investigations into unnatural deaths.
The document outlines the key stages of a criminal trial in India. It discusses the differences between a summons case and a warrant case, and covers the trial procedures for warrant cases before a Sessions Court and Magistrate. The trial procedures covered include framing of charges, examining witnesses and evidence, defenses, submissions, and judgment. It also discusses some common provisions like acquittal or conviction, absence of complainant, and compensation for false accusations. Overall, the document provides a comprehensive overview of the different stages and processes involved in criminal trials under Indian law.
This document summarizes a 1996 Federal Court of Malaysia case regarding the standard of proof required of the prosecution at the close of its case under Section 180 of the Malaysian Criminal Procedure Code. The majority held that the prosecution must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt at this stage in order to require the accused to enter a defense. However, one judge dissented, finding that Section 180 requires only a prima facie case, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt, in order to protect the accused's presumption of innocence. The decision clarifies the distinction between the burden and standard of proof at different stages of a criminal trial.
There are three types of criminal trials in India - warrant trials, summons trials, and summary trials. Warrant trials are for offenses punishable by more than 2 years in prison and follow the most formal procedures. Summons trials are for offenses punishable by less than 2 years in prison and have simplified procedures compared to warrant trials. Summary trials are for offenses punishable by up to 6 months in prison and involve the most streamlined procedures of the three types.
A petition to review allows a person to contest a definitive final judgment. It can be filed by the Minister of Justice, a convicted person, or their relatives in certain circumstances. Reasons a petition may be granted include new evidence casting doubt on guilt, inconsistent judgments for the same crime, or a witness being convicted of false testimony. The Supreme Court handles petitions to review and can suspend sentences while reviewing cases. It notifies relevant parties, holds public hearings, and issues a final judgment.
This document is a request from the Supreme Court of the Philippines to publish Rules 22 and 24 of the proposed Revised Rules of Civil Procedure in newspapers. These rules will be piloted in specific courts in Quezon City, Makati City, Angeles City, Iloilo City, Davao City, and Cebu City beginning February 16, 2015. The rules establish procedures for mandatory disclosure of evidence by parties, preparation of terms of reference to define the scope of trial, and preliminary conferences between the court and parties.
Feminist jurisprudence is a philosophy of law based on gender equality. It began in the 1960s and believes that law systematically maintains patriarchy by privileging male perspectives. There are several schools of feminist thought, including liberal feminism which seeks equal treatment, difference feminism which emphasizes women's differences, radical feminism which views patriarchy as the root of gender inequality, and postmodern feminism which rejects universal standards.
Islamic dawah, or preaching, is based on the core Islamic principles of "There is no god but Allah" and "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah." It involves inviting others to Islam through peaceful, wise, and reasoned discussion as instructed in the Quran. Dawah is an obligation for all Muslims according to hadith and allows Muslims to spread the message of Islam to all parts of the world. While dawah should be a top priority, it often does not receive enough emphasis in practice.
Trustees have both powers and duties. Their powers include selling trust property, insuring assets, compounding liabilities, maintaining and advancing funds to beneficiaries. Their key duties are to protect trust assets, treat beneficiaries equally, provide beneficiaries with account information, and properly distribute trust funds. Trustees must exercise their powers and duties with care, skill, prudence and in the sole interest of beneficiaries.
The cy-près doctrine allows charitable funds to be applied to similar purposes as the original intent if the specified purpose becomes impossible, impractical, or illegal to fulfill. When applying cy-près, courts will consider whether the settlor intended a general charitable purpose or a specific purpose. If the intent was specific and the purpose cannot be fulfilled, the gift fails completely. Cy-près may apply in cases of initial failure, where the purpose failed before the gift was made, or subsequent failure, where the purpose failed after the gift was made, to redirect the funds to similar charitable goals.
This document summarizes the law on charitable trusts in the UK. It discusses the four principal categories of charitable purposes as defined by Lord MacNaughten: 1) relief of poverty, 2) advancement of education, 3) advancement of religion, and 4) other purposes beneficial to the community. It provides detailed explanations and case examples for each category. For relief of poverty, it discusses what constitutes poverty, public benefit requirements, and cases related to aged, impotent, poor persons. For advancement of education, it examines what activities fall under education like research, art, extracurricular activities, and public benefit. For advancement of religion, it analyzes definitions of religion, requirements for public benefit, and cases related to various religions
This document summarizes the key concepts and principles related to constructive trusts under Malaysian law. It discusses the different types of constructive trusts, the differences between constructive trustees and ordinary trustees, and important cases that have helped shape the law on constructive trusts. The summary provides the essential information in 3 sentences:
Constructive trusts are implied trusts that equity recognizes to prevent unfairness, where a person obtains property through wrongful means or in circumstances that would make it unjust for them to keep the property. The document outlines the different situations that can give rise to a constructive trust, such as fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and acquisition of property through killing. It also discusses the flexible "new model" of constructive trust introduced by Lord
This document discusses resulting trusts, which arise in the absence of express trusts when the beneficial interest returns to the settlor. There are two types of resulting trusts: automatic resulting trusts, which arise whenever the beneficial interest has not been fully disposed of by an express trust; and presumed resulting trusts. Automatic resulting trusts occur in situations like when an express trust fails due to lack of formalities, an incomplete disposal of the beneficial interest, or other reasons. Surplus funds from unincorporated associations may also result in a resulting trust, with courts determining on a case-by-case basis whether the surplus reverts back to contributors under a resulting trust or is distributed contractually.
1. A completely constituted trust (CCT) exists when the settlor has fully transferred property to the trustee. This makes the trust binding and prevents the settlor from changing their mind. An incompletely constituted trust (ICT) exists when property is not fully transferred to the trustee, so it only operates as a contract that may be enforced by beneficiaries who provided consideration but not volunteers.
