BRT in South Africa
in 12 minutes
Christo Venter
BRT workshop, June 2018
The extent of BRT
The extent of BRT
2010
2012
2014
2016
2008
2018
2020
JHB: Phase 1A & 1B (44km T + 76km F) 1C
CT: Phase 1A & 1B (32 + 360)
COT: Line 2A & 1A (13 T)
EKH
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
DOT Public Transport Strategy
NMB RUS BFN
ETH
The extent of BRT
13 July 20184
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
July August September October November December January February March April May June
Passenger numbers per month: Rea Vaya Phase 1A and 1B
2013-2014 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
The performance of BRT
Demand & Financial Performance
13 July 20186
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
R0
R200
R400
R600
R800
R1,000
R1,200
2012 / 2013 2013 / 2014 2014 / 2015 2015 / 2016
Passengertrips
FarerevenueandOperatingcost
Rea Vaya Lines 1a & 1b
Fare Revenue (Rm) Operating Costs (Rm) Avg weekday passenger trips
Subsidy required
Demand & Financial Performance
• Land use and demand structure
13 July 20187
Source: Scorcia & Munoz-Raskin, The
World Bank
Transformation of existing
operators
• Replacement, formalization of minibus-taxi
operators
• Initially limited to competing services in
corridor
• 12-year negotiated bus operating contracts
• Very slow and costly:
– Existing services seen as “property rights” –
compensation paid
– PLUS premium paid for bus operating contract
– (PLUS some continue operating anyway)
13 July 201810
ITS architecture
• EMV standard for fare card
• Several costly mistakes in technology, user
interaction (fare cards)
• Now starting to integrate with other bus services
• Technological mismatch between bus operators
and bus control
13 July 201811
Changing BRT perspectives
Lighter, more flexible infrastructure
– City of Cape Town’s MyCiti Phase 2A
• Construction estimates = 2x that of Phase 1 per km
• Considering 23 of 53km trunk routes in mixed traffic
• Considering 28 of 47 stations open design (median or
curbside)
• New routes low-floor, low-platform
– City of Johannesburg’s Rea Vaya Phase 1C+
• Scale back dedicated trunk routes
• Outer extensions to include more mixed traffic routes
Greater role for paratransit as feeders
(hybrid systems)
Source: TDA, City of Cape Town; COJ
13 July 201813
Thank you

Workshop Innovation in Africa - BRT in South Africa by Christo Venter

  • 1.
    BRT in SouthAfrica in 12 minutes Christo Venter BRT workshop, June 2018
  • 2.
  • 3.
    The extent ofBRT 2010 2012 2014 2016 2008 2018 2020 JHB: Phase 1A & 1B (44km T + 76km F) 1C CT: Phase 1A & 1B (32 + 360) COT: Line 2A & 1A (13 T) EKH Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 DOT Public Transport Strategy NMB RUS BFN ETH
  • 4.
    The extent ofBRT 13 July 20184
  • 5.
    0 200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1400000 1600000 July August SeptemberOctober November December January February March April May June Passenger numbers per month: Rea Vaya Phase 1A and 1B 2013-2014 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 The performance of BRT
  • 6.
    Demand & FinancialPerformance 13 July 20186 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 R0 R200 R400 R600 R800 R1,000 R1,200 2012 / 2013 2013 / 2014 2014 / 2015 2015 / 2016 Passengertrips FarerevenueandOperatingcost Rea Vaya Lines 1a & 1b Fare Revenue (Rm) Operating Costs (Rm) Avg weekday passenger trips Subsidy required
  • 7.
    Demand & FinancialPerformance • Land use and demand structure 13 July 20187 Source: Scorcia & Munoz-Raskin, The World Bank
  • 8.
    Transformation of existing operators •Replacement, formalization of minibus-taxi operators • Initially limited to competing services in corridor • 12-year negotiated bus operating contracts • Very slow and costly: – Existing services seen as “property rights” – compensation paid – PLUS premium paid for bus operating contract – (PLUS some continue operating anyway) 13 July 201810
  • 9.
    ITS architecture • EMVstandard for fare card • Several costly mistakes in technology, user interaction (fare cards) • Now starting to integrate with other bus services • Technological mismatch between bus operators and bus control 13 July 201811
  • 10.
    Changing BRT perspectives Lighter,more flexible infrastructure – City of Cape Town’s MyCiti Phase 2A • Construction estimates = 2x that of Phase 1 per km • Considering 23 of 53km trunk routes in mixed traffic • Considering 28 of 47 stations open design (median or curbside) • New routes low-floor, low-platform – City of Johannesburg’s Rea Vaya Phase 1C+ • Scale back dedicated trunk routes • Outer extensions to include more mixed traffic routes Greater role for paratransit as feeders (hybrid systems) Source: TDA, City of Cape Town; COJ
  • 11.

Editor's Notes

  • #3 3 large formal systems: CT, (Phases 1A & 1B: 31.5km dedicated trunk, 108km mixed traffic trunk, 360km feeder) JHB , (Phases 1A and 1B: 43.5km of trunk services, 14.7 km of complementary bus services, and 75.8 km of feeder buses services ). COT, (Line 2A: 4.4km trunk, ~2km mixed trunk, ~20km feeder) 2 large systems coming on-line: Durban Ekurhuleni 2 failed/delayed (PE, RUST) Several more planned
  • #4 3 large formal systems: CT, (Phases 1A & 1B: 31.5km dedicated trunk, 108km mixed traffic trunk, 360km feeder) JHB , (Phases 1A and 1B: 43.5km of trunk services, 14.7 km of complementary bus services, and 75.8 km of feeder buses services ). COT, (Line 2A: 4.4km trunk, ~2km mixed trunk, ~20km feeder) 2 large systems coming on-line: Durban Ekurhuleni 2 failed/delayed (PE, RUST) Several more planned
  • #5 Mostly on long-dist routes between townships and CBD.
  • #6 Demand grows nicely, but problems: (a) still only about 60,000 pax/day, much lower than expected and needed for this kind of investment so it raises subsidies; (b) demand is volatile due to industrial action – points to larger problems in SA economy
  • #7 Do not have latest numbers but general trend = concern with costs. Capital and operating costs significantly higher than expected. Effect = reduced ability to expand service, questions being asked. Capex: CPT R82m/km Phase 1 busways & statns; est R151m/km phase 2A Cost recovery been improving, but still between 30 & 40%
  • #8 Factors contributing to under-performance. Related to choice of BRT corridors – not best suited to long-distance, low density township to CBD service.
  • #9 Factors contributing to under-performance
  • #10 Key imperatives are to expedite roll-out of better PT; figure out how to do more with available (and shrinking budget), Demonstrate that PT is delivering wider policy value, incl restructuring cities
  • #12 Need systems approach to make it worthwhile
  • #13 What should have been done differenelt?