2. Equity may assist volunteers to enforce an ICT under certain exceptions, such as if the settlor appointed the volunteer as executor (rule in Strong v Bird), if it was a deathbed gift (donatio mortis causa), or if the volunteer relied on the settlor's representations about the gift (proprietary estoppel
This document discusses hearsay evidence under the topic of law of evidence. It begins by defining hearsay evidence as a statement made out of court that is offered in court to prove the truth of what was stated. Direct evidence is testimony based on a witness's own knowledge or observation, whereas hearsay is indirect evidence of a statement made by someone other than the witness. The document goes on to provide examples of hearsay in oral, written, and non-verbal forms, and discusses exceptions to the hearsay rule. It also outlines rationales for excluding hearsay, such as it not being given under oath or subject to cross-examination.
This document summarizes the legal definition and scope of charity in England based on a seminal case. It discusses the four principal categories of charitable trusts: (1) relief of poverty, (2) advancement of education, (3) advancement of religion, and (4) other purposes beneficial to the community. It provides detailed explanations and case examples for each category. For example, it describes what constitutes relief of poverty, how education is broadly defined, how religious trusts must promote monotheistic beliefs, and examples of trusts that fall under "other purposes beneficial to the community."
This document discusses the law around charitable trusts established for the relief of poverty and advancement of education. It provides numerous cases as examples and outlines the key principles, such as that poverty does not require destitution, education is not limited to classroom teaching but includes research and the arts, and trusts cannot have political purposes but can discuss political issues if their primary aim is educational. Overall, the document analyzes the legal definitions and precedents around charitable purposes related to poverty relief and education.
The document discusses the benefits of meditation for reducing stress and anxiety. Regular meditation practice can help calm the mind and body by lowering heart rate and blood pressure. Studies have shown that meditating for just 10-20 minutes per day can have significant positive impacts on both mental and physical health over time.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
1. Section 96
SYARIAH CRIMINAL PROCEDURE (FEDERAL TERRITORIES)
ACT 1997
Evidence and Procedure of Shariah Court II
(SHA 4011)
Prepared by Ikram Abdul Sattar
1124977
3. Section 96 of SCP
• The following procedure shall be observed by Judges
in trials:
(a) when the accused is brought before the Court, a
charge containing the particulars of the offence of
which he is accused shall be framed, read and
explained to him,
and he shall be asked whether he is guilty of the
offence charged
or claims to be tried;
4. 1- If the accused pleads guilty to a charge:
(b) Before a plea of guilty is recorded, the Court
shall ascertain that the accused understands the
nature and consequences of his plea and intends
to admit, without qualification, the offence
alleged against him.
• This principle is originated in the case of Mai’z,
where Mai’z pleaded guilty of adultery the
prophet (SAW) ascertained that he really
understand the nature and consequences of his
plea.
5. • The facts of the case will be read and
explained to the accused and the court will
ask him whether he agree with the facts of
not.
• If he did not agree with the facts his plea of
guilty will be rejected.
6. Mitigating Factor: plea of guilty does not it self a
mitigating factor.
Case: Pendakwa Syarei Vs Jaafar bin Sudin dan
Seorang Lagi
• When both the accused pleaded guilty to the
charge the judge acquitted the two accused.
• Syriah High Court ordered for retail and held that
the learned judge has no power to free people
who are accused without hearing their case
against the prosecutor and witnesses presented.
7. Case: Rusidah binte Abdul Ghani Vs Pendakwa Jabatan Agama
Islam, Wilayah Persekutuan
• The accused pleaded guilty to charges of Khalawat .
• Prosecutor urged the court to impose a heavy
punishment on the ground that she was a prostitute ,
the Syariah Subordinate Court judge sentenced her to a
fine of RM400.00 and 2 months imprisonment.
• The accused appealed against the sentence. The
accused said that she had ceased to be a prostitute and
now she is taking care of her children and she had
repented.
• Syariah High Court held that the prison sentence should
be set aside and only fine was upheld.
8. (2) If the accused refuses to plead or does
not plead.
• (c) The Court shall proceed with the trail to
hear the complainant and to take all such
evidence as may be produced in support of
the prosecution;
• (e) the accused is allowed to cross-examine all
the witnesses.
9. No prima facie case
• (f) if the Court finds that there is no prima facie case the
Court record an order of acquittal;
• Pendakwa Syarei Vs Mohd Sabu & Norma (1995) 11 JH 61,
• The Court held that the prosecution had failed to prove a
prima facie case. When there is no prima facie case, the
accused persons must be returned to their original
condition.
(g) The Court may discharge the accused at any previous
stage of the case if the Court considers the charge to be
groundless.
10. Case against the accused
• (j) if the accused does not plead guilty to the charge
the accused shall be called upon to enter his defence
and to produce his evidence,
• and at any time while he is making his defence be
allowed to recall and crossexamine any witness;
• (l) The accused apply to the Court to issue a summons
for compelling the attendance of any witness or
production of any document or other thing, the Court
shall issue a summons unless;
– such application should be refused on the ground that it is
made for the purpose of vexation or
– delay or
– for defeating the ends of justice;
11. • (m)
– (i) if the Court finds the accused not guilty, the
Court shall record an order of of acquittal;
– (ii) if the Court finds the accused guilty or if a plea of
guilty has been recorded and accepted, the Court
shall pass sentence according to the law;
• (n) If the complainant failed to attend the hearing
of the case on the fixed day,
– the Court may, in its discretion, notwithstanding
anything contained in this section, discharge the
accused.